courts are not at liberty to pick and choose among congressional enactments, and when two statutes are capable of co-existence, it is the duty of the courts, absent a clearly expressed congressional intention to the contrary, to regard each as effective. Decisions of the Comptroller General of the United States - 298 페이지저자: United States. General Accounting Office - 1993전체보기 - 도서 정보
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service - 1976 - 1092 페이지
...States, 185 US 83, 87-89 (1902). The courts are not at liberty to pick and choose among congressional enactments, and when two statutes are capable of co-existence,...intention to the contrary, to regard each as effective. "When there are two acts upon the same subject, the rule is to give effect to both if possible ....... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Human Resources - 1980 - 1748 페이지
...would not lead to conflict. The courts are not at liberty to pick and choose between congressional enactments, and when two statutes are capable of co-existence,...intention to the contrary, to regard each as effective. * ****** The FAA and FDC Acts are clearly "capable of co-existence." The requirement of the FDC Act... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice - 1985 - 998 페이지
...Langdeau, 371 US 555, 565 (1963;. Thus, "courts are not at liberty to pick and choose among congressional enactments, and when two statutes are capable of co-existence,...intention to the contrary, to regard each as effective." Morton v. Mancari, 417 US 535, 551 (1974). There is no affirmative obligation on Congress to explain... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice - 1985 - 966 페이지
...application," §3(c)(l)(D)(ii), indicates Congress' intent that there be no Tucker Act remedy. But where two statutes are " 'capable of co-existence, it is...intention to the contrary, to regard each as effective.'" Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases, 419 US , at 133-134, quoting Morton v. Mancari, 417 US 535,... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice - 1985 - 990 페이지
...application," §3(c)(l)(D)(ii), indicates Congress' intent that there be no Tucker Act remedy. But where two statutes are " 'capable of co-existence, it is...intention to the contrary, to regard each as effective.'" Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases, 419 US , at 133-134, quoting Morton v. Mancari, 417 US 535,... | |
| |