the spirit of this prohibition should pervade the entire body of legislation, and that the justice which the Constitution was ordained to establish was not thought by them to be compatible with legislation of an opposite tendency." Soon after the Constitution was adopted the case of Calder vs. Bull came before this court, and it was there said that there were acts which the Federal and State legislatures could not do without exceeding their authority; and among them was mentioned a law which punished a citizen for an innocent act, and a law which destroyed or impaired the lawful private contracts of citizens. "It is against all reason and justice," it was added, "for a people to entrust a legislature with such powers, and, therefore, it cannot be presumed that they have done it" (3 Dallas, 388). And Mr. Madison, in one of the articles in the Federalist, declared that laws impairing the obligation of contracts were contrary to the first principles of the social compact, and to every principle of sound legislation. Yet this court holds that a measure directly operating upon and necessarily impairing private contracts, may be adopted in the execution of powers specifically granted for other purposes, because it is not in terms prohibited, and that it is consistent with the letter and spirit of the Constitution.
From the decision of the court I see only evil likely to follow. There have been times within the memory of all of us when the legal-tender notes of the United States were not exchangeable for more than one-half of their nominal value. The possibility of such depreciation will always attend paper money. This inborn infirmity no mere legislative declaration can cure. If Congress has the power to make the notes a legal tender and to pass as money or its equivalent, why should not a sufficient amount be issued to pay the bonds of the United States as they mature? Why pay interest on the millions of dollars of bonds now due, when Congress can in one day make the money to pay the principal? And why should there be any restraint upon unlimited appropriations by the Government for all imaginary schemes of public improvement, if the printing-press can furnish the money that is needed for them?
Accumulation of notes in Treasury,
45. Action of Parliament in 1720, 3; of Parliament in 1740, 3; of Parlia- ment in 1751, 3; of Colonies, 3; of Continental Congress, 9; of Federal Convention, 13. Action, Congressional. See Acts. Action of States in regard to sur- plus, 181.
Acts of Parliament prohibiting paper money in Colonies, of 1720, 3; of 1740, 3; of 1751, 3; for issue of Treasury notes, of June 30, 1812, 29; of February 25, 1813, 29; of March 14, 1814, 30; of December 26, 1814, 30; of Feb- ruary 24, 1815, 33; of October 1. 1837, 42; of May 1, 1838, 45; of March 2, 1839, 45; of March, 31, 1840, 46; of February 15, 1841, 49; of January 31, 1842, 51; of August 31, 1842, 51; of March 3, 1843, 51; of July 22, 1846, 64; of January 28, 1847, 69; of Decem- ber 23, 1857, 70; of December 17, 1860, 75.
Acts authorizing Treasury notes, of March 2, 1861, 79.
Acts authorizing 7-30 notes, of July 17, 1861, 88; of August 5, 1861, 88; of June 30, 1864, 97; of March 3, 1865, 97.
Acts authorizing demand notes, of July 17, 1861, 88; of August 5, 1861, 88.
Acts, miscellaneous, of June 22, 1860, 72; of February 8, 1861, 79; postal note, 100; prohibiting shin- plasters, 103; for retiring 7-30
notes, 113; authorizing four per cent. certificates, 117; authorizing additional issue bank circulation, 114; authorizing issue of legal ten- ders, 136, 138; authorizing issue of gold certificates, 115; authorizing issue of legal-tender note
tificates, 116; authorizing cancel- lation of legal tenders, 140; repeal- ing right to fund legal-tender notes, 138; for resumption of specie payments, 141; removing restrictions as to limit of issue of National bank notes, 140; coinage of 1792, 148; of 1873, 149; au- thorizing silver dollars, 152; au- thorizing silver certificates, 152; regulating deposits with State banks, 172; authorizing deposit of surplus money with the States, 172. Adams, John Quincy, opposes post- ponement bill, 187. Additional issue of notes, 30. Administration, Harrison's, Van Buren's, 50; Tyler's, 53; Buchanan's, 71; Lincoln's, 117; Jackson's, represented by Benton in Senate, 176; Hayes', 150. Advances made by banks to Govern- ment, 96.
Advantages to banks in placing 7-30 notes, 94.
Allegations of favoritism to banks, 29, 175.
Alley, John B. Remarks on legal- tender bill, 125. Amendment to Constitution to per- mit distribution of surplus, sug- gested by Jackson, 169. Amount of Treasury notes author
ized in 1812, 25; of bank currency, 31; of Treasury notes outstand- ing in 1814. 31; of notes author- ized, 42; largest outstanding at any one time, 45; amount out- standing at advent of Harrison's administration, 50; issued under Act of February, 1841, 49; of notes issued from 1837 to 1841, 49; notes falling due during year 1843, 51; of loan of 1846, 64; issues and reissues under Act of 1847, 69; Treasury notes outstanding in 1860, 71; in 1884, 71; of Treasury notes issued under the Act of March 2, 1861, 79; of 7-30 notes taken by New York bankers, 93; of fraction- al currency issued, 104; of surplus due from States carried as una- vailable on Treasury books, 188; authorized under various Acts, 52. Anticipation of revenues by use of Treasury notes, 49.
Antipathy to paper money, 10. Anxiety to obtain fractional cur- rency, 104.
Apportionment of deposit banks among States, 182.
Apportionment of surplus revenue among States, recommended by Jackson, 169; opposed by Jackson, 171; basis of, 180.
Appropriation of public money for improvements thought unconsti- tutional, 169; required to take surplus from Treasury, 189. Approval of bills. See Acts.
Arguments for and against Treasury notes in 1812, 22; in 1813, 29; in 1814-15, 31; in 1837, 41; in 1838, 43; in 1840, 46; in 1842, 51; of Committee of Ways and Means in 1844, against Treasury notes, 54; in Federal Convention, 14; in 1862, 125; in legal-tender cases, 156- 166; relative to distribution of sur- plus, for and against, in 1829, 171; in 1835, 172; of Jackson's oppo- nents, 175; of Benton, against, 177; for and against postponement of fourth instalment, 183-188. Arrangements with New York banks for placing 7-30 loan, 93. Attorney General Bates' opinion as to legal tender, 121.
Authority to issue bills, States de- prived of, 10.
Authority to coin money, States de- prived of, 10,
Available balance in Treasury at various dates, 171.
BANKS, land, proposed by John Coleman, 1; defeat of land, 2; paper money, under auspices of Treasury, 2; loan of merchants of Boston, 2; second land, proposed by Coleman, 2; plan of, 3; opposed by Governor Belcher, 3; Hutchi- son's specie, 3; charter of, by States, 11; power of Congress to create, to circulate bills, 11; Na- tional recommended, 31; Second, of United States, 41; National, Hamilton's report on, 19; propo- sition to tax circulation on, 51. Banks of New York City strengthen hands of Government, 143. Banks, right to issue paper money when chartered by States, 11; to circulate bills when chartered by Congress, 11; bad condition of currency of, in 1815, 31; great increase in number of, 31; alleged favoritism shown to, 29; resump- tion of specie payments by, 43; negotiations and agreements with, 95; advances agreed to be made by, 96; National, bill for, 120; of deposit in 1837, 182; forms of let- ters sent to, directing transfer of deposits, 182; losses from failure to pay specie, 183; specie payments suspended by, in 1814, 31; in 1837, 40; in 1857, 70; amounts due Gov- ernment from insolvent, 43; re- sumption of specie payments by, in 1837, 43; use of, as depositories of Government money, 40, 172; favor- ites of the administration, 172. Bank circulation, Benton's propo- sition to tax, 51.
Bank vs. Supervisors, legal-tender
Bank of Commerce vs. New York City, 156.
Banking Act, free, of New York State, 43.
Banking Act, National, 120. Bates, Attorney-General, opinion
as to constitutionality of legal- tender bill, 121. Bayard, Thomas F., Delaware, re- marks on legal-tender bill, 133. Belcher, Governor, Massachusetts, intrigues of paper money advocates against, 4; proclamation of, 5; differences with Legislature, 6; forced to retire, 4; subsequently Governor of New Jersey, 4; let- ter to Hutchison, 6.
Bell, John, Tennessee, opposes bill for postponement of fourth instal- ment of surplus, 187. Benton, Thos. H., Missouri, moves to increase denominations of Treas- ury notes, 41; in favor of Treas- ury notes, 41; in favor of Treasury note bill of 1838, 45; proposes to tax bank circulation, 51; objects generally to issue of Treasury notes, 41; "Thirty years' view " upon Jackson's course toward Bank of United States, 174; made member of committee to inquire into Federal expenditure, 175; defends Jackson's administration, 176; opposes bill for distribution of surplus, 177; his description of Jackson's repugnance to sign bill for distribution of surplus, 178; remarks on use of deposits made by States, 190.
Bibb, Geo. M., Secretary of Treas- ury, 52; member of committee to inquire into extent of Executive patronage, 175.
Bids, for Treasury notes, 76; for bonds, 80.
Bills, for Treasury notes 1812, 15; arguments for and against, 23; for Treasury notes 1813, 29; for Treasury notes 1837, 41; for new issue of Treasury notes 1838, 43; for Treasury notes 1840, 46; long debate on bill of 1840, 46; loan introduced by Millard Fill- more, 50; objections to Fillmore's loan bill, 50; Fillmore's loan, bitter debate on, 50; for issue and reissue of Treasury notes intro- duced 1842, 51; Treasury notes of 1843, 51; Treasury notes of 1846, 63; Treasury notes of 1847, 64; Treasury notes of 1857, 70; National Bank, 120; legal-tender,
121; exchequer of President Ty- ler, 53; for loan and issue of Treasury notes, 63; legal tender (see Legal tenders) for recharter of Bank of United States, 174; for distribution of surplus rev- enue, 167. 177; for postponement of payment of fourth instalment of surplus, 184.
Bills of credit, in Federal Conven- tion, 13; authority of States to issue, 13; power of Congress to emit, 13; discussion of right to make legal tender, 14; Hamilton's opinion as to, 19; revolutionary, bore interest, 44; definition of, by Chief Justice Marshall, 44; argu- ment of committee of House in 1844 as to right to issue, 54-61. Blaine, James G., Maine, discusses policy of legal tender issues in
Twenty Years in Congress," 144-147.
Blake, Harrison G., Ohio, remarks on legal-tender bill, 125. Board of Supervisors of New York City claim greenbacks are not obligations of the United States, 156, 157.
Bollan, Thos., agent of Province of Massachusetts in England, 7.
Bonds, U. S., discount during period 1812-1815, 39; discount during 1860, 1861, 79.
Bradley, Mr. Justice, of Supreme Court, separate concurring opin- ion in legal-tender case, 162. Brown, Bedford, Senator from North Carolina, in favor of Treas- ury note bill, 45.
Bubble Act enacted by Parliament in 1720, 7.
Buchanan, Jas., President, Treasury notes of administration of, 70; amendment to bill for postpone- ment of fourth instalment of sur- plus, 186.
CABINET, Jackson's, dissent from his views, 174; paper read to, 174; changes in, 175.
Calhoun, Jno. C., of South Carolina, in favor of Treasury note bill of 1838, 45; makes motion in Senate for select committee, 175. Cambreling, Churchill C., of New
« 이전계속 » |