 Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise...  Miscellaneous Reports. Cases Decided in the Courts of Record of the State of ... - 610 페이지저자: New York (State). Courts, Francis Blaine Delehanty (Reporter), Austin B. Griffin (Reporter), Robert George Scherer (Reporter), Edward Jordan Dimock (Reporter), Joseph Albert Lawson (Reporter), Charles Cook Lester (Reporter), William Van Rensselaer Erving (Reporter), Louis J. Rezzemini (Reporter) - 1921전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | Railroad and Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota - 1918 - 528 페이지
...Government of the one involves the control of the other, it is Congress, and not the state, that is enitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise...Nation, would be supreme within the national field." Following the Shreveport decision the ICC decided the Missouri River-Nebraska Cases, 40 ICC 201. We... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1914 - 204 페이지
...the State, that is entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress would he denied the exercise of its constitutional authority,...and the State, and not the Nation, would be supreme in the national field. The power to deal with the relation between intrastate and interstate rates,... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1917 - 908 페이지
...the government of the one involves the control of the other it is Congress and not the ttte that ia entitled to prescribe the final and dominant rule,...nation Would be supreme within the national field. n the sole issue were whether or not the present adjustment of class and commodity rates between Shreveport... | |
 | Westel Woodbury Willoughby, John Archibald Fairlie, Frederic Austin Ogg - 1915 - 882 페이지
..."wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other, it is Congress...Nation, would be supreme within the national field." And further: "This is not to say that Congress possesses the authority to regulate the internal commerce... | |
 | Herbert Confield Lust - 1917 - 1102 페이지
..."Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other it is Congress...nation would be supreme within the national field." Railroad Commission of Louisiana v. AHT Ry., 41 ICC 83, 121. (e) Duty of the Commission to cooperate... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1914 - 206 페이지
...Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other it is Congress,...and the State, and not the Nation, would be supreme in the national field. The power to deal with the relation between intrastate and interstate rates,... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1914 - 254 페이지
...Wherever the interstate and intrastate transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one involves the control of the other it is Congress,...and the State, and not the Nation, would be supreme in the national field. The power to deal with the relation between intrastate and interstate rates,... | |
 | William Mack, William Benjamin Hale - 1917 - 1362 페이지
...transactions of carriers are so related that the government of the one Involves the control of tne other, it Is Congress, and not the state, that is...nation, would be supreme within the national field." Houston, etc., R. Co. v. US, supra. "The Constitution reserved to the nation the unlimited power to... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1914 - 914 페이지
...other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to preOpinion of the Court. 234 US scribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress...Nation, would be supreme within the national field. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 221 US 612, 618; Southern Railway... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1914 - 910 페이지
...other, it is Congress, and not the State, that is entitled to preOpinion of the Court. 234 US scribe the final and dominant rule, for otherwise Congress...Nation, would be supreme within the national field. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 221 US 612, 618; Southern Railway... | |
| |
