페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

a volunteer of this kind might seriously mislead one
who relied upon him, and who would otherwise have
employed some one else for a compensation, and thus
have been sure of the service he required.

S1010. A gratuitous employee, who accepts a writ- · 1a.
ten power of attorney, must act under it so long as
it remains in force, or until he gives notice to his em-
ployer that he will not do so.

Code La., 2971. This provision is new to the common
law: but is founded upon justice. By retaining the
instrument, the attorney keeps in his hands a power
which he may use to the detriment of his principal,
and misleads the latter into the belief that he will use
it for his benefit.

S1011. One who, for a good consideration, agrees to serve another, must perform the service, and must use ordinary care and diligence therein, so long as he is thus employed.

Story on Bailm., §§ 398, 399, 429, 442. Ordinary care
and diligence are all that are required (Johnson v. N. Y.
Central R. R., 31 Barb., 196; Ackley v. Kellogg, 8
Cow., 223; Brown v. Denison, 2 Wend., 593; Platt v.
Hibbard, 7 Cow., 497).

S1012. One who is employed at his own request to do that which is more for his own advantage than for that of his employer, must use great care and diligence therein to protect the interest of the latter.

S1013. A contract to render personal service, other than a contract of apprenticeship under sections 140, 143, or 149, cannot be enforced against the employee beyond the term of two years from the commencement of service under it, but if the employee voluntarily continues his service under it beyond that time, the contract may be referred to as affording a presumptive measure of the compensation.

This section is new.

Duties of for reward.

employee

Duties of for his own

employee

benefit.

Contracts limited to

for service

two years.

must obey

S1014. An employee must substantially' comply Employee with all the directions of his employer concerning employer. the service on which he is engaged, even though contrary to the provisions of this Title, except where

[blocks in formation]

such obedience is impossible3, or unlawful, or would impose new and unreasonable burdens upon the employee, or in case of an emergency which, according to the best information which the employee can with reasonable diligence obtain, the employer did not contemplate, in which he cannot, with reasonable diligence, be consulted, and in which non-compliance is judged by the employee, in good faith, and in the exercise of reasonable discretion, to be absolutely necessary for the protection of the employer's interests. In all such cases, the employee must conform as nearly to the directions of his employer as may be reasonably practicable, and most for the interest of the latter.5

4

4

'Substantial and not literal obedience, is required (Johnson v. N. Y. Central R. R., 31 Barb., 196; Parkhill v. Imlay, 15 Wend., 431).

Evans v. Root, 7 N. Y., 186; Blot v. Boiceau, 3 id., 78; Bruce v. Davenport, 36 Barb., 349; Bell v. Palmer, 6 Cow., 128; Wilson v. Wilson, 26 Penn. St., 394; see Johnson v. N. Y. Central R. R., 31 Barb., 196; Ackley v. Kellogg, 8 Cow., 223; Turner v. Mason, 14 M. & W., 112; Amor v. Fearon, 9 Ad. & El., 548. Johnson v. N. Y. Central R. R., 31 Barb., 196; Drnmmond v. Wood, 2 Cai., 310.

Ib.; Story on Agency, §§ 85, 141, 193; Dusar v. Perit,

4 Binn., 361.

Johnson v. N. Y. Central R. R., 31 Barb., 196.

S1015. An employee must perform his service in conformity to the usage of the place of performance, unless otherwise directed by his employer, or unless it is impracticable, or manifestly injurious to his employer to do so.

Story on Agency, § 199; Johnson v. N. Y. Central R. R., 31 Barb., 196; see Horton v. Morgan, 19 N. Y., 170.

S1016. An employee is bound to exercise a reasonable degree of skill,' unless his employer has notice, before employing him, of his want of skill.'

1 Harmer v. Cornelius, 5 C. B. (N. S.), 236; Story Bailm., SS 431-435; see Cuckson v. Stones, 1 El. & El., 248.

[blocks in formation]

S1017. An employee is always bound to use such Must use skill as he possesses.

Wilson v. Brett, 11 M. & W., 113.

what skill he has.

longs to em

ployer.

S 1018. Everything which an employee acquires What be by virtue of his employment, except the compensation, if any, which is due to him from his employer, belongs to the latter, whether acquired lawfully or unlawfully,' or during, or after the expiration of,2 the term of his employment.

1Code La., 2974; see Tenant v. Elliott, 1 Bos. & P., 3;
Farmer v. Russell, id., 296; Bousfield v. Wilson, 16
M. & W., 185.

⚫ Edmondstone v. Hartshorne, 19 N. Y., 9.

count.

S1019. An employee must, on demand, render to Duty to ao his employer just accounts of all his transactions in the course of his service, as often as may be reasonable,' and must, without demand, give prompt notice to his employer of everything which he receives for his account.2

1

2

Story on Agency, § 203; Collyer v. Dudley, Turn. &
Russ., 421.

By DUER, J., Heubach v. Mollmann, 2 Duer, 227, 252;
see Edmonstone v. Hartshorne, 19 N. Y., 9.

not bound

to deliver mand.

without de

$1020. An employee, who receives anything on Employee account of his employer, in any capacity other than that of a mere servant, is not bound to deliver it to him until demanded,1 and is not at liberty to send it to him from a distance without demand, in any mode involving greater risk than its retention by the employee himself.3

This seems to the commissioners to be the true princi

ple upon which the cases holding a demand to be
necessary as against a factor (Baird v. Walker, 12
Barb., 298; Halden v. Crafts, 4 E. D. Smith, 490;
2 Abb. Pr., 301; Cooley v. Betts, 24 Wend., 203;
Ferris v. Paris, 10 Johns., 285), an attorney (Stafford
v. Richardson, 15 Wend., 302; Rathbun v. Ingalls,
7 id., 320; Taylor v. Bates, 5 Cow., 376; Beardsley
v. Root, 11 Johns., 464) and other agents (Reina v.
Cross, 6 Cal., 31), are founded. In Lillie v. Hoyt (5
Hill, 395), the rule was limited to attorneys and

Preference to be given

ers.

factors, but without reason. The defendant, in that case, seems to have been a mere servant. In Stacy v. Graham (14 N. Y., 492; affirming S. C., 3 Duer, 444), the defendant had been instructed to remit. Heubach v. Mollmann, 2 Duer, 227.

This qualification seems to be only just to the employee.

S1021. An employee, who has any business to to employ transact on his own account, similar to that intrusted to him by his employer, must always give the latter the preference. If intrusted with similar affairs by different employers, he must give them preference according to their relative urgency, or, other things being equal, according to the order in which they were committed to him.

Responsibility of employee for substitute.

Responsi bility for

There is no direct authority for these provisions, but they are required by sound principle.

$1022. An employee, who is expressly authorized to employ a substitute, is liable to his principal only for want of ordinary care in his selection. The substitute is directly responsible to the principal.

Story on Agency, § 217 a.

S 1023. An employee, who is guilty of a culpable negligence, degree of negligence, is liable to his employer for the damage thereby caused to the latter; and the employer is liable to him, if the service is not gratuitous, for the value of such services only as are properly rendered.

Surviving employee.

Confiden

S 1024. Where service is to be rendered by two or more persons jointly, and one of them dies, the survivor must act alone, if the service to be rendered is such as he can rightly perform without the aid of the deceased person, but not otherwise.

See Story on Bailm., § 202.

$1025. The obligations peculiar to confidential ment. employments are defined in the Title on TRUSTS.

tial employ

ARTICLE IV.

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT.

SECTION 1026. Termination by death, &c., of employer. 1027. Employment, how terminated.

1028. Continuance of service in certain cases.

1029. Termination at will.

1030. Termination by employer for fault.

1031. Termination by employee for fault.

1032. Compensation of employee dismissed for cause.
1033. Compensation of employee leaving for cause.

$1026. Every employment, in which the power of the employee is not coupled with an interest in its subject, is terminated by notice to him of:

1. The death of the employer; or,

2. His legal incapacity to contract.

This section alters the common law by continuing the
power until the agent has notice of the principal's
change of condition. Such a rule is advocated by
Story (Agency, § 495), and is obviously just.

S 1027. Every employment is terminated:
1. By the expiration of its appointed term;

2. By the extinction of its subject;

3. By the death of the employee; or,
4. By his legal incapacity to act as such.

S 1028. An employee, unless the term of his service has expired, or unless he has a right to discontinue it at any time, without notice, must continue his service after notice of the death or incapacity of his employer, so far as is necessary to protect from serious injury the interests of the employer's successor in interest, until a reasonable time after notice of the facts has been communicated to such successor. The successor must compensate the employee for such service, according to the terms of the contract of employment.

[blocks in formation]
« 이전계속 »