CASES (MINNESOTA) DISTINGUISHED-Continued.

Lamberton v. Merchants Nat. Bank of Winona, 24 Minn. 281.

-Oxborough v. St. Martin, 35.

Langford v. County Commrs. of Ramsey County, 16 Minn. 333 (375).
-State ex rel. v. City of Montevideo, 158, 163.

McAlpine v. Millen, 104 Minn. 289, 116 N. W. 583.

-Anderson v. Van Doren, 239, 240.

McDonald v. City of St. Paul, 82 Minn. 308, 84 N. W. 1022.

-O'Keefe v. Dietz, 448.

McManus v. Blackmarr, 47 Minn. 331, 50 N. W. 230.

-Noyes v. Brown, 218.

McNamara v. Pengilly, 64 Minn. 543, 67 N. W. 661.

-Noyes v. Brown, 218.

Meyers v. Markham, 90 Minn. 230, 96 N. W. 335.

-Noyes v. Brown, 218.

Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 123 Minn. 231, 143 N.
W. 728.

-Currie v. Silvernale, 259.

Moorhead v. Minneapolis Seed Co. 139 Minn. 11, 165 N. W. 484.

-Wavra v. Karr, 252, 253.

Myers v. Duluth Transfer Ry. Co. 53 Minn. 335, 55 N. W. 140.

-Currie v. Silvernale, 259.

Newlin v. Hoyt, 91 Minn. 409, 98 N. W. 323.

-Krohn v. Dustin, 308.

Northern Nat. Bank v. Douglas, 135 Minn. 81, 160 N. W. 193.
-Stone-Ordean-Wells Co. v. Helmer, 267.

Northwestern Land Co. v. Dewey, 58 Minn. 359, 59 N. W. 1085.
-Oxborough v. St. Martin, 35.

Pasco v. Minneapolis S. & M. Co. 105 Minn. 132, 117 N. W. 429.

-Gutmann v. Anderson, 145.

Puhlmann v. District Court of Brown County, 137 Minn. 30, 162 N. W.

678.

—State ex rel. v. District Court of Pennington County, 424.
Rochette v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. 32 Minn. 201, 20 N. W. 140.
-Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Johannsen, 210.

Sorenson v. Rasmussen, 114 Minn. 324, 131 N. W. 325.

-State ex rel. v. Probate Court of Freeborn County, 287.
State v. Chadwick, 133 Minn. 117, 157 N. W. 1076, 158 N. W. 637.

-State ex rel. v. District Court of St. Louis County, 416, 417.
State v. District Court of Stearns County, 137 Minn. 318, 163 N. W. 667.
-State ex rel. v. District Court of Pennington County, 424.
Watters v. City of Mankato, 106 Minn. 161, 118 N. W. 358.

-Currie v. Silvernale, 259.

CASES (MINNESOTA) DISTINGUISHED-Continued.
Wilkins v. Bevier, 43 Minn. 213, 45 N. W. 157.

-Oxborough v. St. Martin, 35.

Zeglin v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Carver County, 72 Minn. 17, 74 N.
W. 901.

-Minneapolis Brewing Co. v. Village of Bagley, 20.

CASES (MINNESOTA) FOLLOWED.

Bieber v. City of St. Paul, 87 Minn. 35, 91 N. W. 20.
-Estabrook v. City of Duluth, 321.

Briglia v. City of St. Paul, 134 Minn. 97, 158 N. W. 794.
-O'Keefe v. Dietz, 447.

Brown v. Smith, 121 Minn. 165, 141 N. W. 2.
-Staley v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 404.
Callan v. Hause, 91 Minn. 270, 97 N. W. 973.

-Bruns v. Willems, 478.

Campbell v. Aarstad, 124 Minn. 284, 144 N. W. 956.

-Nickolay v. Orr, 348.

City of Minneapolis v. Wilkins, 30 Minn. 140, 14 N. W. 581.
-State ex rel. v. City of Montevideo, 163.

Cochran v. Toher, 14 Minn. 293 (385).

-Krause v. Union Match Co. 27.

Cooper, Myers & Co. v. Smith, 139 Minn. 382, 166 N. W. 504.
-Northern Fruit Co. v. Consolidated Elevator Co. 140.

Davis v. Godart, 131 Minn. 221, 154 N. W. 1091.

-Krause v. Union Match Co. 28.

Erkens v. Nicolin, 39 Minn. 461, 40 N. W. 567.

-Minneapolis Brewing Co. v. Village of Bagley, 19.

Fortmeyer v. National Biscuit Co. 116 Minn. 158, 133 N. W. 461.

-Estabrook v. City of Duluth, 321.

Gardner v. Kellogg, 23 Minn. 463.

-Nickolay v. Orr, 349.

George A. Hormel & Co. v. American Bonding Co. 112 Minn. 288, 128
N. W. 12.

-Krause v. Union Match Co. 27.

Gilfillan v. Schmidt, 64 Minn. 29, 66 N. W. 126.

-Hartle v. Neighbauer, 440.

Harcum v. Benson, 135 Minn. 23, 160 N. W. 80.
-Churchill v. Overend, 103.

Hein v. Holdridge, 78 Minn. 468, 81 N. W. 522.

-Nickolay v. Orr, 348.

Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 137 Minn. 321, 163 N. W. 665.

-Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 74, 77.

CASES (MINNESOTA) FOLLOWED-Continued.

Hopkins v. Taylor, 128 Minn. 511, 151 N. W. 194.
-Hartle v. Neighbauer, 440.

Houde v. Tolman, 42 Minn. 522, 44 N. W. 879.

-Mooney v. Burgess, 409.

Kay v. Elsholtz, 138 Minn. 153, 164 N. W. 665.
-Hurley Brothers v. Haluptzok, 269, 270.
Kelly v. Tyra, 103 Minn. 176, 114 N. W. 750.

-Staley v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 404.
Larson v. Minneapolis T. M. Co. 92 Minn. 62, 99 N. W. 623.
-Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 79.

Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340, 125 N. W. 507.
-Estabrook v. City of Duluth, 320, 321.

Lidgerden v. Zignego, 77 Minn. 421, 80 N. W. 360.

-Bruns v. Willems, 478.

McAlpine v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 134 Minn. 192, 158 N. W. 967.
-J. L. Owens Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
490.

McKusick v. City of Stillwater, 44 Minn. 372, 46 N. W. 769.

-State ex rel. v. City of Montevideo, 162.

McManus v. Blackmarr, 47 Minn. 331, 50 N. W. 230.

-Noyes v. Brown, 218.

Manthey v. Schueler, 126 Minn. 87, 147 N. W. 824.

-Gibbon Farmers Elevator Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Rail-
road Co. 60.

Meyers v. Houghton, 137 Minn. 481, 163 N. W. 754.

-State ex rel. v. Houghton, 30.

Meyers v. Markham, 90 Minn. 230, 96 N. W. 335, 787.

-Noyes v. Brown, 218.

Moon v. Northern Pacific R. Co. 46 Minn. 106, 48 N. W. 679.

-Staley v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 404.

Mundwiler v. Bentson, 128 Minn. 69, 150 N. W. 209.

-Erickschen v. County of Sibley, 37.

O'Brien v. American Bridge Co. 110 Minn. 364, 125 N. W. 1012.
-Staley v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 404.

Oftelie v. Town of Hammond, 78 Minn. 275, 80 N. W. 1123.

-Hartle v. Neighbauer, 440.

Pixley v. Reed, 26 Minn. 80, 1 N. E. 800.

-Furst v. W. B. & W. G. Jordan, 231.

Potter v. Engler, 130 Minn. 510, 153 N. W. 1088.

-Borough of Belle Plaine v. Northern Power Co. 364.
Praught v. Bukosky, 116 Minn. 206, 133 N. W. 564.

-Hartle v. Neighbauer, 441.

CASES (MINNESOTA) FOLLOWED-Continued.
Rachelman v. Skinner, 46 Minn. 196, 48 N. W. 776.
-Furst v. W. B. & W. G. Jordan, 231.

Reick v. Schamanski, 117 Minn. 25, 134 N. W. 228.
-Hartle v. Neighbauer, 440, 441.

Reynolds v. Lynch, 98 Minn. 58, 107 N. W. 145.

-Noyes v. Brown, 214.

Roberts v. Mazeppa Mill Co. 30 Minn. 413, 15 N. W. 680.

-Krause v. Union Match Co. 27.

Robson v. Bohn, 27 Minn. 333, 344, 7 N. W. 357.

-Noyes v. Brown, 214.

Rossiter v. Minnesota Paper B-S Co. 37 Minn. 296, 33 N. W. 855.

-Furst v. W. B. & W. G. Jordan, 231.

Rowell v. Oleson, 32 Minn. 288, 20 N. W. 227.

-Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co. 79.

Schuek v. Hagar, 24 Minn. 339.

-Nickolay v. Orr, 348, 349.

Sheehan v. Flynn, 59 Minn. 436, 61 N. W. 462.

-Hartle v. Neighbauer, 438, 440.

Smith v. Minneapolis St. Ry. Co. 134 Minn. 292, 157 N. W. 499, 159 N.

W. 623.

-Churchill v. Overend, 103.

Spencer v. Tozer, 15 Minn. 112 (146).

-Staley v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 405, 406.

State v.

City of Minneapolis, 136 Minn. 479, 162 N. W. 477.
-State ex rel. v. Houghton, 30.

State v. Corrivau, 93 Minn. 38, 100 N. W. 638.

-State v. Henrionnet, 8.

State v. District Court of Ramsey County, 142 Minn. 336, 172 N. W. 133.
-State ex rel. v. District Court of Pennington County, 420, 422.

State v. Gilbert, 141 Minn. 263, 169 N. W. 790.

-State v. Martin, 484.

State v. Great Northern Ry. Co. 135 Minn. 19, 159 N. W. 1089.

Commercial Club of St. James v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis
& Omaha Railway Co. 171.

State v. Grear, 29 Minn. 221, 13 N. W. 140.

-Staley v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. 405.

State v. Houghton, 134 Minn. 226, 158 N. W. 1017.
-State v. Houghton, 30.

State v. Kaercher, 141 Minn. 186, 169 N. W. 699.

-State v. Townley, 333.

State v. Probate Court of St. Louis County, 128 Minn. 371, 150 N. W.

1094.

-State ex rel. v. Probate Court of St. Louis County, 417.

CASES (MINNESOTA) FOLLOWED-Continued.
State v. Salverson, 87 Minn. 40, 91 N. W. 1.
-Stock v. St. Paul City Ry. Co. 317.

State v. Winona & St. Peter R. Co. 21 Minn. 472.

-Noyes v. Brown, 214.

McAlpine v. Millen, 104 Minn. 289, 116 N. W. 583.
Sumner v. City of Northfield, 96 Minn. 107, 104 N. W. 686.
-Estabrook v. City of Duluth, 320.

Thomas v. Craig, 60 Minn. 501, 62 N. W. 1133.

-Furst v. W. B. & W. G. Jordan, 231, 232.

Wendt v. Bowman & Libby, 126 Minn. 509, 145 N. W. 568.
-Young v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 14.

CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT.

Given by Decedent to Defendant for Delivery to Decedent's Daughter
after Her Death. See Gift.

CERTIORARI. See Court, 4; Eminent Domain, 9.

Review of an Order of the Probate Court on a Claim against an Estate
for Maintenance of Patient in State Institution for the Insane Should
Not Be by Writ of Certiorari but by Appeal to the District Court. See
Executor and Administrator, 7.

When the Supreme Court Will Entertain Original Jurisdiction. See
Court, 3.

Review of Findings of Fact in Proceeding under Workmen's Compensa-
tion Act. See Workmen's Compensation Act, 7-9.

CHANGE OF THEORY. See Appeal and Error, 6.

CITY OF DULUTH. See Municipal Corporation, 11, 12.

CITY OF HASTINGS. See Mandamus, 1.

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS. See Eminent Domain, 14, 15; Municipal Corpor-
ation, 8.

CITY OF MONTEVIDEO.

See Eminent Domain, 2-8.

CITY OF ST. PAUL. See Municipal Corporation, 6.

COLLATERAL ATTACK.

Upon Judgment. See Appeal and Error, 5.

Decree of Probate Court Disposing of Household Goods Not Open to Col-
lateral Attack. See Executor and Administrator, 1.

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT.

Avoidance for Fraud.

1. Action for damages for breach of warranty in the sale of a tractor.
The complaint alleged a failure to fulfil the terms of the written
warranty; that defendant's expert undertook to remedy the defect