ERRATA.

PAGE

9. 1. 22. after "Scotland,” add "The Wafer Great Seal, and the Wafer Privy Seal, framed under the Crown Office Act, 1877;" and append a note, referring to "40 & 41 V. c. 41, § 4."

11. n. 7. after “27 & 28 V. c. 54, §§ 9, 50, Ir.,” add "Now Repealed by 32 & 33 V. c. 42, § 21, Ir."

29. L 11. after "1873," add "to those made either by Order in Council, or by the Committee of Council, under the Crown Office Act, 1877," and append a note referring to " 40 & 41 V. c. 41, §§ 3, 5."

49. 1 2. after "escape," add note, "Such an action is no longer maintainable, 40 & 41 V. c. 21, § 31; 40 & 41 V. c. 49, § 43, Ir."

50. n. 4. after "Jackson v. Metrop. Ry. Co.," add "reversed in Dom. Proc. 26 W. R., n. 10, p. 175. Since this last decision it would seem to be more difficult than ever to define the respective functions of the judge and the jury, when a question of negligence is involved in the trial. Read the recent cases attertively, and try to make sense of them."

53. 1. 4. after "the costs shall follow the event," add note, "Where a nonsuit was set aside and plaintiff obtained a verdict on second trial, he was held entitled to the costs of the first trial, and of the rule for a new trial, Creen v. Wright, L. R., 2 C. P. D. 354; 46 L. J., C. P. 427, per Ct. of App., S. C."

53. 1. 5. after "good cause shown," add note referring to "Gen. Steam Nav. Co. v. Lond. & Ed. Ship. Co., L. R., 2 Ex. D. 467; 47 L. J., Ex. 77, S. C." 53. 1. 6. after "or the Court," add note referring to "Gen. Steam Nav. Co. v. Lond. & Ed. Ship. Co., L. R., 2 Ex. D. 467; 47 L. J., Ex. 77, S. C." 53. n. 1. add "But see Garnet v. Bradley, L. R., 2 Ex. D. 349; 46 L. J. Ex. 545, S. C., in which the Court of App. (by Bramwell and Brett, L.JJ., and Kelly, C. B., diss.) overruled Parsons v. Tinling, and held, that when the rule declared that 'costs should follow the event,' it did not intend what it said, but it simply meant that the costs would follow as regulated by former statutes. This reasoning is not very satisfactory, and the question can scarcely yet be considered as finally settled. See 21 J. 1, c. 16, § 6."

54. 1. 18. after "competency of a testator in a will cause," add “and his freedom from undue influence," and then append a note, referring to “Purdon v. Ld. Longford, I. R., 11 C. L. 267.”

57. n. 1. after

"Bowes v. Shand, add L. R., 2 App. Cas. 455; S. C. 46 L. J., Q. B. 561;" and also add, "See, too, Quinn v. Shields, I. R., 11 C. L. 254, where held, that the meaning of the word “ moss," as used in a fee-farm grant, was a question, not for the jury, but for the judge."

i

PAGE

95. n. 3.

138. n. 3.

add "continued by 40 & 41 V. c. 67, till 31 Dec. 1878."

add "Birmingham, May. of v. Allen, 46 L. J., Ch. 673, per Ct. of App.; L. R., 6 Ch. D. 284, S. C."

139. n. 1. add "See Siddons v. Short, L. R., 2 C. P. D. 572; 46 L. J.,

P. 795, S. C."

C.

140. n. 3. after "Lascelles v. Ld. Onslow," add "L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 433, 450, S. C."

140. n. 5. add "Att.-Gen. v. Tomline, L. R., 5 Ch. D. 750, pe Fry, J.; 46 L. J. Ch. 654, S. C."

140. n. 9.

165. n. 7.

166. n. 6.

168. n. 2.

184. n. 5.

192. n. 2.

after "5 & 6 V. c. 39, § 1," add "40 & 41 V. c. 39."

add "Slator v. Nolan, I. R. 11 Eq. 367."

add "See, also, O'Rorke v. Bolingbroke, L. R., 2 App. Cas. 814, per Dom. Proc. (Ir.) See, too, Gen., Ch. xxv., vv. 29–34.”

add "40 & 41 V. c. 57, § 28, subs. 3, Ir."

add "40 & 41 V. c. 57, § 28, subs. 5, Ir."

add "Ex p. Tennant, re Howard, per Ct. of App., L. R., 6 Ch. D. 303. 194. n. 7. after "Spice v. Bacon," add "46 L. J., Ex. 713; L. R., 2 Ex. D. 463, S. C."

195. n. 3. after "Spice v. Bacon," add L. R., 2 Ex. D. 463; 46 L. J., Ex. 713, S. C."

206. n. 5. add "Prudential Ass. Co. v. Edmonds, L. R., 2 App. Cas. 487, per

221. n. 3.

Dom. Proc."

For "Lugg v. Silber," in 1. 4, read "Sugg v. Silber;" also after "Bordier v. Burrell," add "S. C. 46 L. J., Ch. 615," and then add at end of note, "Leigh v. Brooks, L. R., 5 Ch. D. 592, per Ct. of App.; and Clements v. Norris, W. N. 8 Dec. 1877, p. 248, per Hall, V.-C.; 26 W. R. 94, S. C. But see Pilley v. Baylis, 46 L. J., Ch. 847, per Malins, V.-C.; L. R. 5 Ch. D. 241, S. C." 224. 1. 23. after "mistake," add "but such mistake as of fact," and then append as a note,

224. n. 1.

may be one of law as well "Duckett v. Gover, L. R.,

6 Ch. D. 82, per Jessel, M. R.; 46 L. J., Ch. 407, S. C."

add "See Child v. Stenning, 46 L. J., Ch. 523; L. R., 5 Ch. D. 695, S. C.; Booth v. Briscoe, L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 496."

225. 1. 12. after "amendment of Pleading," add note, "As to the amendment of pleadings in the Consistory Court of London, see Reg. Gen. of 1877, relating to that Court, Ord. iii.”

225. 1. 20. after "embarrass," add note referring to Heap v. Marris, L. R., 2 Q. B.

D. 630; 46 L. J., Q. B. 761, S. C."

226. R. 5. at end add reference to "Durling v. Lawrence, 46 L. J., Ch. 808, per Jessel, M. R."

284. n. 6. add "See Heap v. Marris, L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 630; 46 L. J., Q. B. 761, S. C."

285. 1. 11. after "Limitations," add this note, "Notwithstanding these precise words a defendant, in an action for the recovery of real estate, may still raise the defence of the Statute of Limitations by demurrer; and that too, although such demurrer,--after specifying some particular ground of defence, should, in accordance with Ord. XXVIII, R. 2, merely refer generally to 'other grounds sufficient to sustain the demurrer.' Dawkins v. Ld. Penrhyn, L. R., 6 C. D. 318, per Ct. of App. The judgment of Jessel, M. R., in this case is, perhaps, more remarkable for vigour and subtlety than for sound and consistent reasoning. 289. n. 3. add "Byrd v. Nunn, L. R., 5 Ch. D. 781, per Fry, J.; S. C. Aff. by Ct. of App. 47 L. J., Ch. 1."

PAGE

325. n. 7. add "Long v. Keightley, I. R., 11 C. L. 221." $52. n. 1. add "See also Rules of Sup. Ct., Order XXXVIII., r. 3, which provides, that affidavits in reply, 'shall be confined to matters strictly in reply.' This rule, however, seems to have been curiously set at nought by Hall, V.-C., in Peacock v. Harper, 26 W. R. 109. Sed. qu."

414. n. 4. after "Dunne v. English," add "See Meyrick v. James, 46 L. J.

Ch. 579."

439. § 496. dele this section, as § 449 of 17 & 18 V. c. 104, therein censured, is now repealed by 39 & 40 V. c. 80, § 45, and Sched.

447. n. 1. 448. n. 2.

449. n. 2.

459. 1. 28.

462. n. 3.

462. n. 4.

581. n. 8.

582. n. 3.

665. n. 6. 699. n. 1.

after "In re West of Canada, &c.," add "46 L. J., Ch. 683."
after "Brydges v. Fisher," add "S. P., decided by Fry, J., in Stewart
v. Gladstone, No. 51, W. N. of 22nd Dec. 1877, p. 270.”
add "See In re Imper. Land Co. of Marseilles, W. N. 8 Dec. 1877,
p. 244, where the Ct. of App. reversed a decision of Malins, V.-C.,
who had refused to issue a commission to examine witnesses in
France."

after "struck out," add note, "See Eade v. Jacob, 47 L. J., Ex. 74,
per Ct. of App."

add "Bp. of Cork v. Porter, I. R., 11 C. L. 94. See also Eade v. Jacob, 47 L. J., Ex. 74, per Ct. of App.'

add "Eade v. Jacob, 47 L. J., Ex. 74, per Ct. of App." after “Sly v. Sly," add “S. C., 46 L. J., P. D. & A. 63.” after "Sly v. Sly," add "S. C., 46 L. J., P. D. & A. 63." add "Peacock v. Harper, 26 W. R., 109, in Ch. D., per Hall, V.-C.” at end add "It has just been decided, that, in an action for a nuisance, raising a question of title, a defendant cannot plead payment into Court, and deny the plaintiff's right of action in respect of the same part of the statement of claim; and any such statement of defence will be amended as 'embarrassing' under Ord. XXVII. r. 1. Spurr v. Hall, L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 615; 46 L. J., Q. B. 693, S. C." 709. n. 4. add "S. C. affid. in Dom. Proc., L. R., 2 App. Cas. 439; 46 L. J., C. P. 583, S. C."

710. n. 1. add “Clark v. Adie, L. R., 2 App. Cas. 423; 46 L. J., Ch. 598, S. C., per Dom. Proc."

712. n. 3.

810. n. 1.

811. 1 13.

819. n. 3.

831. n. 5.

834. n. 3.

845. n. 1.

after "Gatty v. Fry," add "46.L. J., Ex. 605, S. C."
add "L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 611, S. C."

for "Clergy," read "Church."

after "Rolls v. Pearce," add "46 L. J., Ch. 791, S. C."
add "40 & 41 V. c. 57, § 28, subs. 6, Ir."

after "Hand v. Hall," add "S. C., 46 L. J., Ex. 603."

add, "Oastler v. Henderson, 46 L. J., Q. B. 607,per Ct. of App.; L. R., 2 Q. B. D. 575, S. C."

846. n. 4. add "A trustee, after disclaimer, cannot remove fixtures, In re Lavies,

847. n. 7.

848. n. 2.

849. n. 1.

856. n. 5.

ex p. Stephens, 47 L. J., Bk. 22, per Ct. of App."

add "40 & 41 V. c. 57, § 28, subs. 4, Ir."

add "But see Ashworth v. Outram, L. R., 5 Ch. D. 923; 46 L. J. Ch. 687, per Ct. of App."

add " Kronheim v. Johnson, L. R., 7 Ch. D. 60, per Fry,

J."

add "Williams v. Jordan, 46 L. J., Ch. 681, per Jessel, M. R.; L. R., 6 C. D. 517, S. C."

856. n. 6. after "Rossiter v. Miller," add "S. C., in Ct. of App. 46 L. J.,

Ch. 737."