 | John Innes Clark Hare - 1871 - 952 페이지
...part ; and in like manner, to charge or discharge the principal by similar circumstances.(l) But if the name of the principal does not appear in the instrument, and the instrument is without ambiguity, and asserts a positive liability on the part of tlje person contracting,... | |
 | 1877 - 510 페이지
...a written parol executory contract entered into by an agent in his own name, within hie authority, although the name of the principal does not appear...that he was acting for himself; and this doctrine is applicable to contracts which are required to be in writing, as to those where a writing is not... | |
 | 1877 - 510 페이지
...a written parol executory contract entered luto by an agent In his own name, within his authority, although the name of the principal does not appear in the instrument, and was not disclosed, aud the party dealing with the agent supposed that he was acting for himself; and this doctrine Is... | |
 | 1894 - 2096 페이지
...although the party dealing wltli the agent supposed that UK lutter was acting for himself. And this rule obtains as well in respect to contracts which are required to be in writing as those to whoa« validity writing is not essential. It does not violate the principle which forbids... | |
 | Austin Abbott - 1880 - 658 페이지
...other contracting party supposed that the latter was acting for himself. This rule applies as well to contracts which are required to be in writing, as to those to which writing is not necessary. Briggs v. Partridge, 64 NY 357 ; affi'g 39 Super. Ct. (J. & 8.)... | |
 | Austin Abbott - 1881 - 552 페이지
...a written parol executory contract, entered into by an agent in his own name, within his authority, although the name of the principal does not appear in the instrument. Nicoll v. Burke. purpose of ascertaining the terms of the agreement. This doctrine is fully sustained... | |
 | Henry Reed - 1884 - 804 페이지
...a written parol executory contract entered into by an agent in his own name, within his authority, although the name of the principal does not appear...where a writing is not essential to their validity. It is doubtless somewhat difficult to reconcile the doctrine here stated with the rule, that parol... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1884 - 862 페이지
...and was not disclosed, anil the party dealing with the agent, supposed he was acting for himselt : and this doctrine obtains as well in respect to contracts...essential to their validity. Higgins v. Senior, 8 M. & W., K34 ; Trucnmn v. Loder, II A. & E*5!H: Dykers v. Townsend, 24 NY, 61; Colenmn v. First Nat. It'k of... | |
 | 1916 - 1404 페이지
...a written simple executory contract entered into by an agent In his own name within his authority, although the name of the principal does not appear in the instrument and was not disclosed. Ford v. Williams, 21 How. 287, 16 L. Ed. 36 ; Eastern R. Co. v. Benedict, 5 Gray (Mass.) 561, 66 Am.... | |
 | 1913 - 1290 페이지
...a written parol executory contract entered into by an agent in his own name, within his authority, although the name of the principal does not appear...where a writing Is not essential to their validity." And the Presiding Justice of this court, in Moore v. Vulcanite Portland Cement Co., 121 App. Div. 667,... | |
| |
... that a principal may be charged upon a written parol executory contract entered into by an agent in his own name, within his authority, although the name of the principal does not appear in the instrument, and was not disclosed, and the party dealing... 
