 | United States. Board of Tax Appeals - 1939 - 1380 페이지
...in a derision is not a miilter of federal concern. There is no federal general common law. Couyress has no power to declare substantive rules of common...they be local in their nature or "general", be they (x-rnnu'ivial law or a part of the Itiw of torts. And value of Its outstanding stuck is owned, directly... | |
 | 1938 - 474 페이지
...Erie R. Co.>v. Tompkins, supra: "Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common lav; applicable in a State whether they be local in their nature or "general", bo they commercial law °ra part of tho law of torts. And no clause in the Constitution purports to... | |
 | Wayne Leslie McNaughton, Joseph Lazar - 1954 - 554 페이지
...judges have attempted to build a body of Federal common law, but the Supreme Court has declared 27 that "there is no Federal general common law. Congress...substantive rules of common law applicable in a State. . . ." Cases involving a given state's common law are decided by Federal judges in the light of that... | |
 | United States. Department of the Interior - 1942 - 972 페이지
...Legislature in a statute or by its highest court in a decision is not a matter of federal concern. There is no federal general common law. Congress has...their nature or "general," be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. And no clause in the Constitution purports to confer such a power upon... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1961 - 232 페이지
...legislature in a statute or by its highest court in a decision is not a matter of Federal concern. There is no Federal general common law. Congress has...their nature or 'general', be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. And no clause in the Constitution purports to confer such a power upon... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance. Subcommittee on Health - 1974 - 546 페이지
...medical malpractice. The Supreme Court has said in Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 US 64 i(1938) that: Congress has no power to declare substantive rules...applicable in a State whether they be local in their nature 'of "general", be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. « * « Supervision over either... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance - 1974 - 574 페이지
...medical malpractice. The Supreme Court has said in Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 US 64 r (1938) that: Congress has no power to declare substantive rules...applicable in a State whether they be local in their nature "of "general", be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. * * * Supervision over either... | |
| |
There is no federal general common law. Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in a state whether they be local in their nature or "general," be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. And no clause in the... 
