« 이전계속 »
dral; that to my fancy it appeared like going up to Jerusalem at the feast of the Passover; and that the strong devotion which I felt on that occasion diffused its influence on my mind through the rest of the year.
TO JAMES BOSWELL, ESQ.
[Not dated, but written about 66 DEAR SIR,
the 15th of March.] “I AM ashamed to think that since I received your letter I have passed so many days without answering it.
“I think there is no great difficulty in resolving your doubts. The reasons for which you are inclined to visit London, are, I think, not of sufficient strength to answer the objections. That you should delight to come once a year to the fountain of intelligence and pleasure, is very natural; but both information and pleasure must be regulated by propriety. Pleasure, which cannot be obtained but by unseasonable or unsuitable expense, must always end in pain ; and pleasure, which must be enjoyed at the expense of another's pain, can never be such as a worthy mind can fully delight in.
“What improvement you might gain by coming to London, you may easily supply or easily compensate, by enjoining yourself some particular study at home, or opening some new avenue to information. Edinburgh is not yet exhausted; and I am sure you will find no pleasure here which can deserve either that
you should anticipate any part of your future fortune, or that you should condemn yourself and your lady to penurious frugality for the rest of the year.
“I need not tell you what regard you owe to Mrs. Boswell's entreaties; or how much you ought to study the happiness of her who studies yours with so much diligence, and of whose kindness you enjoy such good effects. Life cannot subsist in society but by reciprocal
concessions. She permitted you to ramble last year, you must permit her now to keep you at home.
“Your last reason is so serious, that I am unwilling to oppose it. Yet you must remember, that your image of worshipping once a year in a certain place, in imitation of the Jews, is but a comparison; and simile non est idem; if the annual resort to Jerusalem was a duty to the Jews, it was a duty because it was commanded ; and you have no such command, therefore no such duty. It may be dangerous to receive too readily, and indulge too fondly, opinions, from which, perhaps, no pious mind is wholly disengaged, of local sanctity and local devotion. You know what strange effects they have produced over a great part of the Christian world. I am now writing, and you, when you read this, are reading under the Eye of Omnipresence.
“To what degree fancy is to be admitted into religious offices, it would require much deliberation to determine. I am far from intending totally to exclude it. Fancy is a faculty bestowed by our Creator, and it is reasonable that all his gifts should be used to his glory, that all our faculties should co-operate in his worship; but they are to co-operate according to the will of him that gave them, according to the order which his wisdom has established. As ceremonies prudential or convenient are less obligatory than positive ordinances, as bodily worship is only the token to others or ourselves of mental adoration, so Fancy is always to act in subordination to Reason. take fancy for a companion, but must follow Reason as our guide. We
We may allow Fancy to suggest certain ideas in certain places; but Reason must always be heard, when she tells us, that those ideas and those places have no natural or necessary relation. When we enter a church we habitually recall to mind the duty of adoration, but we must not omit adoration for
want of a temple; because we know, and ought to remember, that the Universal Lord is every where present; and that, therefore, to come to Jona, or to Jerusalem, though it may be useful, cannot be necessary.
“Thus I have answered your letter, and have not answered it negligently. I love you too well to be careless when you are serious.
“I think I shall be very diligent next week about our travels, which I have too long neglected. I am, dear Sir,
“ Your most, &c.
"Sam. Johnson. “Compliments to Madam and Miss.”
TO THE SAME.
“ DEAR SIR,
“The lady who delivers this has a lawsuit, in which she desires to make use of your skill and eloquence, and she seems to think that she shall have something more of both for a recommendation from me; which, though I know how little you want any external incitement to your duty, I could not refuse her, because I know that at least it will not hurt her, to tell you that I wish her well. I am, Sir, “Your most humble servant,
“SAM. Johnson." “ May 10, 1774."
MR. BOSWELL TO DR. JOHNSON.
“ Edinburgh, May 12, 1774. “LORD HAILES has begged of me to offer you his best respects, and to transmit to you specimens of · Annals of Scotland, from the Accession of Malcolm Kenmore to the Death of James V.' in drawing up which, his Lordship has been engaged for some time. His Lordship writes to me thus : 'If I could procure
Dr. Johnson's criticisms, they would be of great use to me in the prosecution of my work, as they would be judicious and true. I have no right to ask that favour of him. If you could, it would highly oblige me.'
“Dr. Blair requests you may be assured that he did not write to London what you said to him, and that neither by word nor letter has he made the least complaint of you; but on the contrary has a high respect for you, and loves you much more since he saw you in Scotland. It would both divert and please you to see his eagerness about this matter.”
" TO JAMES BOSWELL, ESQ. 's Dear SIR,
Streatham, June 12, 1774. “YESTERDAY I put the first sheets of the 'Journey to the Hebrides' to the press. I have endeavoured to do you some justice in the first paragraph. It will be one volume in octavo, not thick.
“ It will be proper to make some presents in Scotland. You shall tell me to whom I shall give; and I have stipulated twenty-five for you to give in your own
Some will take the present better from me, others better from you. In this, you who are to live in the place ought to direct. Consider it. Whatever you can get for my purpose send me; and make my compliments to your lady and both the young ones.
“I am, Sir, your, &c.
MR. BOSWELL TO DR. JOHNSON.
“ Edinburgh, June 24, 1774. “You do not acknowledge the receipt of the various packets which I have sent to you. Neither can I prevail with you to answer my letters, though you
honour me with returns. You have said
You have said nothing to me about poor Goldsmith, nothing about Langton.
“I have received for you, from the Society for propagating Christian Knowledge in Scotland, the following Erse books :- The New Testament;' 'Baxter's Call; '— The Confession of Faith of the Asembly of Divines at Westminster;—The Mother's Catechism;— A Gaelick and English Vocabulary.”
"TO JAMES BOSWELL, ESQ. - DEAR SIR,
“I wish you could have looked over my book before the printer, but it could not easily be. I suspect some mistakes; but as I deal, perhaps, more in notions than in facts, the matter is not great, and the second edition will be mended, if any such there be. The
go on slowly for a time, because I am going into Wales to-morrow.
“ I should be very sorry if I appeared to treat such a character as Lord Hailes otherwise than with high respect. I return the sheets,a to which I have done what mischief I could ; and finding it so little, thought not much of sending them. The narrative is clear, lively, and short.
“I have done worse to Lord Hailes than by neglecting his sheets : I have run him in debt. Dr. Horne, the President of Magdalen College in Oxford, wrote to me about three months ago, that he purposed to reprint Walton's Lives, and desired me to contribute to the work: my answer was, that Lord Hailes in
y Dr. Goldsmith died April 4, this year.
a On the cover enclosing them, Dr Johnson wrote, “If my delay has given any reason for supposing that I have not a very deep sense of the honour done me by asking my judgement, I am very sorry.”