David Bowman, East Donegal Township, $17,923.58.
Samuel and Letitia Miller, Strasburg, $341.89.
Henry Baumgardner, city. Bryan Kavanaugh, Columbia. Dr. Levi Huber, West Lampeter, $1,- 097.06.
Susanna Williams, Salisbury, $542.51. Joseph M. Balser, Warwick, $23,386.41.
Henry Barto (or Berto), West Donegal, $1,802.62.
Charles W. Costollo, East Lampeter, $386.09.
Adjudications filed October 20, were published in last issue. Thursday, October 27, 1910.
Christiana Highet, Little Britain, $113.78. Friday, October 28, 1910.
Salome H. Gruger, city, $1,142.07. William Rai'son, Columbia, $2.727.16. Benjamin F. Diffenderfer, Rapho, $2,846.95.
-Another good illustration of the danger of using too florid speech is afforded by the story of an English barrister who, having made the mistake of using too flowery language in addressing a hardheaded English judge (when such speech was in bad taste and wie of the issues before the court), was impatiently rebuke by his Lordship, who remarked, "I advise you, sir, to pluck a few feathers from the wings of your imagination and stick them in the tail of your judgment." October 15, 1910.
-As a prominent member of the American Bar Association was leaving one of the meetings at Chattanooga he met one of his colleagues who asked him what was going on in the meeting. The prominent member answered that Judge Blank had been talking for over an hour. In reply to the question of the other prominent member, "On what subject?" he replied, "The judge didn't say."
O. C. ADJUDICATIONS. BY JUDGE SMITH. Thursday, October 13, 1910. Opinion:
Estate of John Voll, deceased. Excep- tions to adjudication dismissed and ad- judication confirmed. October 17, 1910.
Jacob Stoner v. Lancaster Electric Light, Heat and Power Company. Rule for new trial discharged.
The John T. Dyer Quarry Company v. S. R. Moss Cigar Company. Rules for new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto discharged.
Mary A. Mitchell v. Columbia and Port Deposit Railway Company. Rule to strike off non-suit discharged.
Grabill S. Withers v. Ephrata and Adamstown Rai'way Company. Rule for new trial discharged.
J. E. Ellwerth, v. D. H. Witmer. Rules for new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto discharged.
In re Little Britain township school district. Appeal from taxation of costs. Fourth and fifth exceptions sustained, second exception sustained in part, and the remaining exceptions are overruled.
Sale. When in suit for price of shoes sold affidavit is insufficient which avers failure to continue sending shoes as agreed without averring payment for those received. Selz, Schwab & Co. vs. Cohn ... Set-off.-Affidavit averring set-off must be specific as to source, character and amount. Ib.
Note. When affidavit insufficient on suit by payee's executors, which avers oral contemporaneous agreement not to collect principal, and lack of consid- eration. Kauffman vs. Kauffman.... 101 Note-Set-off. When in suit on note with endorsement of settlement, an affidavit is sufficient averring a set-off for services prior to settlement. Bard vs. Johns ..... 105 Same. When in suit on note affidavit is sufficient setting off loss from stock purchased for store rented from plain- tiff who re-rented and refused posses- sion. Rost & Co. vs. Globe Cigar Co. 148
Averments. Need not aver that expects to be able to prove what is stated in defendant's own knowledge. Ib. Replevin Judgment-Practice.-A gen- eral judgment should be entered for plaintiff on a rule when affidavit of defense is insufficient in replevin suit. Salant vs. Miller..... Sale. In suit for price of lime, affi- davit of defense insufficient which avers that price was to be what lime was worth but was higher than mar- ket price without showing how much. Baker Co. vs. Evans.... AGENCY: See PRINCIPAL AND AGENT. AGREEMENT: See CONTRACT.
ALDERMEN: See JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
APPEALS: See ERRORS AND APPEALS. ASSIGNMENT: See DECEDENTS' Es- TATES; RAILROADS.
ATTACHMENT: See DESERTION.
ATTACHMENT-EXECUTION.
Evidence. To recover plaintiff must show such evidence as would enable him to recover in assumpsit; answers to interrogatories are primary evi- dence. Pollock to use vs. Johnson et al. ... ATTORNEY-AT-LAW: See DECEDENTS' ESTATES.
AUTOMOBILES: See JUSTICE OF THE PEACE.
Lien.-Bailee who has agreed that noth- ing due for work done on the bailed goods until they are delivered, has no lien thereon. Salant vs. Miller...... 180 BANKS AND BANKING: See PROMIS- SORY NOTES; TRUST COMPANIES. Guaranteeing Bank Deposits. Article.. 207 Directors' liability-Bank directors are not personally liable for losses by fraud of president who deceived them; only liable for their own fraud and for gross neglect: not liable for bor- rowing more than statutory allowance where loans repaid. Rathfon Locher, et al....
BENEFICIAL SOCIETIES. Suit-Husband and wife - Benefits. Member may bring suit against soci- ety for benefits where constitution pro- vides that a member may appeal to the
tribunals of the order but does not say must; wife of member not a "member" because a beneficiary; where arrearage stops benefits for period after payment, benefits due for death after, from sickness beginning during, non-beneficial period. Tucker vs. Jr. O. U. A. M... Husband and wife.-Wife's estate is not liable for debts incurred by her de- ceased husband to obtain money for dues to a beneficial society from which the money of her estate was derived. Nutto's Estate
BEQUEST: See DECEDENTS' ESTATES; WILLS.
BOND: See GUARDIAN AND WARD; RECOGNIZANCE; TRUSTS.
BOROUGHS: See CONSTRUCTION; WATER COMPANIES.
BRIDGES: See CITIES.
CAPIAS: See JUSTICE OF THE PEACE; PRACTICE.
CARRIERS: See RAILROADS AND RAIL-
CITIES: See CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Damages-Gutter bridge. Where per- son is injured by stepping on defective gutter bridge while looking straight ahead the question of contributory negligence is for jury where not shown that plaintiff could have seen the defect by looking down. Clark vs. City ...113, 385 Damages-Defect in sidewalk.-When person injured by stepping on defec- tive place in sidewalk cannot recover damages, being guilty of contributory negligence. Stitzel vs. Marietta Boro. 117 Sewers. Opening of new system of sewers should be by ordinance. tion of Lancaster City....
Streets. Ordinance opening a street
in southeast ward" to another street is too indefinite. Ib. Bridge-Court cannot compel street com- missioner to build bridge in connec- tion with the opening of a street. Road in W. Lampeter Twp...... 377 Streets-Act of Jan. 31, 1857, applies to street not on plan of Lancaster though only partly in city. Ib.
COLLATERAL INHERITANCE TAX: See DECEDENTS' ESTATES.
Foreign property. - Foreign personalty but not realty estate is liable when owner lived and died in this state. Mentzler's Estate
Life interest.-Whole tax on legacy may be paid at once notwithstanding inter- vening life interest. Hildebrand's Es-
Practice question for court. Petition of Lancaster.. 233
Fish law-Act of May 1, 1909, P. L. 353, as to fishing is not unconstitu- tional for more than one subject in title. Com. vs. Hippy... Health law-Health Act of April 27, 1905, P. L. 312, is not unconstitutional because its punitive features are not in its title. Com. vs. Grube. Garb_law-The Act of June 27, 1895, P. L. 395, forbidding the wearing of a religious dress by a public school teacher is not unconstitutional by rea- son of religious discrimination or de- fective title. Com. vs. Herr et al.... 313 CONSTRUCTION: See COLLATERAL IN- HERITANCE TAX; WILLS.
Statute - Presumption.-When the lan-
guage of a statute is clear and un- equivocal without ambiguity or uncer- tainty it is presumed to express the intent of the legislature and no con- struction is necessary. Drumore School District vs. Fulton School Dis- trict. Same.-Words to be taken in popular or ordinary sense; title may aid in con- struction; all presumptions favor con- stitutionality. Petition of Lancaster City.... Boroughs-Water companies.-The Act of May 31, 1907, P. L. 355, is not un- constitutional in allowing the taking of property without securing damages. Petition of Manheim Boro..... Same. The Act of May 31, 1907, P. L. 355. is unconstitutional in confiscating rights under its severe penalty. Ib. Manheim Boro. vs. Manheim Water Co. 326 Trust companies. - Words trust com- panies" in Act of May 11, 1874, P. L. 135, refers only to those created by special acts. Rathfon vs. Rhoads et al. 345 CONTRACT: See BAILMENT; CONTRACT;
CRIMINAL LAW; DECEDENTS' Es- TATES; ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANIES; EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE; EVIDENCE; PRACTICE; PRINCIPAL AND AGENT. Breach-Damages.-When plaintiff can recover for work notwithstanding de- fects, they being caused by defendant;
standard fixed and facts not disputed. Clark vs. City... Negligence. No one can complain of want of care in another when care is only rendered necessary by his own wrongful act. Mahler vs. Hartman.. 316 Negligence - Practice. - Plaintiff's con- tributory negligence is a matter of de- fense and is not presumed, and plain- tiff need not disprove it in first in- stance. Clark vs. City..... ... 385 CORPORATIONS: See BANKS AND BANKING; CRIMINAL LAW; DECE- DENTS' ESTATES; ELECTRIC LIGHT COM- PANIES; EVIDENCE; TAXES AND TAXA- TION; WATER COMPANIES. Incorporating a name. Article.
Letter regarding change of corporation law.
Charter-Practice.-Better practice to file charter of first class in Prothonotary's office before presentation to court, but not legally necessary; advertise- ment need not show residences of incorporators or where meetings will be held. Charter of St. John's Ben. Union
Similarity.-Charter will not be refused to St. John's Beneficial Union because of existing society known as Knights of St. John or because former is try- ing to absorb latter. Ib.
COSTS: See JUSTICE OF THE PEACE; PRACTICE.
Jurisdiction.-Orphans' Court has exclu-
sive jurisdiction over decedents' es- tates and is not concerned about costs in abandoned suit in C. P. Kampel's Estate.
Practice. Where on suit for less than $100 without affidavit and verdict against one of two defendants and for other, court cannot rule plaintiff at instance of former to pay latter de- fendant's bill of costs; bill should be properly taxed and dispute settled by appeal: latter defendant entitled to costs for witnesses for himself alone. Quarryville Bank vs. Hess and Hill,
"Fixing up crime. Article. Right to kill hounds. Article. False pretense.-Knowingly and design- edly inducing the sale of a horse by falsely representing that it was sound and gentle is indictable as false pre- tense. Com. vs. Hinden.. Same-Evidence.-In such case evidence of value of horse immaterial. Ib. Rape - Evidence. - Statements made by girl two days after offence in answer to questions are not admissible to cor- roborate her testimony on trial for statutory rape. Com. vs. Dorwart.... 106 New trial. Will not be granted for after-discovered evidence to impeach credibility of a witness. Ib. Larceny as bailee-Sale of horse.-Fail- ure to return price for horse sold with privilege to return and get money back is larceny as bailee. Com. vs. Resh
may be conviction of murder on tes- timony of accomplice alone; confes- sion by another party implicating de- fendant can be used against him when made in his presence, though he was not present voluntarily; confession not involuntary because made in answer to questions. Com. vs. Aston.. Trespass-Practice-Fine. - Trespass is indictable as crime under Act of April 14, 1905; any act made unlawful is in- dictable; imposition of fine and pen- alty contemplates criminal proceeding. Com. vs. Peaco. Larceny as bailee.-When lessee of per- sonal property liable for selling it. Com. vs. Mantia Indictment.-Indictment is had for du- plicity where two offenses constituting different violations of law are con- tained in one count. Com. z's. Grube. 259 Compensatory administration of crim- inal law. Article.... Forgery-Health officer.-Indictment for forging name of health officer to recommendation of preparation is valid without stating that anybody was prejudiced. Com. vs. Moore... 389 Liquor laze Indictment for selling liquor without license founded on no- tice to constable is sufficient though notice does not set forth the manner of violation of law, names of persons to whom sold, or that they were un- known. Com. vs. Fowl..... 390 Practice. While improper except in case of pressing necessity to send in- dictment to grand jury without hear- ing or consent of court, court may give approval by dismissing motion to quash. Com. vs. Fowl.... Indictment Practice-Partnership. Corporation.-Indictment against indi- vidual members of partnership or cor- poration on return against partnership or corporation is fatal variance. vs. Grebe
« 이전계속 » |