481 § 763 1175 For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER OR 1918. 8 74 .335, 410 § 134, 338 831 § 596 .436, 834 597 899 $ 756 197 719 88 1106-1124 176 78 $ 1256 197 44 $ 1317 118 .56, 511 $$ 1356, 1371 122 78 $$ 1380-1382 197 COMPILED STATUTES AN- CRIMINAL CODE OF PRAC NOTATED SUPPLE MENT 1919. COMPILED STATUTES AN-§ 281 NOTATED SUPPLE MENT 1923. TICE. 531 $8 1397, 1410 189 197 1089 § 1469 169 §§ 122, 124 36 $1473 241 125 $8 166, 167 § 238 719 $$ 1478, 1479 148 .1071, 1092 § 340 511, 515, 520 $ 1532 .1081 133 §§ 349, 353 515 $8 1725, 1766 148 .1081 STATUTES 1922. § 1807 241 476 $8 1877, 1910 195 $543 483 $ 2160 197 CONSTITUTION. $$_655, 671 65 $2256 420 786 91 $$ 2591-2613 155 1159 Art. 12, § 4. 389, 707 492 $8 2619, 2620 122 1294 Art. 14 397 56 $ 3259 727 Art. 16, § 11. 355 $ 1407 65 $8 3262, 3263 730 Art. 19, § 22. 355 § 1475 69 $ 3264 ..1040 Amend. 11 389 § 1596a12 441 $3274 .1106 Amend. 12 355 § 1696 88$ 3275 .1057, 1058, 1060 1906 485 $3448 726 $ 1910 88 $ 3537 .1069 CRAWFORD AND MOSES' $$ 2252, 2268 489 $$ 3692, 3693 730 DIGEST. $ 2353 § 1300 85 $3849 139 7 $ 2518 548 3907 .1057 § 2343 11 § 3540 366 § 2739g28 .92, 470 $$ 3607, 3650. 383 $8 2739g34, 2739g35 470 § 3738 364 $ 2739g51 472 §§ 2740, 2741 4149 19 500 4029 727 $$ 3297, 3298 503 6266 18 $$ 3450, 3453 443 6374 353 $ 3563 6808 383 488, 519 4057 .1069 $$ 9108, 9285 397 $$ 3570, 3571 473 4058 739, 1069 3574 10495, 10501 .1026 473, 519 4106 247 § 4217 .1043 ROAD LAWS 1919. $3587a1 et seq.. 498 § 6145 201 § 3587a16 498 $8 6229-6231, 6239 161 Volume 1. § 3633 720 $ 3635 441 6588. Amended by Laws SPECIAL LAWS. § 3638 720 § 6596 $$ 3643-1 to 3643-12... 48 $8 6615, 6616 $ 3659 441 § 6786 1923, pp. 498, 650 1034 $ 3760 1923, p. 1302 $$ 4356t5. 4356t8. .1032 $$ 3847, 3870, 3872, 3884 548 § 7058 $$ 8232, 8239, 8241, 8242 170 545 § 6802 48 $7221 139 .1047 1089 418, 752 .1089 240 $8305 494 §§ 11159, 11223. 237. 182 1893, p. 253 1899, p. 294, § 1. 397 1901, p. 136 383 1913, p. 64, § 12. Amend ed by Laws 1923 (Sp. Sess.) p. 119.. 713 §§ 4896, 4897, 4901, 4902, 83 Kansas City, art. 2, § 3... 105 Kansas City, art. 6, §§ 3, CITY CHARTERS. 105 1917, p. 917, § 6. Amend ed by Sp. Laws 1919, p. 1906, ch. 22, art. 11. 28 LAWS. 197, § 6.. 711 1919, p. 177 1917 (Sp. Sess.) ch. 5. 362 1922, ch. 33 34 1911, p. 327 172 1919, p. 259, § 5 1919, p. 344 1921, p. 532. 1923, p. 40 1923 (Sp. Sess.) p. 36, § 25 1034 397 1922, ch. 33, §§ 12, 13. 353 1924, ch. 82. 552 1923, p. 237, § 1 492 1923, p. 237, § 2. 500 1923, p. 242, § 21 28 1921, p. 414.....139, 141, 1039 63 1921 (Ex. Sess.) p. 76. 1040 46 1923, p. 236. .1039 736 739 .1037 25. 736 1923 (Sp. Sess.) p. 119. 707 MISSOURI. 1925, No. 53. TENNESSEE. 1925, No. 73. 362 1925, No. 356. 711, 713 Art. 2, § 11.. 736 Art. 2, § 15 SHANNON'S CODE. .1050 §§ 3666, 3668, 3669..... 7 Art. 2, § 16 195 KENTUCKY. Art. 2, § 23 .736, 1039 TEXAS. 11 51 157 158 161 248 511 $$ 580, 650 ... 500 57. 498 REVISED STATUTES 498 $$ 62-65 488 § 192 489 §§ 315, 321. ...1050 Art. 1, § 10. 582 1919. Art. 1, § 16. Art. 1, § 15. 195 Art. 3, § 35. 974 299 799 .1006 615 For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER whole premises constitutes disseizin.-McBur STIPULATIONS. 3 (Mo.App.) Appointment of foreign ad- ney v. Knox, 273 S. W. 819. 15(4) (Tex.Com.App.) Possession of land ministratrix for wife held mere irregularity held sufficient to perfect title under five and ten which could be waived by stipulation.-Leutzing-year statutes if adverse.-McBurney v. Knox, er v. McNeely, 273 S. W. 241. 273 S. W. 819. STREET RAILROADS. II. REGULATION AND OPERATION. 83 (Mo.App.) Pedestrian crossing tracks along continuation of sidewalk not trespasser. -Sterr v. Wells, 273 S. W. 1092. 91 (Mo.App.) Violation of ordinance relating to stopping of street cars for passengers held not negligence as to occupant of automobile.-Anderson v. Wells, 273 S. W. 233. 93 (3) (Mo.App.) Pedestrian bound by knowledge of absence of headlight.-Sterr v. Wells, 273 S. W. 1092. 98(6) (Mo.App.) Pedestrian may assume street car will stop for passengers.-Goggin v. Wells. 273 S. W. 1107. 98 (8) (Mo.App.) Pedestrian held negligent.-Goggin v. Wells, 273 S. W. 1107. 99(14) (Ky.) Care required of automobile guest stated.-Rice's Adm'rs v. Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co., 273 S. W. 78. 28(3) (Tex.Civ.App.) Tenant holding possession of common property to exclusion of other tenant is liable for rental value thereof. -Markum v. Markum, 273 S. W. 296. Wife held liable to husband for one-half rental value of community property from which husband was excluded.-Id. Wife held liable for only one-half of rentals received from community estate.-Id. TORTS. See Abduction, 19-21; Libel and Slander, 9-123; Malicious Prosecution, 21-69; Municipal Corporations, 736; Negligence, 2-136; Nuisance, 3-53; Trover and Conversion. 1 (Ky.) Defendants wrongfully ousting plaintiff and transferring property to innocent purchaser liable for value of property.-Cawood v. Cawood, 273 S. W. 67. TRADE-MARKS AND TRADE-NAMES 101 (Mo.App.) Contributory negligence defense to action for violating vigilant watch ordinance.-Goggin v. Wells, 273 S. W. 1107. 117(5) (Mo.App.) Demurrer to evidence 1. MARKS properly overruled.-Potashnick v. Wells, 273 S. W. 777. 17(7) (Ky.) Instruction held to properly leave it to jury to determine whether car was being properly operated.-Rice's Adm'rs Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co., 273 S. W. 78. V. 117(7) (Mo.App.) Negligence in violating speed ordinance held for jury.-Potashnick v. Wells, 273 S. W. 777. 117(10) (Mo.App.) Negligence in violating vigilant watch ordinance for jury.-Goggin v. Wells, 273 S. W. 1107. 117(23) (Mo.App.) Pedestrian's negligence in failing to look held for jury.-Deming v. Wells, 273 S. W. 128. 117(23) (Mo.App.) Plaintiff crossing street car tracks not contributorily negligent as matter of law. Sterr v. Wells, 273 S. W. 1092. 117 (24) (Mo. App.) Contributory negligence held for jury.-Potashnick v. Wells, 273 S. W. 777. 117(35) (Mo.App.) Negligence under humanitarian doctrine held for jury.-Potashnick v. Wells, 273 S. W. 777. 118(1) (Ky.) Instruction held not to state traction company had exclusive right to use portion of highway.-Rice's Adm'rs v. Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co., 273 S. W. 78. 58 (Ky.) Taxing statute cannot be construed prospective as to some and retroactive as to others.-Greene v. Frankfort Distillery Co., 273 S. W. 28. to collect 58 (Tex.Civ.App.) Right tax ceases on repeal of statute authorizing it, unless directly or impliedly preserved.-Pioneer Oil & Refining Co. v. State, 273 S. W. 615. TENANCY IN COMMON. II. MUTUAL RIGHTS, DUTIES, AND BILITIES OF COTENANTS. AND NAMES SUBJECTS OF OWNERSHIP. and 3(1) (Tex.Civ.App.) Generic names emblems protected by injunction, if unauthorized use thereof by defendants would mislead public.-Burrell v. Michaux, 273 S. W. 874. TRESPASS TO TRY TITLE. II. PROCEEDINGS. 40 (5) (Tex.Civ.App.) Execution held admissible as muniment of title conveying ownership of defendant in the land to plaintiff.Alcorn v. Means, 273 S. W. 1016. 44 (Tex.Com.App.) Proof of common source of title for jury.-Bell v. Thomsen, 273 S. W. 1109. TRIAL. See Continuance; Costs; Criminal Law, 621-901; Jury; New Trial; Venue. For trial of particular actions or proceedings, see also the various specific topics. For review of rulings at trial, see Appeal and Error. 75 (Mo.) Plaintiff, by introducing witness to rebut testimony of defendant to be offered, held not estopped from objecting thereto.Scullin Steel Co. v. Mississippi Valley Iron Co., 273 S. W. 95. 82 (Mo.App.) General objection sufficient if evidence is not competent for any purpose.Ruffum v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 273 S. W. 176. LIA-84 (3) (Tex.Civ.App.) Execution not rendered inadmissible by objection that judgment debtor had no title to the land.-Alcorn v. Means, 273 S. W. 1016. 14 (Tex.Com.App.) Entry by third person under deed from one cotenant and claiming VII. INSTRUCTIONS TO JURY. (A) Province of Court and Jury in Gen 84(4) (Tex.Civ.App.) Execution held ad- motion for directed verdict.-Sterr v. Wells, missible to establish title of purchaser at sale 273 S. W. 1092. thereunder.-Alcorn v. Means, 273 S. W. 1016. 89 (Mo.) Refusal to strike testimony, permitted to be given out of order, as rebuttal to testimony to be given by defendant, held without reversible error.-Scullin Steel Co. v. Mississippi Valley Iron Co., 273 S. W. 95. 90 (Mo.App.) Objection to question and answer after their admission, without moving to strike out, presents nothing for trial or appellate court.-Citizens' Bank of Edina Kriegshauser, 273 S. W. 764. V. 105(1) (Mo.App.) Where testimony is admitted without objection, adverse party cannot thereafter object to same evidence.-Buffum v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 273 S. W. 176. eral. 191(1) (Mo.App.) An instruction must not assume disputed facts.-Jackson v. Anderson, 273 S. W. 429. 191 (9) (Tex.Civ.App.) Charge held not to impress on jury idea that court assumed failure of defendant to stop its car sufficient length of time for plaintiff to alight.-Galveston Electric Co. v. Marangola, 273 S. W. 311. held not as assuming disputed facts.Jackson v. Anderson, 273 S. W. 429. Instruction held not objectionable as assuming employé's right of recovery for personal injuries.-Id. 191 (10) (Mo.App.) Instruction objectionable ~105(2) (Mo.App.) Instruction on defendant's failure to slacken speed of truck at intersection held proper, though petition failed to rely on it, where evidence thereof introduced 192 (Tex.Civ.App.) Charge assuming what without objection.-D'Wolf v. Stix-Baer & Ful- uncontroverted proof showed not error.-Gulf, ler Dry Goods Co., 273 S. W. 172. C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Stephenson, 273 S. W. Defendant cannot complain of instruction be- 294. cause not warranted by petition, where evi-192 (Tex.Civ.App.) Court may withdraw dence in support thereof admitted without ob- issue from jury, where only one conclusion jection.-Id. could be reached thereon.-Galveston Electric 105(2) (Mo.App.) Objection to plaintiff's Co. v. Marangola, 273 S. W. 311. testimony relating to inadmissibility of employ-194 (12) (Mo.App.) Instruction merely rement certificate held not waived.-Buffum v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 273 S. W. 176. V. ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF 106 (Mo.App.) Preserving proper conduct at trial and preventing improper statements by counsel, within trial court's discretion.—Morgan v. Doe Run Lead Co., 273 S. W. 244. | quiring jury to determine truth of plaintiff's prima facie case of ownership of note held not error.-Citizens' Bank of Edina v. Kriegshauser, 273 S. W. 764. 194(15) (Tex.Civ.App.) Error for court to charge on any particular state of facts constituting negligence.-Galveston Electric Co. v. Marangola, 273 S. W. 311. of court 194(18) (Tex.Civ.App.) Charge held not on weight of evidence.-Galveston Electric Co. v. Marangola, 273 S. W. 311. V.194 (19) (Ark.) Instruction taking issue of employee's duty to discover defect from jury held error, where evidence thereon conflicting. McCormack-Reedy Lumber Co. v. Savage, 273 S. W. 1028. 119 (Tex.Civ.App.) Counsel in argument must confine remarks to testimony offered in evidence and to issues submitted.-Crow Monroe, 273 S. W. 886. 125(1) (Tex.Civ.App.) Argument to jury held reversible error as appeal to passion and prejudice. Thetford v. Modern Woodmen of America, 273 S. W. 666. 125(4) (Tex.Civ.App.) Counsel's comment (B) Necessity and Subject-Matter. that plaintiff was poor woman and defendant203 (1) (Mo.App.) Defendant has right to rich man held error as inflaming minds of ju- have his theory of case submitted to jury.— ry.-Crow v. Monroe, 273 S. W. 886. Feurt v. Lotspeich, 273 S. W. 240. 127 (Mo.App.) Plaintiff's testimony that doctors examining him were sent by insurance company held not to require mistrial.-Zein v. Pickel Stone Co., 273 S. W. 165. W. 221. 141 (Ark.) If testimony is undisputed, and all reasonable minds must draw same conclusion of fact therefrom, court has duty to declare, as matter of law, conclusion to be reached therefrom.-Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Daniel, 273 S. W. 15. 142 (Tex.Civ.App.) When evidence is for jury or for court stated.-Margules v. Terry, 273 S. W. 690. 143 (Ark.) Conflicting testimony on question of fact raises issue for jury.-Ozark Mut. Life Ass'n v. Dillard, 273 S. W. 378. .145 (Mo.) Refusal of instruction that there was no evidence footboard was defective, as pleaded, held error.-Bonnarens v. Lead Belt Ry. Co., 273 S. W. 1043. (D) Direction of Verdict. 178 (Mo.App.) Most favorable and reason (C) Form, Requisites, and Sufficiency. 223 (Mo.App.) Court's remark that remarks of opposing counsel to each other not to be considered as evidence held not an oral instruction.-Lumatz v. American Car & Foundry Co., 273 S. W. 1089. 228(1) (Ky.) Giving of concrete rather than general instruction on contributory negligence not error.-Wener v. Pope, 273 S. W. 92. 228 (1) (Mo.App.) Instruction not intended to cover entire case or direct verdict held not error because not requiring certain finding necessary to recovery.-Bluff City Shoe Co. v. Levy, 273 S. W. 1086. 228 (3) (Mo.App.) Use of word "purpose" instead of "intent" in instruction held not reversible error.-First Nat. Bank v. Kibble, 273 S. W. 148. 232 (2) (Tex.Civ.App.) Duty to maintain watchman at crossings held sufficiently stated in charge.-Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. Southern Casualty Co., 273 S. W. 680. special 232 (2) (Tex.Civ.App.) Requested charge as to contributory negligence in crossing collision held properly refused.-Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Freeman, 273 S. W. 979. defining 232 (5) (Mo.App.) Instruction "market value" as applied to other instructions held misleading.-Electric Products Co. v. St. Louis Theater Supply Co., 273 S. W. 135. 233(3) (Mo.App.) Instruction held not erroneous as referring jury to petition or pleadings.-Carpenter v. Burmeister, 273 S. W. 418. Rule against reference to pleadings for issues involved inapplicable to instruction on bur For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER 234 (1) (Mo.) Trial court held to have 260(1) (Mo.App.) Refusal of instruction, properly limited proof of paralysis.-Rosen- covered by instruction given, not error.-Bagby zweig v. Wells, 273 S. W. 1071. v. Culberson, 273 S. W. 209. 234(4) (Mo.App.) Instruction, not requir-260 (8) (Mo.App.) Refusal of instruction ing finding that hypothetical facts stated, if held not error, in view of other instructions.true, constitute negligence, held not error.- Spina v. Union Biscuit Co., 273 S. W. 428. Bagby v. Culberson, 273 S. W. 209. If hypothetical facts make out actionable negligence, as matter of law, it is neither necessary nor proper to submit question whether such facts constitute negligence. Id. 260(9) (Mo.App.) Requested instruction held properly refused as covered by given instruction and tending to confuse and mislead jury.-Citizens' Bank of Edina v. Kriegshauser, 273 S. W. 764. 234 (7) (Mo.) Instruction held properly to 261 (Ky.) Rule, as to instruction on rate place burden of proof.-Scullin Steel Co. v. of speed, where defendant offers incorrect inMississippi Valley Iron Co., 273 S. W. 95. struction thereon, stated.-Wight v. Rose, 273 234 (7) (Mo.App.) Instructions held re- S. W. 472. versible error as leading jury to believe plain-267 (3) (Mo.App.) Modification of instructiff could not recover, unless all parties consented to erasure of names of certain indorsers. -Miners' & Merchants' Bank of Flat River v. Richards, 273 S. W. 415. 243 (Ky.) Instructions held not contradictory.-Wight v. Rose, 273 S. W. 472. 243 (Mo.App.) Instruction, in action for injuries while locking wheels, held not inconsistent.-Evans v. Southern Wheel Co., 273 S. W. 749. 244(4) (Tex.Civ.App.) Charge held not objectionable, as emphasizing or reiterating failure of defendant to stop car.-Galveston Electric Co. v. Marangola, 273 S. W. 311. (D) Applicability to Pleadings and Evidence. 250 (Ky.) Instruction on employee's duty of inspection held improper, where no question thereof either in pleadings or evidence.-Rockport Coal Co. v. Barnard, 273 S. W. 533. 250 (Mo.App.) Instructions held erroneous as insufficient and improperly calling attention of jury to verdict and acts of plaintiff's employer. Smith v. Anderson Motor Service Co., 273 S. W. 741. 251(1) (Mo.) Instructions may not be broader than petition.-Rosenzweig v. Wells, 273 S. W. 1071. 251 (3) (Mo.App.) Instruction held properly refused as attempting to raise a false issue. -Mount Arbor Nurseries v. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co., 273 S. W. 410. 251 (8) (Mo.App.) Instruction as to concurrent negligence of driver of defendant's automobile and driver of another automobile, causing collision, held misleading.-Gallagher v. S. Z. Schutte Lumber Co., 273 S. W. 213. 252 (20) (Mo.) Instruction on measure of damages should be framed to submit question of permanent injuries only as to such injuries alleged to be permanent.-Rosenzweig v. Wells, 273 S. W. 1071. 252 (20) (Tex.Civ.App.) Refusal to instruct jury not to consider depreciation of plaintiff's property by reason of injury to street held not error, where no damages claimed by reason of injury to street.-St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Wilson, 273 S. W. 622. tion, so as to submit question whether failure to look was negligence, held not error.Deming v. Wells, 273 S. W. 128. (G) Construction and Operation. 295(1) (Ky.) Instructions must be considered together.-Wight v. Rose, 273 S. W. 472. 296 (1) (Mo.App.) Erroneous instructions not cured by conflicting proper instructions.Miners' & Merchants' Bank of Flat River v. Richards, 273 S. W. 415. 296 (2) (Mo.) Instruction that acceptance of one installment or portion thereof did not waive right to require other installments to be delivered under contract held not misleading on subject of waiver.-Scullin Steel Co. v. Mississippi Valley Iron Co., 273 S. W. 95. 296(2) (Mo.App.) Erroneous instruction not cured by previous correct but inconsistent ones.-Electric Products Co. v. St. Louis Theater Supply Co., 273 S. W. 135. 296 (2) (Mo.App.) Erroneous clause of instruction not cured by preceding inconsistent clause.-Miners' & Merchants' Bank of Flat River v. Richards, 273 S. W. 415. 296 (3) (Ky.) Instruction making it absolute duty of mine owner to maintain roof free from hanging slate held erroneous, though other instruction properly defining duty.-Rockport Coal Co. v. Barnard, 273 S. W. 533. 296 (3) (Mo.App.) Instruction submitting issue of employer's negligence in employing minor without employment certificate held prejudicial error.-Buffum v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 273 S. W. 176. 296 (3) (Mo.App.) Instructions read together held to have correctly stated employer's duty to provide reasonably safe place.-Ray v. Marquette Cement Mfg. Co., 273 S. W. 1078. Instruction as to duty of furnishing reasonably safe place to work, if error, held cured by defendant's instructions.-Id. 296(7) (Mo.App.) Erroneous instruction not cured by instruction in conflict therewith. -Meadows v. Wabash Ry. Co., 273 S. W. 130. 296 (7) (Mo.App.) Instruction held not reversible error as referring jury to pleadings, especially in view of other instructions.-Carpenter v. Burmeister, 273 S. W. 418. 296(9) (Mo.) Instruction held not erroneas assuming negligence of defendant.Meyers v. Wells, 273 S. W. 110. ous, 253 (5) (Tex.Civ.App.) Issue of implied agreement to look only to assets of company for payment of debt held not eliminated by in-296(11) (Mo.) Instruction held not objecstruction. Farmers' State Bank & Trust Co. v. Gorman Home Refinery. 273 S. W. 694. 253(7) (Mo.App.) Instruction held not objectionable as purporting to cover case and omitting contributory negligence alleged.Jackson v. Anderson, 273 S. W. 429. (E) Requests or Prayers. 255 (2) (Ky.) Instruction, presenting defendant's affirmative contention, must be requested.-Jones v. Dalton, 273 S. W. 449. 259(1) (Mo.App.) No duty to give instruction except when requested in writing.-Traynor v. Wells, 273 S. W. 1100. 260(1) (Ky.) Refusal of instruction, covered by instruction given, not prejudicial error. -Hunt v. Callihan, 273 S. W. 555. tionable, as not requiring finding that loss of earnings was direct result of injuries complained of, in view of another instruction.Meyers v. Wells, 273 S. W. 110. |