Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1910 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
2 ÆäÀÌÁö
... sufficient reason appears why Cox was not interviewed for the purpose of acquiring either an affirmation or denial of such facts prior to the closing of the rebuttal testimony . The testimony presented in behalf of Christensen was such ...
... sufficient reason appears why Cox was not interviewed for the purpose of acquiring either an affirmation or denial of such facts prior to the closing of the rebuttal testimony . The testimony presented in behalf of Christensen was such ...
4 ÆäÀÌÁö
... sufficient until it is finally determined whether a patent shall issue thereon . The reasons for this provision of Rule 54 are obvious . To require an applicant to file new drawings prior to the allowance of his application when the ...
... sufficient until it is finally determined whether a patent shall issue thereon . The reasons for this provision of Rule 54 are obvious . To require an applicant to file new drawings prior to the allowance of his application when the ...
5 ÆäÀÌÁö
... sufficient for the purpose of examination , would cause unnecessary expense and to that extent work undue hardship upon the applicant . Construing these rules together , it is believed that the objection to the drawing in this case is ...
... sufficient for the purpose of examination , would cause unnecessary expense and to that extent work undue hardship upon the applicant . Construing these rules together , it is believed that the objection to the drawing in this case is ...
7 ÆäÀÌÁö
... sufficient under the pro- visions of Rules 5 and 20 to empower the Rail Joint Company to re- 21895 - H . Doc . 124. 61–2 . voke the power of the attorney of record and substitute DECISIONS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS . 7.
... sufficient under the pro- visions of Rules 5 and 20 to empower the Rail Joint Company to re- 21895 - H . Doc . 124. 61–2 . voke the power of the attorney of record and substitute DECISIONS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS . 7.
22 ÆäÀÌÁö
... sufficient excuse upon their part for failure to adduce sufficient evidence concerning the disclosure in connection with Exhibit No. 5 is clearly pointed out in the decision of the Ex- aminer of Interferences and does not need further ...
... sufficient excuse upon their part for failure to adduce sufficient evidence concerning the disclosure in connection with Exhibit No. 5 is clearly pointed out in the decision of the Ex- aminer of Interferences and does not need further ...
¸ñÂ÷
19 | |
38 | |
52 | |
58 | |
60 | |
72 | |
74 | |
76 | |
80 | |
84 | |
89 | |
93 | |
98 | |
105 | |
108 | |
109 | |
116 | |
140 | |
146 | |
151 | |
165 | |
170 | |
171 | |
184 | |
186 | |
192 | |
199 | |
200 | |
212 | |
216 | |
220 | |
225 | |
228 | |
233 | |
235 | |
238 | |
239 | |
251 | |
266 | |
268 | |
273 | |
356 | |
365 | |
370 | |
381 | |
385 | |
386 | |
393 | |
411 | |
428 | |
444 | |
461 | |
471 | |
476 | |
483 | |
530 | |
536 | |
556 | |
564 | |
569 | |
573 | |
580 | |
585 | |
586 | |
592 | |
594 | |
597 | |
598 | |
602 | |
603 | |
610 | |
613 | |
619 | |
±âŸ ÃâÆǺ» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
abandoned action affidavit affirmed alleged amendment apparatus appellant's appellee applicant's assignment Assistant Commissioner attorney awarding priority circuit cited claims combination Commissioner of Patents Company construction contended counts Court of Appeals Decided decision declaration denied described descriptive properties device disclosed disclosure District of Columbia divisional application drawings entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiner of Trade-Marks Examiners-in-Chief fact February February 20 Ferranti filed his application final rejection granted ground held improvement interference proceeding invention in issue inventor involved machine manufacture mark means mechanism Messrs metal mold motion to dissolve oath Ohlsen operation opinion original application party Patent Office petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention prosecution purpose question reason record reduction to practice references refused registration reissue reissue application reopen res adjudicata Rule shown specification sufficient take testimony thereof tion Trade-Mark Act transmit whisky word
Àαâ Àο뱸
505 ÆäÀÌÁö - Act or by treaty; or when such foreign state or nation is a party to an international agreement which provides for reciprocity in the granting of copyright, by the terms of which agreement the United States may, at its pleasure, become a party thereto...
258 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof, or more than two years prior to his application, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years prior to his application, unless the same is proved to have been abandoned, may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceedings had, obtain a patent therefor.
507 ÆäÀÌÁö - The existence of the reciprocal conditions aforesaid shall be determined by the President of the United States, by proclamation made from time to time, as the purposes of this Act may require...
36 ÆäÀÌÁö - In the patent office a written description of the same, and of the manner and process of making, constructing, compounding, and using It, in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which It appertains, or with which It is most nearly connected, to make, construct compound, and use the same...
505 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... provides for reciprocity in the granting of copyright, by the terms of which agreement the United States of America may at its pleasure become a party to such...
36 ÆäÀÌÁö - Before any inventor or discoverer shall receive a patent for his invention or discovery, he shall make application therefor, in writing, to the Commissioner of Patents, and shall file in the Patent Office a written description of the same, and of the manner and process of making, constructing, compounding, and using it...
466 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... and a statement of the mode in which the same is applied and affixed to goods, and the length of time during which the trade-mark has been used.
261 ÆäÀÌÁö - States shall have the same force and effect as the same application would have if filed in this country on the date on which the application for patent for the same invention...
482 ÆäÀÌÁö - Whenever an application is made for a patent which, in the opinion of the Commissioner, would interfere with any pending application, or with any unexpired patent, he shall give notice thereof to the applicants, or applicant and patentee, as the case may be. The question of priority of invention...
509 ÆäÀÌÁö - That whenever, by mistake, accident, or inadvertence, and without any wilful default or intent to defraud or mislead the public, any patentee shall have in his specification claimed to be the original and first inventor or discoverer...