« 이전계속 »
in the Rescript of the Roman emperors relating to the articles im ed into Egypt from the east, and contained in the Digest of the Ro Law, Lib. XXXIX. title XV. 5. 7.*
Lign Aloe.—The fragrant wood called Lign Aloe or Aguru in San: is the Ahaloth of Scripture, from which term the name of Agalloc given to it in the Digest, is derived. Hence the modern appellatio Agal or Eagle wood which is sometimes applied to it. Aquillaria A locha, which yields this substance, is common in the mountainous cou between Sylhet and Assam. Speaking of the latter country, Maho Cazim observes: “the mountains of Nanac (the Naga hills or Nazavic of Ammianus Marcellinus) produce plenty of Lign Aloes, which a soo of natives import every year into Assam and barter for salt and gra The fragrance of Lign Aloe is supposed to be the result of a dise. state of the centre layers of the wood, which is converted into a resil matter. At Sylhet an essence or attar is extracted from it, which former days when this article was in great demand, was sold fo weight in gold. Both the wood and the essence or attar are purch, by Moghul merchants and are sent to Jidda and Bussora. The atta Lign Aloe, which is of the consistence of thick oil and of a dark br colour, appears to be the substance called Indian Cinnabar by Arr Dr. Vincent remarks in speaking of Arrian's account of Socotra: “. remarkable that aloes are not mentioned by the author of the Peril but he notices particularly the drug called Indian cinnabar which exu from a certain species of trees. Dr. Vincent says that the confound of Cimabar and Dragons blood was a mistake of ancient date, and t cludes that the latter is the article that is referred to.”# It wo seem, however, that the substance, which Arrian alludes to, was the produce of Socotra, but of India, and it is likely, therefore, that attar of Lign Aloe is, from its colour, the substance that is meant the article Cinnabar which exudes from certain trees. It was no do imported into Socotra from India. Lign Aloe is highly esteemed perfume throughout the east, and is employed for various purpo as incense in temples, to fumigate apartments, cloths, &c. The J used it at their interments.
* Quaere, Tit. IV. 2 where a long and highly interesting catalogue of oriental ports is given.—Eds. t Vincent's Periplus.
Rhinoceros's Horn.—This appears to be the article which is mentionrd under the term Prokopas in the Periplus. The Rhinoceros's horn was considered an antidote to poison, and was, therefore, highly valued in ancient times. These horns were no doubt exported from Assam where the Rhinoceros abounds. The horn of the Rhinoceros of Bengal was considered superior to that of every other country of Asia. Linshoten remarks that this was owing “to the herbs which Bengala yieldeth, for in other places they were not near the price of these.” The two Mahomedan travellers of the 9th century state that the Chinese purchased the horns of Rhinoceroses in the kingdom of Rami, in the sens of which country they are said to abound (the marshes of Bengal) and that they adorned their girdles with these, some of which were valued at 3000 pieces of gold in China.
Tahasheer—This is supposed by some to be the aea waxaawow of the Periplus. It is designated the sugar or manna of bamboos. It occurs in the works of the old travellers under the name of Spodiom de Canna. Barett mentions it as an export from Bengal to Goa in the 16th century. It is also noticed, as an article of traffic in other parts of India. Caesar Frederick remarks: “From Cambara cometh the Spodiom which tongealeth in certain canes (bamboos) whereof I found many in Pegu, of which I made my house there, because as I said before they make their houses there of woven canes like mats.” Odoricus, who travelled in India in the early part of the 14th century, speaks of canes named “Cassam, of which they make sails (masts) for ships, and in which are found tertain stones, one of which stones whosoever carrieth it about with him cannot be wounded with any iron, and therefore the men of the country for the most part carry such stones wherever they go.” (Haklyut's voyages, p. 162.)
Dacca, 16th April, 1846.
A PPEND IX.
Note: I. Sin W.M. Jon Esmentions “the similarity of some proper names on the borders of India to those of Arabia, as the river Arabius, a place called Araba, * People named Aribes or Arabies and another called Sabi.” (Discourse on the Arabs, As. Res. Vol. ii. p. 7.) Words allied to the latter term occur in "my's Geography of the commies of India ; and were perhaps the names of **bean commercial settlements. Supara or Sippara (the Sefareh of Arabian moi : mais de nouvelles? relations m'apprennent qu'il n°y a point de ville , i.e. mom.” The site of Bengala appears to have been confounded with that Chittagong about the beginning of the 18th century. In some of the Fren, geographical Dictionaries of that period, these towns are described as “ Cha gan sur la rivière de Cosmin vis-a-vis Bengal que plusieurs geographes co fondent avec elle. Quelques uns ont cru que Bengale n'est autre q Chatigan.” Dict. de Lamartine. That they were different places, however, evident from the circumstance of Bengala, Chatigan and Satigan being seve ally mentioned as the chief emporia of Bengal. From the city of Beng, being described as situated on an island and opposite to Chittagong, Sun de would seem to be the locality that is referred to ; on the other hand, Sir Herbert mentions this island, but does not allude to any town upon it, whil he particularly specifies Chatigan, Bacola, Serripore, and Sonargong as ti principal towns of the eastern part of Bengal. In a work entitled “L, Mercatoria,” written about the middle of the last century, Dacca is mentione as identical with Bengala. The mention by Morery of the latter having bee frequented by Portuguese, Dutch, English, and French, seems to countenanc this opinion; but on the other hand the insular situation of Bengala, and i being placed opposite to Chittagong prove that Dacca is not the town that referred to. Rennell, speaking of this city, remarks “no traces of it now exis It is described as being near the eastern mouth of the Ganges, and I conceiv the site of it has been carried away by the river.”
Note on an Image of Budha found at Sherghatti, &c. by Capt. Kirror:
I have the pleasure herewith to transmit a sketch of a small imag, \ of Budha at this place, and said to have been brought from a hill nea Gaya. Jo
It will be observed to differ in some respects from the ordinary form of these idols; it appears to hold a cup for offerings, instead of the right hand resting open on the knee, as generally found, but it is common in § this district, as well as other forms which I propose treating upon on a future occasion. - o
It will be observed that on the right beneath the “Simhasun,” or, throne, is represented a monkey ! on his hind legs, holding an offering in his fore paws; on the left, the same animal appears to be jumping down a well. This I have also seen on a fine figure of Budha at Budh Gaya, given in Buchaman, but badly drawn. Probably Lieut. Latter, who has already offered the Society some useful observations on Budhist emblems,