« 이전계속 »
leath. But it was not these qualities which distinguished him so highly seyond his fellows. To say that he had them will not enable those who stood without the privileged circle of his friends to comprehend why, within that circle, the old mourn hiin as a son, and the young as a brother. It is not because he was so gifted that the veterans of science one and all affirm his loss to >e irreparable, and the aspirants know that they may succeed but cannot replace him. Our affections cling to character and not to intellect; and rare is was the genius of Edward Forbes, his character was rarer still. The petty canities and heart-burnings which are the besetting sins of men of science and if men of letters, had no hold upon his large and generous nature—he did not :ven understand them *n others. A thorough spirit of charity—a complete oleration for everything but empiricism and pettiness—seemed to hide from iim all but the good and worthy points in his fellow-men. If he ever wronged i man, it was by making him fancy himself better than he was. Worked to leath, his time and his knowledge were at the disposal of all comers; and hough his published works have been comparatively few, his ideas have been Ls the grain of mustard-seed in the parable—they have grown into trees, and jrought forth fruit an hundred-fold.
We are happy to say that his friends have found among his papers a most methodical list of all his writings, which literally amount to hundreds in numier, commencing with "Notes of Experiments on Animals of the Genus iymncea," read to the Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh, June 24, 1832, ind terminating with the article Siluria, in the last October number of the Quarterly Review. There is also a Journal of his Voyage to Asia Minor and •reece, kept with the utmost regularity. We have been allowed to look over K>me of these papers, and have seen with astonishment the amount of labour )f various kinds which he had accomplished. In science there are bis long catalogues of plants and animals of different regions; his numerous contributions to different journals, and his published works. Several books, including 'The Rambles of a Naturalist," "The Zoology of the European Seas," and various papers, are in a forward state of preparation, and many of the blocks dready cut for illustration are now in the hands of his publisher, Mr Van Voorst. In literature there are endless lists of various papers and contributions '.o journals, besides a host of poetical compositions on almost every subject, uid some serious pieces in verse of great beauty, of which latter we append to this sketch a short and pleasing sketch. In art, there are endess sketches of men and things, poems illustrated in outline, water-colour Irawings, and careful designs for future scientific publications. There is a rery extensive series of landscape sketches in water-colour, depicting the nfluence of geological structure on scenery, which it was his intention to have brought out as a separate publication. His collected works would, if judiciously edited, serve to show the world what Forbes had already done, and of liow much he was capable; and we sincerely trust that some kindred spirit in science and literature will still, for the sake of his memory, combine those ilready pubished with the fragments he has left, and present us with a work worthy of bis genius and equal to his fame.
But who can do justice to the wonderful power he possessed of inspiring confidence and respect in all with whom he came in contact—to that earnestness which evidently guided his own proceedings, and which he infused into the labours of others—to the remarkable quality of availing himself of the investigations of his fellow-naturalists, and, while thus carrying ont his own generalizations, elevating the isolated observer in the opinion of himself and of the public—or to the genial humour which presided over his intercourse with Jthers, and especially gave a charm to his lectures, and even to his scientific publications? Who that has heard him unfolding his beautiful theories, and seen him illustrating thflm by sketches on the board, now rapidly producing M sorts of animals—now, with a steady artist's hand, displaying the graceful curves of a shell, and then, by a touch, imparting animation to what had previously been dead and inert,—which of his audience have not recognised thit his philosophy was " not harsh and crabbed, as dull fools suppose," but capable of at once exciting enthusiasm and creating admiration! In him, indeed, trfe a union of qualities so valuable and varied, that we doubt the probability of our meeting with it again ; for he possessed the investigating ana generalizing power of the man of science, the skilful hand of the artist, the imaginative mind of the poet, and the truthfulness and simplicty of an upright and noble nature.
We conclude with a few lines of poetry, illustrative of Forbes' more serious compositions :— m
TO A STAB.
"A night sky overhead;
No jealous planet shone with which it to compare.
The dark clouds rolled away,
And all night's shining train
So lustrous shall we find
On earth each living soul
When seen alone;
That it is not less bright although it be outshined!"
SCOTCH REGISTRATION ACT. The new Registration Act comes into operation on 1st January 1855. Tfc section (XLI.) specially referring to medical men is as follows :—" The inedirsi person who shall have been in attendance during the last illness, and until the death of any person shall, within fourteen days after the death of «l» person, and under a penalty not exceeding forty shillings in case of failure transmit to the registrar a certificate of such death in the form of the schedul' (G) hereto annexed, the particulars of which shall forthwith be entered by tl;? registrar in the register, and the registrar shall from time to time furnW gratis, to every medical person within his parish or district known to him. * who shall require the same, the necessary copies of such certificate." The schedule referred to is as under.
To the Registrar of the •
I hereby certify that I attended
who was apparently aged years; that I last saw
h— on the day of 10—; that he died
on the day of 18—, at ;that the
cause of h— death was ■
and that the disease
Besides the medical attendant, householders, relatives, and the undertaker, are held bound to give notice of death. In the case of births the medical man incurs no responsibility; the parents, and failing them, the nurse, etc., being required to give the necesssary intimation to the registrar. One grand defect runs through the whole Act, namely, that while the many difi'erent parties interested in the three events of birth, death, and marriage, incur penalties for non-intimation to the registrar, no provision is made except in two cases for receipt or acknowledgment by that functionary that the original information has been lodged with him. To obviate this defect, so far as the medical profession is concerned, we would suggest that the registrar should be asked to initial the margin of schedule O.
Advertisements In The Weekly Medical Journals.—If flaring and extravagant advertisements lower the character of common newspapers, they must degrade medical journals still more, devoted as they are to topics of a serious nature, and treating of matters peculiar to their readers. Yet the advertising sheets of th e medical journals present more examples of the transition from thesublime to the ridiculous than those of any other periodicals: indeed people can scarcely refrain from laughter when they view the pictorial illustrations which ornament them. Here is the gentleman with the tail of his shirt drawn over his pubis who sells the " mock-main" truss; and there the lady's torso in citerpo, with the elastic appliance called " the abdominal supporter, most valuable to those ladies who are anxious for the look of their waists;" while another female figure displays the beauties of "an air-pad for prolapsis uteri" in situ, "highly appreciated by the most eminent members of the profession." Then comes " a bed-pan of cunning construction," followed by "railway urinals for male and female." We say nothing of the picture of the nursemaids rolling their babies along in three-wheeled barrows, nor yet again of the " grype and grimly beast" which warns us to "mark our linen." We do not even object to the pair of breeches, with boots and spurs attached, they are at least harmless ; all we venture to do is to suggest as much decency respecting such matters as may prevent people from talking of "nasty doctors," as they view these pictures, or even sometliing worse than them, in shop windows. We pretend not to dictate to our contemporaries, they are the best judges of what U fitting, but we see no harm in saying so much.—Dublin Med. Press.
Royal College Of Physicians or Edinburgh.—At the late eleetkn meeting of this College Dr Begbie was placed in the President's chair, ovec the heads of eighteen of his senior Fellows. We regret to say that this was entirely owing to the active exertions of the party now predominant in Ha affairs, who, to the number of twenty, had private meetings, and sent round circulars to their friends directing them how to vote, so as to place their own leaders and Dr Begbie in the council. Among so small a body as the Edinburgh College of Physicians a secret cabal or Junto of this kind, formed prhvcipally at supper parties among the juniors, must of course always secure a majority of votes. It would therefore be wiser and more dignified for tb? senior and distinguished Fellows (all of whom, we are happy to say, opposed the late proceedings), not to mix themselves up in any way at present with College affairs. The Junto have already so mismanaged the question of medical reform in Scotland, that all the sister colleges and institutions hare shrunk from it in distrust. Its present forlorn condition will certainly not b? improved by the late election, which is simply an acknowledgment that elderly general practitioners of the College of Surgeons, who find it convenient to provide for their sons by surrendering to them their general practice, and bv retaining what they are pleased to call consulting business, are in future to be elevated by the Junto, over men who have been consistent supporters of th* College all their lives.
The Practice Of Physic Should Be Founded On Knowledge Batheb Than Experience.—It is not unworthy of remark that many physicians profess to hold chemistry in contempt, exactly as they do physiology; tha: medicine reproaches physiology, with the same injustice, that she reproaches chemistry. The physician who has learned medicine, not as a science, but as empirical art, acknowledges no principles, but only rules derived from experience. The object of his inquiries is only whether a remedy, in any given case, had a good or a bad effect. This is all the empiric cares abont. He never asks why t He never inquires into the causes of what he observes' How differently would the treatment of diseases be conducted if we had perfectly clear notions of the processes of digestion, assimilation, and excretion Without just views of force, cause, and effect,—without a clear insight into the very essence of natural phenomena—without a solid physiological and chemical education, is it to be wondered at that men, in other respects rational, should defend the most absurd notions ; that the doctrines of Hahnemann should prevail in Germany, and find disciples in all countries? Reason alone will not prevent whole nations from falling into the most abject superstitions whilst even a child whose mind has been duly developed and instructed will repudiate the fear of ghosts and hobgoblins.—Lkbig's Letters on Chemistry.
M. CAPURON.—M. Dubois says, in his eloge of M. Capuron, who left a considerable fortune in charitable bequests, besides L.fiOOO to his relations, and L40 annually to the Academy of Medicine, for a prize, that—" He passed hi= entire life in the Pays Latin, near the schools and hospitals. For many years he followed the clinique of Duputren at the Hotel Dieu, and then that of M. Bouillaud at La Charite. His grey hairs were sei ii towering over all the young heads by the bedside where he disputed for the best place with the student*. For some time he was an obstinate supporter of the doctrines of Boussais, at whose lectures he sat on the first bench. No student ever lived harder than he. His room presented the poverty and severity of a monk's cell; a thick dust covered his books and furniture, which latter consisted only of an old bureau and a few straw chairs. It is not known whether a little fire ever enlivened the gloom. The use of a carriage was to him completely unknown. He was to be seen, in the depth of winter, every morning hastening to the cliniques, his face i-ed with cold, and he himself only clothed in a simple frock coat that no one ever remembered to have seen new. He died 28th April, aged eighty-three years.—Qazctte Medicate.
Tows PtTHiriCATiON.—Every house in which tenants die of typhus fever should be held suspect, examined by the authorities, and, if need be,like a foul grave-yard, summarily closed until it has been put into a wholesome state. Many small owners, no doubt, could not afford the immediate expense of renovation ; but a principle already introduced as part of sanitary discipline might be extended : an efficient Board of Health might be empowered to effect all necessary alteration, and distributing its charge on each house-owner over thirty years, saddle him with no more than a small terminable tax upon his premises. By the adoption of a policy like this, carried out strictly and carefully, how much, might be done in the course even of a single generation for the cure of our towns—done too at no real cost to the nation, by the mere guidance of house-owners into a path of justice profitable even in the most worldly sense to themselves, and by lending them such power to fulfil necessary injunctions as they may not have immediately at command.—Household Words.
Mis-statements Of Tfie "medical Times."—We took occasion to point out during the Gay affair, when the Medical Times was full of rounded sentences about the honour and dignity of medicine, how incompatible its practice was with its professions, in admitting anonymous letters, full of malicious statements, and attacks on medical men in Edinburgh. These letters have lately been resumed, and abound in false assertions, with a view of puffing the writer's friends and injuring his opponents. We beg to caution our readers against believing any portion whatever of the "gossip " of the "provincial correspondent" for Scotland, and to express our regret that a journal should find it worth its'while thus to pander to those mean and secret attacks on character, so disgraceful in one belonging to the profession of medicine. „
Banquet To A Bone-setter.—In November last a public banquet was riven to a country bone-setter called Mason, in Wisbeach, in Cambridgeshire, ivhich was presided over by the Mayor, when a silver cup and a sum of money amounting to L.225, 8s. were presented to him. "It was remarkable that just as Mr Mason was proceeding to attend the dinner, he was called upon by Ei lady to reduce a dislocation of the coliar bone. After leaving her he was stopped by a case of fractured leg, which he also set. The dinner was kept waiting in consequence, but the delay was inconsiderable."—Cambridge Independent Press.—This transaction will constitute an important illustration >f the manners of the 19th century, for some future historian.
The London WEeklies And Tub Edinburgh School Of Medicine.—The lecessity of finding matter to fill four weekly medical journals, seems now to lave exhausted the numerous schools of London of those lectures on which these jeriodicals mainly depend for matter. Hence the Lancet has had recourse to Mr 5yine of Edinburgh, and the Medical Times to Br Stokes of Dublin. The Times, n addition, has a correspondent in Edinburgh, who evidently imposes upon the ditor, by sending him the merest twaddle and petty malice of his own under he head of " news." The Association Journal, again, reports the meetings of ocieties, and any other scraps of Edinburgh intelligence it can pick up, in order a couirnunicate interest to its pages.
LntES On The Death Of Professor E. Forbes.—A gentleman who ttended the course of Natural History last summer, and who is favourably nown in the literary world, observes on the death of Professor Forbes :— One could almost fancy that Truth perceived he would outrun his age and ilenced a tongue which had also anticipated the future :—
Nature, a jealous mistress, laid him low.
He woo'd and won her; and, by love made bold,
She showed him more than mortal man should know;
Then slew hiin lest her secrets should be told."—Scottish Press. We are happy to announce that Ur George Wilson has undertaken to writo,