페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

FOREWORD

This is an exact photo-reproduction of an original copy of the

DECISIONS

of the

COMMISSIONER

of

PATENTS

Volume 1911

As a copy of the original is practically unobtainable, this volume is offered to enable law libraries to complete their collection of government publications. The edition has a limited printing.

DENNIS & CO., INC. Buffalo, N. Y.

May, 1948

DECISIONS

OF THE

COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

AND OF THE

UNITED STATES COURTS

IN

PATENT AND TRADE-MARK AND

COPYRIGHT CASES

COMPILED FROM VOLS. 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, AND
173 OF THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT OFFICE DURING THE YEAR

1911

WASHINGTON
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

1912

COMMISSIONER OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT OBBION DURING THE YRAR 1911,

HON. E. B. MOOKE.

FIRST ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

HON. C. C. BILLINGS.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

• HON. F. A. TENNANT.

INDEX OF CASES.

Decisions of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia are indicatod by the letter a; of the United

States Circuit Courts by the letter c; of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia by a star (*) of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals by the letter d; and of the Supreme Court of the Unitod States by two stars (**).]

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

* A. B. Dick Company. Underwood Typewriter Company v....
* A. Leschen & Sons Rope Company v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey.
* A. Leschen & Sons Rope Company v. Broderick & Bascom Rope Company..
* A. Santaella & Company. Justin Seubert, Incorporated, v.........
Acker, Merrall & Condit Company. Ex parte........
d Allis-Chalmers Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co....
# American Lithographic Company, The, v. Werckmeister ......
* American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey. A. Leschen & Sons Rope Com-

pany v.............
Ames v. Lindstrom.......
* Ames. Lindstrom v...
Andrews. Ex parte.............
* Antikamnia Chemical Company. United States of America v.
Armstrong. Ex parte...........
* Armstrong. De Kando v......................
* Artesian Manufacturing Company. In re..
d Ashley v. Samuel C. Tatum Co.......
A tsatt Bros. Ex parte...
Atwood. Ex parte..........
Austin, Nichols & Co. Ex parte......

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

** Baglin. Père Alfredo Luis, Superior General Order Carthusian Monks, v. Cusenier Company .......

552 Baltzer. Swift v. Crawford v.......

114 Barber. Ex parte................ Barber Milling Company. Wm. A. Coombs Milling Company v......

27,58 * Barclay & Barclay. Carter Medicine Company v.....

268 * Barnes. Swartwout v.......

284 Barratt. Lasher v......... * Barrett Manufacturing Company. In re.... * Beecham. Jacobs v...

549 * Billings, Acting Commissioner of Patents, v. Field. Blackburn. Miller v......

194 Blaw. Whitall v. Gillespie v....... Blish Milling Company, The. Ex parte......... Bohn. Ex parte..............

90 * Booth, Booth, and Flynt v. Hanan and Gates

293 d Boss Mfg. Co. v. Thomas....

456 * Braino. Griffith v......

381

285

131

« 이전계속 »