TABLE V.-Disposition of unfair labor practice cases on docket during the fiscal year: By regions Cases closed before formal action Region 110 233 2 12 2 14030 2 12 72 51 12 3 63 2 118 26 6 206 20 6, 836 4.6644, 132 1.836 930 1,343 23 532 28 6 5 13 30 1.343 23 5:32 28 65 3 2 1 10 11 26 1 Cases in which the Board assumed original jurisdiction because more than 1 region was involved or for other reasons. ↑ Companies were liquidated before compliance had been secured with Court order. TABLE VI.-Types of formal action taken in unfair labor practice cases during the fiscal year: by regions 1 Cases in which the Board assumed original jurisdiction because more than 1 region was involved or for other reasons. TABLE VII.-Disposition of representation cases on docket during the fiscal year: by types of petitioner Cases pending June 30, 1939. Cases received July 1, 1939-June 30, 1940. • Number of workers involved counted in another case. Includes one petition filed jointly by A. F. of L. affiliate and C. I. O. affiliate; discrepancy in total figures arises out of double counting. TABLE VIII.—Disposition of representation cases on docket during fiscal year: by regions Consent election Recognition Pay-roll check Dismissed Withdrawn Withdrawn No election Election No election Election Otherwise closed after formal action Total cases pending June 30, 1940 275987-41-3 Region } 23 23 1 Cases in which the Board assumed original jurisdiction because more than 1 region was involved or for other reasons. 1. Boston. 2. New York. Buffalo Philadelphia. 5. Baltimore. 6. Pittsburgh. 67 7. Detroit 8. Cleveland. 11. Indianapolis. 12. Milwaukee. 16. Fort Worth. 17. Kansas City. 18. Minneapolis. 19. Seattle 20. San Francisco. 21. Los Angeles. 22. Denver. Board 1. 22 495 13 1 |