« 이전계속 »
The Friends of Religion will, I trust, receive this attempt to explain and defend a part of Revelation most frequently assailed by infidels, * with candour and indulgence. I am deeply sensible of the importance of the subject, and would not have presumed to enter upon it, had I found it already preoccupied by any writer of established reputation; but it appeared to me that all, or very nearly all the distinguished authors, whose labours have been employed in illustrating the Old Testament in particular, or stating the proofs of Revelation in general, have been in some degree led away from bestowing on this subject that continued attention which its importance deserved, and combining the various characters of truth incidentally dispersed through the writings of the great Jewish Legislator, in one distinct viero, in which each would communicate new lustre to the rest. Sucha authors as have illustrated the Scriptures with continued commentaries, were, by the very nature of their undertaking, prévented from uniting in one view the many important observations and proofs which the separate parts of the sacred text suggested. Those who were employed in refuting the objections of any one particular anlagonist, were almost inevitably led to magnify these objections beyond their relative importance in any general consideration of the subject. The same writers also frequently were induoed to employ their attention almost exclusively 'on such passages as seemed obscure or objectionable, and pass with less distinct notice the clear and direct arguments and proofs, which were to be derived from those parts of the sacred history which soepticism itself could scarcely venture to attack;—thus suffering the adversary of revealed truth to lead its advocate from the strongest to the weakest ground, and prevent him from employing those topics which would operate most powerfully on every candid and unprejudiced mind. Works
* That infidels or sceptics still direct their chief attacks against the Old Testament, is daily experienced. The reader will see some very recent instances, in the publications of the late Rev. Dr. Geddes, and of Mr. De Wette, noticed in the APPENDIX.
construęted entirely on this plan have sometimes a most pernicious effect on the young, the uninformed, and the wavering; they lead them to consider Revelation as consisting chiefly of obscurities, and founded chiefly on questionable facts: while on the contrary, the great truths it establishes are as clear and intelligible as they are important; and the series of proofs on which it rests, when viewed in their natural order, are so firmly .connected and plainly conclusive, that, if considered with attention and eandour, they carry with them the fullest convictions and when contrasted with the improbabilities which must be eredited without proof, and the wild conjectures which must be admitted as certain, by those who reject all supernatural inter position in the history of religion, render it evident that blind eredulitay * is much more imputable to those who believe the saered history to be false, than those who admit it to be true, and that sound reason and philosophy, far from being opposed to religious faith, in reality coalesce with and support it.
In what I have now said, I beg that I may not be misunderstood; as if I undervalued the labours of those Writers who have stepped forward with such mạnly and pious zeal, to repel the assailants of Revelation, No, their exertions have been most prajseworthy and useful; they have shewn that the most obseure parts of Scripture admit a fair and natural explanation, and that the most plausible objections to it are founded on misconception and mistake; they have exposed in the strongest colours the diningenuousness and the unreasonableness of infidel writers, and in various important particulars have illustrated many truths of Revelation with great elearness, and strengthened its evidence by new proofs. I only mean to say, that works entirely or chiefly controversial are not the best calculated for impressing conviction on the yet wavering mind of youth, Or conveying that information which is most necessary to the
* Vide for some instances of this, the Appendix, Sect. II. in the review of the manner in which Dr. Gedạes attempts to account for the Mosaic Miracles.
uninstructed ; they rather prepare the way for, and facilitate the labours of, the direct and general advocate for the truth of Revelation, than preoccupy his office or supersede the necessity of his exertions.
It was on this view I undertook, and with these feelings I composed, the following Treatise. In that part of it which is entitled a Review of the chief Effects of Judaism, as connected with and preparatory to Christianity, I hope it will be found that I have endeavoured to attend to the principles I have now stated, and to combine the answer to each objection with the statement of the positive evidence for the truth of the facts, or the rea-sonableness of the principles, objected to, in such a manner as may prevent this work from having any tendency to perplex the minds or unsettle the faith of that class of Students to whom the different parts of it were separately addressed, and to whom it is my most ardent wish and humble prayer that it may now be useful.
If it be asked why I have separated the evidences of Judaism from those of Christianity? I answer, not only because the admirable works of many eminent writers, particularly of Archdeacon PaleY,* had already exhibited the distinct evidence of the Gospel history in the clearest view, but because I conceive the combination of these two subjects in most preceding works in which the divine original of the Jewish Law has been defended, has in some measure prevented the distinct evidence for this part of Revelation from being as fully and clearly stated as it ought to be. Where the Law and the Gospel are at once in a writer's contemplation, the immediate and as it were practical importance of the latter must appear so much greater than that of the former, that it is natural this should engross almost the whole of his attention. Besides, the proofs and principles of the Mosaic Law are so distinct from those of the Gospel,
* In his Evidences of Christianity, and his Hore Paulinæ; which last I consider as one of the most original, most convincing, and most important illustrations of the truth of the Gospel History, ever published.
and the period of human history with which they are connected so different, that it is not easy to combine them in one system of reasoning with clearness and effect. At the same time I am fully sensible of the inseparable connexion between these two grand parts of the divine economy of grace, and that to represent either as independent of the other would be to misrepresent and undermine it. I hope it will be found that this principle has not been neglected in the following Work. *
If it be asked why I have exhibited the internal evidence of the Mosaic Law -separate from the external ? I answer, because I conceive it a completely distinct topic of argument, to which the external evidence is properly a supplement, which may be resorted to with much more advantage and effect when the internal has been first distinctly considered. Besides, the external testimonies for the truth of the Mosaic history have been lately examined and exhibited by many learned and able writers (particularly by Mr. FABER, in his Horæ Mosaicæ) so fully, that it would be as unnecessary as it would be arrogant to attempt to supersede their labours, when I can do my reader so much more service by simply referring to them. +
* Vide Part III. Lect. V. & VI. + As this Work may come into the hands of some theological Students desirous to acquaint themselves with the external evidences for the truth of the Old Testament, I annex the following references to some of the chief authors who have treated of them.
JOSEPHUS, in his first book against Apion, quotes many testimonies to the antiquity of the Jewish nation; the circumstances attending their emigration rom Egypt, and the later periods of their history, from a number of authors then extant, and whom he appeals to as perfectly known, though only fragments of a few of their works now remain. He appeals also to the public records of the Tyrians, “ which (he says) are kept with great exactness, and “ include accounts of the facts done among them, and such as concern their “ transactions with other nations also.” These records state the building of the temple of Solomon, and the time it took place, and various circumstances connected with it.-Josephus also quotes Manætho, Dius the historian of Phænicia, and Menander of Ephesus, to the same purpose. He also quotes Berosus the Chaldean, “ well known (says he) by the learned,
on account of his publication of the Chaldean books of astronomy and philosophy among the Greeks. This Berosus therefore, following the most ancient records of that nation, gives us an History of the Deluge of
Some Friends whose judgment I most highly respect, have stated to me, that I ought to have included the book of Genesis in my plan; and that even now Į ought to prefix some prelimie
“ Waters that then happened, and of the destruction of mankind thereby, and
agrees with Moses's narrative thereof; he also gives an account of the Ark “ wherein Noah the origin of our race was preserved, when it was brought “ down to the highest part of the Armenian mountains; after which he ' gives a catalogue of the posterity of Noah, and adds the years of their
chronology, and at length comes down to Nabolassar (or Nabopollassar) “ who was king of Babylon.”-I earnestly recommend the entire Book to the perụsal of the Student.
The concurrence of the Sacred Records with those of Pagan history, and the probable derivation of much of the ancient philosophy from the Seripture, is confirmed by EUSEBIUS in his Præparatio Evangelica, much more fully than by Josephus—a work of such signal importance that it useful to give an Abstract of its Contents, to excite the attention of the Studento-In his first book, Eusebius exhibits a view of the Theology of the Ancients, particularly of the Phænicians and Egyptians, and of the progress of idolatry, and the ancient opinions on the origin of the universe; in his seoond book he carries on his view to the Theology of the Greeks and Romans, the fables of the heroię age, and the Arcana of the mysteries; and also introduces a brief exposition of the absurdities of this theology, and these superstitions. In his third, fourth, and fifth books, he exposes at large the absurdities of the fables and superstitions attending idolatry, especially the fallacy of its divinations and oracles; and though he intermixes opinions of his own in accounting for facts, which a more enlightened philosophy will not approve, yet the facts themselves, and the original authorities on which they are supported are most highly important. In his sixth book, he exposes the pagan system of fate, &e. In his seventh and eighth books, he illustrates the superiority of the Jewish religion, in its theology, its moral principles, and its effects. But in his ninth, he adduces what is most directly connected with the object of our present inquiry, an accumulation of testimonies from works then extant, but very many of which are now lost, to confirm the sacred history: he here produces the strongest testimonies of Grecian writers to the excellence of the Hebrew principles of theology and morals, * to the vain attempts of the Egyptian magicians in opposition to Moses,t Abydenus's tradition of the deluge, £ and Tower of Babel, | Eupolemus's testimony to the history of Abraham, || and various other confirmations of the Jewish history preserved by Alexander Polyhistor--from Theodotus, to the bistory of Jacob; from Artapanes, to that of Joseph and of Moses, and a long and accurate testimony to the plagues of Egypt and the passage of the Red Sea ; 1 from the tragic poet Ezekiel, to the same facts; and Demetrius, to the same, in an abstract evidently taken from the sacred writings as
ģ Cap. xv.
* In the first seven Chapters.
# Cap. viii.