페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

TABLE OF RULES AND FORMS OF SUPREME

COURT CITED.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

7

PAGE
. . . 1466
. . . 1322

1322
1322
224
224
224
413
224
225
284
616
284

290
. 1415
85, 352
85, 347

11

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

. . . . . . 460 · · · · 460, 1228 . .

. 460 ... . . . . 460 . 1492, 1499, 1500

.. 1499, 1500 1490, 1500, 1502, 1503 • · 399, 1489 · · · · 1490, 1502 . . . . . 1491 .. 1491, 1504

. 1491, 1504 . . . 461, 1505

1505 . . . . 1505 . . . . . . 619

649 650

650 · · · · 32, 221

. 32, 221 . . . . . 221

. . . . . 221 ..... 32, 221 . . . . . . 32 · · · · · · 484

. 1094 : 447, 453, 1171, 1172

1318, 1533 ..: . . 1172

453, 1316, 1318 · ·

Errata · · · · · · 1559

. . . 690

. . . 1323 .... 1426, 1441 · · · · · · 1322 ' .· : · 1323

. 1069, 1507 · · · ... 53 . . . . . . 399 :

.. 24

2:26

.

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. ......................

.

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. . .

XXXVII

XXXVIII
XXXIX

xxviii

XLI

xxix

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors]

ORDERS. RULES.
LVIII 1

5 "VI (Costs) 8

15 i 18

PAGE, FORMS ; APPENDIX B. : - PAGE ...in 1558

. . . . . . . . 457 ... 229, 1560

. . . . . . . . . 460 ... 1042 9 . . . . . . . . . 1500

. . . 1491 10 · · · · · :: 1490 .... 413 11 . . . . . . . 1490, 1502

· · · · · 650

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small]

9. 1. 22. after "Scotland," add “The Wafer Great Seal, and the Wafer Priry

Seal, framed under the Crown Office Act, 1877 ;and append a

note, referring to “ 40 & 41 V. c. 41, 8 4." 11. n. 7. after 27 & 28 V. c. 54, SS 9, 50, Ir.,” add “Now Repealed by 32 &

33 V. c. 42, § 21, Ir." 29. L 11. after “1873," add "to those made either by Order in Council, or by

the Committee of Council, under the Crown Office Act, 1877," and

append a note referring to " 40 & 41 V. c. 41, SS 3, 5." 49. 1. 2. after "escape," add note, “Such an action is no longer maintainable,

40 & 41 V. c. 21, § 31 ; 40 & 41 V. c. 49, $ 43, Ir.” 50. D. 4. after "Jackson v. Metrop. Ry. Co.,” add "reversed in Dom. Proc.

26 W. R., n. 10, p. 175. Since this last decision it would seem to be more difficult than ever to define the respective functions of the judge and the jury, when a question of negligence is involved in the trial. Read the recent cases attertively, and try to make sense of

them.” 53. I 4. after the costs shall follow the event,” add note, “Where a nonsuit was

set aside and plaintiff obtained a verdict on second trial, he was held entitled to the costs of the first trial, and of the rule for a new trial, Creen v. Wright, L. R., 2 C. P. D. 354 ; 46 L. J., C. P. 427, per Ct.

of App., S. C.” 53. 1. 5. after “good cause shown," add note referring to Gen. Steam Nav. Co.

0. Lond. & Ed. Ship. Co., L. R., 2 Ex. D. 467; 47 L. J., Ex. 77, S. C.” 53, 1. 6. after “or the Court,” add note referring to Gen. Steam Nav. Co. v.

Lond. & Ed. Ship. Co., L. R., 2 Ex, D. 467; 47 L. J., Ex. 77, S. C." 53. n. 1. add “But see Garnet v. Bradley, L. R., 2 Ex. D. 349 ; 46 L. J. Ex. 545,

S. C., in which the Court of App. (by Bramwell and Brett, L.JJ., and Kelly, C. B., diss.) overruled Parsons v. Tinling, and held, that when the rule declared that costs should follow the event,' it did not intend what it said, but it simply meant that the costs would follow as regulated by former statutes. This reasoning is not very satisfactory, and the question can scarcely yet be considered as finally

settled. See 21 J. 1, c. 16, $ 6.” 54. 1. 18. after “competency of a testator in a will cause," add "and his free.

dom from undue influence," and then append a note, referring to

“ Purdon v. Ld. Longford, I. R., 11 C. L. 267." 57. n. 1. after “Bowes v. Shand, add L. R., 2 App. Cas. 455 ; S. C. 46 L. J.,

Q. B. 561 ;” and also add, “See, too, Quinn v. Shields, I. R., 11 C. L. 254, where held, that the meaning of the word "moss,” as used in a fee-farm grant, was a question, not for the jury, but for the judge.”

PAGE

95. n. 3. add "continued by 40 & 41 V. c. 67, till 31 Dec. 1878.” 138. n. 3. add Birmingham, May. of v. Allen, 46 L. J., Ch. 673, per Ct. of

App. ; L. R., 6 Ch. D. 284, S. C." 139. n. 1. add See Siddons v. Short, L. R., 2 C. P. D. 572; 46 L. J., C.

P. 795, S. C.” 140, n. 3. after “Lascelles v. Ld. Onslow," add "L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 433,

450, S. C." 140. n. 5. add Att.-Gen. v. Tomline, L. R., 5 Ch. D. 750, pe Fry, J. ; 46 L. J.

Ch. 654, S. C." 140. n. 9. after “5 & 6 V. c. 39, § 1,add " 40 & 41 V. c. 39." 165. n. 7. add Slator v. Nolan, I. R. 11 Eq. 367." 166. n. 6. add See, also, O'Rorke v. Bolingbroke, L. R., 2 App. Cas. 814, per

Dom. Proc. (Ir.) See, too, Gen., Ch. XXV., vy. 29–34." 168. n. 2. add “ 40 & 41 V. c. 57, § 28, subs. 3, Ir." 184. n. 5. add 40 & 41 V. c. 57, § 28, subs. 5, Ir.” 192. n. 2. add Ex p. Tennant, re Howard, per Ct. of App., L. R., 6 Ch. D. 303. 194. n. 7. after “Spice v. Bacon,” add " 46 L. J., Ex. 713; L. R., 2 Ex.

D. 463, S. C.” 195. n. 3. after “Spice v. Bacon,” add L. R., 2 Ex. D. 463 ; 46 L. J., Ex. 713,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

S. C."

221.

3.

add " Prudential Ass. Co. v. Edmonds, L. R., 2 App. Cas. 487, per

Dom. Proc." 3. Por Lugg 2. Silber,” in l. 4, read “Sugg v. Silber ;” also after

“Bordier v. Burrell," add S. C. 46 L. J., Ch. 615," and then add at end of note, “Leigh v. Brooks, L. R., 5 Ch. D. 592, per Ct. of App.; and Clements v. Norris, W. N. 8 Dec. 1877, p. 248, per Hall, V.-C. ; 26 W. R. 94, S. C. But see Pilley v. Baylis, 46 L. J.,

Ch. 847, per Malins, V.-C. ; L. R. 5 Ch. D. 241, S. C." 224. 1. 23. after mistake,” add but such mistake may be one of law as well

as of fact,” and then append as a note, “Duckett v. Gover, L. R.,

6 Ch. D. 82, per Jessel, M. R. ; 46 L. J., Ch. 407, S. C." 224. n. 1. add “See Child v. Stenning, 46 L. J., Ch. 523 ; L. R., 5 Ch. D. 695,

S. C. ; Booth v. Briscoe, L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 496." 225. 1. 12. after " amendment of Pleading," add note, “ As to the amendment of

pleadings in the Consistory Court of London, see Reg. Gen, of 1877,

relating to that Court, Ord. iii.” 225. 1. 20. after “embarrass," add note referring to Heap v. Marris, L. R., 2 Q. B.

D. 630 ; 46 L. J., Q. B. 761, S. C.” 226. R. 5. at end add reference to “ Durling v. Lawrence, 46 L. J., Ch. 808, per

Jessel, M. R." 284. n. 6. add “See Heap v. Marris, L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 630; 46 L. J., Q. B. 761,

S. C." 285. 1. 11. after “Limitations," add this note, “Notwithstanding these precise words

a defendant, in an action for the recovery of real estate, may still raise the defence of the Statute of Limitations by demurrer; and that too, although such demurrer,-- after specifying some particular ground of defence, -should, in accordance with Ord. XXVIII, R. 2, merely refer generally to 'other grounds sufficient to sustain the demurrer.' Dawkins v. Ld. Penrhyn, L. R., 6 C. D. 318, per Ct. of App. The judgment of Jessel, M. R., in this case is, perhaps, more remarkable

for vigour and subtlety than for sound and consistent reasoning." 289. n. 3. add "Byrd v. Nunn, L. R., 5 Ch. D. 781, per Fry, J. ; S. C. Aff. by

Ct. of App. 47 L. J., Ch. 1.”

PAGE 325. n. 7. add Long v. Keightley, I. R., 11 C. L. 221." 352. n. 1. add See also Rules of Sup. Ct., Order XXXVIII., r. 3, which pro

vides, that affidavits in reply, shall be confined to matters strictly in reply.' This rule, however, seems to have been curiously set at nought by Hall, V.-C., in Peacock v. Harper, 26 W. R. 109.

Sed. qu.” 414. n. 4. after “Dunne v. English,” add “See Meyrick v. James, 46 L. J.

Ch. 579." 439. § 496. dele this section, as § 449 of 17 & 18 V. c. 104, therein censured, is now

repealed by 39 & 40 V. c. 80, $ 45, and Sched. 447. n. 1. after “In re West of Canada, &c.,add “46 L. J., Ch. 683." 448. n. 2. after “Brydges v. Fisher," add “S, P., decided by Fry, J., in Stewart

v. Gladstone, No. 51, W. N. of 22nd Dec. 1877, p. 270." 449. n. 2. add. “See In re Imper. Land Co. of Marseilles, W. N. 8 Dec. 1877,

p. 244, where the Ct. of App. reversed a decision of Malins, V.-C., who had refused to issue a commission to examine witnesses in

France." 459. 1. 28. after “struck out,” add note, “See Eade v. Jacob, 47 L. J., Ex. 74,

per Ct. of App." 462. n. 3. add. Bp. of Cork v. Porter, I. R., 11 C. L. 94. See also Eade v.

Jacob, 47 L. J., Ex. 74, per Ct. of App." 462. n. 4. add " Eade v. Jacob, 47 L. J., Ex. 74, per Ct. of App."

n. 8. after “Sly v. Sly,” add S. C., 46 L. J., P. D. & A. 63." 582. n. 3. after “Sly v. Sly," add S. C., 46 L. J., P. D. & A. 63." 665. n. 6. add “Peacock v. Harper, 26 W. R., 109, in Ch. D., per Hall, V.-C." 699. n. 1. at end add “It has just been decided, that, in an action for a nuisance,

raising a question of title, a defendant cannot plead payment into Court, and deny the plaintiff's right of action in respect of the same part of the statement of claim; and any such statement of defence will be amended as 'embarrassing' under Ord. XXVII. r. 1. Spurr

v. Hall, L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 615 ; 46 L. J., Q. B. 693, S. C.”. 709. n. 4. add S. C. affid. in Dom. Proc., L. R., 2 App. Cas. 439 ; 46 L. J.,

C. P. 583, S. C." 710. n. 1. add " Clark v. Adie, L. R., 2 App. Cas. 423 ; 46 L. J., Ch. 598, S. C.,

per Dom. Proc.” 712. n. 3. after Gatty v. Fry,add “46 L. J., Ex. 605, S. C.” 810. n. 1. add L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 611, S. C.” 811. l. 13. for “Clergy," read Church." 819. n. 3. after “Rolls v. Pearce," add. 46 L. J., Ch. 791, S. C." 831. n. 5. add. 40 & 41 V. c. 57, § 28, subs. 6, Ir.” 834. n. 3. after “Hand v. Hall,” add "S. C., 46 L. J., Ex. 603." 845. n. 1. add, Oastler v. Henderson, 46 L. J., Q. B. 607, per Ct. of App. ; L. R.,

2 Q. B. D. 575, S. C." 846. n. 4. add “A trustee, after disclaimer, cannot remove fixtures, In re Lavies,

ex p. Stephens, 47 L. J., Bk. 22, per Ct. of App." 847. n. 7. add 40 & 41 V. c. 57,8 28, subs. 4, Ir.” 848. n. 2. add. But see Ashworth v. Outram, L. R., 5 Ch. D. 923; 46 L. J.

Ch. 687, per Ct. of App." 849. n. 1. add " Kronheim v. Johnson, L. R., 7 Ch. D. 60, per Fry, J." 856. n. 5. add " Williams v. Jordan, 46 L. J., Ch. 681, per Jessel, M. R. ; L. R.,

6 C. D. 517, S. C.” 856. 1. 6. after “ Rossiter v. Miller," add. "S. C., in Ct. of App. 46 L. J.,

Ch. 737.

« 이전계속 »