 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1832 - 948 페이지
...statute, an acknowledgment or promise must be express and direct in itself, in order to be received as evidence of a new or continuing contract, to take a case out of the operation of the statute. Mr. Justice GASELEE. — Admitting the rule to be, that a promise to pay may be implied from... | |
 | New York (State). - 1850 - 920 페이지
...which the penalty or forfeiture attached, or the liability was created. Amended Code, $ 109. § 594. No acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, by which to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same is contained in some... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1856 - 724 페이지
...upon what was then said and done, and not upon what was transacted antecedently. By the code (§ 110) no acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take the case out of the operation of the title prescribing the limitations, unless the... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1861 - 722 페이지
...no acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take a case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby ; but that this provision... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1864 - 712 페이지
...ever since in force, by which it is provided that no Coe v. Mason. acknowledgment or promise shall take a case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby. But by the 73d section... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1865 - 630 페이지
...no acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take a case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, unless the same be contained in some writing, signed by the party to be charged thereby. It seems to me that... | |
 | New York (State) - 1867 - 1086 페이지
...against the assignor (Pickett v. King, 34 Barb. 193, disapproving Barger v. Durvin, 22 Barb. 68). «. ( e 1I TP0 V^^ 4 ,HehM1 7 Xٻ) F T . - Ȍ g G U, G... 6Kw t _. rf U g /l: ɭ l)o ʑ/ 7 m ~ P O: charged thereby (Hope v. Bogart, 1 Hilton, 544). What is a sufficient signing, see Rome v. Thompxm,... | |
 | New York (State), Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1867 - 966 페이지
...writing. In llope 4gt. J)oyart, 1 JIM., 545, Special Term, April, 1858, HILTON, J., it was decided that no acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence...contract, to take a case out of the operation of the statute of liniiuuions, unless contained in some writing signed by the party u> be charged thereby.... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1867 - 1310 페이지
...on Ev. $ 84. Roscoe on Ev. 1-4 By the Rev. Sts. c. 120, § 13, no acknowledgment or promise shall be evidence of a new or continuing contract, to take a case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, or to deprive a party of the benefit thereof, unless such acknowledgment or... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - 1867 - 652 페이지
...on Ev\ $ 84. Roscoe on Ev. 1-4 By the Rev. Sts. c. 120, $ 13, no acknowledgment or promise shall be evidence of a new or continuing contract, to take a case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, or to deprive a party of the benefit thereof, unless such acknowledgment or... | |
| |
No acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, by which to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same is contained in some writing, signed by the party to be charged thereby. 
