Handbook of the Law of Antitrust |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
81°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 3°³
303 ÆäÀÌÁö
A low level of investment and delay in achieving results then becomes the more likely , probably the most likely ... This " market making " type of integration may be achieved indirectly ; it may result from joint action in any of ...
A low level of investment and delay in achieving results then becomes the more likely , probably the most likely ... This " market making " type of integration may be achieved indirectly ; it may result from joint action in any of ...
452 ÆäÀÌÁö
nificant to their competitive positions , then allowing the tie through which discrimination is achieved can ... discrimination : should tying be countenanced where it is used to achieve a price discrimination , on the ground that such ...
nificant to their competitive positions , then allowing the tie through which discrimination is achieved can ... discrimination : should tying be countenanced where it is used to achieve a price discrimination , on the ground that such ...
484 ÆäÀÌÁö
There are of course grave differences between vertical integration achieved through merger and vertical integration achieved through a requirements contract ; we shall touch upon these in the next section .
There are of course grave differences between vertical integration achieved through merger and vertical integration achieved through a requirements contract ; we shall touch upon these in the next section .
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
¸ñÂ÷
Chapter | 1 |
An Eclectic View of Antitrust and Legal Doctrine | 10 |
Basic Statutory Materials | 13 |
ÀúÀÛ±Ç | |
Ç¥½ÃµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ¼½¼Ç 211°³
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
achieved action activity agreement analysis antitrust apply arrangement association basis boycott buyers cartel cert Commission competing competition competitors concentration concept conduct consider contract Corp corporation cost course Court customers deal dealer decision defendant demand denied discrimination economic effect efficiency entry established evidence example F.Supp fact firm given grant held holding increase industry integration interest involved issues joint Justice kind L.Ed less license limited manufacturer Materials matter ment merger monopoly particular patent performance person potential practice present price fixing problems profits protect question reason reduce require resale restraint restrictions result retail rule S.Ct Section sell seller share Sherman significant single social Standard structure substantial suggested supra tend territorial tion trade United unlawful vertical violation