ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

Summo v. Snare & Triest Co. (Sup.).

29

Tribune Ass'n, Roth v. (Sup.).

755

Trimble, Evans v. (Sup.).

333

1022

Tripler v. Fairchild (Sup.).

624

V.

Trustee of Supreme Court Library at Buffalo. In re (Sup.).

.1146

1102

136

.1145

Trustees of Mission Church in City of New
York v. Ridley (Sup.)..
Tuohey v. McGratty (Sup.).
Twombly v. New York (Sup.)...

745

.1146

.1146

Summo v. Snare & Triest Co. (Sup.).....1145
Sun Ins. Office, Robinson v. (Sup.).
Superintendent of Banks of State of New
York, New Belgravia Realty Co.
(Sup.)
Supreme Court, I. O. F., McClement v.
(Sup.)
Suss v. Farley (Sup.).
Sussman v. Hershfield, two cases (Sup.)..1145
Swasey, People ex rel. Brunner v. (Sup.). .1135
Swirson, De Hunt v. (Sup.).
.1106
Sylvestro, People v. (Sup.)..
.1134

Tableporter v. Schenectady R. Co. (Sup.)1145
Talcott, Spain v. (Sup.)..
Tannenbaum, Galinger v. (Sup.).
Tatum v. Farson (Sup.)...

Taylor, Clarke v. (Sup.).

Taylor, Clarke v. (Sup.).

[blocks in formation]

Tennessee Copper Co., Nalewajko v. (Sup.)1130
Terminal Station Commission of City of
Buffalo, In re (Sup.)..

Terpezone Co. v. Knox Terpezone Co. of
America (Sup.)..
1145
Terryberry v. Lehigh Val. R. Co. (Sup.).. 450
Terry & Tench Co., Nusbaum v. (Sup.)..1130
Terry & Tench Co., Wissbach v. (Sup.)....1150
Tevis, Rambaut v. (Sup.)..
Thatcher & Son, Raymond Concrete Pile
Co. v. (Sup.)..

[blocks in formation]

United States Trust Co. of New York v. Martindale Real Estate Co., three cases (Sup.)

.1147

98 771

.1149

[blocks in formation]

902

Van Den Burgh v. New York (Sup.)......1147
Vandyke v. Webb (Sup.)...

508

Thompson v. Bellas Hess & Co. (Sup.).
Thorn, Murtfeldt v. (Sup.).

.1146

.1130

Thorp, Pring v. (Sup.).

Thorp, Pring v. (Sup.).

.1138

Tiffany, McKaigney v. (Sup.)..

.1125

Tomkins, People ex rel. Rodgers v. (Sup.)..1137
Tompkins, American Convex Co. v. (Sup.)..1055
Tompkins, Inc., Nelson v. (Sup.).
Tielenius v. Hollender (Sup.).

.1130

.1146

Van Riper, Di Mombercelli v. (Sup.)..
Van Syckle v. Van Syckle (Sup.)..
469 Van Tuyl v. Ammerman (Sup.).
Van Wagenen, Williams v. (Sup.).
Vassie, Commissioner of Public Charities
of City of New York v. (Sup.)..
Venner, Bessler v. (Sup.)..
Verderber V. Globe Antifriction
Bearing Co. (Sup.)....

.1107

.1047

..1147

. 926

496

.1099

Roller

.1147

Tighe v. Walters (Sup.).

..1146

Tilton v. Gans (Sup.)..

Tilton v. Gans, two cases (Sup.).

981 .1146

Village of East Rochester, Bidwell v. (Sup.)1099
Village of Fredonia v. Fredonia Natural
Gaslight Co. (Sup.)..

.1147

Timen v. James A. McCreery & Co. (Sup.)1146

Village of Mechanicville, Powers v. (Sup.)..1077

[blocks in formation]

Wabash R. Co., Pollitz v. (Sup.)..
Wainwright, Columbia-Knickerbocker Trust
Co. v. (Sup.)....

.1104

Waldo, People ex rel. Crowley v. (Sup.)..1135
Waldo, People ex rel. Gleason v. (Sup.)..1136
Waldo, People ex rel. Henninger v. (Sup.)..1136
Waldo, People ex rel. Hook v. (Sup.)..1136
Waldorf Astoria Hotel Co., Gage v. (Sup.).. 1019
Walker, In re (Sup.).

Walker & Co. v. Leeming (Sup.).
Wall v. Merkert (Sup.).
Wallace, Hollender v. (Sup.).

Walsh-Kahl Const. Co., Cick v. (Sup.).

1147

.1097

647 .1103

(Sup.) White v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co. (Sup.) White, Nitzke v. (Sup.).

.1149 .1044

.1123

White, People ex rel. Gegan v. (Gen. Sess.) 887
White & Sons, Levin v. (Sup.).
Whitehill v. Hartman Const. Co. (Sup.)..1149
Whitman, Simpson v. (Sup.).

.1143

293 White Plains Development Co. v. Reed (Sup.)

.1149

Walsworth, Pillmore v. (Sup.).

344

Whitmore, Rauber & Vicinus v. Edgerton (Sup.)

.1149

Walter v. Farrell, two cases (Sup.)

[blocks in formation]

1147 Whitney-Steen Co., Allen v. (Sup.).
Wick v. Boyd (Sup.).

1096

1149

Walton, Chichester v. (Sup.).

.1011

Ward v. Briggs (Sup.).

.1147

Ward v. Couch (Sup.).

.1148

Wickwire Steel Co., Hargraves v. (Sup.). .1116
Wien v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co.
(Sup.)

154

Ward v. Ward (Sup.).

.1148

Wiener v. Ross, two cases (Sup.).

.1149

Ward, Sothman v. (Sup.).

.1144

Wiesbader v. Marks (Sup.).

248

Ward v. Union Trust Co. of New York (Sup.)

237

Wardell, Auburn Draying Co. v. (Sup.)... 475
Warden and Keeper of City Prison, People
ex rel. Krohn v. (Sup.)..

Wiesnewsky v. E. E. Smith Contracting
Co. (Sup.)

.1149

Wilbisky v. German Alliance Ins. Co. of
New York (Sup.).

.1048

..1136

Wildner, People v. (Sup.)..

.1134

Warden of City Prison, People ex rel.
Davanza v. (Sup.)

.1135

Willard Parker Hospital, In re, two cases (Sup.)

..1150

Warden of City Prison, People ex rel. Led

[blocks in formation]

Willbrandt, People v., two cases (Sup.)..1134
Willets, Pierce v. (Sup.).

...1137

Warden of Raymond St. Jail, People ex rel.

Hendrick v. (Sup.)..

.1136

Warfield, Carpenter v. (Sup.)

Warfield, Carpenter v. (Sup.).

Warren v. Albro (Sup.).

.1102 .1103 ..1148

Wm. A. White & Sons, Levin v. (Sup.)..1123
Wm. H. Davidow Sons Co., Daversa v.
(Sup.)

.1106

Wm. H. Geer Co. v. J. W. Matthews & Co.

[blocks in formation]

Wasser, India Wharf Brewing Co. v.

(Sup.)1138 Wm. L. Crow Const. Co. v.

Auerbach

Watson, Leerburger v. (Sup.)...

Watts v. Doull-Miller Co. (Sup.).

.1122 .1148

(Sup.)

.1150

W. Burton & Co., Burton v. (Sup.).

.1149

William S. Merrell Chemical Co. v. Root (City Ct. N. Y.)..

368

Webb, Vandyke v. (Sup.).

508

Weber v. Donnelly (Sup.).

.1148

[blocks in formation]

Weber v. Interborough Rapid Transit (Sup.)

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Weedsport Electric Light Co. v. Weedsport (Sup.)....

Williams, People v. (Sup.)..

1134

.1148

Williams v. Trecartin (Sup.).

340

Weiden, Baff v. (Sup.).

979

Weidmann v. Borden (Sup.)..

.1148

Weinberg v. Grand Union Paper Co. (Sup.)1148

[blocks in formation]

Weinberg v. Smith (Sup.)...

Weisbader v. Marks (Sup.).

.1030 Williamsburg Iron & Wire Works v. Kuhn .1148 (Sup.)

.1150

Weiss v. Rosen (Sup.).

Weitkus, Schmitz v. (Sup.).

Wells v. Eckerson (Sup.).

.1148 Wills, Inc., Duffey v. (Sup.).
.1141 Willsea Works, Kelly v. (Sup.).
.1148 Wilson v. Wilson (Sup.)..

.1108

.1121

.1150

Wells v. Haff (Sup.).

.1148 Windsor Realty Co. v. Reddy (Sup.). ..1150

Werbelovsky, Epstein v. (Sup.).

Werle, Rosen v. Sup.)...

Werner, In re (Sup.).

Wesel, Ott v. (Sup.)..

Wesley v. New York (Sup.)..

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

See End of Index for Tables of New York Supplement Cases in Other Reports +

THE

NEW YORK SUPPLEMENT

VOLUME 152

(89 Misc. Rep. 431)

JENNINGS v. LINCOLN NAT. BANK. (Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department. March 17, 1915.) 1. BANKS AND BANKING 154-DEPOSITS-SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE.

In an action by a depositor against the bank, evidence held insufficient to sustain a verdict finding that the entries of two separate deposits of the same amount on the passbook and duplicate slips of the depositor and on the loose-leaf ledger of the bank were erroneous, and that there was only one deposit of that amount.

[Ed. Note. For other cases, see Banks and Banking, Cent. Dig. §§ 502512, 515, 516, 518-533; Dec. Dig. 154.]

2. WITNESSES 255-REFRESHING MEMORY-PERSONAL KNOWledge.

It was error for the court to permit the assistant cashier of a bank, who had stated that he had no personal knowledge of the transaction, to testify, after refreshing his recollection by the inspection of a book in which he did not make the entries, that plaintiff had not made a deposit in the bank on a certain day, as she claimed.

[Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Witnesses, Cent. Dig. §§ 874-890; Dec. Dig. 255.]

3. APPEAL AND ERROR 1050-PREJUDICIAL ERROR-ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE. The admission of that evidence was highly prejudicial, where the deposit claimed by plaintiff had been entered in her passbook and on the bank loose-leaf ledger, and the bank, though claiming those entries to have been erroneously made, did not produce the witnesses who made them to explain the error.

[Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 1068, 1069, 4153-4157, 4166; Dec. Dig. 1050.]

Bijur, J., dissenting.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District.

Action by Mary W. Jennings against the Lincoln National Bank. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Motion for reargument upon the appeal granted, judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.

Argued January term, 1915, before GUY, BIJUR, and GAVEGAN, JJ.

Charles A. Taussig, of New York City, for appellant.

Dittenhoefer, Gerber & James, of New York City, for respondent.

For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes 152 N.Y.S.-1

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »