페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

OF THE

ASSEMBLY

OF THE

STATE OF NEW YORK

AT THEIR

ONE HUNDRED AND FORTY-FIFTH SESSION

[graphic]

Begun and Held at the Capitol, in the City of Albany,

on Wednesday, the Fourth Day of January, 1922

VOLUME III

PXCELSIOR

ALBANY
J. B. LYON COMPANY, PRINTERS

1922

[blocks in formation]

Betts
Duke
Joiner
Moran

Taylor
Bloch
Dunmore Judson

Murphy Thomas
Bly
Eberhard Kahan

Nugent

Tonry
Booth

Eldridge Kaufmann O'Connor Ullman
Brooks
Ellsworth Kirkland Osborn

Van Wagenen
Brundage Esmond
Kleinfeld Palmer

Vaughan
Brunner
Evans
Laidlaw

Patterson Wackerman
Buuchill
Everett
Lattin
Peck

Walsh
Campbell EC Farrell
Leininger Porter

Waterbury
Campbell W W Fasullo

Lewis
Rayher

Webb
Caulfield Fenner
Livermore Reiburn

Wells
Chamberlin Franklin Long

Reilly

Westall
Cheney
Gaffers
Loscalzo
Ricca

Westerbeke
Claessens Galgano Lown

Rice

Wheatley
Clayton
Gray
Lyman

Richford Whitcomb
Cole EE Hackenburg Male CT Rosenman Witter
Cole FS
Hackett
Male J
Rourke

Williams
Cosgrove J E Hager

Mastick
Rowe

Wright
Cosgrove TF Hall
McArdle Sackett

Yacenda
Cowee
Hamill
McCleary Schoffel

Yale
Crews
Harrington McDonald Seelbach

Zimmerman
Cross
Harris

McGinnies Sidney Ordered, That the Clerk return said bill to the Senate, with a message that the Assembly have concurred in the passage of the same.

On motion of Mr. Lewis, the committee on rules was instructed to report Senate bill (No. 1135, Rec. No. 402) entitled "An act to amend the Surrogate's Court Act, in relation to fees of stenographers in surrogate's court of Monroe county.”

On motion of Mr. Lewis, and by unanimous consent, said bill was read the second time and ordered to a third reading.

On motion of Mr. Lewis, and by unanimous consent, said bill was read the third time, having been printed and on the desks of the members in its final form at least three calendar legislative days prior to its final passage.

Mr. Speaker put the question whether the House would agree to the final passage of said bill, and it was determined in the affirmative, a majority of all the members elected to the Assembly voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present.

[ocr errors]

AYES 144

NOES 00
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Adler
Cuvillier Hausner

McKee
Alexander Davison Hickey

McLoughlin
Antin
DePew

Howard McWhinney
Aronson Dever

Hutchinson Merrigan
Banks
Dickstein Jeffery

Miller CP
Barnes
Dobson
Jenks

Miller FA
[ASSEMBLY JOURNAL]

229

Slacer
Smith JC
Smith TK
Soule
Stapley
Steinberg

Bartholomew Donohue Jesse

Moore

Steingut
Betts
Duke
Joiner
Moran

Taylor
Bloch
Dunmore Judson

Murphy Thomas
Bly
Eberhard Kahan

Nugent Tonry
Booth

Eldridge Kaufmann O'Connor Ullman
Brooks
Ellsworth Kirkland Osborn

VanWagener Brundage Esmond

Kleinfeld Palmer Vaughan
Brunner
Evans

Laidlaw Patterson Wackerman
Burchill
Everett
Lattin
Peck

Walsh
Campbell EC Farrell
Leininger Porter

Waterbury
Campbell W W Fasullo

Lewis
Rayher

Webb
Caulfield
Fenner
Livermore Reiburn

Wells
Chamberlin Franklin Long

Ricca

Westall
Cheney
Gaffers
Loscalzo Reilly

Westerbeke
Claessens Galgano Lown

Rice

Wheatley Clayton Gray

Lyman

Richford Whitcomb
Cole E E Hackenburg Male CT Rosenman Witter
Cole FS Hackett

Male J
Rourke

Williams
Cosgrove J E Hager

Mastick
Rowe

Wright
Cosgrove T F Hall
McArdle Sackett

Yacenda
Cowee
Hamill
McCleary Schoffel

Yale
Crews

Harrington McDonald Seelbach Zimmerman
Cross
Harris

McGinnies Sidney Ordered, That the Clerk return said bill to the Senate, with a message that the Assembly have concurred in the passage of the same.

On motion of Mr. Duke, the committee on rules was instructed to report Senate bill (No. 1585, Rec. No. 483) entitled "An act to amend the Court of Claims Act, in relation to fees of court stenographers for making copies of minutes and testimony."

On motion of Mr. Duke, and by unanimous consent, said bill was read the second time and ordered to a third reading.

On motion of Mr. Duke, and by unanimous consent, said bill was read the third time, having been printed and upon the desks of the members in its final form at least three calendar legislative days prior to its final passage.

Mr. Speaker put the question whether the House would agree to the final passage of said bill, and it was determined in the affirmative, a majority of all the members elected to the Assembly voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present.

AYES 144

NOES 00
Those who voted in the affirmative were:
Adler

Cuvillier Hausner McKee
Alexander Davison

Hickey

McLoughlin
Antin
DePew

Howard McWhinney
Aronson Dever

Hutchinson Merrigan
Banks
Dickstein Jeffery

Miller CP

Slacer
Smith JC
Smith TK
Soule
Stapley

Barnes

Dobson Bartholomew Donohue Betts

Duke Bloch

Dunmore Bly

Eberhard Booth

Eldridge Brooks

Ellsworth
Brundage Esmond
Brunner Evans
Burchill Everett
Campbell EC Farrell
Campbell W W Fasullo
Caulfield Fenner
Chamberlin Franklin
Cheney

Gaffers
Claessens Galgano
Clayton Gray
Cole EE Hackenburg
Cole FS Hackett
Cosgrove JE Hager
Cosgrove TF Hall
Cowee

Hamill
Crews

Harrington Cross

Harris

Jenks
Jesse
Joiner
Judson
Kahan
Kaufmann
Kirkland
Kleinfeld
Laidlaw
Lattin
Leininger
Lewis
Livermore
Long
Loscalzo
Lown
Lyman
Male CT
Male J
Mastick
McArdle
McCleary
McDonald
McGinnies

Miller FA
Moore
Moran
Murphy
Nugent
O'Connor
Osborn
Palmer
Patterson
Peck
Porter
Rayher
Reiburn
Ricca
Reilly
Rice
Richford
Rosenman
Rourke
Rowe
Sackett
Schoffel
Seelbach
Sidney

Steinberg
Steingut
Taylor
Thomas
Tonry
Ullman
Van Wagenen
Vaughan
Wackerman
Walsh
Waterbury
Webb
Wells
Westall
Westerbeke
Wheatley
Whitcomb
Witter
Williams
Wright
Yacenda
Yale
Zimmerman

Ordered, That the Clerk return said bill to the Senate, with a message that the Assembly have concurred in the passage of the same.

On motion of Mr. Webb, the committee on rules was instructed to report Senate bill (No. 1227, Rec. No. 422) entitled "An act to provide for a re-survey, by the State Engineer and Surveyor, of part of the boundary line between the States of New York and Connecticut, and, pending such survey, its acceptance and approval, to fix the boundary line as to such part according to the agreement between such States, made December eighth, eighteen hundred and seventy-nine, thereby superseding in part the existing provisions of section two of the State Law.”

On motion of Mr. Webb, and by unanimous consent, said bill was read the second time and ordered to a third reading.

On motion of Mr. Webb, and by unanimous consent, said bill was read the third time, having been printed and upon the desk3 of the members in its final form at least three calendar legislative days prior to its final passage.

Mr. Speaker put the question whether the House would agree to the final passage of said bill, and it was determined in the affirmative, a majority of all the members elected to the Assembly voting in favor thereof, and three-fifths being present.

« 이전계속 »