Law and Social Change in IndiaDeep & Deep, 1983 - 431ÆäÀÌÁö |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
81°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 3°³
127 ÆäÀÌÁö
... Supreme Court has no where stated that the ' Caste ' basis should not be adopted in determining the socially and educationally backward classes . If I understand the Supreme Court's decision aright , what that decision says is that the ...
... Supreme Court has no where stated that the ' Caste ' basis should not be adopted in determining the socially and educationally backward classes . If I understand the Supreme Court's decision aright , what that decision says is that the ...
351 ÆäÀÌÁö
Balbir Sahai Sinha. The Supreme Court , therefore , did not agree to award com- pensation to the workers . This decision unfortunately hits very hard the poor section of population and is definitely in favour of capitalists . The Supreme ...
Balbir Sahai Sinha. The Supreme Court , therefore , did not agree to award com- pensation to the workers . This decision unfortunately hits very hard the poor section of population and is definitely in favour of capitalists . The Supreme ...
360 ÆäÀÌÁö
... Courts and the Supreme Court . 132 A large number of cases have been decided by the Supreme Court.133 From a review of these cases , it is clear that the Supreme Court will interfere with an order of Industrial Tribunal in the following ...
... Courts and the Supreme Court . 132 A large number of cases have been decided by the Supreme Court.133 From a review of these cases , it is clear that the Supreme Court will interfere with an order of Industrial Tribunal in the following ...
¸ñÂ÷
Preface | 11 |
Law and Social Change in India after the Post | 17 |
Social Legislation and Criminal Sanctions | 25 |
ÀúÀÛ±Ç | |
Ç¥½ÃµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ¼½¼Ç 19°³
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
Amendment amount applied areas Article backward classes Bombay bonus caste citizens classes clause Commission compensation consideration considered Constitution decision determined economic educational effect employer enacted equality established existing fact follows force freedom fundamental further give given Government ground held High Hindu hold husband important India individual industrial institution interest judges judgment judicial Justice labour land legislation legislature living Madras marriage matters means ment minority moral nature necessary object observed offence particular parties person pointed political practice Prevention principles prostitution protection provisions question reasonable referred reform regard Regulation relating religion religious Removal Report reservation restrictions result rule Scheduled secular secure separation social social legislation society Supreme Court taken temple term tion Union untouchability validity wages welfare wife women workers workmen