COMPENSATION CASES ANNOTATED c+ THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION, EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY THE COURTS OF LAST RESORT OF ALL THE STATES AND TERRITORIES AND THE ENGLISH AND TABLE OF CASES [In addition to the cases reported at length in this volume are numerous annotations which appear in the footnotes. These annotations consist of abstracts of cases giving statement of facts and excerpts from opinions. Cases appearing in the notes are designated by the letter n preceding the number of the page on which the same appear in this volume, as, for instance: Adams v. Hines, Wash. 196 Pac. 19. n28] A Adams v. Hines. Adams v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co..199 Mass. 476, 85 N. E. 585. n589 Alexander v. Great Northern R. Co.....51 Mont. 565, 154 Pac. 914... Allen v. Dunham.... Allen v. Holler.. 178 Iowa 161, 159 N. W. 705.. n100 n763 n162 n73 n611 American Car & Foundry Co. v. Adams..178 Ind. 607, 99 N. E. 993... American Coal Min. Co. v. Crenshaw....- Utah 189 Pac. 69.. n215 Anderson v. Kansas City Rys. Co.. 187 N. W. 746........ n5 n724 n412 Anderson v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co... ...89 Wash. 83, 154 Pac. 135... n448 Anderson v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.... (Mo. App.), 184 S. W. 481. n615 Co. Arkansas Cent. R. Co. v. Janson.... Arkansas Midland R. Co. v. Worden....90 Ark. 407, 119 S. W. 828... n603 n248 Armitage v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co..54 Mont. 38, 166 Pac. 301... n773 n225 .163 N. Y. App. Div. 253, 148 N. Y. Supp. 479 n899 Askay v. Maloney.... ..... Associated Employers' Reciprocal V. Drilling Co. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Kelly....16 Ala. App. 360, 77 So. 972...... Baker v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co..191 N. Y. App. Div. 322, 181 N. Y. .142 La. 853, 77 So. 768.. n751 n406 n937 n770 Baker v. Southern Pac. Co.. Supp. 675 n34 193 Pac. 765. n9 Baldwin v. Omaha & C. B. St. R. Co....105 Neb. 614, 181 N. W. 525. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. White... 176 Fed. 900.. 134 N. E. 858... n117 Ind., n29 Barnett v. Levy.. 166 Mich. 491, 132 N. W. 77.... 158 Mich. 206, 122 N. W. 531.. .141 La. 1059, 76 So. 199.. Barber v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.... Barclay v. Puget Sound Lumber Co....48 Wash. 241, 93 Pac. 430. Barker v. Dairymen's Milk Products Co.205 Ala. 470, 88 So. 588. Barnes v. Honey Grove Natatorium Co..(Tex. Civ. App.), 228 S. W. 354.. (Tex. Civ. App.), 229 S. W. 588... Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium. .213 Ill. App. 129.. n809 n810 n613 n912 n68 n901 n310 n44 Barnett v. Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co..123 Minn. 153, 143 N. W. 263... n179 Basel v. Ansonia Clock Co.. Cal. App. 189 Pac. 1025.... .216 N. Y. 356, 110 N. E. 767.... Basham v. Chicago Great Western R. Co.178 Iowa 998, 154 N. W. 1019.. Utah, 189 Pac. 70.. n485 n963 n693 n51 n915 n597 Baughman v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.. (Mo. App.), 177 S. W. 800..... n852 86 W. Va. 437, 103 S. E. 278.. Tex. Civ. App., 208 S. W. 935.. n74 193 N. Y. App. Div. 669, 184 N. Y. Supp. 807... Bell v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co......152 N. Y. App. Div. 434, 137 N. Y. Bender v. Dazian... Benner v. Wallace Lumber & Manu facturing Co..... Bennett v. Page Bros. Supp. 266..... n271 n545 n940 .180 N. Y. Supp. 461. n754 .55 Wash. 579, 105 Pac. 145...... n933 n431 Benoit v. Boston & N. St. R. Co. .....216 Mass. 320, 103 N. E. 830.... n828 Benton v. Regeser.. Bergeron v. Texas & P. R. Co.... Berry v. Atlantic Ry... Berry v. M. F. Donovan & Sons... Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Variety Iron & Biggs v. Peoria & P. U. Ry. Co.. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Camp... 182 Ill. App. 613.... 2 Ala. App. 649, 57 So. 50...... n455 .20 Ariz. 273, 179 Pac. 966. n248 .196 Ill. App. 509.... n960 .144 La. 225, 80 So. 262... n786 Cal. App., 197 Pac. 356..... n966 .109 Me. 330, 84 Atl. 740... n130 115 Atl. 250. n865 n580 .178 N. C. 481, 100 S. E. 891.. n266 |