235 U.S. Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. U. S. 536. No brief filed for the plaintiff in error. Mr. R. G. Pleasant for the defendant in error. No. 35. J. A. MILLER, TRUSTEE, ETC., APPELLANT, v. THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALBUQUERQUE. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico. Submitted October 27, 1914. Decided November 2, 1914. Per Curiam. Decree affirmed with costs, upon the authority of Thompson v. Fairbanks, 196 U. S. 516; Humphrey v. Tatman, 198 U. S. 91; Bryant v. Swofford Bros., 214 U. S. 279, 290-291, and cause remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico. Mr. O. N. Marron and Mr. Francis E. Wood for the appellant. Mr. A. B. McMillan for the appellee. No. 13. MOUND CITY COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT H. CASTLEMAN ET AL. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued for the appellant October 23 and 26, 1914. Decided November 9, 1914. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U. S. 477; Weir v. Rountree, 216 U. S. 607; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569. Mr. Ben T. Castleman and Mr. Chester H. Krum for the appellant. No brief filed for the appellees. No. 23. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, SUING BY THE CANAL COMMISSIONERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. PITTSBURGH, FORT WAYNE & CHICAGO RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State VOL. CCXXXV-44 Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 235 U.S. of Illinois. Argued October 29, 1914. Decided November 9, 1914. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541. Mr. William Ritchie and Mr. Samuel B. King for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Timothy J. Scofield, Mr. Frank J. Loesch, Mr. Charles F. Loesch and Mr. James Stillwell for the defendants in error. No. 36. TWIN FALLS CANAL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE STATE OF IDAHO ET AL. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho. Argued October 30 and November 2, 1914. Decided November 9, 1914. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541. Mr. Arthur M. Bowen for the plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Peterson and Mr. Edwin G. Davis for the defendants in error. No. 41. J. F. SMITH ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. GEORGE LEAVENWORTH. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi. Argued November 3, 1914. Decided November 9, 1914. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Rogers v. Jones, 214 U. S. 196, 204; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672, 677; (2) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674; de Bearn v. Safe Deposit Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 670; (3) New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 344; Gring v. Ives, 222 U. S. 365, 370; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 235 U.S. Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 652. Mr. John W. Cutrer and Mr. O. G. Johnston for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Gerald FitzGerald and Mr. Edward Mayes for the defendant in error. No. 57. JOHN JENKINS, APPELLANT, v. MAXWELL LAND GRANT COMPANY. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico. Argued for the appellant and submitted for the appellee November 5, 1914. Decided November 9, 1914. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Gildersleeve v. New Mexico Mining Co., 161 U. S. 573; Harrison v. Perea, 168 U. S. 311, 323; Wm. W. Bierce, Ltd., v. Hutchins, 205 U. S. 340, 344, and cause remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico. Mr. F. T. Cheetham for the appellant. Mr. Chas. A. Spiess for the appellee. No. 105. OSWALD WEST, AS GOVERNOR, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. CORVALLIS & EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 9, 1914. Decided November 16, 1914. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, 450; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665; People ex rel. Hastings v. Jackson, 112 U. S. 233, 236; (2) Marshall, Governor, v. Dye, 231 U. S. 250. Mr. A. M. Crawford for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Joseph Paxton Blair and Mr. Wm. D. Fenton for the defendant in error. No. 264. EDWARD S. GARD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. In error to the Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. 235 U. S. Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 9, 1914. Decided November 16, 1914. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Gring v. Ives, 222 U. S. 365, 370; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658. Mr. James Hartnett for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Patrick J. Lucey and Mr. Lester H. Strawn for the defendants in error. No. 64. PETER H. ANDERSON ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE SWEDISH EVANGELICAL MISSION COVENANT OF AMERICA ET AL. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. Argued November 6, 1914. Decided November 30, 1914. Per Curiam. Decree affirmed with costs, upon the authority of White Star Mining Co. v. Nels O. Hultberg; Claes W. Johnson v. White Star Mining Co.; Peter H. Anderson v. White Star Mining Co., 205 U. S. 540. Mr. Axel Chytraus, Mr. E. Allen Frost and Mr. John J. Healy for the appellants. Mr. Silas H. Strawn, Mr. John Barton Payne and Mr. Harris F. Williams for the appellees. No. 90. WILLIAM R. COWAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. JOHN E. W. WAYMAN, State's attorney. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. Argued November 13, 1914. Decided November 30, 1914. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, upon the authority of Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 107; Consol. Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 599, 600. See Shedd v. People, 217 U. S. 597. Mr. Harry S. Mecart 235 U. S. Opinions Per Curiam, Etc. ney for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Patrick J. Lucey and Mr. L. H. Strawn for the defendant in error. No. 596. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. LENA HANSON, AS EXECUTRIX, ETC. In error to the Circuit Court of Ozaukee County, State of Wisconsin. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 16, 1914. Decided November 30, 1914. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spies v. Illinois, 123 U. S. 131, 181; Erie Railroad v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148, 154; Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Woodford, 234 U. S. 46; Willoughby. v. Chicago (decided at this term), ante, p. 45. Mr. C. H. Van Alstine for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Geo. D. Van Dyke for the defendant in error. No. 109. OREGON SHORT LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CHARLOTTE A. HOMER. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Utah. Submitted for the plaintiff in error December 4, 1914. Decided December 7, 1914. Per Curiam. Judgment reversed with costs, and case remanded for further proceedings upon the authority of Boston & Maine R. R. v. Hooker, 233 U. S. 97. Mr. Geo. H. Smith and Mr. Henry W. Clark for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error. No. 424. JOHN F. DOYLE AND JOHN F. DOYLE, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COPARTNERS, TRADING AS JOHN F. DOYLE & SON, APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE J. SCHMIDHEISER, TRUSTEE, ETC. Appeal from the United States Circuit |