Summo v. Snare & Triest Co. (Sup.). 29 Tribune Ass'n, Roth v. (Sup.). 755 Trimble, Evans v. (Sup.). 333 1022 Tripler v. Fairchild (Sup.). 624 V. Trustee of Supreme Court Library at Buffalo. In re (Sup.). .1146 1102 136 .1145 Trustees of Mission Church in City of New 745 .1146 .1146 Summo v. Snare & Triest Co. (Sup.).....1145 Tableporter v. Schenectady R. Co. (Sup.)1145 Taylor, Clarke v. (Sup.). Taylor, Clarke v. (Sup.). Tennessee Copper Co., Nalewajko v. (Sup.)1130 Terpezone Co. v. Knox Terpezone Co. of United States Trust Co. of New York v. Martindale Real Estate Co., three cases (Sup.) .1147 98 771 .1149 902 Van Den Burgh v. New York (Sup.)......1147 508 Thompson v. Bellas Hess & Co. (Sup.). .1146 .1130 Thorp, Pring v. (Sup.). Thorp, Pring v. (Sup.). .1138 Tiffany, McKaigney v. (Sup.).. .1125 Tomkins, People ex rel. Rodgers v. (Sup.)..1137 .1130 .1146 Van Riper, Di Mombercelli v. (Sup.).. .1107 .1047 ..1147 . 926 496 .1099 Roller .1147 Tighe v. Walters (Sup.). ..1146 Tilton v. Gans (Sup.).. Tilton v. Gans, two cases (Sup.). 981 .1146 Village of East Rochester, Bidwell v. (Sup.)1099 .1147 Timen v. James A. McCreery & Co. (Sup.)1146 Village of Mechanicville, Powers v. (Sup.)..1077 Wabash R. Co., Pollitz v. (Sup.).. .1104 Waldo, People ex rel. Crowley v. (Sup.)..1135 Walker & Co. v. Leeming (Sup.). Walsh-Kahl Const. Co., Cick v. (Sup.). 1147 .1097 647 .1103 (Sup.) White v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co. (Sup.) White, Nitzke v. (Sup.). .1149 .1044 .1123 White, People ex rel. Gegan v. (Gen. Sess.) 887 .1143 293 White Plains Development Co. v. Reed (Sup.) .1149 Walsworth, Pillmore v. (Sup.). 344 Whitmore, Rauber & Vicinus v. Edgerton (Sup.) .1149 Walter v. Farrell, two cases (Sup.) 1147 Whitney-Steen Co., Allen v. (Sup.). 1096 1149 Walton, Chichester v. (Sup.). .1011 Ward v. Briggs (Sup.). .1147 Ward v. Couch (Sup.). .1148 Wickwire Steel Co., Hargraves v. (Sup.). .1116 154 Ward v. Ward (Sup.). .1148 Wiener v. Ross, two cases (Sup.). .1149 Ward, Sothman v. (Sup.). .1144 Wiesbader v. Marks (Sup.). 248 Ward v. Union Trust Co. of New York (Sup.) 237 Wardell, Auburn Draying Co. v. (Sup.)... 475 Wiesnewsky v. E. E. Smith Contracting .1149 Wilbisky v. German Alliance Ins. Co. of .1048 ..1136 Wildner, People v. (Sup.).. .1134 Warden of City Prison, People ex rel. .1135 Willard Parker Hospital, In re, two cases (Sup.) ..1150 Warden of City Prison, People ex rel. Led Willbrandt, People v., two cases (Sup.)..1134 ...1137 Warden of Raymond St. Jail, People ex rel. Hendrick v. (Sup.).. .1136 Warfield, Carpenter v. (Sup.) Warfield, Carpenter v. (Sup.). Warren v. Albro (Sup.). .1102 .1103 ..1148 Wm. A. White & Sons, Levin v. (Sup.)..1123 .1106 Wm. H. Geer Co. v. J. W. Matthews & Co. Wasser, India Wharf Brewing Co. v. (Sup.)1138 Wm. L. Crow Const. Co. v. Auerbach Watson, Leerburger v. (Sup.)... Watts v. Doull-Miller Co. (Sup.). .1122 .1148 (Sup.) .1150 W. Burton & Co., Burton v. (Sup.). .1149 William S. Merrell Chemical Co. v. Root (City Ct. N. Y.).. 368 Webb, Vandyke v. (Sup.). 508 Weber v. Donnelly (Sup.). .1148 Weber v. Interborough Rapid Transit (Sup.) Weedsport Electric Light Co. v. Weedsport (Sup.).... Williams, People v. (Sup.).. 1134 .1148 Williams v. Trecartin (Sup.). 340 Weiden, Baff v. (Sup.). 979 Weidmann v. Borden (Sup.).. .1148 Weinberg v. Grand Union Paper Co. (Sup.)1148 Weinberg v. Smith (Sup.)... Weisbader v. Marks (Sup.). .1030 Williamsburg Iron & Wire Works v. Kuhn .1148 (Sup.) .1150 Weiss v. Rosen (Sup.). Weitkus, Schmitz v. (Sup.). Wells v. Eckerson (Sup.). .1148 Wills, Inc., Duffey v. (Sup.). .1108 .1121 .1150 Wells v. Haff (Sup.). .1148 Windsor Realty Co. v. Reddy (Sup.). ..1150 Werbelovsky, Epstein v. (Sup.). Werle, Rosen v. Sup.)... Werner, In re (Sup.). Wesel, Ott v. (Sup.).. Wesley v. New York (Sup.).. THE NEW YORK SUPPLEMENT VOLUME 152 (89 Misc. Rep. 431) JENNINGS v. LINCOLN NAT. BANK. (Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department. March 17, 1915.) 1. BANKS AND BANKING 154-DEPOSITS-SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE. In an action by a depositor against the bank, evidence held insufficient to sustain a verdict finding that the entries of two separate deposits of the same amount on the passbook and duplicate slips of the depositor and on the loose-leaf ledger of the bank were erroneous, and that there was only one deposit of that amount. [Ed. Note. For other cases, see Banks and Banking, Cent. Dig. §§ 502512, 515, 516, 518-533; Dec. Dig. 154.] 2. WITNESSES 255-REFRESHING MEMORY-PERSONAL KNOWledge. It was error for the court to permit the assistant cashier of a bank, who had stated that he had no personal knowledge of the transaction, to testify, after refreshing his recollection by the inspection of a book in which he did not make the entries, that plaintiff had not made a deposit in the bank on a certain day, as she claimed. [Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Witnesses, Cent. Dig. §§ 874-890; Dec. Dig. 255.] 3. APPEAL AND ERROR 1050-PREJUDICIAL ERROR-ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE. The admission of that evidence was highly prejudicial, where the deposit claimed by plaintiff had been entered in her passbook and on the bank loose-leaf ledger, and the bank, though claiming those entries to have been erroneously made, did not produce the witnesses who made them to explain the error. [Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 1068, 1069, 4153-4157, 4166; Dec. Dig. 1050.] Bijur, J., dissenting. Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by Mary W. Jennings against the Lincoln National Bank. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Motion for reargument upon the appeal granted, judgment reversed, and new trial ordered. Argued January term, 1915, before GUY, BIJUR, and GAVEGAN, JJ. Charles A. Taussig, of New York City, for appellant. Dittenhoefer, Gerber & James, of New York City, for respondent. For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes 152 N.Y.S.-1 |