페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

PAGE
Motion to strike out answer, requisites of affidavits to oppose

17
to vacate attachment, affidavits in opposition to, for what purpose
received .

33
to vacate order of arrest.

note, 315, 319

N.

Non-resident, what is.......

874
Notice in proceedings to dismiss policeman.

162
of appeal, requisites of

183
of defect in sealed proposals required by ordinance, need not be in
writing....

42
of examination of party, form and requisites of.. .284, note, 288

to county clerk, of proceedings to foreclose lien, object, requisites,
and effect of

99

0.

Officer de facto and de jure, distinction between..

of foreign corporation, action by
Officers, not allowed double costs .

220, 228, 296

105
381

P.

7

59

Parol proof, when not admissible to prove deed defeasible. .

113
Parties, in creditor's action

109
in foreclosure

113
Partition, history of jurisdiction

352
what irregularities do not affect title

59
interests of persons not in being ...,
Partner has no power to make general assignment..

123
one liable to arrest for fraud of another in a partnership transac-
tion, note

319
Party in interest, who is

.198, 205
Practice in proceedings for street opening.

273
in quo warranto not a guide in action under the Code.

220
Proceedings to open streets, regularity in

273
Penal statule, construction of .....

132
Penalty, form of summons in action for

.343, note, 344
Pleading-objection which does not appear on face of complaint, cannot be
raised on demurrer

6
what is a counter-claim...

290
Police, proceedings of Board of, reviewed by certiorari.

162
Precept, not issuable for costs, granted with order for judgment on the plead-
ings...

12
Promissory note-defence of accommodation maker.

32
liability of indorsee to payee ..

20

151,

R.

Recapture--when lawful out of the State

206
Receiver, action against not to be restrained on ground of a former judgment 293

PAGE

1

Receiver, liability of, for costs...

.....65, 96
may be appointed to close up affairs of insolvent partnership al-
though one of the firm has made an assignment of the partnership
property...

123
what must be shown to authorize the appointment of, note

371
when should be appointed in supplementary proceedings

92
Referee, powers of ...

.213, 217, note.
Reference may be ordered on a motion to discharge from arrest, note

320
Reply, when not necessary

290
Report of referee, taken before trial and put in evidence, how to be re-
viewed

68
Resident, who is .

374

S.

[ocr errors]

Scaled proposals, defect of form in

42
Seduction under promise of marriage, requisite proof of

139
Service of summons, when fraudulent...

307
Sheriff not entitled to double costs .

381
not liable to proceedings of claim and delivery by third party, to re-
cover personal property taken by him in similar proceedings

189
when may recapture after escape

206
Specific performance—when recession of contract may be adjudged in action
for .

42
Stay of proceedings on appeal does not restrain action on the undertaking.. 70

in foreclosure, on payment of interest .
Street opening, practice in proceedings in ....

373
Summons-amendment of allowed

380
fraudulent service of...

307
when should be under subdivision 1, and when under subdivision 2,
of $ 129....

15, 329, note, 336, note, 340, 343, 344, note.
Supplementary proceedings, what questions are allowable in

212
when allowable.

211
when receiver should be appointed in

92

92

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

Waiver-appearance is not, of irregularity in complaint..
Writ of assistance not allowable on judgment of ouster

329
220

ABBOTTS'

PRACTICE REPORTS.

NEW-YORK.

THE AMERICAN EXCHANGE BANK Q. SMITH.

New York Superior Court; General Term, December, 1857.

JUDGMENT ENTERED BY CLERK ON FAILURE TO ANSWER.—RE

QUISITES OF JUDGMENT-ROLL.

In an action to recover money only, where the complaint is not verified, and states

as a cause of action a promissory note made by the defendant, and judgment is entered upon a failure of the defendant to answer, it is not essential to the regularity of the judgment that the judgment-roll should show on its face that the note was produced to the clerk, and that he assessed the amount due to the plaintiff thereon. The Code does not, in terms, or by fair construction, require it. It was not re

quired by the practice prior to the Code. As the clerk, in such cases, must enter the judgment for the amount he has assessed, the judgment-roll is evidence that he did his duty in respect to assessing the amount due.

This action comes before the general term on an appeal by the defendant from an order made by Mr. Justice Hoffman, dated October 28, 1857, denying a motion made by the defendant on the judgment-roll, to vacate, for irregularity, a judgment entered on the 16th of said October for $3944.45 and costs.

The grounds of irregularity specified in the notice of motion, are,

1st. It does not appear by the record that the note, described VOL. VI-1

The American Exchange Bank a. Smith.

in the complaint as the cause of action, was produced to the clerk of the court, or that he assessed the damages thereon.

2d. It does not appear by the record that the defendant served any offer in writing that the plaintiff might enter judgment for any sum; nor that any offer, if served, was accepted within ten days thereafter, or at any other time.

3d. That there is no authority in the Code, or in any statute of this State, for the entry of such a judgment, and the same is void for want of jurisdiction.

The judgment-roll contains a summons dated December 14, 1845, stating that the plaintiff would take judgment for $3500.75, with interest from December 12, 1855. Also an unverified complaint, on a note dated June 9, 1855, made by the defendant, payable to the order of Dexter C. Force, six months from its date, for $3500. The complaint also states the indorsement of the note by the payee to Claflin, Mellen & Co., and by them to the plaintiffs, the due protesting of the note when due, and notice thereof to the payee, and that it is wholly unpaid; and prays judgment for $3500 and interest from the maturity of the note, and also for seventy-five cents for protesting it.

The roll also contains a paper writing containing the title of the action, and the words following, viz. :

“I hereby consent to, and do hereby withdraw the answer put in by me in this case, and consent that judgment be taken by the plaintiff against me for the sum demanded in the complaint, with costs.

CHARLES H. Smith, “ September 1, 1856." The judgment is in these words, viz. :

Superior Court, City of New York. The American Exchange Bank, plaintiff,

against Charles H. Smith, defendant. Judgment,

185 “The summons, with a copy of the complaint in this action, having been personally served on Charles H. Smith, the defendant, more than twenty days previous to this date, exclusive of the day of service, and the answer to the complaint having been

[ocr errors]

The American Exchange Bank a. Smith.

withdrawn: Now, on motion of Peet & Nichols, plaintiff's attorneys, it is hereby adjudged that the American Exchange Bank, the plaintiff, recover of Charles H. Smith, the defendant, the sum of three thousand nine hundred and thirty-two dollars and fifty cents, with eleven dollars and ninety-five cents costs and disbursements, amounting in the whole to three thousand nine hundred and forty-four dollars and forty-five cents.

GEORGE T. MAXWELL, Clerk.

To this is annexed a paper with the heading, “Statement for judgment,” and under that is written thus :4 Amount claimed in summons,

$3500.00 Interest,

431.75 Protest fees,

75

3932.50" This is followed by items of cost, which, in the aggregate, are

11.95 $3944.45

To this is added an affidavit of one of the plaintiff's attorneys that no notice of appearance, answer, or demurrer, or copy thereof, has been received in said action, and that the disbursements charged have been, or may be, necessarily made. That affidavit is sworn to before the clerk, and the roll was filed September 18, 1857.

C. Bainbridge Smith, for the appellant.
C. A. Nichols, for the respondent.

BY THE COURT.*-BOSWORTH, J.-As to the ground first alleged to establish irregularity, it is to be observed that the judgment-roll does not show that the note was not produced to the clerk, nor that he did not assess the damages thereon. It therefore follows that the judgment is not irregular, merely because it does not affirm that these things were done, unless the Code requires that it should appear by the record itself that the

• Present, Duer, C. J., Bosworth, Slosson, Hoffman, and Woodruff, JJ.

« 이전계속 »