ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

PRESCRIPTION.

124 (L.) Proof of sale to de facto corpo-
ration held admissible under answer denying See Adverse Possession; Limitation of Ac-
sale to defendant individually.-John Lucas &
Co. v. Bernhardt's Estate, 399.

(E) Set-Off, Counterclaim, and Cross-
Complaint.

146 (Ala.) Plea of set-off subject to same
tests as complaint.-Ex parte Steverson, 912.

tions.

PRINCIPAL AND AGENT.

See Attorney and Client; Brokers.

I. THE RELATION.

(A) Creation and Existence.

IV. REPLICATION OR REPLY AND SUBSE-10(2) (Ala.) Execution of power of attor-

QUENT PLEADINGS.

[blocks in formation]

V. DEMURRER OR EXCEPΡΤΙΟΝ.
193(8) (Ala.App.) Claim of damages not
maintainable in trespass not reached by de-
murrer.-Cheek v. Odom, 782.

204(2) (Ala.) Demurrer to bill as whole
not sustained because of insufficiency of allega-
tions relating to accountability for rents. -For-
rester v. Granberry, 551.

207 (Ala.) Special demurrer showing de-
fect in plea of agreement between obligors for

conditional delivery, necessary.-McConnon &
Co. v. Kirby, 764.

228 (La.) Exception of no cause of action

ney held binding. -Cornelius v. Moore, 895.

22(1) (Ala.App.) Declarations of agent not
received to establish agency. -American Lumber
& Export Co. v. Love, 623.

22(2) (Ala.) When acts and declarations
of alleged agent are admissible to show agency
stated.-Langham v. Jackson, 757.

(B) Termination.

41 (L.) Mandate; allegations insuffi-
cient to warrant recovery of profits for trac-
tors not delivered.-Van Ness v. Louisiana

Farm Machinery Co., 48.

Mandate; petition for commissions and re-
covery of advances on tractors not shipped
held good.-Id.

III. RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES AS TO
THIRD PERSONS.

(A) Powers of Agent.

99 (Ala.) When rule of apparent author-
ity can be invoked by one misled to his detri-
ment stated.-Langham v. Jackson, 757.

103(10) (Ala.) Power of attorney to broth-

er to sell land held to authorize acceptance of
part cash and balance in notes. -Cornelius v.
Moore, 895.

insufficient as exception of vagueness. - Dron-124(1) (Ala.App.) Refusal of charges that
ette v. Meaux Bros., 411.

228 (L.) When peremptory exception
founded on law may be sustained as to part of
demand stated. -Succession of Curtis, 412.

agent had no authority to make alleged repre-
sentations held error.-American Lumber & Ex-
port Co. v. Love, 623.

228 (La) In determining sufficiency of pe-
tition, allegations taken as true.-Labourdette 171(4) (Ala.) Principal bound by agent's
v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., 547.

XI. MOTIONS.

(D) Ratification.
representations when availing himself of con-
tract made by agent.-Langham v. Jackson,
757.

(F) Actions.

352 (Ala.App.) Claim of damages not
maintainable in trespass reached by motion to 189(1) (Miss.) Essentials of bill for spe-
strike. Cheek v. Odom, 782.

cific performance of contract made by undis-
closed agent stated.-Young v. Clark, 180.

362 (1) (Ala.App.) Method of reaching
averments in cross-action claiming damages194(2) (Miss.) Instruction as to custom

not recoverable stated. -Robinson v. Stever-
son, 910.

XII. ISSUES, PROOF, AND VARIANCE.

and usages held improper to show agent's au-
thority to draw draft.-Allen v. Gaddis, 29.

PRINCIPAL AND SURETY.

391 (Ala.) Time alleged under videlicet See Guaranty: Indemnity.
need not be proved exactly as alleged.-Ray v.
Summerlin, 482.

III. DISCHARGE OF SURETY.

'XIII. DEFECTS AND OBJECTIONS, WAIV-108(5) (Ala.) Partial payment before ma-

ER, AND AIDER BY VERDICT

OR JUDGMENT.

turity is consideration for extension, and if
made without surety's consent, he is discharg-

428 (2) (Ala.App.) Method of reaching ed.-Ray v. Summerlin, 482.
averments in cross-action claiming damages V. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES OF SURETY.
not recoverable stated. -Robinson v. Steverson,
910.

[blocks in formation]

For practice in particular actions and proceed - 84 (Ala.) Service by publication must be

1

969
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

(E) Return and Proof of Service.

134 (Ala.) Personal service of copy of
summons held not shown by constable's return.
-Morrison v. Covington, 124.

146 (Ala.) Parol proof of service or waiv.
er by appearance inadmissible. Morrison v.
Covington, 124.

PROHIBITION.

See Intoxicating Liquors,

I. NATURE AND GROUNDS.

5(3) (Ala) Jurisdiction of bill by next
friend not destroyed by motion to dismiss on
ex parte affidavits of complainant.-Ex parte
Minchener, 98.

10(2) (Ala.) Determination of motion for
new trial not pre preventable by prohibition.-Ex
parte Webster, 909.

PROMISSORY NOTES.

See Bills and Notes.

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.

See Municipal Corporations, 266-516.

1

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONS.
7 (L.) Rate-making power within police
power of state.-Baton Rouge Waterworks Co.
v. Louisiana Public Service Commission, 710.
State may delegate to municipal corporation
or commission rate-making powers.-Id.

Power to make rates to govern local utilities
placed by law under control of municipality, ex-
cluded from Public Service Commission.-Id.

19(2) (Ala) Order sustained on collateral
attack unless void.-Alabama Water Co. v.
City of Attalla, 490.

PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATIONS.
See Carriers; Electricity; Railroads; Street
Railroads; Telegraphs and Telephones.

QUIETING TITLE.

I. RIGHT OF ACTION AND DEFENSES.

(2) (Ala.) Conditions enabling one to sue
to remove recorded deed as cloud on title
stated.-Frazier v. Frazier, 118.

Deed delivered to grantee before death of
both grantors in violation of agreement held
cloud on title.-Id.

II. PROCEEDINGS AND RELIEF.
27 (Ala.) Court of equity has original ju-
risdiction to cancel recorded conveyances as
cloud on title. Frazier v. Frazier, 118.

39 (Ala.) Cross-bill to quiet title held with-
out equity.-Scott v. Scott, 755,

QUO WARRANTO.

I. NATURE AND GROUNDS.

(Ala.) Proceeding in nature of quo war-
ranto to test title to office held appropriate.-
State v. Thompson, 756.

RAILROADS.

See Street Railroads.

[blocks in formation]

X. OPERATION.

(C) Companies and Persons Liable for In-

juries.

260 (Ala.App.) Company liable for negli-
gence of another permitted to use tracks.-
Dolcito Quarry Co. v. Cruse-Crawford Mfg.
Co., 72.

Company held liable for negligence of em-
ployee of quarry company permitted to use
tracks.-Id.

266 (Ala.) Railroad and truck owner held
jointly and severally liable for injuries to pe-
destrian.-Hall v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.,
890.

use of car by

272 (Ala.App.) Finding
quarry company was by permission of rail-
road held warranted.-Dolcito Quarry Co. v.
Cruse-Crawford Mfg. Co., 72.

(D) Injuries to Licensees or Trespassers
in General.
274(2) (Ala.) White man in colored wait-
ing room held not trespasser.-American Ry.
Express Co. v. Tait, 328.

(F) Accidents at Crossings.
327 (1) (La.) Automobile driver held negli-
gent in failing to keep lookout.-Jeansonne v.
Teves & Pac. Ry. Co., 410.

327 (3) (Ala.) Care required to pedestrian
at crossing.-Southern Ry. Co. v. Cates, 356.

44(1) (Ala.) Counts for injuries at cross-
ing by joint wrongdoers held to plead duty and
breach with sufficient certainty.-Hall v. Sea-
board Air Line R. Co., 890.

346(2) (Ala.) Burden on plaintiff to show
facts making statute applicable.-Southern Ry.
Co. v Cates, 356.

Evidence held to make prima facie case of
negligence, shifting burden of proof. Id.

346(4) (Ala.App.) Burden on company to
acquit itself of negligence. Dolcito Quarry
Co. v. Cruse-Crawford Mfg. Co., 72.

346(5) (Ala.) Burden of proving contribu-
tory negligence on defense.-Southern Ry. Co.
v. Cates, 356.

347 (5) (Ala.) Evidence of changes after
collision held inadmissible.-Alabama Great
Southern R. Co. v. Ensley Transfer & Supply
Co., 342.

348(1) (Ala.App.) Finding of negligence
in operating car by gravity warranted.-Dol-
cito Quarry Co. v. Cruse-Crawford Mfg. Co.,

72.

350(1) (Ala.) Negligence at crossing held
for jury. Southern Ry. Co. v. Cates, 356.
350(29) (Ala.) Contributory negligence at
guarded crossing held for jury.-Southern Ry.
Co. v. Cates, 356.

(H) Injuries to Animals on or near Tracks.
439(2) (Ala.) Averment of place of injury
to dog held insufficient.--Alabama Great South-
ern R. Co. v Sheffield, 125.

443(1) (Ala.) Finding of no negligence in
killing hog sustained.-Smith v. Bugg, 503.

(I) Fires.

478(1) (Ala.) Complaint for negligent fire
held sufficient on demurrer.-Atlanta & St. A.
B. R. Co. v. Spivey, 759.

481(1) (Ala.) Exclusion of proof property
burned was insured held proper.-Atlanta & St.
A. B. R. Co. v. Spivey, 759.

481(2) (Ala.) Evidence sparks from en-
gine set other fire held competent.-Atlanta &
St. A. B. R. Co. v. Spivey, 759.

engine emitted
481(8) (Ala.) Evidence
sparks and cinders competent.-Atlanta & St.
A. B. R. Co. v. Spivey, 759.

RAPE.

II. PROSECUTION AND PUNISHMENT.
(A) Indictment and Information.

22 (Ala.App.) Indictment held sufficient to
show that assaulted party was woman.-Show-
ers v. State, 569.

REAL ACTIONS.

REVIEW.
See Ejectment; Forcible Entry and Detainer; See Appeal and Error; Certiorari.
Partition; Quieting Title.

RECEIVERS.

1. NATURE AND GROUNDS OF RECEIVER-
SHIP.

(A) Nature and Subjects of Remedy.
3(Fla.) Receiver not usually appointed in
action instituted alone for such purpose.
Armour Fertilizer Works v. First Nat. Bank,
362.

(Fla.) Appointment of receiver discre-
tionary.-Armour Fertilizer Works v. First
Nat. Bank, 362.

(B) Grounds of Appointment of Receiver.

19 (Fla.) Mere insolvency does not war-
rant appointment.--Armour Fertilizer Works v.
First Nat. Bank, 362.

II. APPOINTMENT, QUALIFICATION, AND

TENURE.

29(1) (Fla) Power to appoint inherent in
court of equity.-Armour Fertilizer Works v.
First Nat. Bank, 362.

31 (Fla.) Cannot be appointed by consent
of parties, where pleadings do not state cause
therefor.-Armour Fertilizer Works v. First
Nat. Bank, 362.

IV. MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSITION OF
PROPERTY.

(A) Administration in General.

90 (L.) Receiver must take or reject in-
separable contract by insolvent as whole.-
Jacob v. Roussel, 295.

91 (L.) When receiver of lessee planting

RIPARIAN RIGHTS.

[blocks in formation]

See Taxation, 623; Vendor and Purchaser.

I. REQUISITES AND VALIDITY OF CON-
TRACT.

4 (2) (Miss.) Contract of sale or return"
defined.-G. A. Soden & Co. v. T. J. Wilkin-
son & Son, 182.

Transaction held to constitute contract of sale
and return.-Id.

22(3) (Ala.) Buyer repudiating contract,
but receiving, using, or selling goods, liable in
assumpsit.-Tuscaloosa Lumber Co. v. Tropi-
cal Paint & Oil Co., 236.

22(3) (La.) Evidence held to show con-

tract for sale of aluminum sets. - Illinois Pure
Aluminum Co. v. Blancand, 537.

38(8) (Ala.App.) Acts amounting to fraud

in execution of contract entitling buyer to set
it aside stated.-Bureau of National Litera-
ture v. Griffin, 77.

4834 [New, vol. 16A Key-No. Series]
(La.) Illegality of consideration held to
affect whole agreement.-J. & G. Lippman v.
Rice Millers' Distributing Co., 685.

Seller of rice held bound by food administra-
tion's ruling, regardless of correctness.-Id.

52(7) (Ala.App.) Evidence held to show
fraud.-Bureau of National Literaturę v. Grif-
fin, 77.

company liable for rent stated.-Jacob v. Rous-53(3) (Ala.) Seller's fraud inducing pur-

sel, 295.

Lease for term held entire contract, which
must be rejected or accepted by receiver as
whole.-Id.

RECEIVING STOLEN GOODS.

chaser not to rescind held not established.-

Fribush v. Friedman, 100.

II. CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT.

71(5) (Miss.) Manufacturer of railroad
ties receiving order may deliver maximum or
8(3) (Fla.) Evidence held sufficient to sus- minimum number.-Ingram Day Lumber Co. v.
tain conviction.-Davis v. State, 739.
Germain Co., 281.

[blocks in formation]

81(3) (Miss.) Term "as soon as possible"
affecting delivery held to be reasonable time.-
Ingram Day Lumber Co. v. Germain Co., 281.
83 (Ala.) Seller held under no duty to ship
unless buyer furnished shipping instructions
and cars.-J. H. Hamlen & Son v. Rosengrant,
217.

III. MODIFICATION OR RESCISSION OF
CONTRACT.

(C) Rescission by Buyer.

124 (L.) No rescission without restora-
tion of status quo. City Sav. Bank & Trust
Co. v. Goodman, 66.

79(1)(Ala.) Elimination of resident de-
fendant by affirmative charge, given at his re-172 (La) Commandeering of rice before

quest, held not to entitle nonresident defend-
ant to removal.-Southern Ry Co. v. Williams,

203.

REPLEVIN.
V. DAMAGES.

IV. PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT.
(C) Delivery and Acceptance of Goods.
shipment held to relieve seller from liability for
nonshipment.-J. & G. Lippman v. Rice Millers'
Distributing Co., 685.

172 (Miss.) Seller prevented from ship-
ping to purchaser because of subsequent car
service orders excused from performance.-
Stoner & Co. v. Blocton Export Coal Co., 5.
where plaintiff himself in default.-J. H. Gar-
rison & Son v. Sherill Hardwood Lumber Co.,

torney's fees and expenses in absence of show-174 (La) No damages for nonperformance

80 (Miss.) Defendant not entitled to at-
ing of willfulness, malice or fraud.-Mars v.
Germany, 23.

See Domicile.

RESIDENCE.

RETROSPECTIVE LAWS,
See Statutes, 267

REVENUE,

253.

176(1) (La) Performance of sales con-
tract cannot be demanded after unreasonable
delay and on advancing market.-J. H. Garri-
son & Son v. Sherill Hardwood Lumber Co.,
253.

181(9) (Ala.) Refusal to permit seller to
prove efforts to procure cars held error.-Way

í

971

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
Exclusion of buyer's letter demanding ship-at time of breach.-Illinois Pure Aluminum Co.
ment after numerous extensions of time held
error.-Id.

181(11) (La.) Evidence held to show that
neither party deemed contract breached until
government commandeered goods.-J. & G.
Lippman v. Rice Millers' Distributing Co., 685.

1

(D) Payment of Price.

191 (L.) Credit on purchaser's note on
exchange of motor cars determined. Gulf Mo-
tor Co. v. Avery, 396.

VI. WARRANTIES.

263 (Ala.) Implied warranty of title,

v. Blancand, 537.

418(2) (Miss.) Measure of damages for
failure to deliver stated. - Stoner & Co. v.
Blocton Export Coal Co., 5.

418 (3) (La.). Measure of damages for
breach by seller of contract of sale stated.-Illi-
nois Pure Aluminum Co. v. Blancand, 537.

418(4) (Ala.) Buyer held entitled to nomi-
nal damages only where goods have no market
value.-J. H. Hamlen & Son v. Rosengrant,

217.

418(7) (Miss.) Purchaser not required_to
buy elsewhere. -Stoner & Co. v. Blocton Ex-
port Coal Co., 5.

where seller in possession. -Edwards v. Beard,420 (Ala.) Evidence of plaintiff's ability

101.

Implied warranty of title, where seller in
apparent possession.-Id.

Implied warranty of title in sale by agent.
-Id.

267 (La) Warranty of tractor held not to
exclude responsibility for negligence.-Elfant
v. Trahan, 404.

288(2) (Ala.) Purchaser may retain goods
and sue for breach of warranty.-Nashville
Broom & Supply Co. v. Alabama Broom &
Mattress Co., 132.

288(4) (La.) Purchaser of tractor held
precluded from alleging defects therein, by de-
lay in making complaint.-Elfant v. Trahan,
404.

288 (4) (Miss.) Breach of warranty held
not available to buyer because of failure to
notify seller of defects within time specified
in contract.-McPherson v. Gullett Gin Co., 16.
288(6) (La.) Purchaser of tractor held es-
topped to resist payment of price because guar-
anteed horse power not developed.-Elfant v.
Trahan, 404.

VII. REMEDIES OF SELLER.
(D) Resale.

334 (Miss.) Rule as to place for resale of
refused goods, stated.-J. Lischkoff, Inc., v.
Cincinnati Bargain House, 278.

339 (Miss.) Evidence of market for refus-
ed goods at place of delivery admissible in suit
for difference between contract and resale
price.-J. Lischkoff, Inc., v. Cincinnati Bargain
House, 278.

VIII. REMEDIES OF BUYER.
(C) Actions for Breach of Contract.
404 (Ala.App.) Buyer may accept or re-
fuse goods, but if he accepts cannot claim
breach of contract.-Robinson v. Steverson,
910.

to carry out contract held sufficient to go to
jury.-B. F. Kay & Son v. Alabama Cotton &
Grain Co., 863.

(D) Actions and Counterclaims for Breach
of Warranty.

428 (Ala.App.) Plea held to set up breach
of warranty, and hence to allege proper set-off.
-Robinson v. Steverson, 910.
434 (Ala.) Complaint against seller
warranty of title held to show claim litigated
by buyer with third person was title superior
to seller's. Edwards v. Beard, 101.

on

435(1) (Ala.App.) Plea held to set up
breach of warranty.-Robinson v. Steverson,
910.

435(4) (Ala.) Plea of set-off held defec-
tive.-Ex parte Steverson, 912.

442 (2) (Ala.) Measure of damages for
breach of warranty stated.-Nashville Broom
& Supply Co. v. Alabama Broom & Mattress
Co., 132.

442 (2) (Ala.App.) Measure of damages for
breach of warranty stated. --Robinson v. Ste-
verson, 910.

442 (67) (Ala.App.) Inconvenience and ex-
pense in connection with lumber not recover-
able for breach of warranty. -Robinson v. Ste-
verson, 910.

442 (12) (Ala.) Costs and attorney's fees
of buyer, in action against third person tak-
ing possession under claim of superior title,
elements of damage for breach of warranty of
title.-Edwards v. Beard, 101.

446(3) (Ala.) Instruction on damages for
breach of warranty held properly refused.-
Nashville Broom & Supply Co. v. Alabama
Broom & Mattress Co., 132.

SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS.

11. PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

ation.

411 (Ala.) Pleadings held to indicate con- (E) District Debt, Securities, and Tax-
tract was for specific cotton rather than for
specific amount.-B. F. Kay & Son v. Alabama 103(2) (Al) Failure to ascertain exist-
Cotton & Grain Co., 863.

413 (Ala.) Proof of actual weight of cot-
ton to be delivered admissible where estimated
weight alleged.-B. F. Kay & Son v. Alabama
Cotton & Grain Co., 863.

417 (Ala.) Plaintiff's compliance with con-
tract as to place of delivery held sufficiently
shown.-B. F. Kay & Son v. Alabama Cotton
& Grain Co., 863.

418(2) (Ala.) In absence of shipping in-
structions from buyer, etc., seller held not in
default.-J. H. Hamlen & Son v. Rosengrant,

217.

418(2) (Ala.) Measure of buyer's damages
stated.-Way v. Waters-Tonge Lumber Co.,

219.

Buyer's damages fixed at expiration of rea-
sonable time after buyer's last demand for de-
livery.-Id.

418(2)(La.) Measure of damages for fail-
ure to deliver railroad ties sold stated.-J. H.
Garrison & Son v. Sherill Hardwood Lumber
Co., 253.

418(2) (La.) Damages for failure to de-
liver determinable by market value prevailing

ence of jurisdictional fact held to validate or-
der for special tax election.-Wall-Hay-Wall
Lumber Co. v. Mathews, 824.

Curative statute held not to reach failure to
ascertain fact on which power to order elec-
tion for tax levy depended.-Id.

105 (Ala.) School taxes, if illegally collect-
ed, may be recovered back under statute.-
Wall-Hay-Wall Lumber Co. v. Mathews, 824.
107 (Ala) Complainants in suit to enjoin
collection of special school tax held to have ade-
quate remedy at law.-Wall-Hay-Wall Lumber
Co. v. Mathews, 824.

(F) Claims Against District, and Actions.

114 (Miss.) Consolidated school district
cannot be sued.-Nabors v. Holly Bluff Consol.
School Dist., 177.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Reasonable ground to believe that debtor in-
tends to conceal or part with property unneces-
sary under statute.-Id.

12(La) Putting debtor in default unneces-
sary where contract violated.-Gueydan v. Т.
P. Ranch Co., 541.

See Drains.

SEWERS.

SHERIFFS AND CONSTABLES.

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.
II. CONTRACTS ENFORCEABLE.

75 (Ala.) Not maintainable to regulate du-
ties extending over series of years and involv-
ing personal skill.-Alabama Water Co. v. City
of Jasper, 486.

80 (L.) Courts will not enforce or re-
quire specific performance of contract preclud-
ing resort to courts. Myevre v. Liberty Realty
& Securities Co., 694.

III. GOOD FAITH AND DILIGENCE.
96 (Ala.) Purchaser need not tender per-
formance before filing bill, where time is not of
essence.-Forrester v. Granberry, 551.

IV. PROCEEDINGS AND RELIEF.
121(11) (La.) Evidence held to show that
title offered vendee good by prescription.-
Moseley v. Gilham, 403.

127(1)(La.) One enforcing specific per-
formance entitled to accounting for fruits and
revenues received by defendant.-Fassbender v.
Ghergich, 436.

STATES.

II. GOVERNMENT AND OFFICERS.

48 (Miss.) Authority of Governor as to ap-
proval of bonds of state officials stated.-Broom
v. Henry, 602.

State officer, whose bond insufficient, requir-
ed to be notified to give new bond.-Id.

51 (Miss.) Governor cannot fill alleged va-
cancies for insufficiency of bond until notice for
new bond has been given.-Broom v. Henry, 602.

III. POWERS, DUTIES, AND LIABILITIES.
111 (Ala.App.) Immunity of sheriffs, where
claim interposed for trial of right of property,
does not apply to constables.-Cheek v. Odom, See Frauds, Statute of.

782.

134 (Ala.App.) All parties assisting in
wrongful levy held proper parties defendant.-
Cheek v. Odom, 782.

IV. LIABILITIES ON OFFICIAL BONDS.

154 (Ala.) Surety on official bond of deputy
sheriff not liable for individual act. Burge v.
Scarbrough, 653.

168(1) (Ala.) Count for assault and bat-
tery must allege official responsibility to im-
pose liability on bond.-Burge v. Scarbrough,
653.

Count for wrongful arrest held to state cause
of action on official bond.-Id.

Count for malicious prosecution held not to
state cause of action on official bond.-Id.
Count held to state cause of action for as-
sault and battery on official bond.-Id.

171 (Ala.) Undisputed evidence that
wrongful act alleged as breach of bond was
done individually required direction of verdict
for surety.-Burge v. Scarbrough, 653.

SHIPPING.

III. CHARTERS.

39 (Ala.) Charter parties construed ac-
cording to intent of parties as manifested by
whole instrument. - Wye Shipping Co. v. Hun-
ter, Benn & Co., 475.

VII. CARRIAGE OF GOODS.

STATUTE OF FRAUDS.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

See Limitation of Actions.

STATUTES.

For statutes relating to particular subjects,
see the various specific topics.

II. GENERAL AND SPECIAL OR LOCAL

LAWS.

97(2) (Fla.) Statute relating to special
road and bridge district in certain county held
not invalid as a special and local law. State v.
Fearnside, 256.

III. SUBJECTS AND TITLES OF ACTS.

109 (Ala.) Purpose of constitutional pro-
vision as to expression of subject in title stated.
-Board of Revenue v. Ikner, 827.

110/2(1) (Ala) Section exempting certain
beats of county from act for establishment, etc.,
of stock law districts held not unconstitutional
as contrary to title.-Board of Revenue v. Ik-
ner, 827.

114(1)(Ala.) Title of act held sufficiently
broad to include regulations affecting public
warehouseman's
bonds. Faircloth-Segrest

Mercantile Co. v. Roach, 908.

118(1) (Fla.) Statute denouncing volun-
tary drunkenness and section providing pun-
ishment therefor held void.-Frazier v. State,
155.

148 (Ala.) Dispatch money and address 120(5) (L.) Omission of part of title in
commission held advancements and not payable amendatory act held not to invalidate it.-Vil-
on loading at par value of pounds sterling.- lage of South Highlands v. Lagier, 287.

Wye Shipping Co. v. Hunter, Benn & Co. 475.121(1) (Miss.) Law levying privilege tax
Charterer held liable for amount wrongfully on motor vehicles held not violative of consti-
receipted for as advancement, notwithstanding tutional provision as to titles.-Roseberry v.
cesser clause.-Id.

SLANDER.

See Libel and Slander.

SPECIAL LAWS.

Norsworthy, 514.

123 (4) (Fla.) Statute relative to special
road and bridge district not violative of provi-
sion requiring act to deal with one subject to
be expressed in title. State v. Fearnside, 256.

125 (7) (Ala.) Title of act changing num-
ber of state highway commissioners held not

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »