252(6) (Ala.App.) Charge not justified by
evidence properly refused.-Cheek v. Odom,
782.
252(11) (Ala.) Instruction as to custom of
switching cars without connecting air brakes
held properly refused as abstract.-Southern
Ry. Co. v. Dickson, 665.
IV. MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF
TRUST PROPERTY.
247 (Ala.) Cestui que trust is real party
in interest in equity.-Agee v. Agee's Cash
Store No. 2, 809.
UNIONS.
253(1) (Ala.) Charges ignoring part of See Trade Unions.
case are misleading.-Mobile Light & R. Co.
v. Gadik, 837.
253 (3) (Ala.) Instructions ignoring issue
as to proper recordation of mortgage of prop-
erty involved, held properly refused.-Gay &
Bruce v. W. B. Smith & Sons, 633.
253(6) (Ala.) Requested instruction held
properly refused as omitting consideration of
evidence. Nashville Broom & Supply Co. v.
Alabama Broom & Mattress Co., 132,
(E) Requests or Prayers.
256 (6) (Ala.) One complaining of charge
misleading should request explanatory
charge.-Farrell V. Anderson-Dulin-Varnell
Co., 205.
260(1) (Ala.) Refusal of requested charg-
es covered by oral charge not error.-Eggleston
v. Wilson, 89; Alabama Great Southern R. Co.
v. Ensley. Transfer & Supply Co., 342.
USE AND OCCUPATION.
ol (La.) Good faith holder not liable for
or damages for occupancy.-Davis v.
Moore, 691.
8 (Ala.) Count of complaint in action for
use and occupation held demurrable.-Davis v.
9 (Ala.) Exclusion of evidence showing du-
Reed, 226.
ration of occupation under lease and after it
expired held error.-Davis v. Reed, 226.
Evidence of title as a basis of action or de-
fense improper.-Id.
Evidence affecting plaintiff's title held prop-
erly excluded.-Id.
Deed to plaintiff of land held admissible to
show assignment of right to sue.-Id.
Deeds to plaintiff showing title held properly
excluded.-Id.
Letter by plaintiff's grantor's daughter claim-
260(1) (Ala.) Requested instruction sub-ing of defendant interest in rents held properly
stantially covered properly refused.-Nashville excluded.-Id.
Broom & Supply Co. v. Alabama Broom &
Mattress Co., 132.
260(1) (Ala.) Refusal of charge substan- I. USURIOUS CONTRACTS AND TRANSAC-
tially and fairly given by court's oral charge
not error.-Cooledge v. Collum, 143.
260(1) (Ala.) No reversal for refusal of 15 (Ala.) Contract to pay interest at legal
general charges covered by oral charge.-Far-rate held not rendered usurious by ex parte
rell v. Anderson-Dulin-Varnell Co., 205.
260(1) (Ala.) Refusal of charges covered entries on mortgagee's books.-Driver v. John-
by charges given not error.-Burge v. Scar-47 (Miss.) Note bearing highest contract
brough, 653.
rate, interest payable semiannually, and de-
faulting interest becoming principal, usurious.-
Rogers v. Rivers, 385.
260(1) (Ala.App.) Refusal of charge cov
ered by general charge not error.-Cheek v.
Odom, 782.
260(10) (Ala.) Refusal to instruct further
that no damages were claimed for death held
proper.-Southern Ry. Co. v. Cates, 356.
261 (Ala.) Requested instruction requiring
proof of geographical fact not existing held
properly refused.-B. F. Kay & Son v. Ala-
bama Cotton & Grain Co., 863.
262 (Ala.) Giving of requested charge
held not to estop defendant from requesting
others.-Gray v. Pankey, 880.
(G) Construction and Operation.
295 (5) (Ala.) Charge as to invalidity of
usurious contract held sufficient.-Cooledge v.
Collum, 143.
295(5) (Ala.) Instruction as to notice from
recordation of mortgage given under name by
which mortgagor generally known held not er-
roneous.-Ingram v Watson, 557
296(2) (Ala.) Defects in charge cured by
other charge.-John R. Thompson & Co. v. Vil-
dibill, 139.
VIII. CUSTODY, CONDUCT, AND DELIBER-
(B) Rights and Remedies of Parties.
102(1) (Ala.) Rule as to right to recover
back usurious payments stated.-Cooledge v.
Collum, 143.
VENDOR AND PURCHASER.
1. REQUISITES AND VALIDITY OF CON-
TRACT.
3(4) (Ala.) Contracts held agreements to
convey lands, and not options.-Erswell v.
Ford, 96.
31 (Ala.) Surrender of possession to ven-
dor's grantor held to entitle purchaser to re-
scind for mistake.-Bain v. Guntersville Realty
Co., 128.
44 (Ala.) Evidence of fraudulent misrepre-
sentation to entitle to rescission must be clear
and convincing.-Bain v. Guntersville Realty
Co., 128.
Evidence held not sufficient to show fraudu-
lent misrepresentation entitling purchaser to
rescission. Id.
Evidence held to justify rescission of land
contract because of mistake as to boundary.
44 (La.) Sales; fraud of broker releasing
agency and subsequently purchasing property
held not shown.-Fassbender v. Ghergich, 436.
II. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF
CONTRACT.
78 (Ala.) Time not generally regarded as of
essence in equity.-Forrester v. Granberry, 551.
III. MODIFICATION OR RESCISSION OF
CONTRACT.
(B) Rescission by Vendor.
95(1) (La.) Sales; installment purchaser's
failure to insure as agreed held waived by ven-
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
(C) Rescission by Purchaser.
107 (Ala.) Purchaser of land held not enti-
tled to rescission of vendor's contract with ven-
dor's grantor.-Bain v. Guntersville Realty Co.,
123 (Ala.) Actual tender of rents collected
held not essential to bill for rescission by buy-
er.-Bain v. Guntersville Realty Co., 128.
(A) As to Each Other.
191 (Ala.) Purchaser under executory con-
tract entitled to possession before payment of
price.-Forrester v. Granberry, 551,
191 (La.) Sales; petition for recovery of
possession by purchasers after repair of prop-
erty by vendor held not subject to exception.
-Cavell v. Trichell, 249.
196 (Ala.) Grantee of land entitled to re-
cover of occupant rent subsequently accruing or
compensation for use and occupancy.-Davis v.
Reed, 226.
200 (La.) Sales; vendor must repair after
damage by fire, if installment purchaser has not
agreed to do so.-Cavell v. Trichell, 249.
(C) Bona Fide Purchasers.
227 (Ala.) Purchaser held to have pur-
chased lot with notice of dedication.-Manning
v. House, 772.
231(1) (La.) Sales; purchasers on faith
of public records not bound by knowledge, ex-
cept that disclosed therein.-Cole v. Richmond,
419.
239 (9) (La.) Sales; bona fide purchaser
for value acting on recorded title not affected
by fraud, want of consideration, or secret equi-
ties. Cole v. Richmond, 419.
VI. REMEDIES OF VENDOR.
(A) Lien and Recovery of Land.
254(2) (Ala.) Lien on land for unpaid pur-
chase money.-Posey v. Dodson, 488.
254(4) (Miss.) Deed conveying land in con-
sideration of third party's note held to give
vendor equitable or implied lien.-Green
Rule. 380.
II. DOMICILE OR RESIDENCE OF PAR-
31 (La.) Exception to venue_rule, stated.—
John A. Wogan, Inc., v. Folse, 540.
Defendant held entitled to be sued in parish
where he had his principal residence.-Id.
VERDICT.
See Criminal Law, 875-878.
2 (Ala.) Warehouseman's bond, executed
by individuals rather than surety company, held
properly rejected.-Faircloth-Segrest Mercan-
tile Co. v. Roach, 908.
WATERS AND WATER COURSES.
See Drains.
II. NATURAL WATER COURSES.
(C) Pollution.
77 (Ala.) Complaint for pollution of stream
held not demurrable.-Tennessee Coal, Iron &
R. Co. v. Wilhite, 135.
Testimony and instruction as to damages
from overflow held not within complaint for
pollution.-Id.
Evidence as to dying of trees on other prop-
erty and overflow held inadmissible in action for
pollution of stream.-Id.
VIII. ARTIFICIAL PONDS, RESERVOIRS,
AND CHANNELS, DAMS, AND
FLOWAGE.
171(1) (Ala.) Railroad constructing cul-
vert must use ordinary care-Atlanta & St.
A. B. Ry. Co. v. Knight, 233.
171(1) (Miss.) Railroad's failure to pro-
vide passageway for water held not proximate
cause of injury.-Illinois Cent. R. Co. v.
Wright, 1.
179(3) (Ala.) Evidence of conditions be-
fore and after construction of railroad culvert
held competent.-Atlanta & St. A. B. Ry. Co. v.
Knight, 233.
Evidence held competent on question of dam-
ages to land by flowage.-Id.
Evidence held admissible as showing knowl-
edge of defects in railroad culvert.-Id.
Evidence of injuries to stock from flowage
held competent.-Id.
179(6) (Ala.) Cause of loss of stock held
for jury.-Atlanta & St. A. B. Ry. Co. v.
Knight, 233.
IX. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY.
(A) Domestic and Municipal Purposes.
201 (Ala.) Citizen or taxpayer may sue to
enjoin water company's violation of public
duty, though city might sue.-Alabama Water
Co. v. City of Jasper, 486.
Citizen may maintain action against water
company to compel performance of duty owing
him under franchise.-1d.
266 (7) (Ala.) Right to foreclose vendor's
lien not barred by suit and judgment at law.-203 (6) (Ala.) Charter and statutes held not
Posey v. Dodson, 488.
281 (1) (Ala.) Burden on vendee to show
lien has been waived.-Posey v. Dodson, 488.
284 (Miss.) Whether vendor waived ven-
dor's lien held question of fact for trial court.
-Green v. Rule, 380.
VII. REMEDIES OF PURCHASER.
(A) Recovery of Purchase Money Paid.
334 (5) (La.) Sales; deposit held recover-
able by purchaser where property encroached
on adjoining owner. Jacobs v. Freyhan, 726.
341(5) (La.) Sales; 1 per cent. of pur-
chase price held recoverable as attorney's fees
for examining title.-Jacobs v. Freyhan, 726.
Sales; outlay for certificates held recoverable
by purchaser on rejecting title.-Id.
to invest city with absolute power to suspend
Public Service Commission's power to regulate
water rates.-Alabama Water Co. v. City of
Attalla, 490.
Public Service Commission held empowered
to fix water rates, notwithstanding lease be-
tween city and water company fixing rates.-Id.
203 (6) (La.) City of Baton Rouge held au-
thorized to establish rates to exclusion of
Public Service Commission.-Baton Rouge Wa-
terworks Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Com-
mission, 710.
Municipality prior to Constitution had im-
plied power to fix rates.-Id.
Municipality authorized to fix rates by com-
pulsion.-Id.
(Ala.) Injunction suit held col-
203 (12)
lateral attack on Public Service Commission's
rate order.-Alabama Water Co. v. City of At- VII. RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES OF DEV-
talla, 490.
18(1) (Ala.) Firearms "dangerous instru-
mentalities."-American Ry. Express Co. v.
Tait, 328.
ISEES AND LEGATEES.
(H) Void, Lapsed, and Forfeited Devises
and Bequests, and Property and In-
terests Undisposed of.
865(4) (La.) Share of community proper-
ty not disposed of by will held to descend to
of
testator's surviving widow.-Succession
See Descent and Distribution; Executors and Pujol, 677.
Administrators.
II. TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY.
WITNESSES.
See Depositions; Evidence.
52(3) (La.) No presumption of execution
of nuncupative will during lucid interval where
not prepared personally by testatrix.-Rodri- (C)
guez v. Succession of McFettridge, 68.
Burden of showing that will was not execut-
ed during lucid interval stated.-Id.
55(1)(La.) Evidence held to require find-
ing that testatrix was wanting in testamentary
capacity.-Rodriguez v. Succession of McFett-
ridge, 68.
III. CONTRACTS TO DEVISE OR BE-
QUEATH.
58(1) (Ala.) Agreement to bequeath in
consideration of care during life not contrary
to public policy.-Taylor v. Cathey, 834.
Testimony of Parties or Persons In-
terested, for or against Representa-
tives, Survivors, or Successors in Ti-
tle or Interest of Persons Deceased
or Incompetent.
128 (Miss.) Claimant
policy by assignment and delivery from de-
ceased father, whose estate not interested, held
competent; "claim against estate of deceased
person."-Garner v. Townes, 20.
159(4) (Ala.) Question prima facie objec-
tionable as calling for statement by deceased
person whose estate was interested.-Earnest
v. Fite, 637.
Testimony of conversation between defend-
63 (Ala.) Letters containing contract must ant and deceased father properly excluded.-Id.
be construed together.-Taylor v. Cathey, 834.159 (7) (Ala.) Defendant could not state
68 (Ala.) Action maintainable on contract deceased father gave him property claimed by
to bequeath in consideration of care.-Taylor v. adverse possession.-Earnest v. Fite, 637.
Cathey, 834.
General affirmative charge for defendant im-
proper if under certain aspects of evidence
plaintiff could recover.-Id.
IV. REQUISITES AND VALIDITY.
(G) Revocation and Revival.
186 (Ala.) Fact that writing declared will
revoked, instead of revoking in præsenti, imma-
terial.-Luther v. Luther, 497.
Will held revoked by writing.-Id.
V. PROBATE, ESTABLISHMENT, AND AN-
NULMENT.
290 (Ala.) Burden showing revocation on
contestants.-Luther v. Luther, 497.
370 (Ala.) Court required to search plead
(A) Taking Testimony in General.
240 (2) (Ala.App.) Permission of leading
questions in sound discretion of judge.-Young-
blood v. State, 87.
255 (2) (Ala.) Permitting witness to re-
fresh memory from memorandum of articles
sold to defendant held without error.-Bailey
v. Griffin, 242.
255(4) (La.) Use of certificate of baptism
held prejudicial, through certificate excluded.
-State v. Larocca, 720.
Certificate of baptism held not properly used
to refresh memory.-Id.
(B) Cross-Examination and Re-Examina.
267 (Ala.App.) Much latitude allowed in
discretion of court as to cross-examination.—
Webster v. State, 201.
ing for sufficient ground of demurrer to ground268(1) (Ala.) Witness held properly cross-
of contest of will.-Luther v. Luther, 497.
VI. CONSTRUCTION.
(A) General Rules.
439 (Ala.) Not purpose of construction to
substitute will of another for that of testator.
-Naugher v. Hinson, 221.
examined as to employment.-Boyette v. Brad-
ley, 647.
268(1) (Ala.App.) Cross-examination
injured party in prosecution for assault as to
brooding over difficulty with defendant evening
before held improper.-Sampson v. State, 305.
268(1) (Ala.App.) Cross-examination of
defendant's witnesses held not improper.—Hasty
v. State, 561.
478 (La.) Devise by implication held not
permissible where testator did not dispose of
his entire property.-Succession of Pujol, 677.270(1) (Ala.) Injection of collateral mat-
ter by defendant held to warrant question on
cross-examination.-Alabama Great Southern
R. Co. v. Ensley, Transfer & Supply Co., 342.
Character and extent of cross-examination
as to collateral matters discretionary.-Id.
(F) Vested or Contingent Estates and In-
terests.
634 (8) (Ala.) Remainder interests of ben-
eficiaries held to vest on testator's death.-
Hughuley v. Burney, 817.
(H) Estates in Trust and Powers.
691 (Ala.) Powers to be defined not re-
stricted. Naugher v. Hinson, 221.
(I) Actions to Construe Wills.
695 (3) (Miss.) Equity will not exercise
jurisdiction merely to interpret will, without
request for further relief.-Kendrick v. Ken-
drick, 181.
702 (Ala.) Bill held to make proper case
for construction of will.-Naugher v. Hinson,
270(2) (Ala.) Refusing cross-question
amounting to self-serving declaration of irrel-
evant matter not error.-Hill v. Hill, 340.
275 (2) (Ala.) Sustaining objection to
cross-examination of plaintiff as to former
business practice held not error.-Richardson
v. Stinson, 209.
277(1) (Ala.App.). Cross-examination of
defendant in murder prosecution securing repe-
tition of statement made on direct examination
held not erroneous.-Erwin v. State, 79.
277(2) (Ala.App.) Cross-question whether
defendant deputy sheriff had reported deceas-
ed's violation of prohibition law testified to
heid proper.-Savage v. State, 919.
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
280 (Ala.) Objection to question on cross-
examination held properly sustained as argu-
mentative.-Stout v. Limestone County, 352.
IV. CREDIBILITY, IMPEACHMENT, CON-
TRADICTION, AND CORROBORATION.
317(1) (Ala.App.) When jury may reject
all testimony of witness.-Grisby v. State, 82.
317(2) (Ala.) Rule stated for considera-
tion of witness' testimony found to be willfully
and corruptly false on a material issue.-Scott
v. State, 211.
state's witness
317(4) (Ala.App.) That
was gambling elsewhere at time of shooting
was material to discredit him.-Savage v. State,
(B) Character and Conduct
as to
337 (2) (Ala.App.) Impeachment
character of accused limited to purpose of af-
fecting credibility unless he puts character in
issue.-Brown v. State, 616.
344(1) (Ala.App.) Proof that witness ran
from still when raided held admissible.-Carter
v. State, 199.
345 (2) (Ala.App.) Conviction of manufac-
turing whisky cannot be used to impeach repu-
tation.-Webster v. State, 201.
357 (Ala.App.) Question to character wit-
ness properly sustained.-McGimpsey v. State,
(C) Interest and Bias of Witness.
363(1) (Ala.App.) Evidence of law viola-
tion by witness and similar charges pending
against him would not show bias or interest.
-Webster v. State, 201.
367(1) (Ala.App.) Evidence that witness
was surety on defendant's appearance bond ad-
missible to show interest.-Dawkins v. State,
374(1) (Ala.App.) Testimony held admissi-
ble as affecting credibility of witness.-Hasty v.
State, 561.
(D) Inconsistent Statements by Witness.
379(1) (Ala.) Conductor's admissions ad-
missible to impeach him.-Bradley v. Lewis,
324.
380 (2) (Miss.) Testimony of accused may
be impeached by showing his contradictory tes-
timony in committing court.-Shaw v. State,
519.
388(10) (Miss.) Testimony in contradic-
tion of witness, denying making of inconsistent
statements, held admissible, though variant in
some respects from predicate laid.-Cain v.
State, 578.
391 (Ala.) Question to impeaching witness
held improper as substantial departure from
preliminary question propounded to witness
sought to be impeached.-Southern Ry. Co. v.
Dickson, 665.
(E) Contradiction and Corroboration of
Witness.
414(1) (Ala.) Expressions "habitual drunk-
enness" and "habit of getting drunk" held ob-
jectionable as conclusion on whole issue, but
corroborating evidence.-O'Byrne v. O'Byrne,
414(2) (Ala.App.) Testimony
trial not admissible to corroborate witnesses.
-Bush v. State, 307.
Witness not corroborated by proving that he
made similar statements prior to time of tes-
tifying.-Id.
WORDS AND PHRASES.
"Absence."-Van Deren v. Lory (Fla.) 794.
communication.".
"Absolutely privileged
Grantham v. Wilkes (Miss.) 673.
First Nat.
"Alteration."-Moore
"Arising out of employment."-Ex parte Ter-
ry (Ala.) 768.
"Belief."-Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney Gen-
eral (Ala.) 312.
"Blind corner."-Mobile Light & R. Co. v.
Gadik (Ala.) 837.
"Brothers-in-law."-Cruce v. State (Fla.) 264.
"Building site."-Myevre v. Liberty Realty &
Securities Co. (La.) 694.
"Caption of indictment."-Williams v. State
(Ala. App.) 573.
"Cashier's check."-Anderson v. Bank of Tu-
pelo (Miss.) 179.
"Charged."-Chappell v. State (Ala. App.) 75.
"Claim against estate of deceased person."-
Garner v. Townes (Miss.) 20.
"Collision."-St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
v. American Compounding Co. (Ala.) 904;
Etna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Cartmel
(Fla.) 802.
"Conjecture."-Southern Ry. Co. v. Dickson
(Ala.) 665.
"Contract of sale or return."-G. A. Soden &
Co. v. T. J. Wilkinson & Son (Miss.) 182.
"Conviction."-Youngblood v. State (Ala. App.)
First Nat. Bank of Brooksville (Fla.) 362.
"Creditors' bill."-Armour Fertilizer Works v.
"Cruel or unusual punishment."-State v. Par-
ker (Fla.) 260.
"Dangerous instrumentality."-American Ry.
Express Co. v. Tait (Ala.) 328.
"Dedication."-Manning v. House (Ala.) 772.
"Domicile."-Lucky v. Roberts (Ala.) 878.
"Entered of record in minutes of court."-State
v. Ellis (Ala.) 866.
"Fee-simple title."-Campbell v. Richmond Ins.
Co. (La.) 679.
"Final order."-Theo. Hirsch Co. v. Scott
(Fla.) 157.
"Fixed."-Youngblood v. State (Ala. App.) 87.
"Fixed conviction of guilt arising out of evi-
dence."-Youngblood v. State (Ala. App.)
87.
"Flight."-Gilbert v. State (Ala. App.) 566.
"F. O. b. cars."-J. H. Hamlen & Son v. Ro-
sengrant (Ala.) 217.
"Fortuitous event."-Thompson v. Commercial
Nat. Bank (La.) 688.
"Further."-Bouchelle v. State Highway Com-
mission (Ala.) 884.
"Good will."-Collas v. Brown (Ala.) 769.
"Grandchildren."-Jenkins v. Harris (Miss.)
V. Harris
"Great-grandchildren."-Jenkins
(Miss.) 280.
"Habeas corpus."-State v. Logan (Fla.) 173.
"Habitual drunkenness."-O'Byrne v. O'Byrne
(Ala.) 781.
"Honest."-American Cigar Co. v. Fabacher
(La.) 299.
"Impact."-St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v.
American Compounding Co. (Ala.) 904.
V. State
"Indirectly interested."-Bouchelle
Highway Commission (Ala.) 884.
"Intentional injury."-Alabama Great Southern
R. Co. v. Ensley Transfer & Supply Co.,
(Ala.) 342.
orders or decrees."-Theo.
"Interlocutory
Hirsch Co. v. Scott (Fla.) 157.
"Land."-Dominion Land Co. v. Stark (La.)
"Larceny."-Economu v. State (Ala. App.) 85.
"Log."-Ladnier v. Ingram Day Lumber Co.
(Miss.) 369.
"Manslaughter in first degree."-Savage v.
State (Ala. App.) 919.
"Murder in second degree."-Cruce v. State
(Fla.) 264.
"Niece."-Capps v. State (Fla.) 172.
"Nonresident."-Lucky v. Roberts (Ala.) 878.
"Object."-St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v.
American Compounding Co. (Ala.) 904.
"Outlaw strike."-American Ry. Express Co. v.
Johnson (Fla.) 743.
"Owner."-Robinson-Slagle Lumber Co. v. Ru-
dy (La.) 296.
"Permanent employment."-Rape v. Mobile &
O. R. Co. (Miss.) 585.
"Possession."-Bridgeforth v. State (Ala. App.)
"Premises."-Matthews v. State (Miss.) 18.
"Presentation."-Southern Ry. Co. v. Williams
(Ala.) 203.
"Privileged communication."-Grantham v. Wil-
kes (Miss.) 673.
"Property."-Garner v. Townes (Miss.) 20.
"Proximate cause."-Illinois Cent. R. Co. v.
Wright (Miss.) 1.
"Qualifiedly privileged communication."—
Grantham v. Wilkes (Miss.) 673.
"Reasonable doubt."-Youngblood V. State
(Ala. App.) 87.
"Reckoning."-Husch v. State (Ala.) 321.
"Return to the state."-Van Deren v. Lory
(Fla.) 794.
"Saw log."-Ladnier v. Ingram Day Lumber
Co. (Miss.) 369.
"Saw log timber."-Ladnier v. Ingram Day
Lumber Co. (Miss.) 369.
"Sober."-American Cigar Co. v. Fabacher
(La.) 299.
"Stated."-Chappell v. State (Ala. App.) 75.
"Strike."-American Ry. Express Co. v. John-
son (Fla.) 743.
"Sufficient means."-Young V. State (Ala.
App.) 200.
"Timber."-Ladnier v. Ingram Day Lumber
Co. (Miss.) 369.
"To any person."-Strickland v. State (Miss.)
184.
"Transaction of business in state."-Houston
Canning Co. v. Virginia Can Co. (Ala.) 104.
"Uncle."-Capps v. State (Fla.) 172.
"Wanton injury."-Alabama Great Southern
R. Co. v. Ensley Transfer & Supply Co.
(Ala.) 342.
"Written contract."-Solomon v. David Roths-
child & Co. (Ala.) 230.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACTS.
See Master and Servant, 351-419.
WRIT OF ERROR.
See Appeal and Error.
See Assistance, Writ of; Attachment; Certio-
rari; Execution; Habeas Corpus Injune-
tion; Mandamus; Process; Prohibition;
Quo Warranto; Replevin; Sequestration.
|