...have had a beginning and been adopted in fome particular cafe. Lord ELLENBOROUGH CJ The queflion fent for our opinion is Whether in point of law the plaintiff, the mailer, had any lien on the (hip for money expended or debts incurred by him for repairs done to her...

...reasonable sum for the conveyance of the plaintiff. But the master of a ship has not a lien on the ship e , for money expended or debts incurred by him for repairs done to it on the voyage. Policy brokers have a lien for their general balance * ; but not where they have...

...al. assignees of Rushforth v. Hadßeld et al. 7 East, 23*. 31 The master of a ship has nu lieu on it for money expended, or debts incurred by him for repairs done to it on the voyage. Hussey v. Christie. 9 East, -t26. 32 Whether debts of the testator are a lien upon...

...delivered up to be cancelled. Hayton v. Jackson. 8 East 5It. -•> The master of a ship has no Hen on it for money expended, or debts incurred by him for repairs done to it on the voyage. Hussey v. Chris* tie. 9 East 4-26. 39 The vice admiralty Courts abroad have no authority,...

...that 301. was a reasonable sum for the conveyance of the plaintiff. But the master of a ship has not a lien on the ship™, for money expended or debts incurred by him for repairs done to it on the voyage. Policy brokers have a lien for their general balance", even as against agents who...

...reasonable sum for the conveyance of the plaintiff. But the master of a ship has not a lien on the ship" i , for money expended or debts incurred by him for repairs done to it on the voyage. Policy brokers have a lien for their general balance', even as against agents who...

...personally with the owner. In Hussey v. Christie and Others (b), it was laid dowa that the master had no lien on the ship for money expended or debts incurred by him for repairs done («} Deugl. 101. (£} 9 Eait, 416. during the voyage. That case came from the Court of 1818, Chancery,...

...personally with the owner. In Hiissey v. Christie and Others (b), it was laid down that the master had no lien on the ship for money expended or debts incurred by him for repairs done (() Dtvgl. 101. (i) 9 £ast, 416. during the voyage. That case came from the Court of Chancery, and...

...that 30/. was a reasonable sum for the conveyance of the plaintiff. But the master of a ship has not a lien on the ship ' , for money expended or debts incurred by him for repairs done to it on the voyage. Nor has he a lien on the freight" for his wages, or for his disbursements on account...

...reasonable sum for the conveyance of the plaintiff. But the master of a ship has not a lien on the ship 1 , for money expended or debts incurred by him for repairs done to it on the voyage. Nor has he a lien OH the freight* for his wages, or for his disbursements on account...