The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code : Human Rights in Human Experimentation: Human Rights in Human ExperimentationGeorge J. Annas Edward R. Utley Professor of Health Law, Medicine Michael A. Grodin Associate Professor of Philosophy and Associate Director of Law, and Ethics Program both of the Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Oxford University Press, USA, 1992. 5. 7. - 400ÆäÀÌÁö The atrocities committed by Nazi physicians and researchers during World War II prompted the development of the Nuremberg Code to define the ethics of modern medical experimentation utilizing human subjects. Since its enunciation, the Code has been viewed as one of the cornerstones of modern bioethical thought. The sources and ramifications of this important document are thoroughly discussed in this book by a distinguished roster of contemporary professionals from the fields of history, philosophy, medicine, and law. Contributors also include the chief prosecutor of the Nuremberg Military Tribunal and a moving account by a survivor of the Mengele Twin Experiments. The book sheds light on keenly debated issues of both science and jurisprudence, including the ethics of human experimentation; the doctrine of informed consent; and the Code's impact on today's international human rights agenda. The historical setting of the Code's creation, some modern parallels, and the current attitude of German physicians toward the crimes of the Nazi era, are discussed in early chapters. The book progresses to a powerful account of the Doctors' Trial at Nuremberg, its resulting verdict, and the Code's development. The Code's contemporary influence on both American and international law is examined in its historical context and discussed in terms of its universality: are the foundational ethics of the Code as valid today as when it was originally penned? The editors conclude with a chapter on foreseeable future developments and a proposal for an international covenant on human experimentation enforced by an international court. A major work in medical law and ethics, this volume provides stimulating, provocative reading for physicians, legal professionals, bioethicists, historians, biomedical researchers, and concerned laypersons. |
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
¸ñÂ÷
THE NUREMBERG CODE | 2 |
1 | 3 |
This part addresses the nature source and scope | 15 |
2 | 17 |
3 | 32 |
4 | 53 |
This part contains the primary source documents from the Doctors | 63 |
LO | 67 |
10 | 183 |
11 | 201 |
This part presents an analysis of the importance and implications | 225 |
of vulnerable patients and protecting their welfare The extent | 226 |
12 | 227 |
13 | 240 |
14 | 258 |
15 | 276 |
6 | 94 |
PROSECUTION COUNSEL | 111 |
CONTI | 112 |
General view of courtroom on opening day of trial | 115 |
SENTENCES AND COMMUTATIONS | 120 |
7 | 121 |
This part of the book explores the legal aspects of | 147 |
human fetuses because of their inability to give consent and | 148 |
8 | 149 |
9 | 174 |
16 | 286 |
17 | 307 |
1 | 317 |
2A | 322 |
2B | 329 |
3 | 331 |
4 | 343 |
LO | 346 |
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
accepted acts American applied Association authority believe benefit biomedical carried Chapter charged clinical concentration camp concerning conducted considered Control countries court crimes criminal death defendants developed direct discussion disease doctors document drugs effects established ethical evidence experiments fact final force German Guidelines Helsinki human experimentation human rights human subjects important individual informed consent Institute interests involving Journal judges judgment justified knowledge means medical research medicine ment mental methods military Military Tribunal moral murder nature Nazi never noted Nuremberg Code obtain official Organization participation patient performed persons physicians possible practice present principles prisoners proposed protect question racial reason regulations Reich respect responsibility risks rules scientific society specific standards suffering therapeutic therapy tion treatment trial Tribunal United University violation World