HUN, VOL. PEOPLE EX REL. CORNELL UNIVERSITY v. DAVENPORT REED v. CRUIKSHANK (Kearney v. Cruikshank, in Court of Appeals.) Judgment of General Term reversed, and judgment ordered for defendant on submission, with costs: 117 N. Y. 95. SLATTERY v. SCHWANNECKE. Order affirmed and judgment absolute against appellants, with costs: 118 N. Y. 543. PAGE. ..... Plaintiff may, within twenty days, stipulate to reduce the judgment in the Orders of General and Special Terms reversed and motion granted, with Judgment affirmed: 118 N. Y. 672. The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decide an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below. The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the General Term does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in, or dissented from, the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court.- [REP. Allen, Bardeen v. 613 Alexander, Cobb v. Alexander, Cole v. Alexander, Humphries v. . 612 612 Associated Lace Makers' Co., Allan v. State Steamship Co., 611 Atlas Steamship Co., Eldridge . 609 Austin, Briggs v. Andrews v. Day Button Co. . 494 . 603 Arkenburgh, Adams v. .607 Arnot v. Bingham . 553 Arnot v. Wright . . 561 Arnow v. Ferguson . 611 604, 610 309 . 612 . Avery, Mandeville v. 607 Axt v. Shankey . 603 610, 611 |