Wetlands, Roseville, California: Hearing Before the Committee on Resources, Task Force on Wetlands, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on the Impact and Cost of Wetlands Regulations April 19, 1995, 4권U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995 - 299페이지 |
기타 출판본 - 모두 보기
자주 나오는 단어 및 구문
acres of vernal acres of wetlands agricultural Alaska birds Brennans Point Butte County California halibut cease and desist Central Valley Chico Clean Water Act coastal CONGRESS THE LIBRARY conservation Corps of Engineers cost create delineation District DOOLITTLE dredged ducks Dungeness crab easement economic ecosystems Endangered Species Act Environmental Protection Agency estuaries fairy shrimp farm farmers fear factor federal Fish and Game Fish and Wildlife Fisheries flood grasslands Gulf menhaden impacts issue jurisdiction land landowners LIBRARY OF CONGRESS marsh menhaden mitigation banking National Nelson percent permit process Placer County plants POMBO preserve property owners ranch regulatory restoration River Roseville Sacramento County salmon says seagrass Section 404 Shanks soil Task Force Thank U.S. Army U.S. Army Corps U.S. Fish vernal pool habitat vernal pools waterfowl wetland habitat Wetlands and Jobs wetlands protection wetlands regulation Wildlands Wildlife Service
인기 인용구
88 페이지 - ... or unlawfully obstructs the free passage or use, in the customary manner, of any navigable lake, or river, bay, stream, canal, or basin, or any public park, square, street, or highway is a nuisance.
174 페이지 - We are in danger of forgetting that a strong public desire to improve the public condition is not enough to warrant achieving the desire by a shorter cut than the constitutional way of paying for the change.
173 페이지 - The question of what constitutes a "taking" for purposes of the Fifth Amendment has proved to be a problem of considerable difficulty. While this Court has recognized that the "Fifth Amendment's guarantee [is] designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole,
18 페이지 - Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force! Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.
264 페이지 - The 1991 regulations were denounced by a broad range of environmental groups, including the Sierra Club, the National Audubon Society, and the National Wildlife Federation.
88 페이지 - Agriculture" includes farming in all its branches and among other things includes the cultivation and tillage of the soil, dairying, the production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of any agricultural or horticultural commodities (including commodities defined as agricultural commodities in section...
167 페이지 - Is the precept that dredged or fill materlal should not be discharged into the aquatic ecosystem, unless it can be demonstrated that such a discharge will not have an unacceptable adverse impact either individually or in combi.
82 페이지 - State, shall be punished by a fine of not less than $2,500 nor more than $25,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by both.
185 페이지 - Juneau and other coastal population centers. These shallow water habitats will be degraded unless their value to Alaska's fisheries is recognized in the wetlands regulatory process. The Clinton Administration announced its policy on wetlands in August, 1993. In Protecting America's Wetlands: A Fair, Flexible, and Effective Approach, the White House declared, "Because of the significant adverse environmental consequences that it would allow, the Alaska 1% rule will be withdrawn.
77 페이지 - DA permits under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 USC 403) for the dredging in navigable waters of the United States.