Handbook of the Law of Antitrust |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
82°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 3°³
233 ÆäÀÌÁö
Of course , unless the participating retailers , acting concertedly , did have a degree of monopoly power , their action ... A wholesaler faced with the risk of losing all or most of its retail buyers can hardly remain indifferent .
Of course , unless the participating retailers , acting concertedly , did have a degree of monopoly power , their action ... A wholesaler faced with the risk of losing all or most of its retail buyers can hardly remain indifferent .
241 ÆäÀÌÁö
There , the association of retail lumber dealers urged members to report to the association the names of any wholesalers known to sell at retail ; the association investigated such reports and if it concluded that a wholesaler made ...
There , the association of retail lumber dealers urged members to report to the association the names of any wholesalers known to sell at retail ; the association investigated such reports and if it concluded that a wholesaler made ...
380 ÆäÀÌÁö
Given whatever price the manufacturer establishes on sales to dealers , the manufacturer's return will increase as the volume of retail sales ( and corresponding purchases from the manufacturer by dealers ) increases , and retail sales ...
Given whatever price the manufacturer establishes on sales to dealers , the manufacturer's return will increase as the volume of retail sales ( and corresponding purchases from the manufacturer by dealers ) increases , and retail sales ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
¸ñÂ÷
Chapter | 1 |
An Eclectic View of Antitrust and Legal Doctrine | 10 |
Basic Statutory Materials | 13 |
ÀúÀÛ±Ç | |
Ç¥½ÃµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ¼½¼Ç 211°³
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
achieved action activity agreement analysis antitrust apply arrangement association basis boycott buyers cartel cert Commission competing competition competitors concentration concept conduct consider contract Corp corporation cost course Court customers deal dealer decision defendant demand denied discrimination economic effect efficiency entry established evidence example F.Supp fact firm given grant held holding increase industry integration interest involved issues joint Justice kind L.Ed less license limited manufacturer Materials matter ment merger monopoly particular patent performance person potential practice present price fixing problems profits protect question reason reduce require resale restraint restrictions result retail rule S.Ct Section sell seller share Sherman significant single social Standard structure substantial suggested supra tend territorial tion trade United unlawful vertical violation