페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

In re PARK et al. (Supreme Court, Appel- 1 ion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted Orde 3 late Division, First Department. March 12, filed. See, also, 161 App. Div. 927, 146 N. I. 1915.) In the matter of Annie G. Park and Supp. 1104. others.

PER CURIAM. Decree affirmed, with costs. Order filed.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. COPETTA, Appel SCOTT and HOTCHKISS, JJ., dissent.

lant. (Supreme Court, Áppellate Division, ond Department. March 13, 1915.) Prveis!

by the l'eople of the State of New York aquest In re PATCHIINAKIS. (Supreme Court, Frank Copetta. No opinion. Judgment of estAppellate Division, First Department. April viction of the County Court of hings Coat 16, 1915.) In the matter of Emmanuel M. atlirmed. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 1135. Patchinakis. No opinion. Order atarmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.

PEOPLE v. DE BELLIS. (Supreme Courts

Appellate Division, First Departinent. Ap.1 PEOPLE, Respondent, v. BARCLAY, Ap-16, 1915.). Proceeding by the Peopce of 1 pellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, State of New York against John De Beds First Department. May 7, 1915.). Proceeding No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal in by the People of the State of New York against Misc. Rep. 459, 150 N. Y. Supp. lott) granted, Robert L. Barclay. J. O'Neill, of New York Order tiled. City, for appellant. R. S. Johnstone, of New York City, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed. Order filed.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. DE MOO, appes

lant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First PEOPLE, Respondent, v. BLUTIER, Appel- Department. Jarch 26, 1915.) Proceeding to lant, et al. (Supreme Court, Appellate Divi- the People of the State of New York azazi sion, First Department. April 9, 1915.) Pro- Alexander de Moo. M. Schneiderman, of New ceeding by the People of the State of New York York City, for appellant. L. Fabricant, of New against Andy Blutier, impleaded with others. York City, for the People. No opinion. Jude C. B. F. Barra, of New York City, for appel- ment allirmed. Order bled. lant. L. Fabricant, of New York City, for the L'eople. No opinion. Judgment attirmed. Order filed.

L’EOPLE, Respondent, V. D'LEEN, Appelo lant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Sector

ond Department. April 23, 1915.) Proceeding PEOPLE, Respondent, v. BRIGHT, Appel- by the People of the State of New York against lant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Louis D'Leen. No opinion. Judgment of conFirst Department. May 7, 1915.) Proceeding viction of the Court of Special Sessions atirtie by the People of the State of New York against Samuel Bright. J. L. Curtis, of New York City, for appellant. L. Fabricant, of New York pellate Division, First Department. Maresme

PEOPLE v. DORTIIY. (Supreme Court

, Ap City, for the People. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed. Order filed.

1915.) Proceeding by the l'eople of the State of New York against John F. Dorthy. No ope"

ion. Motion granted. Order filed. PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CEPRIANO, Appellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. March 5, 1915.) Proceed PEOPLE v. EGAN. (Supreme Court, Appeling by the People of the State of New York late Division, First Department. April 3. against Cilo Cepriano.

1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State PER CURIAM. Motion to dismiss appeal of New York against Harry A. Egan. No opisdenied, without prejudice to a renewal thereof ion, Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Order when the appeal is brought on for a hearing,

filed. and without prejudice to a new motion to disiniss unless said appeal is diligently prosecuted. Whether the judgment of conviction may be re

PEOPLE v. FIORE. (Supreme Court, A? viewed under the notice of appeal which has pellate Division, First Department. April 16 been served will be then considered.

1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against Vincenzo Fiore. No opir

ion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Order PEOPLE v. CISZENSKI. (Supreme Court, filed. Appellate Division, First Department. April 16, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against Edward Ciszenski, No opinion. Motion to dismiss ap- SAME-v. OHLSON. (Supreme Court, appela

PEOPLE V. ISER. alias, etc. peal granted. Order filed.

late Division, First Department. April 1, 1914)

Proceedings by the People of the State of der PEOPLE v. CLEARY. (Supreme Court, Ap-York against Morris Iser, against Agnes Smith, pellate Division, First Department. April 16, and against Chas. A. Ohlson. No opinion. No 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State | tions granted, unless appellants comply with of New York against William Cleary. No opin-' terms stated in orders. Orders filed.

SAME V. SMITH.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. KARDACH, Ap-, PEOPLE, Respondent, v. MOYER et al., Appellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, pellants. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. March 26, 1915.) Pro- First Department. April 9, 1915.) Proceeding ceeding by the People of the State of New York by the People of the State of New York against against Peter Kardach.

John H. Moyer and another. 1. L. Broadwin, PER CURIAM. Judgment of conviction and of New York City, for appellants. L. Fabriorder affirmed.

cant, of New York City, for respondent. No

opinion. Judgment atfirmed. Order filed. LAMBERT, J., dissents, upon the ground that the admission of the evidence of the impli- : PEOPLE, Respondent, V. NOVICK, Appel

cation of the defendant in independent burgla- lant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, SecSpin ries in no wise connected with the property men- ond Department. April 16, 1915.) Proceeding

tioned in the indictment was prejudicial error by the People of the State of New York against requiring a reversal. See People v. Doty, 175 Sarah Novick. N. Y. 164, 67 N. E. 303.

PER CURIAM. Judgment of conviction of

the Court of Special Sessions affirmed. PEOPLE, Respondent, v. KIRSCHMAN, Ap- BURR, J., not voting. pellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department. April 30, 1915.) Proceed- PEOPLE, Respondent, v. O'BRIEN, Appeling by the People of the State of New York lant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First against Jacob Kirschman. G. A. Teitelbaum, Department. May 7, 1915.) Proceeding by of New York City, for appellant. R. S. John the People of the State of New York against stone, of New York City, for respondent. No James J. O'Brien. J. E. Wilkinson, of New opinion. Judgment affirmed. Order filed. York City, for appellant. L. Fabricant, of

i New York City, for the People. No opinion. PEOPLE, Respondents, v. LASTER, Appel- Judgment alirmed. Order filed. lant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Sec- PEOPLE, Respondent, v. PARK ROW ond Department. April 9, 1915.), Proceeding REALTY 'CO., Appellant, et al. (Supreme by the People of the State of New York against Court, Appellate Division,' Third Department. James Laster. No opinion. Judgment of con- May 5, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of viction of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed. the State of New York against the l'ark Row

Realty Company, impleaded with others. No PEOPLE v. LEVINE. (Supreme Court, Ap- opinion. Interlocutory judgment (in 88 Misc. pellate Division, First Department. April 1, Rep. 254, 151 N, Y. Supp. $04) atlirmed, with 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State costs, with usual leave to defendant to withof New York against Harry Levine, alias Beck- draw demurrer, and answer upon payment of erman, in which Benjamin Cohen appeals. C. costs at Special Term and in this court. G. F. Wahle, of New York City, for appellant. R. H. Mitchell, of New York City, for respond- PEOPLE v. RIBLE. (Supreme Court, Apent. No opinion. Order aflirmed. Order filed. pellate Division, First Department. April 30,

1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State PEOPLE, Respondent, v. LICANZIATO, Ap- of New York against Adolph Rible. No opina pellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, ion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless First Department. April 23, 1915.) Proceed

appellant comply with terms stated in order.

Order filed. ing by the People of the State of New York against Carmine Licanziato. A. D. Pape, of New York City, for appellant. S. L. Richter, of New York City, for respondent. No opinion. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second De

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ROMA, Appellant. Judgment aflirmed. Order filed.

partment. March 5, 1915.) Proceeding by the

People of the State of New York against PEOPLE v. LUTZ. (Supreme Court, Appel- Charles Roma. No opinion. Judgment of conlate Division, First Department. April 16, viction of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State of by default. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 1136. New York against Warren s Lutz. No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. pellate Division, First Department. April 1,

PEOPLE v. SANDOR. (Supreme Court, ApOrder filed.

1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State

of New York against Maurice J. Sandor. No PEOPLE, Respondent, v. MILLER. SAME opinion. Motion granted, unless appellant stipv. BROWN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate ulates to vacate certificate of reasonable doubt Division, First Department. March' 19, 1915.) and serve the printed case and place case on Proceedings by the People of the State of New calendar so that same can be heard on April York against Joseph Miller and against Harry 13, 1915. Settle order on notice. Brown and another.

N. Tolk, of New York City, for appellants. S. L. Richter, of New PEOPLE, Respondent, v. SCHAEFER, ApYork City, for the People. No opinion. Or- pellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, ders affirmed.

Orders filed. See, also, 151 N. First Department. April 30, 1915.) Proceed Y. Supp. 1135, 1136.

ing by the People of the State of New York

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

against Harry Schaefer. C. G. F. Wahle, of man and Augusta Stadleman.

No opinion.
New York City, for appellant. L. Fabricant, Judgment of conviction of the County Court of
of New York City, for the People. No opinion. Dutchess County affirmed.
Judgment and order affirmed. Order filed.

PEOPLE v. STAGG. (Supreme Court, dp

pellate Division, First Department. April 10, PEOPLE v. SCHIFF et al. (Supreme Court, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State Appellate Division, First Department. April of New York against Sylvester Stagg: No 16, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the opinion, Motion to dismiss appeal granted, uno State of New York against Julius L. Schiff less appellant complies with terms stated in or and another. No opinion. Motion to dismiss der. Order filed. appeal granted. Order filed.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. SYLVESTRO, ApPEOPLE v. SCHOCH. (Supreme Court, Ap- First Department. March 26, 1915.) Proceed

pellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Divisiva,
pellate Division, First Department. April 1,
1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State ing by the People of the State of New York
of New York against Will E. Schoch. No opin- New York City, for appellant. R. S. Joht:

against Angelino Sylvestro. H. J. Block, oi
ion. Motion granted, unless appellant complies
with terms stated in order. Order filed. See, stone, of New York City, for the People. No
also, 152 N. Y. Supp. 1134.

opinion. Judgment affirmed. Order filed. See,

also, 163 App. Div. 895, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1133 PEOPLE, Respondent, y, SCHOCH, Appel

PEOPLE v. UEBELMESSER. (Supreme lant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Court, Appellate Division, First Department, Department. May 7, 1915.) Proceeding by the April 16, 1915.) Proceeding by the l'eople of People of the State of New York against Will the State of New York against Charles R. le E. Schoch. C. L. Jordan, of New York City, belmesser. No opinion. Motion to dismiss apfor appellant. R. S. Jolinstone, of New York peal granted, unless appellant complies with City, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment

terms stated in order. Order filed.
atlirmed. Orders tiled. See, also, 152 N. Y.
Supp. 1134.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. VON SCHLEN
CZYNSKI,'Appellant. (Supreme Court, Appel

late Division, First Department. January 29, PEOPLE. V. SERAGO. (Supreme Court, Ap- | 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State pellate Division, First Department. April 1, of New York against Josef von Schlenczynski 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State II. G. Gray, of New York City, for appellant of New York against one Serago. No opinion. S. L. Richter, of New York City, for the PeoMotion granted. Order filed.

ple. No opinion. Judgment and order attirmed.
Order filed.

PE larts

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

PEOPLE V. SINNOTT. (Supreme Court, PEOPLE v. WILDNER. (Supreme Court,
Appellate Division, First Department. April Appellate Division, First Department. April 1.
10, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the 1915.) Proceeding' by the People of the State
State of New York against Daniel Sinnott. No of New York against Harry Wildner

. No opíz:
opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted. ion. Motion granted. Order filed.
Order filed.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WILLBRANDT,
PEOPLE. Respondent, v. SMITH, Appellant. Second Department. March 3, 1915.) Procery

Appellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division,
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First De- ing by the People of the State of New Work
partment.

May 7, 1915.) Proceeding by the againSelma Willbrandt. No opinion. JudaPeople of the State of New York against Agnes ment of conviction of the Court of Special Smith. c. L. Jordan, of New York City, for sions affirmed by default. See, also, 151 N. I. appellant. S. L. Richter, of New York City, Supp. 1137. for the People.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed. Order filed. See, also, 152 N. Y. Supp. 1132.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WILLBRANDT,
Appellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division,

Second Department. March 5, 1915.) Proved
PEOPLE v. SPORANZA. (Supreme Court, ing by the People of the State of New York
Appellate Division, First Department. April against William Willbrandt. No opinion. Judz
30, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the ment of conviction of the Court of Special Se
State of New York against James Sporanza. sions affirmed by default. See, also, 151 N. I.
No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Supp. 1137.
Order filed.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WILLIAMS, A
PEOPLE v. STADLEMAN et al. (Supreme Second Department. April 9, 1915.) Propos

pellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. ing by the People of the State of New Jork April 23, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of against Bertha Williams. No opinion. Motico the State of New York against John G. Stadle-'granted,

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]

1 ST Dry

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. XAVIER, Appel-, partment. March 5, 1915.) Proceeding by the lant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Sec- People of the State of New York, on the relaond Department. March 5, 1915.) Proceeding tion of Jane L. Brunner, against Lewis M. by the People of the State of New York against Swasey, Sheriff of Kings County, and another. Frank Xavier. No opinion. Motion disinissed, PER CURIAM. The commitment was not as made without lawful authority Matter re- void for defects in form. The court which adferred to the district attorney of Westchester judged the relator in contenipt had full juriscounty.

diction. If it made an error in its determination, the remedy was by appeal. The writ of

habeas corpus is not one of review. Order afPEOPLE ex rel. ABBRUZZEZE v. WOODS, firmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Police Com’r. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. March 26, 1915.) PEOPLE ex rel. BURKE V. HOFFMAN et Proceeding by the People of the State of New al. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third York, on the relation of Dominick Abbruzzeze, Department. May 5, 1915.) Proceeding by the against Arthur Woods, as Police Commissioner People of the State of New York, on the relaof the City of New York. No opinion. De- tion of John Burke, for a writ of certiorari to termination confirmed, and writ dismissed, with Harry N. Hoffman and others, Police Commis$50 costs and disbursements.

sioners of the City of Elmira, constituting the

Board of Police Commissioners for said city, PEOPLE ex rel. APPLEBY et al., Appel- and to the Board of Police Commissioners of lants, v. POLK, Corp. Counsel, Respondent. said city of Elmira. No opinion. Determina(Supreme Court, 'Appellate Division, First De- tion (150 N. Y. Supp. 1) unanimously confirmed, partment. March 19, 1915.) Proceeding by the without costs. People of the State of New York, on the relation of Edgar S. Appleby and another, against PEOPLE ex rel. COOPER, Appellant, v. J. Frank L. Polk, as Corporation. Counsel, etc. B. GREENHUT CO. et al., Respondents. (SuB. Moore, of New York City, for appellants. preme Court, Appellate Division, First DepartJ. F. O'Brien, of New York City, for respond- ment. March 19, 1915.) Proceeding by the ent. No opinion, Order affirmed, with $10 People of the State of New York, on the relacosts and disbursements. Order filed. See, also, tion of Winifred B. Cooper, against the J. B. 152 N. Y. Supp. 1135.

Greenhut Company and another. J. A, Arnold,

of New York City, for appellant. B. G. PasPEOPLE ex rel. APPLEBY et al, v. POLK. kus, of New York City, for respondents. No (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First De- opinion. Order affirmed, with: $10 costs and partment. April 16, 1915.) Proceeding by the disbursements. Order filed. People of the State of New York, on the relation of Edgar S. Appleby and others, against Frank PEOPLE ex rel. COSTA, Appellant, L. Polk, etc. No opinion. Motion denied, with POLK, Respondent. (Supreme Court, Appel$10 costs, Order filed. See, also, 152 N. Y. late Division, First Department. April 30, Supp. 1135.

1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Jacinto Costa,

against Frank L. Polk, as Corporation Counsel, PEOPLE ex rel. BOICE v. WOODS. (Su-etc. 1. T. Flatto, of New York City, for appelpreme Court, Appellate Division, First Depart. lant. E. C. Kindleberger, of New York City, ment. March 26, 1915.) Proceeding by the for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, People of the State of New York, on the re- with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed. lation of Alvin Boice, against Arthur Woods, as Commissioner. Grant & Rouss, of New York

PEOPLE ex rel, CROWLEY V. WALDO. City, for relator. T. Farley, of New York City, (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Defor respondent. No opinion. Writ dismissed, partment March 19, 1915.) Proceeding by the and proceeding affirmed, with $50 costs and dis- People of the State of New York, on the relabursements. Order Giled.

tion of John Crowley, against Rhinelander

Waldo. No opinion. Motion granted, without PEOPLE ex rel. BOSKOWITZ, Respondent, costs. Order filed. V. PURDY et al., Com’rs, Appellants. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First 'Depart

PEOPLE ex rel. DAVANZA V. WARDEN ment. April 1, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation OF CITY PRISON. (Supreme Court. Appel

March 5, of Adolph Boskowitz, against Lawson Purdy 1915. Proceeding by the People of the State

late Division, Second Department. an others, as Commissioners. C. A. Peters, of New York City, for appellants. L. B. Cohen, of New York, on the relation of Louis Davan. of New York City, for respondent.

za, against the Warden of the City Prison. No

opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted. PER CURIAM, Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.

PEOPLE ex rel. DAVIS, Appellant, v. CLARKE and DOWLING, JJ., dissent,

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF

NEW YORK, Respondent. (Supreme Court, PEOPLE ex rel. BRUNNER, Appellant, v. Appellate Division, Second Department. March SWASEY, Sheriff, et al., Respondents. (Su-19, 1915.). Proceeding by the People of the preme Court, Appellate Division, Second De- State of New York, on the relation of James

V.

ment.

Davis against the Board of Education of the for appellant. L. H. Hahlo, Asst. Corp. CocaCity of New York.

sel, of New York City, for responuots. PER CURIAM. We think the relator's rem- opinion. Reargument (of 152 N. Y. Supp. edy is by writ of certiorari to review the action ordered. of the board of education. Therefore the order denying the motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus is afirmed as a matter of law, and

PEOPLE ex rel. KEENAN v. MCKAY, (Se the order denying the motion for resettlement preme Court, Appellate Division, First Departis afirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. People of the State of New York, on the re

Proceeding by the PEOPLE ex rel. FARLEY v. Woods. tion of James Keenan against Douglas I. 34 (Supreme Court, Appellante Division, First De: York City, for relator. T. Farley, oi Veli

Kay, as Commissioner. V. E. Murphy, of 14 partment. March 12, 1915.) the People of the State of New York, on the City, for respondent. No opinion. Writ cu relation of Arthur J. Farley, against Arthur missed. and proceeding affirmed, with $3003 Woods, as commissioner. J. T. Mahoney, of

and disbursements. Order filed. New York City, for relator. T. Farley, of New York City, for respondent. No opinion. Writ

PEOPLE ex rel KROHN, Appellant, T. disinissed, and proceeding affirmed, with $50 WARDEN AND KEEPER OF CITY IRS costs and disbursemenis Order filed.

ON et al., Respondents. (Supreme Court. Ar pellate Division, Second Department Apri

30, 1915.) PEOPLE ex rel. GLEASON v. WALDO,

Proceeding by the l'eople of the Police Com’r.” (Supreme Court, Appellate Divi: Krohn, against the Warden and Keeper of C.

State of New York, on the relation of Ja sion, Second Department. April 23, 1915.) Prison and another. Proceeding by the People of the State of New firmied, on authority of People v. Charles

No opinion. Onder a York, on the relation of Edward J.. Gleason, Schweinler Press, 108 N. E. 639, decided by against Rhinelander Waldo, as Police Com the Court of Appeals March 26, 1915. missioner, etc. No opinion. Determination confirmed, and writ dismissed, with $50 costs and disbursements.

PEOPLE ex rel. LA CHICOTTE, Aprel

lant, v. O'KEEFE, Com'r, Respondent. Sa PEOPLE ex rel. HENDRICK v. WARDEN preme Court, Appellate Division, First Dezult

January 22, 1915.) Proceeding by the OF RAYMOND ST. JAIL el al. (Supreme People of the State of New York, on the Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. lation of Henry A. La Chicotte, against ar April 23, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of thur J. O'Keefe, as Commissioner, etc.

No the State of New York, on the relation of opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granit Charles C. Hendrick, against the Warden of with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 132 X Raymond Street Jail and others. No opinion. Y. Supp. 1136. Order affirmed, without costs. PEOPLE ex rel. HENNINGER v. WALDO,

PEOPLE ex rel. LA CIIICOTTE, Appel. Police Com'r, Respondent. (Supreme Court,

lant, v. O'KEEFE, Respondent. (Supreme Appellate Division, Second Department.

March Court, Appellate Division. First Department 5, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of the State March 26, 1915.) Proceeding by the People of of New York, on the relation of Louis J. Hen- the State of New York, on the relation of 11:00 ninger, against Rhinelander Waldo, as Police ry A. La Chicotte, against Arthur J. O'Kecte Commissioner, etc. No opinion. Motion for as Commissioner, etc. E. C. Kindleberger, ef reargument (in 151 N. Y. Supp. 506) denied, New York City, for respondent. No oririnn without costs.

Order aflirmed, with $10 costs and disburse ments. Order filed. See, also, SO Misc. Her

344, 141 N, Y. Supp. 82; 152 N. Y. Supp. 1136 PEOPLE ex rel. HOOK V. WALDO, Com'r. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department. January 22, 1915.) Proceeding by

PEOPLE ex rel. LITTLE V. JOHNSON et the l'eople of the State of New York, on the al. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First relation of Joseph P. Hook, against Rhinelan

Department. April 1, 1915.) Proceeding by der Waldo, as Commissioner. Grant & Rouss, the People of the State of New York, on the re of New York City, for relator. T. Farley, of lation of Jos. J. Little, against Jos. Johnson New York City, for respondent. No opinion. and others. No opinion. Motion granted, witbWrit dismissed, and proceeding affirmed, with

out costs. Order filed. '$50 costs and disbursements. Order filed.

PEOPLE ex rel. McCADDEN v. WOODS, PEOPLE ex rel. IMPORTERS' & TRAD- | Police Com'r. (Supreme Court, Appellate Di ERS' NAT. BANK, Appellant, v. PURDY et vision, Second Department. March 19, 191.1) al., Respondents. (Supreme Court, Appellate Proceeding by the People of the State of les Division, First Department. January 22, 1915.) York, on the relation of George A. McCadden, Proceeding by the People of the State of New against Arthur Woods, as Police CommissionYork, on the relation of the Importers' & Trad er of the City of New York. No opinion. De ers' National Bank, against Lawson Purdy and termination confirmed, and writ dismissed, witbothers. Kalish & Palmer, of New York City, '$50 costs and disbursements.

« 이전계속 »