« 이전계속 »
* RT. I—Notice of Inscriptions in Behar, communicated by Mr. RAVENSHAw. By the Editors.
We present our readers with a letter from Mr. RAvKNsh Aw, with *hich we received several copies and facsimiles of Inscriptions obtain*d by that gentleman during his tour in South Behar. We regret to *Y, that the most important and interesting of these impressions **e so imperfect and confused as to baffle the attempts of the Pandit Kawal, KAUNT, who aided Mr. JAMES PRINSEP in his valuable dis*Veries. We allude particularly to the inscriptions on the inverted **umn in the fort of Behar. They are in the Sanscrit language, and ***Ancier. Nos. 1 and 2 are duplicates taken on sized paper. The ***ers on the one have been inked on the obverse side, and on the ** set on the reverse. The only word yet deciphered is “Srenayah,” *-iders,” “files." From No. 3 of the same pillar these Sanscrit words Yo-e been discovered—“labdhopāya wetropari ku-kriya tyá(jyā) any "=vilact against land obtained by any means, should be avoided.” ENos. 4, 5, 6, and 7, are in the same character and language, taken *=n the ruins of Baudhist statuary at Barahgaon. They appear to *-tain Baudhist moral sayings; example— ** Ye dharma hetu prabhavah teshåm hetun Tathâgutam avagachchh.” ** Know Budh to be the author of those things which proceed from \\ttue as a cause.” We suspect that the image at this place (so described by Mr. Howesshaw) cannot be BHAIRAva. The terrific Siva would be cer*ly misplaced amongst the peace-loving divinities of the Baudhists. Z Z
No. 8 is in the Deva Nagri, and belongs to a class of inscriptions bearing the name of NA’ykA PRATA'PA DHAvALA Dev A RAJA of Japila. They are described by Mr. Colebrooke in the first volume of the Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society (page 201), on inspection of the facsimiles taken by Dr. Bucha NAN. No. 8 is that translated by that distinguished orientalist. “It is (to borrow his words,) “an inscription on a rock, denominated, from an “idol delineated on it, Táráchándi, in the vicinity of Sahusram, in “South Behar; and contains the protest of a chieftain named PRA“TA'PADHAvALA De'v A, bearing the title of Náyaca and that of Rája “of Japila, against an usurpation of two villages by certain Brāh“manas in his neighborhood, under colour of a grant, surreptitiously “obtained through corruption of his officers, from the Rájá of Gádhi“nagara or Cányaculja (Canój), who was the celebrated WEJAYA“chandra. Its date is 1229 Samvat, corresponding to A. D. 1173." The obliteration of the first digit has led Mr. RAvens HAw to impute to these inscriptions an age more remote by one thousand years than the true era. No. 9 belongs to the same class, but is not described by Mr. CoLEBRooke. The transcriber of No. 8 seems to have been no great scholar; but the transcriber of No. 9 is evidently quite illiterate. He introduces his own Lala letters where they differ from the Deva Nagri, and is baffled by the conjunct letters. From what is deciphered, this appears to commemorate, by the Raja the construction of a road, “like steps” from the Pratabali river to the top of the adjoining hill, on which are impressions of the feet of Vishnu and CHAND1. The seal of BHIKU Pandit, the composer of the inscription, is on the slab, which besides the fact commemorated, records some notice of this redoubtable Raja's family. Parts of the slab are obliterated, but the transcription of what is legible by a scholar, would enable us to give a more correct analysis of its contents. The impression of No. 10 is as imperfect and confused as those of Nos. 1, 2, and 3; so that we must wait the receipt of a more correctimpression before we can hope to arrive at the contents of this stone. The four Persian inscriptions communicated by Mr. Ravenshaw, require little comment in addition to the notice by that gentleman. From the first, we learn that in the time of AKBAR “his servants had thousands of powers,” and that SAid SURFARAz KhAN, (one of them perhaps) founded the Musjid, “a sublime shrine. He was a pious man, as it were a sacred parterre in spring.” From the second we learn, that MUNIR Raj built “this tomb of the IMAM of age."—In these verses the Prophet is piously apostrophized The third informs us, that in the reign of Shah JFHAN the Just, HABIB SUR (the Raj no doubt) constructed the basin of SHARAF-AD-DIN, and “repaired (babast) and made this sublime Id-gah, and the brick pavement.” Mr. RAvenshaw informs us, that this saint died in 782. A. H. The dedication of the basin is therefore a posthumous honor. In the last line of the third couplet of the epitaph on IBRAHIM BAYU we have hazarded a correction,-Kin-toz for Kin-loz. The first, however unusual as a compound, may mean zealous or fervent, the second has no sense. This good man it seems “was royal in his disposition, and in religion as fervent as Abraham.” He died in the month of Hajj on a Sunday. The line obliterated would have supplied the date. The concluding line prays “that God may make easy his last account.” A correct plate of Mr. Ravenshaw's sketch of the tower of JARA'sANDHA near Girik is annexed. Mr. RAvenshAw has detailed the pauranic legend of this ‘Asur,’ demon, (not Assyrian). The term is given to the foes of KRISHNA. KANSA, the slain son-in-law of JARAsANDHA, and the uncle of KRISHNA, is so called, (See Wilson's Dictionary.) We are much mortified, in being obliged to send forth this Number without an analysis of the inscriptions on the inverted column in the fort and on the stone on the hill near Sasseram, now called ChandanShahid-of course from some Moslim devotee. They may, we think, afford interesting historical facts. We wish Mr. RAvenshaw, or any other friend to antiquarian research, could find the opportunity of taking more perfect facsimiles. Captain BURNs would render important service if he would describe minutely the best process and fittest materials for taking accurate facsimiles from engraved slabs. In the meantime we suggest that other impressions be taken on damp or sized paper, and that they be sent to us without any attempt to delineate in ink the letters either on the concave or convex faces. If they be sent in duplicate the chance of being deciphered is greater. The slab to which Mr. RAvenshAw refers at the close of his valuable letter has been received, and will be noticed in an early Numher. We now pass on to that gentleman's letter.
To the Secretary of the Asiatic Society, Calcutta.
SIR, I have the pleasure to forward for the inspection of the Society, a few inscriptions collected by me in a late tour through the district of Behar, in the hope that some of them may prove to be new, and useful in illustrating the history of the country. No. 1, is an inscription on a stone pillar found among the ruins of the fort of Behar. The fort is supposed by Buchanan" to have been built by the Maga Rajas, who during the first three centuries after Christ ruled over this part of the country, then called Magadha, and indeed still called Magad by the lower orders of natives to this day. The shaft of the column is about eleven feet high, being a fragment only of the original pillar. It is situated on the high ground, a little to the west of the northern gate of the fort. Its original position is said to have been in front of the gate ; on removing it to its present site, the pillar was erected in a reversed position, with its base in the air, and its summit in the ground. Various expedients were tried, in order to take off the inscription; but wax, sealing wax, and the ordinary method of inking the pillar, and taking the impression on damp paper, alike failed. At last I had recourse to sized paper, which being pressed while damp carefully into the letters, retained the form of them when dry. In No. 1, the cavities of the letters have been filled with ink. In No. 2, which is another copy of the same inscription, the reverse or embossed side has been inked. The latter appears the best copy, and if the paper be held up to the light the characters can be as distinctly traced as on the other. No. 3, is a copy of an inscription on the upper (really lower) part of the column. As I have never seen any characters which resemble those on the Behar column, I shall be glad to learn from your Society by what name they are designated, and to what era they belong. It is singular that Buchanan should not have alluded to this pillar in his description of the fort of the Magas while giving an account of the numerous Boodhist images, &c. scattered among the ruins. There are several ancient Mahomedan buildings in the town and its vicinity, which are likewise unnoticed by Buchanan. The principal one is the tomb or Durgah of a holy saint, styled Huzrat Mukdoom Ool Moolk Shah Shureef Oodeen. There is an inscription in the Cusic character over the entrances to the Durgah, which, however, time has rendered illegible, with the exception of the date of the death of the saint, 782 Hijree, (1380 A.D.) and of the erection of the tomb, 977 Hijree (1569 A. D.) The Durgah is held in great veneration by the Mahomedans, who at the Oors, or anniversary of the death of the saint assemble from all parts of the country, it is said to the number sometimes of 50,000. This ceremony takes place in December. The tomb, the adjoining mosque, and other buildings, are illuminated, and prayers are offered up for the dead and the living.
Extensive endowments of rent-free lands have been granted at different times by Emperors, Amils, and pious Mahomedans, for the support of the shrine, the administration of which, is entrusted to a Sujadah Nusheen, an hereditary officer, to whom great reverence is paid by the Faithful. But a great portion of the lands has been alienated either to relations of the family, or in satisfaction of debts of former incumbents, and a great part has become liable to assessment under the Resumption Laws; so that little now remains for the support of the family, the splendour of religious festivals, or the maintenance of the Moolvees who were wont to teach to the rising generation the doctrines of the law and the tenets of the Prophet.
The following inscription is on the Joomah Musjid, date 1004 Hijree, in the reign of Akbar.
The subjoined is in a tank and Eid Gah, date 1065 Hijree, in the reign of Shah Jehan.