Dissolution and New Parliament-State of the Country-Death of Grattan-Education-Capital Punishments-Agricultural Dis- tress-Parliamentary Reform-Catholic Claims-Constitutional Coalition with the Grenville Party-Retirement of Lord Sidmouth -Mr. Peel-Mr. Canning-Lord Wellesley in Ireland-Motion in favour of Catholic Peers-Peterborough Questions-New Marriage Act-Close of Session-King's Visit to Scotland- Policy of Castlereagh-The Princes and Peoples of Europe-Re- volutions Abroad-Policy of Canning-Congress of Verona- French Invasion of Spain-Overthrow of Spanish Revolution- South American Provinces-Appeal from Portugal-New Era Changes in the Ministry-Mr. Canning and Mr. Huskisson—The Debt and Taxation-Commercial Policy-Spitalfields and Navi- gation Acts-Parliamentary Topics-Negro Slavery-Govern- Peace of Paris-Holy Alliance-Congress of Vienna-Secret Treaty THE world was at peace. On the 20th of November 1815, Viscount Castlereagh and the Duke of Wellington, on the part of the King of Great Britain and Ireland, for himself and his allies; and the Duke of Richelieu, on the part of the King of France and Navarre, put their signatures to the defi- nitive treaty between France and the Allied Powers. That treaty was for the object of restoring between France and her neighbours those relations of reciprocal confidence and good-will which the fatal effects of the Revolution and of the system of conquest had for so long a time disturbed.' At the moment of signing this pledge of peace, the Duke of Richelieu described it as a fatal treaty.' More dead than alive,' he writes on the 21st November, I yesterday put my name to this fatal treaty.' It was fatal in his view, because it contained' an arrange- alone did this treaty of the 20th November apply. The settlement of Europe, as it was called, had been effected by the general treaty signed in congress at Vienna, on the 9th of June 1815. Nothing remained but to carry out the great principles of justice and truth which were to heal the wounds of a bleeding world. Who could doubt that the reign of violence was destroyed for ever, when the Emperor Alexander of Russia proclaimed that henceforth the political relations of the powers of Europe were to be founded on the gospel of peace and love? In a manifesto from St. Petersburg, dated on the day of the birth of our Saviour, 25th December 1815,' the emperor commanded that there should be read in all the churches a 'convention concluded at Paris on the 26th of September 1815, between the Emperor of Russia, the Emperor of Austria, and the King of Prussia ;' in which they solemnly declare that the present act has no other object than to publish in the face of the whole world their fixed resolution, both in the administration of their respective states, and in their political relations with every other government, to take for their sole guide the precepts of the holy religion of our Saviour-namely, the precepts of justice, Christian charity, and peace; which, far from being applicable only to private concerns, must have an immediate influence on the councils of princes, and guide all their steps, as being the only means of consolidating human institutions, and remedying their imperfections.' All crimes shall cease, and ancient frauds shall fail, Peace o'er the world her olive wand extend, And white-robed Innocence from heaven descend.-POPE. was a The declaration of the Holy Alliance '-for so this convention of the 26th of September was namedrhodomontade which the Emperor Alexander amused himself by composing, with the assistance of a 'whiterobed Innocence' called Madame Krudener,* whilst the prosaic destinies of Europe were being settled amidst a *Clothed always in white, kneeling in the oratories, she seemed one of the Druidesses whose wonderful words commanded the elements.' -Capefigue, Restauration. conflict of jarring interests. The mystical doctrines of political perfectibility had few disciples, although the enthusiastic emperor laboured unremittingly for converts. Metternich slily laughed, and handed it to his master to sign; Wellington coldly bowed, and said that the English parliament would require something more precise. The peace of Europe was settled, as every former peace had been settled, upon a struggle for what the respective powers thought most conducive to their own aggrandisement. We shall endeavour briefly to trace some of the circumstances of the final settlement of 1815. Time has revealed many of the hidden movements by which that settlement was accomplished. The The Treaty of Union, Concert, and Subsidy,' of the 1st March 1814, known as the Treaty of Chaumont, was concluded between Great Britain, Austria, Russia, and Prussia, whilst the contest with France still remained undecided. The four great powers were negotiating for peace with Bonaparte, whilst war was raging all around them. Treaty of Chaumont declared that the four powers had 'transmitted to the French government proposals for concluding a general peace;' and 'should France refuse the conditions therein contained,' that the object of this solemn engagement was 'to draw closer the ties which unite them for the vigorous prosecution of a war undertaken for the salutary purpose of putting an end to the miseries of Europe, by re-establishing a just balance of power. But this treaty was not limited to the attainment of peace aloneit contemplated a long alliance for the preservation of what should be attained and established. Its second object was, 'should the Almighty bless their pacific intentions, to fix the means of maintaining, against every attempt, the order of things which shall have been the happy consequence of their efforts.' To this end the four powers each agreed to keep in the field a hundred and fifty thousand effective men; Great Britain engaged to furnish a subsidy of five millions sterling for the service of the year 1814; and the duration of the treaty was to extend to twenty years. Within one month from the date of this treaty, the counter-revolution of France was effected, and Napoleon was decreed to have forfeited the throne. On the 23rd of April, a convention was agreed with the restored government for the suspension of hostilities; of which the second article left no doubt that the just balance of power was to be established by reducing France to the territorial limits of the 1st January 1792. By the definitive treaty of peace of the 30th May 1814, some additions were made to these limits. With reference to the final disposal of the ceded territories acquired by France during the war, the treaty was necessarily vague. The larger questions of contemplated aggrandisement by Russia and Prussia were wholly left out of view: all was to be settled in the general congress to be held at Vienna. The Congress of Vienna was not only the most important assembly that modern Europe had beheld, but it was, at the same time, the most imposing and ostentatious. It was accompanied by all the 'fierce vanities' of the last days of feudalism; and the great dramatic poet's description of the splendours of the vale of Andren' might, with little alteration, be applied to the saloons of Vienna in the latter months of 1814. In that city of pleasure were assembled, in October, the sovereigns of Austria, and Russia, and Prussia, with many of the lesser princes of the Germanic states. Emperors shook hands in the public streets; Metternich and Castlereagh strolled about arm in arm. The royal negotiators vied with each other in the splendour of their entertainments; the British minister, a commoner of England, o'er-topped the magnificence of the proudest royalties. The old Prince de Ligne exclaimed: 'Le congrès danse, et ne marche pas.' They did not move on quite so easily and agreeably as their outward delights and courtesies might seem to indicate. Talleyrand came with his profound adroitness to demand that France should take a part in all the deliberations. The parties to the Treaty of Chaumont would have narrowed his claims, but he persevered, and France regained her proper rank in European diplomacy. The ministers of England and Austria had begun to feel that ambitions might arise as adverse to the just balance of power as the humbled ambition of France itself. A voice had gone forth from the British parliament to protest against the annexation |