| Adam Carlyle Breckenridge - 1970 - 168 ÆäÀÌÁö
...oppressive treatment."82 Suck v. Bell was not overruled, but Douglas had this to say about basic rights. We are dealing here with legislation which involves...basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation 80. 316 US 535 (1942). 81. Ibid., 538, 541. 82. Ibid., 541. are fundamental to the very existence and... | |
| United States. Commission on Population Growth and the American Future - 1972 - 642 ÆäÀÌÁö
...suggested that the right to procreate is a "natural" one. In the opinion of the Court as stated by Douglas: We are dealing here with legislation which involves...power to sterilize, if exercised, may have subtle, far reaching and devastating effects. . . . There is no redemption for the individual whom the law... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1974 - 694 ÆäÀÌÁö
...upheld, Buck v. Bell, 274 US 200(1927). However, strict judicial scrutiny has been applied to such laws: The power to sterilize, if exercised, may have subtle, far-reaching and devastating effects. . . . Any experiment which the state conducts is to his irreparable injury. . . . We mention these... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control - 1980 - 370 ÆäÀÌÁö
...stated that an equal protection challenge required "strict scrutiny" of a compulsory sterilization law. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very...have subtle, far-reaching and devastating effects. . . . There is no redemption for the individual whom the law touches. Any experiment which the State... | |
| Robert H. Blank - 1988 - 312 ÆäÀÌÁö
...procedures might be reversible, most conclude, as did Justice Douglas in Skinner v. Oklahoma (1941), that "the power to sterilize, if exercised, may have subtle, farreaching and devastating effects There is no redemption for the individual whom the law touches. Any experiment which the state conducts... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1989 - 1346 ÆäÀÌÁö
...unanimous Supreme Court saved him from the surgeon's knife. As Justice Douglas wrote for the Court, "We are dealing here with legislation which involves...have subtle, far-reaching and devastating effects. . . . There is no redemption for the individual whom the law touches. . . . He is forever deprived... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1989 - 1322 ÆäÀÌÁö
...of Oklahoma could not sterilize him. Let me read something from the Court's opinion. "We are dealing with legislation which involves one of the basic civil...fundamental to the very existence and survival of a race. There is no redemption for the individual whom the law touches. Any experiment which the State... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1989 - 1312 ÆäÀÌÁö
...to the Court's analysis was the decision to subject the law to "strict scrutiny" because it affected "one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and...procreation are fundamental to the very existence of the human race." 316 US at 541. PRINCE v. MASSACHUSETTS, 321 US 158 (1944). Justice Black joined... | |
| |