 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1909 - 952 페이지
...was not present when they were made, and could not have known anything about them, Leucht v. Leucht. or whether they were, in fact, related by the husband...to what the husband said to them. In neither case Leucht v. Leucht. would the defendant deny that the husband made the statements. The Code provision... | |
 | Peyton Randolph, Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1827 - 776 페이지
...incompetency to satisfy the mind of the existence of the fact, and the frauds which might be practised under its cover, combine to support the rule, that hear-say evidence is totally inadmissible." To this rule, however, there are some few exceptions, which, the books tell us, are as old as the rule... | |
 | 1843 - 506 페이지
...incompetency to satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds, which may be practised under its cover, combine to support the rule, that hearsay evidence is totally inadmissible. It becomes, therefore, of great importance clearly to distinguish between hearsay, and what is deemed... | |
 | Esek Cowen, Nicholas Hill - 1839 - 906 페이지
...weakness, ils incompetency to .satisfy the mind of the existence of the fact, and the frauds which might be practiced under its cover, combine to support the...rule that hearsay evidence is totally inadmissible: thegenral rule supports the case ; and the case is not within any exception heretofore recognized.... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1848 - 764 페이지
...satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds which may be practised with impunity under its cover, combine to support the rule that hearsay evidence is inadmissible (i). § 386. It cannot, however, be denied, that the rule excluding hearsay evidence,... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1849 - 814 페이지
...tency to satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds which might be practised under its cover, combine to support the rule that hearsay evidence is totally insufficient« The principle of this rule ¡Si that such evidence requires credit to be given to a... | |
 | Theodore Thring - 1861 - 416 페이지
...satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds which may be practised with impunity under its cover, combine to support the rule that hearsay evidence is inadmissible. 2 Kxceptiona There are, however, certain important exceptions, dfexciusioa. which it... | |
 | Simon Greenleaf - 1866 - 756 페이지
...mcompetency to satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact, and the frauds which may be practised under its cover, combine to support the rule, that hearsay evidence is totally inadmissible.2 § 100. Before we proceed any farther in the discussion of this branch of evidence,... | |
 | 1916 - 506 페이지
...specific fact, which, in its nature, is susincompetency to satisfy the mind as to the existence of the fact and the frauds which may be practiced under its...rule, that hearsay evidence is totally inadmissible."* Notwithstanding such weakness and incompetency, yet we know that when we get away from effort "to establish... | |
 | Herbert Broom, Edward Alfred Hadley - 1875 - 858 페이지
...weakness, its incompetency to satisfy the mind of the existence of the fact, and the frauds which might be practiced under its cover, combine to support the...rule that hearsay evidence is totally inadmissible. MAKSIIATJ,, CJ, in Mima Queen v. Hepburn, 7 Cranch, 290, 296. See Ваш v. Wood, 1 Wheat. 6, 8. On... | |
| |
... that this species of testimony supposes some better testimony which might be adduced in the particular case is not the sole ground of its exclusion. Its intrinsic weakness, its incompetency to satisfy the mind of the existence of the fact, and the... 
