Handbook of the Law of Antitrust |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
83°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 3°³
96 ÆäÀÌÁö
10 " Exclusion , ¡± includes any course of action which is deliberate , in the sense that the firm has a choice whether or not to follow it , and which has the effect of excluding others . From all of this one can formulate a rule : a ...
10 " Exclusion , ¡± includes any course of action which is deliberate , in the sense that the firm has a choice whether or not to follow it , and which has the effect of excluding others . From all of this one can formulate a rule : a ...
97 ÆäÀÌÁö
Such conduct would , of course , be unnatural ; it would run contrary to the normal human motives and responses to the market situations described . But in this respect it would not clearly be different from the course of conduct which ...
Such conduct would , of course , be unnatural ; it would run contrary to the normal human motives and responses to the market situations described . But in this respect it would not clearly be different from the course of conduct which ...
757 ÆäÀÌÁö
The Commission also issues advisory opinions on the legality of specific courses of action which a firm requesting the opinion proposes to carry out.4 Opinions will generally be given upon a specific disclosure of the proposed course of ...
The Commission also issues advisory opinions on the legality of specific courses of action which a firm requesting the opinion proposes to carry out.4 Opinions will generally be given upon a specific disclosure of the proposed course of ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
¸ñÂ÷
Chapter | 1 |
An Eclectic View of Antitrust and Legal Doctrine | 10 |
Basic Statutory Materials | 13 |
ÀúÀÛ±Ç | |
Ç¥½ÃµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ¼½¼Ç 211°³
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
achieved action activity agreement analysis antitrust apply arrangement association basis boycott buyers cartel cert Commission competing competition competitors concentration concept conduct consider contract Corp corporation cost course Court customers deal dealer decision defendant demand denied discrimination economic effect efficiency entry established evidence example F.Supp fact firm given grant held holding increase industry integration interest involved issues joint Justice kind L.Ed less license limited manufacturer Materials matter ment merger monopoly particular patent performance person potential practice present price fixing problems profits protect question reason reduce require resale restraint restrictions result retail rule S.Ct Section sell seller share Sherman significant single social Standard structure substantial suggested supra tend territorial tion trade United unlawful vertical violation