ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

WEAPONS.

10 (Mo.) Carrying loaded revolver on floor of automobile held "concealment" within statute.-State v. Renard, 273 S. W. 1058.

11(1) (Mo.) State deputy beverage inspector not entitled to carry concealed weapon; "officer."-State v. Hogan, 273 S. W. 1060.

13 (Mo.) Exclusion of evidence, in prosecution for carrying concealed weapons, that accused had been shot at, not error.-State v. Hogan, 273 S. W. 1060.

[ocr errors]

(E) Jurisdiction, Limitations, and Laches. 253 (Tex.Civ.App.) Will held properly probated by district clerk in 1874.-Clements v. Texas Co., 273 S. W. 993.

(I) Hearing or Trial.

324 (2) (Tex.Civ.App.) Evidence of testamentary incapacity sufficient for jury.-Moore v. Martin, 273 S. W. 961. defining

330(1) (Tex.Civ.App.) Charge "sound mind" held sufficiently comprehensive.

17(1) (Mo.) No variance between evidence-Bell v. Blackwell, 273 S. W. 866. of carrying weapon on person and charge of carrying it concealed about person.-State v. Renard, 273 S. W. 1057.

17(3) (Tex.Cr.App.) Testimony of what happened at accused's home on night of offense, and what happened after she left home, competent, in charge of carrying weapons.Knoble v. State, 273 S. W. 594.

(K) Review.

359 (Tex.Civ.App.) Courts cannot qualify or limit statutory right of appeal.-Moore v. Martin, 273 S. W. 961.

400 (Tex.Civ.App.) Error, if any, in explanation in connection with submission of will contest on special issue, held harmless.-Bell v. Blackwell, 273 S. W. 866.

17(5) (Mo.) Whether revolvers in pocket on back of automobile seat occupied by accused were concealed about his person held for jury.400 (Tex.Civ.App.) Court will not presume an improper use of evidence.-Moore v. Mar-State v. Hogan, 273 S. W. 1060. tin, 273 S. W. 961.

17(5) (Mo.) Whether revolvers hidden on seat between accused and another were carried by accused concealed about his person held for jury.-State v. Scanlan, 273 S. W. 1062.

17(6) (Mo.) Evidence held to justify instruction as to carrying concealed weapon prior to entering automobile.-State v. Scanlan, 273 S. W. 1062.

Instruction allowing finding of carrying weapon "upon" tthe person allowable under indictment for carrying weapons "about" the person.-Id.

17(6) (Tex.Cr.App.) Charge that accused could carry revolver for no other purpose than to deliver it to mother error.-Knoble v. State, 273 S. W. 594.

WILLS.

(L) Fees and Costs.

405 (Tex.Civ.App.) Fee of guardian ad litem for defending suit to avoid will properly taxed against minor.-Moore v. Martin, 273 S. W. 961.

(M) Operation and Effect.

421 (Tex.Civ.App.) District clerk's order reciting jurisdictional facts on probate of will attack.held conclusive against collateral Clements v. Texas Co., 273 S. W. 993. Ancient orders for probate of wills construed to uphold titles emanating thereunder.-Id.

VI. CONSTRUCTION.

(H) Estates in Trust and Powers.

See Descent and Distribution; Executors and 674 (Mo.App.) Will held to create spendAdministrators.

II. TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY.

thrift trust, though not declaring cestui's interest not subject to creditors.-Commerce Trust Co. v. Bayles, 273 S. W. 759.

52(1) (Tex.Civ.App.) Burden is on opponent to show testamentary incapacity.-Moore VII. RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES OF DEVIv. Martin, 273 S. W. 961.

53(1)(Tex.Civ.App.) Deed to testator before marriage competent on question of incapacity, where be believed property so conveyed was community property.-Moore v. Martin, 273 S. W. 961.

IV. REQUISITES AND VALIDITY. (G) Revocation and Revival. 184(2) (Ark.) Instrument declaring intention not to will land to son held not codicil. Newboles v. Newboles, 273 S. W. 1026.

186 (Ark.) Purported revocation, failing to refer to or identify will, held not defective.Newboles v. Newboles, 273 S. W. 1026.

Instrument signed by another than testatrix held not good as revocation.-Id.

V. PROBATE, ESTABLISHMENT, AND AN-
NULMENT.

(A) Probate and Revocation in General.

SEES AND LEGATEES.

(D) Election.

793 (Ark.) Widow's renunciation of will held not in compliance with statute, and hence ineffective.-Lucas v. Lacy, 273 S. W. 366.

(G) Debts of Testator and Incumbrances on Property.

837 (Ark.) Widow as devisee in husband's will held not bound to pay debt of estate out of her estate or estate so devised.-Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Costen, 273 S. W. 705.

Widow held entitled to enjoy portion of estate devised and bequeathed to her by husband.

-Id.

[blocks in formation]

204 (Tex.Civ.App.) Act vesting district 48(1) (Tex.Cr.App.) Codefendant, under clerk with probate authority in vacation held suspended sentence for same offense, not comvalid.-Clements v. Texas Co., 273 S. W. 993. petent to testify.-Majors v. State, 273 S. W. (B) Actions to Establish or Determine Va-52(7) (Tex.Cr.App.) Proof by third party

lidity in General.

(Tex.Civ.App.) Judgment not im225 peached for fraud where laches and lack of diligence in discovering fraud shown.-Warne v. Jackson, 273 S. W. 315.

267.

of declaration of wife to husband ordinarily not inadmissible against husband.-Goforth v. State, 273 S. W. 845.

Declarations of wife not privileged when husband and wife coconspirators.-Id.

230 (Tex.Civ.App.) Wife not estopped from 53(5) (Ky.) In suit to recover for servcontesting will under circumstances not show-ices rendered to deceased, witness for estate ing election to stand by it.-Moore v. Martin, competent as to some matters.-Clark v. Hale,

1183

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

(C) Testimony of Parties or Persons interested, for or against Representatives, Survivors, or Successors in Title or Interest of Persons Deceased or Incompetent.

CON

IMPEACHMENT,
IV. CREDIBILITY,
TRADICTION, AND CORROBORATION.

(A) In General.

321 (Mo.App.) Party may not impeach his own witness, unless he shows that he has been surprised or entrapped.-Gallagher v. S. Z. Schutte Lumber Co., 273 S. W. 213.

140(6) (Ky.) Witness' testimony as to sale of lumber by decedent not rendered inadmissible because he was given small bequest.-330(1) (Ark.) Cross-examination as to repWalker v. Bennett, 273 S. W. 548. utation of accused in conducting dances and drinking parties proper to test credibility.Weakley v. State, 273 S. W. 374.

159(9) (Ky.) In suit to recover for services rendered to deceased, witness for estate competent as to some matters.-Clark v. Hale, 273 S. W. 39.

(B) Character and Conduct of Witness.

181 (Mo.App.) Defendants not estopped to 337 (2) (Ky.) Admission of testimony as object to competency of claimant as a witness to accused's-bad reputation, after he had tesbecause not objecting in probate court.-Lang tified, proper.-Loving v. Commonwealth, 273 v. Wishart, 273 S. W. 768. S. W. 56. Courts will not raise a waiver of incompe-337 (2) (Ky.) Testimony of moral charactency of witness to testify as to transaction ter of accused, who was witness for himself, with deceased person upon a mere pretext.-Id. competent.-Lake v. Commonwealth, 273 S. W.

[blocks in formation]

511.

Moral reputation of accused for period of 22 to 3 years prior to crime may be proved.

190 (Tex.Cr.App.) Declarations of wife not-Id. privileged when husband and wife coconspirators.-Goforth v. State, 273 S. W. 845.

193 (Tex.Cr.App.) Proof by third party of declaration of wife to husband ordinarily not inadmissible against husband.-Goforth State, 273 S. W. 845.

V.

212 (Ark.) Testimony of defendant's family physicians as to his mental condition, not obtained from any information received for purpose of treating defendant, held properly admitted.-Burris v. State, 273 S. W. 19.

[blocks in formation]

266 (Mo.App.) No abuse of discretion in allowing plaintiff to cross-examine his hostile witness. Semper v. American Press, 273 S. W. 186.

337 (5) (Tex.Cr.App.) Indictment for felony or offense imputing moral turpitude admissible to affect accused's credibility as witness.-Scogin v. State, 273 S. W. 575.

337 (5) (Tex.Cr.App.) Permitting prosecu tion to interrogate accused's witness as to other indictments against accused held not reversible error.-Littlejohn v. State, 273 S. W. 864.

337(6) (Tex.Cr.App.) Questioning accused as witness, as to whether he was not under indictment for selling whisky in two other cases, and if he had not been convicted in four liquor cases, held not error.-Littlejohn v. State, 273 S. W. 864.

345(1) (Ark.) Witness may be discredited by showing that he was formerly accused of particular crime charged to defendant.-Campbell v. State, 273 S. W. 1035.

349 (Ky.) Exclusion of question as to how much plaintiff was engaged in liquor business held not erroneous.-Walker v. Rogers, 273 S. W. 439.

as to how 350 (Ky.) Cross-examination many times plaintiff had been fined for selling whisky held properly excluded.-Walker v. Rogers, 273 S. W. 439.

360 (Ky.) Refusal of defendant's rebuttal evidence to show good character held erroneous.-Barker v. Commonwealth, 273 S. W. 503.

361 (1) (Tex.Cr.App.) Admission of testimony, showing good reputation of prosecuting 267 (Mo.App.) Trial court may not too witness for truth and veracity, held not error. narrowly restrict_cross-examination.-Gallagher-Littlejohn v. State, 273 S. W. 864. v. S. Z. Schutte Lumber Co., 273 S. W. 213.

(C) Interest and Bias of Witness.

270(2) (Tex.Cr.App.) Refusal to permit accused to interrogate witness as to witness' 366 (Ark.) Question whether state witness brother being charged with violations of liquor had been charged with same robbery competent law held not error.-Littlejohn v. State, 273 S. to show bias.-Campbell v. State, 273 S. W. 1035. W. 864. Cross-examination 274(1) (Ky.) Commonwealth may attack 372 (2) (Tex.Cr.App.) defendant's reputation, where he has offered of accused's brother, as to whether they were proof thereof, and may cross-examine defend- not all mad at deceased's family, not improper. ant's witnesses, to test memory and extent of -Emmons v. State, 273 S. W. 253. information.-Cox v. Commonwealth, 273 S. 376 (Tex. Civ.App.) Permitting witness, W. 515.

whose bias plaintiff attempted to show, to ex274(2) (Ark.) Cross-examination as to ac- plain on cross-examination her conduct in dicused's general reputation for "peace and quie-recting plaintiff to leave her premises, held not tude" proper; "public peace."-Weakley v. error.-Joseph v. Puryear, 273 S. W. 974. (D) Inconsistent Statements by Witness.

State, 273 S. W. 374.

277(2) (Tex.Cr.App.) Cross-examination of accused as to why she did not stop readily when officer tried to stop her improper under showing.-Knoble v. State, 273 S. W. 594.

283 (Ark.) Refusal to allow defense to recall witness for cross-examination, after all evidence had been taken and jury partially instructed, held not error.-Murphy v. State, 273 S. W. 718.

379(3) (Ky.) Exclusion of written statement inconsistent with testimony, though merely expressing opinion, held error.-Rockport Coal Co. v. Barnard, 273 S. W. 533.

383 (Tex.Cr.App.) Hearsay testimony, offered for impeachment purposes, held properly excluded as immaterial.-Brown v. State, 273 S. W. 263.

287(3) (Tex.Cr.App.) Re-examination to (E) Contradiction and Corroboration, of show prosecuting witness took whisky to get Witness. in with defendant held not error, where crossthat company's examination showed witness took such whisky 405(1) (Ark.) Evidence with him.-Nowells v. State, 273 S. W. 561. employee attempted to secure admission that

witness fastened foreign wire to high-tension | "Fundamental error."-Bristol v. Chas. F. Nowire held inadmissible to impeach witness.Pine Bluff Co. v. Bobbitt, 273 S. W. 1.

405 (1) (Ark.) Question as to statement by deceased that another ought to whip defendant was not a threat of violence on deceased's part, and hence not a matter on which witness could be contradicted.-Burris v. State, 273 S. W. 19.

406 (Ky.) Rebuttal evidence showing domestic troubles of accused, who was witness in his own behalf, held competent.-Lake v. Commonwealth, 273 S. W. 511.

406 (Ky.) Question to defendant, as to whether he made a certain statement, properly excluded, where statement not in language testified to.-Cox v. Commonwealth, 273 S. W. 515.

406 (Tex.Civ.App.) Evidence held admissible to discredit testimony of beneficiary that he had not heard of insured for 7 years.-Thetford v. Modern Woodmen of America, 273 S. W. 666.

[blocks in formation]

443.

"And interest."-Rosenberg v. Greenstone (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 133.

"Apparent authority in an agent "-Ozark Mut. Life Ass'n v. Dillard (Ark.) 273 S. W. 378. "Authentication."--Bell V. Thomsen (Tex. Com. App.) 273 S. W. 1109. "Authority.' Graham v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. (Mo App.) 273 S. W. 221. "Bawdy house."--Claiborne v. State (Tex. Cr

App.) 273 S. W. 260; Hardaman v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 273 S. W. 584. "Bill of exchange "-Bush v. Gholson (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 703.

"Bill of interpleader."-Continental Nat. Bank of Fort Worth v. Smith (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 657.

"Bona fide purchaser."-Whitaker v. Davidson (Ky.) 273 S. W. 485.

"Casing-head gas."-Livingston Oil Corporation v. Waggoner (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 903.

"Civil action."-Janin v. Logan (Ky.) 273 S. W. 531. "Concealment."-State v. Renard (Mo.) 273 S. W. 1058. "Conversion."-Livingston Oil Corporation v. Waggoner (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 903. "Coram nobis."-Schneider v. Schneider (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 1081.

"Cropper."-Cry v. J. W. Bass Hardware (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 347. "Culpable negligence."-State v. Winkler (Mo.) 273 S. W. 1040. "Definite and permanent source."-Hoefs v. Short (Tex.) 273 S. W. 785. "Deposit in court."-Mannion v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 201.

"Easement."-Rogers v. Hussion (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 969.

"Ex parte proceeding."-Janin v. Logan (Ky.) 273 S. W. 531.

"Express contracts."-Farmers' State Bank & Trust Co. v. Gorman Home Refinery (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 694.

"Fellow servant."-Evans v. Southern Wheel Co. (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 749. "Fraud."-Steffen v. Stahl (Mo. App.) 273 S.

ble Oil & Gas Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 946.

"General denial."-Franklin Bank v. International Hospital Equipment Co. (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 197.

"General law."-Farelly Lake Levee Dist. v. Hudson (Ark.) 273 S. W. 711.

"General statute."-McLaughlin v. Ford (Ark.) 273 S. W. 707. "Hootch."-State v. Hull (Mo.) 273 S. W. 1039. "Implied contracts in fact."-Farmers' State Bank & Trust Co. v. Gorman Home Refinery (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 694. "Implied contracts in law."-Farmers' State Bank & Trust Co. v. Gorman Home Refinery (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 694. "Instructions."-Graham v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 221. "Intent."-First Nat. Bank v. Kibble (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 148. "Interest."-Henderson v. Chesley (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 299. "Interest in land."-Sibley v. Pickens (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 897. "Interstate commerce."-McCaskey

Register

Co. v. Mann (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 1113.

"Involuntary manslaughter."-Crafford v. State (Ark.) 273 S. W. 13.

"Joint owners."-Henderson v. Chesley (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 299.

"Landlord and tenant relation."-Cry v. J. W. Bass Hardware (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 347.

"Machine."-Lumatz v. American Car & Foun-
dry Co. (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 1089.
"Maintain."-St. Louis, Southwestern Ry. Co.
of Texas v. Davy Burnt Clay Ballast Co.
(Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 630.
"Maritime."-Lee v. Licking Valley Coal Dig-
ger Co. (Ky.) 273 S. W. 542.
"Maritime cause."-Lee v. Licking Valley Coal
"Market value."-Electric Products Co. v. St.
Digger Co. (Ky.) 273 S. W. 542.

Louis Theater Supply Co. (Mo. App.) 273
S. W. 135.

"Material." Wittels Loan & Mercantile Co. v. American Cent. Ins. Co. (Mo.) 273 S. W. 1084.

"Ministerial act."-Kaufman County v. Gaston (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 273. "Near."-Clements v. Texas Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 993.

"Negligence."-D'Wolf v. Stix-Baer & Fuller Dry Goods Co. (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 172; Ray v. Marquette Cement Mfg. Co. (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 1078.

"Numbness."-Rosenzweig v. Wells (Mo.) 273 S. W. 1071. "Officer."-State v. Hogan (Mo.) 273 S. W. 1060.

"Oil."-Livingston Oil Corporation v. Waggoner (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 903. "Or."-State v. Combs (Mo.) 273 S. W. 1037. "Party."-State ex rel. Cornelius v. McClanahan (Mo.) 273 S. W. 1059. "Peace and quietude."-Weakley V. State

(Ark.) 273 S. W. 374. "Personal property."-Garcia v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 273 S. W. 860. "Plaintiff." McFadin v. Simms (Mo.) 273 S. W. 1050.

"Private residence."-Luttrell v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 273 S. W. 597. "Process."-Clements v. Texas Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 993. "Property."-Garcia v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 273 S. W. 860.

"Proximate cause."-Wengert v. Lyons (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 143. "Public peace."-Weakley v. State (Ark.) 273 S. W. 374.

"Purpose."-First Nat. Bank v. Kibble (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 148.

"Realty."-Sibley v. Pickens (Tex. Civ. App.)

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

"Robbery."-Lanford v. Commonwealth (Ky.) "Trial."-Shanks Bros. v. Chicago Great West-

273 S. W. 492.

"Sale by sample."-Levine v. Hochman (Mo.
App.) 273 S. W. 204.
"Scaffold."-Carpenter Burmeister Mo.
App.) 273 S. W. 418.
"Seduction."-State v. Shiflett (Mo.) 273 S. W.

727.

V.

"Slipped."-Zein v. Pickel Stone Co. (Mo.
App.) 273 S. W. 165.

"Sound mind."-Bell v. Blackwell (Tex. Civ.
App.) 273 S. W. 866.

"Special proceeding."-Janin v. Logan (Ky.)
273 S. W. 531.

"Special statute."-McLaughlin v. Ford (Ark.)
273 S. W. 707.
"Stream."-Hoefs v. Short (Tex.) 273 S. W.
785.

"Taxes."-Shaver v. Rice (Ky.) 273 S. W. 48.
"Tenant"-Cry v. J. W. Bass Hardware (Tex.
Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 347.

"Theft."-Garcia v. State (Tex. Cr., App.) 273
S. W. 860.

"Transacting business."-Bristol v. Chas. F.
Noble Oil & Gas Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 273
S. W. 946.

273 S.W.-75

ern R. Co. (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 169.
"Trial by jury."-Branham v. Commonwealth
(Ky.) 273 S. W. 489.

"Twelve months' bond."-Clements v. Texas
Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 993.
"Upon."-State v. Scanlan (Mo.) 273 S. W.
1062.

"Vice principal."-Evans v. Southern Wheel
Co. (Mo. App.) 273 S. W. 749.

"Voting at said election."-Ladd v. Yett (Tex.
Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 1006.
"Waters of a stream."-Hoefs v. Short (Tex.)

273 S. W. 785.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACTS.
See Master and Servant, 356-419.
WRIT OF ERROR.

See Appeal and Error.

WRITS.

See Attachment; Certiorari; Execution; Gar-
nishment; Habeas Corpus; Injunction;
Mandamus.

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »