페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

Page

873 980

831

798

233

Pacific Exp. Co., Rosenberger v. (Mo.).... 429
Paine v. Kentucky Refining Co., two cases
(Ky.)

Palmer, Archer v. (Ark.).
Perrigin, State v. (Mo.).
Parsons v. Dills (Ky.).
Pecos & N. T. R. Co. v. Thompson (Tex.).. 801

Peters, State v. (Mo.).
Peterson v. Barbero (Mo. App.).
Phelan v. Granite Bituminous Pav. Co.

520
.1180

Page 483

71

577

106

96

784

489

246

724

Saline Val. R. Co., Coffman v. (Mo. App.)1053
Samstag, Radford v. (Ark.).

491

1059
101

San Antonio & A. P. R. Co. v. Houston
Packing Co. (Tex.)..

228

353
134

San Augustine Grocery Co., Fink v. (Tex.
Civ. App.).....

808

Scanlan, Elstun v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
144 Schaper, Pollman v. (Mo.).
.1104 Scheibler v. Steinburg (Tenn.).

35 ..1107 953 866

447

444

953 Schimpler, Southern Nat. Bank v. (Ky.).. 148
623 Schooler, Cowsert v. (Mo.).
Schooler v. Schooler (Mo.)..
Schulte, Hiller v. (Mo. App.).
Scism v. Scism (Mo. App.).
928 Sconce v. George Surmeyer Lumber
928 (Mo.)

461

455

Ohio Valley Coal & Mining Co. v. Heine (Ky.)

O'Kelley, State v. (Mo.).

Ortiz v. Walker (Tex. Civ. App.)
Owens v. First State Bank of Bronte (Tex.
Civ. App.)......

Owens, Supreme Hive of Ladies of Macca-
bees of World v. (Tex. Civ. App.)...

(Mo. App.)..

Phillips v. Grubbs (Ark.).

Phillips v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Phipps, Adkins v. (Ky.)...

Pierce Oil Corp. v. Weinert (Tex.).
Piersall v. Huber Mfg. Co. (Ky.)...
Poland, Kallison v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Pollman v. Schaper (Mo.)..
Pool, Claxton v. (Mo. App.).

Porter v. Loyal Americans of Republic

(Mo. App.)..

559

Potter v. Campbell (Ky.).
Powell v. Broaddus (Ky.).
Powell v. Horn (Ky.)..
Powell, State v. (Mo.).
Prendergast v. St. Louis (Mo.).
Prescott & N. W. R. Co. v. Thomas (Ark.) 486
Prestonsburg Coal Co. v. Wallen (Ky.)...
Prieto v. Hunt (Tex. Civ. App.).
Prince, State v. (Mo.).

970

395

4
535
885

Proctor Coal Co., Beaver's Adm'r v. (Ky.)..
P. R. Walsh Tie & Timber Co. v. Chester,
P. & S. G. R. Co. (Mo. App.)..
Pugh v. Pugh (Tex. Civ. App.)...
Putnam County v. Johnson (Mo.).

Quigley, Crouch v. (Mo.)...

Quincy, O. & K. C. R. Co., George v. (Mo.
App.)

614 312 .1039

Radford v. Samstag (Ark.)..
Ragghianti, State v. (Tenn.).
Raifeisen v. Young (Mo. App.).
Ranney v. Lewis (Mo. App.).
Rathblath, International & G. N. R. Co. v.

(Tex. Civ. App.)...

Rathblath, International & G. N. R. Co. v.

(Tex. Civ. App.)....

Reed v. Moss (Mo.)..

Reppert, Alsworth v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Reserve Loan Life Ins. Co. v. Benson (Tex.

Civ. App.)....

375

99

573

415

978

153

Sinclair v. Wismann (Mo. App.).
Singleton v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
491 Singley, Suggs v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
689 Skinner v. Whitlow (Mo. App.).
648 Sloan, State v. (Mo.)..
601

Sloan v. Gilmore (Tex. Civ. App.)

751

753 523 ..1098

Rhinehart, Newberry's Adm'x v. (Ky.)
Richardson v. Cohen (Ark.)..
Riley v. Independence (Mo.).

Roach, State ex rel. Garesche v. (Mo.)
Robbins v. Robbins (Mo.).
Robertson, Miles v. (Mo.).
Robinson, Ferguson v. (Mo.).

Robinson Seed & Plant Co. v. Hexter &

578
404

266 674 83 1022 1008 502 .1000 447

749

Kramer (Tex. Civ. App.).
Rodgers, St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v.

(Ark.)

106
Rosenberger v. Pacific Exp. Co. (Mo.). 429
Rosenberger v. Wells Fargo & Co. (Mo.).. 433
Ross, Gibbons v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Roth v. St. Joseph (Mo. App.).

17
.1155

Rounds v. Cloverport Foundry & Machine
Co. (Ky.)...

Rowell, Bird v. (Mo. App.)
Rucker, Houston Belt & Terminal R. Co.
v. (Tex. Civ. App.)....
Rust v. Carpenter (Ky.)..

...

384 .1172

Sadau, Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v.

301
873

Saffell v. State (Ark.).

St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Copeland
(Ark.)

St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry., Eads v. (Mo.
App.)
St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Rodgers
(Ark.)

St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Spriggs
(Ark.)

St. Louis, S. F. & T. R. Co. v. Thomas (Tex. Civ. App.)..

St. Louis Southwestern R. Co. v. Curtis (Ark.)

St. Louis Southwestern R. Co. of Texas
v. Balthrop (Tex. Civ. App.)..

St. Louis Southwestern R. Co. of Texas v.
Gresham (Tex.)..

[blocks in formation]

Shepherd, Lemon v. (Mo. App.)
Shields' Adm'r, Wallsend Coal & Coke Co.
v. (Ky.)..

544 .1145

918 580

46

241

463 500 .1089

Sly, State ex rel. Hackett v. (Mo. App.)....1197
Smith v. Adams (Tex. Civ. App.).
Smith, Anderson, Evans & Evans v. (Tex.
Civ. App.)....

30

Smith v. Egan (Mo.).

765 971

Smith, Joplin Supply Co. v. (Mo. App.).. 649 Smith v. State (Tex. Cr. App.)... 843

Smith & Co. v. Duncan (Tex. Civ. App.).. 233
Snowden v. Flanery (Ky.)...
893

Snyder Co., Louis P. Hyman & Co. v. (Ky.) 146
Sorell v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).

Sorge, Warne v. (Mo.).

356 967

Southern Kansas R. Co. of Texas, Logue v. (Tex.)....

805

Southern Nat. Bank v. Schimpler (Ky.)... 148
Southern Pac. Co., Wright v. (Mo. App.)..1137
Southern R. Co. v. Griffin (Tenn.).

688

Southern Sand & Material Co., State v.
(Ark.)
854
Southern Surety Co. v. First State Bank of
Montgomery (Tex. Civ. App.).
833
Southwest Missouri R. Co., Blackburn v.
(Mo. App.)..
457

[blocks in formation]

Spriggs, St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. (Ark.)

Stalcup, Ft. Worth & D. C. R. Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.).

Stamps v. Tittle (Tex. Civ. App.). Stanfield v. Hennegar (Mo.).

State, Allen v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State v. Arnett (Mo.).

State, Baker v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Ballard v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State v. Banks (Mo.)....

State, Barnhill v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Bishop v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Brown v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Brown v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Bryan v. (Ark.)...
State, Burge v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State v. Butler (Mo.).

State, Caples v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Carey v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State v. Conners (Mo.)..

State, Davis v. (Tex. Cr. App.).

Stange, State v. (Mo. App.)
Starks v. Garver Lumber Mfg. Co. (Mo.

App.)

[blocks in formation]

Co. v.

State v. Douglas (Mo.)..

State v. Dunnegan (Mo.).

State, Flannigan v. (Tex. Cr. App.)

State v. Flynn (Mo.)..

State, Garrard v. (Ark.).

State v. Gennusa (Mo.).
State v. Green (Tenn.).

State, Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. (Tex. Civ.

App.)

v. (Tex. Civ. App.)..

State, Mora v. (Tex. Cr. App.)

State, O'Hara v. (Tex. Cr. App.).

State v. Stange (Mo. App.). State, Suggs v. (Tenn.)

State v. O'Kelley (Mo.).

State v. Perrigin (Mo.)..
State v. Peters (Mo.)...

State, Phillips v. (Tex. Cr. App.).

State v. Powell (Mo.).
State v. Prince (Mo.).

State v. Ragghianti (Tenn.).
State, Saffell v. (Ark.)..

State, Singleton v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State v. Sloan (Mɔ.).

State, Smith v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Sorell v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State v. Southern Sand & Material
(Ark.)

96

279 776 .1036 ..1199

State, Taylor v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Thompson v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Tolliver v. (Ark.)..

State, Walker v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State v. Walls (Mo. App.).
State, Ward v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Warner v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Whittlesey v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Williamson v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Willis v. (Tex. Cr. App.)..
State, Woolman v. (Ark.).

Page

..1198

342

526

340

340

State, Jones v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State v. Ketchum (Ark.)...
State, Knox v. (Tex. Cr. App.)
State, Looper v. (Tex. Cr. Äpp.).
State, Lopez v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, McDaniels v. (Ark.).
State, McGough v. (Ark.)..
State v. McTeer (Tenn.).

State, Martoni v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Messer v. (Tex. Cr. App.).
State, Missouri, K. æ T. R. Co. of Texas

505

348

363 348

.1107 484

63

509

730

366

429

1108

552

497

1113

516 Sultrage, Martin v. (Ky.).

485 439

867

727

733

492

822 344 .1113

Page

State ex rel. Chamberlain v. Young (Mo.).. 995 State ex rel. City of Elvins v. Marshall (Mo. App.)..

...

.1050 State ex rel. Garesche v. Drabelle (Mo.)...1016 State ex rel. Garesche v. Roach (Mo.). 1008 State ex rel. Hackett v. Sly (Mo. App.)....1197 State ex rel. Holmes v. Kernes (Mo. App.)1080 State ex rel. Journal Printing Co. v. Dreyer (Mo. App.)

Steinburg, Scheibler v. (Tenn.)

Stevens, Cobern v. (Tex. Civ. App.)..
Stewart v. Williams (Tex. Civ. App.).
Stockholders of First State Bank v. First

854 .1199

.1123 866 207 761

State Bank's Receiver (Ky.)..

678

Stockton v. John Ainsfield Co. (Mo. App.)1143 Stoeltzing, Shaw v. (Mo. App.).

..1158
864

Stone, Hessig-Ellis Drug Co. v. (Tenn.).
Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v.
Goodman (Tex. Civ. App.).

10

Stout, City of Columbia v. (Mo. App.)....1153
Stowers Furniture Co., Marshall v. (Tex.
Civ. App.)..

Stringer, Combes v. (Tex.).

Sturgis, Loftus v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Stuyvesant Ins. Co., Gulf Compress Co. v. (Tenn.)

Supreme Hive of Ladies of Maccabees of
World v. Owens (Tex. Civ. App.)... 233
Supreme Lodge K. P. v. Mims (Tex. Civ.
App.)

835

192

Surmeyer Lumber Co., Sconce v. (Mo.)... 997 43 Swain, Hickman v. (Tex.)... 209

40

529 Tafel, Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. (Ky.)... 887 965 Taylor v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).

56

.1113 Taylor, Western Union Tel. Co. v. (Tex. 524 'Civ. App.)..

345

360

Suggs v. Singley (Tex. Civ. App.). Suggs v. State (Tenn.).

352

851

Teat, Witt v. (Tex. Civ. App.)

Terry, Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. . .. .

.1110 Terry v. Groves (Mo.).

1 563 .1003

73 Tevis v. Tevis (Mo.)..

.766

729 Texas Furniture Co. v. Meyers (Tex. Civ.
342
App.)
844 Texas Midland R. R., Burns v. (Tex. Civ.
96 App.)

264

857 Texas Packing Co., Missouri, K. & T. R.
121 Co. of Texas v. (Tex. Civ. App.)... 337
349 Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Cook (Tex. Civ.
342 App.)
158

33

792

980 Tharp University School v. Komus Realty
573 Co. (Ky.)....

136

520 Thomas v. English (Mo. App.).

.1147

353 Thomas, Prescott & N. W. R. Co. v. (Ark.) 486
559 Thomas, St. Louis, S. F. & T. R. Co. v.
535 (Tex. Civ. App.).....

784

689 Thompson v. O. A. Crenshaw Grain Co.
483 (Ark.)

699

345

46 Thompson, Pecos & N. T. R. Co. v. (Tex.) 801 500 Thompson v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).. 843 Thompson Pub. Co., Bryan v. (Mo.). . 356

440

Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Drennon
(Mo. App.)

Co.

Tittle, Stamps v. (Tex. Civ. App.)
Tolliver v. State (Ark.)..

Texas & P. R. Co. v. Dickson Bros. (Tex.
Civ. App.)..
Texas & P. R. Co. v. Martin Bros. (Tex.
Civ. App.)...

122 Tomlin v. Clay (Tex. Civ. App.).

56 Town of Anchorage, Bernheim v. (Ky.). 345 Toyah Valley Irr. Co., Lastinger v. (Tex. 703 Civ. App.).. 339 .1160

Tracy v. Berridge (Mo. App.). Trapp v. Mersman (Mo. App.). 343 Trinity & B. V. R. Co. v. Dodd (Tex. Civ. .1109 App.)

230 217

14

859

241

122

399

289 302

.1181

776

703

Troll, Horton v. (Mo. App.).
Turner, Collin County Nat. Bank v. (Tex.
Civ. App.)..

204

139

788 .1176

612

238

.1081

165

Turner v. Tyler Land & Timber Co. (Mo.) 973

Page .1116 891

643

..1070

Ungerecht, Bond v. (Tenn.).
United Mine Workers of America v. Crom-
er (Ky.)....

United Rys. Co. of St. Louis, Foster v.
(Mo. App.)..

United Rys. Co. of St. Louis, Hamm v.
(Mo. App.)...
United Rys. Co. of St. Louis, Hays v. (Mo.
App.)

United Rys. Co. of St. Louis, Maloney v. (Mo. App.).

United Rys. Co. of St. Louis, Veiss v. (Mo. App.)

United Rys. Co. of St. Louis, Warren v. (Mo. App.).

United Rys. Co. of St. Louis, Wellman v.
(Mo. App.)..

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.,
Greenup v. (Ky.)

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.,
Hunter v. (Tenn.)..

Urban, Cook v. (Tex. Civ. App.).

498

Van Blarcom, Winter v. (Mo.).
Vanderwolk v. Matthaei (Tex. Civ. App.).. 304
Vandyke, Bank of Taylorsville v. (Ky.)...
Van Hoose, Knost v. (Mo. App.).
Vaughan's Adm'x, Chesapeake & O. R. Co.
of Kentucky v. (Ky.)..

869
596

141

Veiss v. United Rys. Co. of St. Louis (Mo.
App.)

Vessel's Adm'x, Louisville R. Co. v.
Villines, Lee v. (Tenn.).

Vineyard v. Heard (Tex. Civ. App.).
Voigt v. Hunt (Tex. Civ. Ap.›.).
Vrana, Gosch v. (Tex. Civ. App.).

Wahl, Ellis v. (Mo. App.)..
Walker v. Garner (Mo.).

Walker, Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. (Tex.

Civ. App.)....

Walker v. Lemma (Tenn.).

Walker, Ortiz v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Walker v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Walker's Adm'r, Chesapeake & O. R. Co.
v. (Ky.).

656

471

615

672

655

910

692
251

Co. (Ky.).

Weinert, Pierce Oil Corp. v. (Tex.).

615 (Ky.) 924 1117 22

Watson, Scott v. (Tex. Civ. App.)
Waugh v. Cook (Ark.).

Webb, Ex parte (Tex. Cr. App.).

Weidekamp's Adm'x v. Louisville & N. R.

113 967 .1109

672

[blocks in formation]

Whitaker v. Bell Oil Co. (Mo. App.).
White, Brinberry v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Whited v. Johnson (Tex. Civ. App.)..
Whitlow, Skinner v. (Mo. App.)...
Whitlow's Estate, In re (Mo. App.)...
Whittlesey v. State (Tex. Cr. App.)..
Wichita Valley R. Co. v. Boger (Tex. Civ.
App.)

(Mo.

Wilkinson v. Harding Dredge Co. App.) 745 Wilkerson & Satterfield v. McMurry (Tex. 757 Civ. App.)...

Western Assur. Co. v. Hillyer-Deutsch-Jarratt Co. (Tex. Civ. App.)

816

Western Union Tel. Co. v. Crutcher (Ky.) 138
Western Union Tel. Co. V. Flannagan
(Ark.)

701

Western Union Tel. Co. v. Fricke & Boyd (Tex. Civ. App.)..

6

Western Union Tel. Co., Johnston v. (Tex.
Civ. App.)....

272

1094

289

Williams, Brickell v. (Mo. App.). 582 Williams v. Collins (Mo. App.).. 955 Williams v. Fulks (Ark.)..

199

474 Williams, Logan v. (Ky.).
831 Williams, Missio v. (Tenn.).

339

128

Wallace, Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. (Tex.
Civ. App.).....

168

Wallen, Prestonsburg Coal Co. v. (Ky.). 395
Waller & Holz Co., Blakely v. (Mo. App.)1170
Walls, State v. (Mo. App.)..
Wallsend Coal & Coke Co. v. Shields'
Adm'r (Ky.).

.1160

918

Walsh Tie & Timber Co. v. Chester, P. &
S. G. R. Co. (Mo. App.)...
Ward v. Haren (Mo. App.).
Ward v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).

614
.1064
343

Ward Seminary for Young Ladies v. Nashville (Tenn.)..

Warne v. Sorge (Mo.).

Warner v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Warren v. United Rys. Co. of St. Louis
(Mo. App.).
Washington Life Ins. Co., Commonwealth
v. (Ky.)...

...

Watson, Edwards v. (Mo.).
Watson, Hicks v. (Mo.).

882
808

Western Union Tel. Co., Kenedy Mercan-
tile Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.).
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Taylor (Tex.
Civ. App.). . . .

Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Hodge
(Mo. App.)

Whaley, Green v. (Mo.).

[ocr errors]

.1186

575 619

205

812

463

463

345

767

595

275

607 .1189 93

Williams v. J. W. Crowdus Drug Co. (Tex.
Civ. App.).....

872 .1119 Yager's Guardian, Melcher v. (Ky.)...... 871 533 Yalr v. Hynes (Ky.). 268 Yeaman v. Galveston City Co. (Tex.). 103 York's Adm'r, Continental Coal Corp. v. .1113 (Ky.)

680
710

Young, Raifeisen v. (Mo. App.).
Young v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).

.1112

Young, State ex rel. Chamberlain v. (Mo.) 995

187

124

473

761

360

352

Williams, Stewart v. (Tex. Civ. App.)
Williamson v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).
Willis v. State (Tex. Cr. App.)...
Willoughby v. Hildreth (Mo. App.).
Wills v. Burbank (Mo. App.).
Wilson, Hardee v. (Tenn.).
Wilson v. Seigel (Tex. Civ. App.).
Winn v. Dyess (Tex. Civ. App.).
Winter v. Van Blarcom (Mo.).
Wisconsin Steel Co. v. Dixon (Ky.)..
Wismann, Sinclair v. (Mo. App.).
Withers, Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas
v. (Tex. Civ. App.)..

5 302

764

Witt v. Teat (Tex. Civ. App.).
Wofford, Brown v. Tex. Civ. App.).
Wofford v. Lane (Tex. Civ. App.).
Wood v. Lewis' Estate (Mo. App.).
Woolman v. State (Ark.)..

180

666

851 922 ...1115 Wright v. Southern Pac. Co. (Mo. App.)...1137

Worell Mfg. Co. v. Ashland (Ky.).
Wrape Co., Barrentine v. (Ark.).

[ocr errors]

639 608

475 .1090 294

498

682

580

131 648

THE

SOUTHWESTERN REPORTER

VOLUME 167

ANDERSON, CLAYTON & CO. v. TERRY. (No. 5362.)

(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin. May 13, 1914.)

1. PLEADING (§ 104*) CHANGE OF VENUEPLEA OF PRIVILEGE-REQUISITES.

Rev. St. 1911, art. 1903, provides that a plea of privilege shall state that none of the exceptions to exclusive venue in the county of one's residence, mentioned in Rev. St. arts. 1830 or 2308, exist in the case. Held, that a plea of privilege, stating that none of the exceptions to exclusive venue in the county of one's residence, mentioned "in articles 1194, 1585, of the Revised Statutes," exist in the case, which articles did not relate to venue, was insufficient.

[blocks in formation]

ferred to point out the exceptions to the statute which requires that a defendant shall be sued in the county of his residence. The plea of privilege filed in this case stated "that none of the exceptions to exclusive venue in the county of one's residence mentioned in article 1194 or article 1585 of the Revised Statutes of the state of Texas exist in this case." At the time this suit was brought and the plea referred to was filed, the Revised Statutes of 1911, from which we have quoted a portion of article 1903, were in force, and contained two articles numbered 1194 and 1585, but those articles do not relate to the subject of venue of suits. So it is quite clear that the plea omitted to state what the statute required, and for that reason we hold that it was insufficient, and that no error was committed in disregarding it.

[2] It is true that the plea stated:

"That this suit does not come within any of the exceptions provided by law in such cases authorizing suit to be brought or maintained in the county of Milam, state of Texas, or elsewhere outside of the county of Harris, State of

Texas."

That statement contained a conclusion of law in the mind of the person who prepared the plea. The statute does not require or authorize the making of such general statement; nor do we feel justified in holding that such statement will supply the omission to state that which the statute requires.

No error has been shown, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

KEY, C. J. C. H. Terry brought this suit against Anderson, Clayton & Co. and certain other defendants, and, from a judgment rendered in his favor against Anderson, Clayton & Co. the latter have appealed.

-RESIDENCE OF PARTIES.

[1] Appellants filed a plea of privilege to be sued in another county, and the only ques-JUSTICES OF THE PEACE (§ 72*)—JuriSDICTION tion presented by this appeal is the action of Under Rev. St. 1911, art. 2308, requiring the trial court in refusing to submit that suits before a justice of the peace to be complea to the jury. Article 1903 of the Revised menced in the county in which the defendants, or one of them, reside, except in certain cases, Statutes requires, among other things, that among which is a suit upon a contract in writsuch a plea of privilege shall state "that none ing promising performance at a particular place, of the exceptions to exclusive venue in the which may be brought in that county, where a county of one's residence mentioned in arti- suit was begun on a promissory note, payable at a certain place, and secured by a chattel cle 1830 or article 2308 of the Revised Stat-mortgage, against the maker of the note and utes exist in said cause." The articles re-the subsequent purchasers of the mortgaged

NOBLE et al. v. BROAD. (No. 5335.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.
April 15, 1914. Rehearing Denied
May 13, 1914.)

For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep'r Indexes

property, none of whom resided in the county in which the suit was brought, the defendants other than the maker of the note are entitled

to have the suit against them transferred to the county of their residence, since they were not parties to the agreement to pay at the particular place.

which judgment Noble and McGregor have appealed to this court, urging that the court erred in overruling their pleas of privilege, as well as rendering judgment against them foreclosing said mortgage lien.

None of the defendants resided in Coleman

county at the time the suit was brought, or process issued, or judgment rendered, nor did any of them have possession of the property in question against which the foreclosure was sought, nor were any of them claiming any interest therein; but it appeared that

Appeal from Coleman County Court; F. M. Bowen, Judge.

Leroy Vaughan had, prior thereto, removed the property out of the state. Appellants'

ants appeal. Reversed, with instructions.

Action by William Broad against T. B. Noble and others. On appeal from a justice of the peace to the county court, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and defend-pleas of privilege were in due form and supported by the facts, showing that neither of them came within any of the exceptions to exclusive venue mentioned in articles 1830 or 2308 of the Revised Civil Statutes of 1911, and, in view of this, it is urged that since none of the defendants lived in Coleman county, and appellants were not parties to the note sued on, that they were improperly joined in a suit by the payee against the maker of the note, notwithstanding the fact that no personal judgment was asked against them, but only a foreclosure of the mortgage

Critz & Woodward, of Coleman, for appellants. Snodgrass, Dibrell & Snodgrass, of Coleman, for appellee.

lien.

[Ed. Note.-For other cases, see Justices of the Peace, Cent. Dig. §§ 56, 143-145, 235; Dec. Dig. § 72.*]

Jenkins, J., dissenting.

RICE, J. While living in Coleman county, J. R. Hager became indebted to appellee in the sum of $125, and on December 3, 1909, gave him his note therefor, payable on the 1st of March, 1911, at Coleman, Tex., bearing 10 per cent. interest and 10 per cent. attorney's fees, secured by a chattel mortgage on two mares, which was duly filed and registered in said county. Afterwards he removed from Coleman to Clay county, taking said animals with him, without the knowledge or consent of appellee, and there mortgaged the same to T. B. Noble and H. L. McGregor to secure a debt due them, who, when the same matured, brought suit to enforce collection thereof, with foreclosure of said mortgage lien, and purchased said property at their foreclosure sale, crediting the amount paid therefor on their judgment against Hager. They subsequently sold said property to Leroy Vaughan, who paid value therefor. This suit was brought June 14, 1912, by appellee in justice court precinct No. 1, Coleman county, against Hager on said note, and against all of the other parties above named, praying for judgment for the debt against Hager, and for foreclosure of his mortgage lien as against said other parties. Hager

answered; but each of the others filed pleas of personal privilege to be sued in the counties of their residences, to wit, Clay and Wichita. On July 28, 1913, judgment went against Hager on the debt, with foreclosure of the mortgage as prayed for, but in favor of Noble, McGregor, and Vaughan on their pleas of privilege, transferring the case to the justice's court of precinct No. 4, Clay county. An appeal was taken to the county court, where the case was tried before the court, without a jury, and resulted in a judgment on the 30th of October, 1913, in favor of appellee against Hager for his debt and foreclosure of the mortgage lien, and against The bank having pleaded the privilege to all of the other parties thereto on their pleas be sued in Comanche, the county of its resiof privilege, and for foreclosure of the mort- dence, it was held that it could not be joined gage lien, as well as for costs of suit, from in the suit in McLennan county, on the

Article 2308 of the Revised Statutes provides that every suit in the court of a justice of the peace shall be commenced in the county and precinct in which the defendant,

or one or more of the several defendants, resides, except in the following cases, and such other cases as are or may be provided by law, etc. Exception 4 provides that suits upon a contract in writing promising perbrought in the county and precinct in which formance at any particular place may be such contract was to be performed, and this thorizing the suit against appellants in this exception is relied upon by appellee as au

instance.

In the case of Behrens Drug Co. v. Hamilton & McCarty, 92 Tex. 284, 48 S. W. 5, the plaintiff brought suit in McLennan county in Comanche county, and against the First against Hamilton & McCarty, who resided National Bank of Comanche. As stated by

the court:

Hamilton & McCarty the sum of $1,269.50, with "The object of the suit was to recover against interest, the value of certain merchandise sold to them by the drug company, for which they had agreed in writing to make payment in McLennan county, and to recover of the First National Bank of Comanche the value of certain book accounts and choses in action, alleged to have been transferred and assigned to the plaintiff by Hamilton & McCarty to secure their indebtedness to the plaintiff, and after that transfer Hamilton & McCarty had pretended to transfer the same to the First National Bank of Comanche, and said bank had wrongfully seiz ed and converted them to its own use."

« 이전계속 »