« 이전계속 »
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER later act.-U. S. v. One Bay State Roadster, 2 Abandoned automobiles containing intoxicatF.(20) 616.
ing liquors on which tax was not paid, subject Om2 (U.S.D.C.Md.) Congress may determine to forfeiture.-Id. extent of publicity to be given income tax re- 46 (U.S.D.C.Tenn.) Automobile used by turns.-U. S. v. Baltimore Post Co., 2 F.(20) narcotic peddler held subject to forfeiture.-U. 761.
S. v. One Cadillac Automobile, 2 F.(20) 886. em (U.S.C.C.A.Ky.) Regulations of Com- Forfeiture statute includes automobiles; missioner of Internal Revenue pursuant to Con- "vehicle."--Id. centration Act have force and effect of law.- Use of automobile by addict with narcotics Simon v. Frankfort Distillery, 2 F.(20) 949. on person not evidence warranting forfeiture. Om7 (U.S.C.C.A.N.J.) Tax paid by obligor-Id. corporation on tax-free. bonds is not part of Omw46 (U.S.D.C.Tex.) Automobile being used "income” of bondholder.-Duffy v. Pitney, 2 F. in transportation of liquor with intent to de(20) 230.
fraud government of tax subject to forfeiture, Contributions to Grand Army post held de- without regard to ownership, liens, or claims. ductible from income; "corporation organized -U. S. v. One Durant Touring Car, 2 F.(20) and operated exclusively for charitable pur- 478. poses."Id.
INTOXICATING LIQUORS. Com (U.S.D.C.Mich.) Earnings of employees of municipally owned street railway not spe
II. CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ACTS AND
ORDINANCES. cifically exempted from income tax.--Frey v. Woodworth, 2 F.(20) 725.
On 21 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Provision of ProhibiOw7 (U.S.D.C.Mo.) Exemption of beneficiary tion Act, authorizing, summary punishment for association from policy premium tax; "lodge contempt for violation of injunction against system."-Western Funeral Ben. Ass'n v. Hell- nuisance, held valid.—Wedel v. U. S., 2 F.(20) mich, 2 F.(20) 367.
462. Exemption of beneficiary association from fur 2!. (U.S.C.C.A.Ill.) Provision of National policy premium tax.-Id.
Prohibition Act for abatement of nuisance held Om7 (U.S.D.C.Wyo.) Mining claim, based sole.
not invalid.-Peter Hand Co. v. U. S., 2 F.(20) lyon discovery and location, "gift,” exempt 449. from income tax.-U. S. v. Hurst, 2 F.(20) 73.
IV. LICENSES AND TAXES. Owll (U.S.D.C.Md.) Tax on corporate certifi- Cam 69. (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Prohibition commissioncates of no par value computed without refer: er's discretion to refuse permits to manufacence to number of shares.-Commercial Credit ture nonintoxicating liquor not absolute.-Fred Co. v. Tait, 2 F.(20) 862.
Feil Brewing Co. v. Blair, 2 F.(20) 879. Cw22 (U.S.D.C.Wyo.) Decisions of depart- Om70 (U.S.D.C.Pa.). Prohibition commissionment not binding on courts.-U. S. v. Hurst, 2 er cannot deny permit without giving applicant F.(20) 73.
hearing.–Fred Feil Brewing Co. v. Blair, 2 On 24 (U.S.C.C.A.Ky.) Proprietor of concen- F.(20) 879. tration warehouse after adjustment of com- 82 (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Federal prohibition commercial arrangements may not arbitrarily re- missioner has no discretion to change condition fuse to sign as consignor form necessary to re- of bond imposed by statute.-U. S. v. Engelmoval.-Simon v. Frankfort Distillery, 2 F.(20) berg, 2 F.(20) 720. 949.
w8871) (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Federal government 25 (U.S.D.C.Wyo.) United States notes- can recover on bond executed on issuance of topped to claim additional income by depart. permit, without regard to damage actually susment's answer to inquiry and delay.-U. S. v. tained.-U. S. v. Engelberg, 2 F.(20) 720. Hurst, 2 F.(20) 73.
Om 102 (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Denial of renewal of 28 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Motion to set aside manufacturing permit reviewable by court of service proper, where action for taxes clearly equity.-Vollmer Beverage Co. v. Blair, 2 barred by limitations.-U. S. v. Scudder, 2 F. F.(20) 469. (20) 632
Discretion given Commissioner to refuse to Motion to vacate and quash seryice in action renew manufacturing permit is a sound judito collect revenue, because of limitations, held cial discretion, and not_arbitrary.-Id. properly denied.-Id.
Ono 106(1) (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Discretion given m28 (U.S.D.C.Tenn.),, Commissioner of In- Commissioner to revoke manufacturing permit ternal Revenue is eligible to receive taxes on is a sound judicial discretion, and not arbitrary. intoxicating liquors.-U. S. v. One Ford Auto- – Vollmer Beverage Co. v. Blair, 2 F.(20) 469. mobile, 2 F.(20) 882.
Om 106(4) (U.S.D.C.La.) Druggist's permit m38 (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Club collecting tax im- should not be revoked for isolated infractions of posed on members cannot maintain action for regulations by employees, without knowledge or its recovery: -Shannopin Country Club v. Hei- consent of responsible head.-Shreveport Drug ner, 2 F.(2d) 393.
Co. v. Jackson, 2 F.(20) 65. Om 39, 40 (U.S.C.C.A.W.Va.) Operator of il- Cm 108 (9) (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Prohibition commislegal distillery may be prosecuted for separate sioner cannot revoke permit without giving offenses.-Neely v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 849.
applicant bearing:-Fred Feil Brewing Co. v. Om 39, 40 (U.S.D.C.Md.) Newspaper's publica. Blair, 2 F.(20) 879. tion of income tax returns from commission- Cow 108(10) (U.S.D.C.La.) On review of ruling er's list is not violation of statute.-U. S. v. revoking permit, investigation has vide latitude, Baltimore Post Co., 2 F.(20) 761.
but court will not administer law, except where 46 (U.S.D.C.Conn.) Motion to dismiss libel clear abuse_shown.-Shreveport' Drug Co. v. admits allegations of fact well pleaded.-U. S. Jackson, 2 F.(20) 64. v. One Bay State Roadster, 2 F.(20) 616.
Scope of. review of ruling revoking druggist's Proceedings for forfeiture of automobile may
permit.-Id. be brought under Internal Revenue Act if eva
cm 108 (10) (U.S.D.C.La.) Revoked permit orsion of tax is charged, but if unlawful trans
dered restored on compliance by permittee with portation, then under Prohibition Act.-Id.
conditions.-Shreveport Drug Co. v. Jackson, Government has burden of proving transpor: 108(10) (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Revocation of man
2 F.(20) 65. tation of liquor was for purpose of evading tax. -Id.
ufacturing permit reviewable by court of equiLibel against automobile held not subject to
ty.- Vollmer Beverage Co. v. Blair, 2 F.(20) motion to dismiss, which in effect admitted
469. facts and pleadings.--Id.
VI. OFFENSES. 46 (U.S.D.C.Tenn.) Forfeiture of automo- mm 139 (U.S.C.C.A.Colo.) Illegal possession of bile authorized for removal or concealment of liquor and maintenance of nuisance may be intoxicating liquors on which tax not paid – charged separate offenses.-Feinberg v. U. S. v. One Ford Automobile, 2 F.(20) 882. U. S., 2 F.(20) 955.
em 139 (U.S.C.C.A.N.J.) Conspiracy to violate Execution of search warrant within 10 days Prohibition Act is offense different from crime held legal.-Id. which is its object.-Linden v. U. S., 2 F.(20) em 249 (U.S.D.C.Nev.) Commissioner without 817.
power to cancel search warrant after prosecu143 (U.S.C.C.A.Colo.) Illegal possession of tion based thereon has been commenced in Disliquor and maintenance of nuisance may be trict Court.-U. S. v. McKay, 2 F.(20) 257. charged as separate offenses.-Feinberg v. U. Prohibition agent may execute search warS., 2 F.(20) 955.
rant.-Id. em 146(2) '(U.S.D.C.W.Va.) Under National No fixed time after sale within which search Prohibition Act, injunctive remedy against per- warrant must be issued -Id. son traveling to solicit orders held exclusive.- O 250 (U.S.D.C.Conn.) Proceedings for forU. S. v. Seibert, 2 F.(20) 80.
feiture of automobile may be brought under Inem 167 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Knowledge of own- ternal Revenue Act if evasion of tax is charged er that tenant is using premises unlawfully but if unlawful transportation, then under Promakes him aider and abettor.-Steir v. U. S., hibition Act.-U. S. v. One Bay State Roadster, 2 F.(20) 149.
2 F.(2d) 616. Om 169 (U.S.C.C.A.Colo.) Knowledge of em- 253 (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Proceedings before ployer's possession is not possession by em- commissioner to obtain search warrant reviewployé.-Feinberg v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 955. able by District Court.-U. S. v. Deloic, 2 F. C 169 (U.S.C.C.A.N.C.) Duty of train con- (2d) 377. ductor to use diligence to prevent unlawful 255 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Defendant not entitransportation on his train.--Powell v. U. S., tled to return of liquor seized.-Reyff v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 47.
2 F.(20) 39. Om 173 (U.S.C.C.A.Mich.) Indictment for con- Om 255 (U.S.C.C.A.Tex.) Return of liquor spiracy to import held not to include conspiracy seized by state officers held properly denied.to transport charged in other count.-Parmen- Vollmer y. U. S., 2 F.(20) 551. ter v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 945.
X. ABATEMENT AND INJUNCTION. VIII. CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS.
On 262 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Brewery could be 211 (U.S.C.C.A.Neb.) Indictment for pos
closed as nuisance, though indictments involysession held sufficient.-Pane v. U. S., 2 F.(20)
ing same offense were pending.–Pilsen Prod
ucts Co. v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 453. 855.
Oma 274 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Allowance of amendww222 (U.S.C.C.A.Colo.) Information for un
ment, alleging similar violation of Prohibition lawful possession need not negative exceptions
Act after filing of bill, held not error.-Pilsen in statute.-Feinberg v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 955.
Products Co. v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 453. m223(1) (U.S.C.C.A.S.C.) Proof of unlawful
Failure to charge operation of brewery withpossession of less quantity than charged will
out permit held immaterial, in proceeding to sustain conviction.-Trammell v. U. S., 2 F.(20)
close brewery as nuisance.-Id. 714.
Cuma 275 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Evidence held to show Cm 224 (U.S.C.C.A.Colo.) Possession is prima
sale in proceeding to abate nuisance.-Peter facie unlawful.-Feinberg v. U. S., 2 F.(22) Hand Co. v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 449. 955.
Evidence held insufficient to prove right to On 226 (U.S.C.C.A.Wash.) Permitting state to
manufacture under government permit.-Id. ask defendant's waiter what his duties were held
Defendants, who claimed right to manufacnot error.-West v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 201.
ture under government permit, had burden of Cross-examination of witness as to events
proving permit and compliance therewith.-Id. preceding visit to defendant's place held not On 275 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Evidence held to susimproper.-Id. Omw233(1)
tain finding in abatement proceeding that nui(U.S.C.C.A.Wash.) Prohibition
sance would be continued, if opportunity peragent's testimony as to purchases in defend- mitted.-Pilsen Products Co. v. U. S., 2 F. (20) ant's absence held not erroneously admitted.
453. West v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 201.
278 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Operation under speCm 236(4) (U.S.C.C. A. Neb.) Evidence held to
cial permit from court to manufacture and disconnect defendant with unlawful sales by ,an- pose of certain materials pot abatement.-Peter other.–Pane v. U. S, 2 F.(20) 855.
Hand Co. v. U. S.. 2 F.(2d) 449. On 236(4) (U.S.C.C.A.N.C.) Conviction of
278 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Denial of petition to railroad conductor as aider and abettor of il
reopen brewery closed as nuisance held warlegal transportation held sustained by evidence,
ranted.--Pilsen Products Co. v. U. S., 2 F.(20) -Powell v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 47.
JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES AND BUSI-Hilsinger v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 241.
NESS TRUSTS. Gaw 236(13) (U.S.C.C.A.S.C.) Chemical analy. Om 17 (U.S.C.C.A.N.J.) One contracting with sis not required to prove that content of bottles trustee bound to learn extent of his powers.is intoxicating liquor.-Smith v. U. S., 2 F. (20) De Witt v. Cabanne, 2 F.(2d) 322. 715.
Authority of one of a number of trustees to
make a contract may be shown indirectly by IX. SEARCHES, SEIZURES, AND
showing general authority.-Id. FEITURES, Om 248 (U.S.C.C.A.Wash.) Affidavit charging
JOINT TENANCY. hotel proprietor with possession, transporta- See Tenancy in Common. tion, and sale of liquor, without statement of evidentiary facts, held insufficient.--Lochnane
JUDGMENT. v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 427.
See Execution. Cm 249 (U.S.C.C.A.Ohio) Seizure of samples For judgments in particular actions or proceedof beer from brewery truck by prohibition
ings, see also the various specific topics. agents without warrant held lawful.-Hilsinger For review of judgments, see Appeal and Error. v. U. S., 2 F.(20) 241. Prohibition agents may search licensed brew
XIII. MERGER AND BAR OF CAUSES OF ery without warrant.-Id.
ACTION AND DEFENSES. Om 249 (U.S.C.C.A.R.I.) Search warrant held (B) Causes of Action and Defenses Merg. not invalid, because not issued until 4 days aft
ed, Barred, or Concluded. er evidence was procured.-Murby v. U. s., 2 m 587 (U.S.C.C.A.Minn.) Judgment for deF.(20) 56.
fendants in suit for fraud held bar to subse
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER quent action against such defendants and oth
LEASE. ers for conspiracy.--Hensch v. Erickson, 2 F.
See Landlord and Tenant. (20) 249.
LIBEL AND SLANDER, XIV. CONCLUSIVENESS OF ADJUDI
IV. ACTIONS. (B) Persons Concluded.
(E) Trial, Judgment, and Review, 702 (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Department of Pub- om 123(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Pa.) Construction of lic Works in Washington representative of publication not libelous per se, but susceptitelephone users, who are bound by decree in
ble of libelous meaning, for jury.-American rate case.-Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Piano Co. v. Cunningham Piano Co., 2 F.(20) v. Star Pub. Co., 2 F.(20) 151.
LICENSES. (C) Matters concluded.
I. FOR OCCUPATIONS AND PRIVILEGES. Ow715(1) (U.S.D.C.Ark.) Judgment in action concerning highway contract does not preclude Oml (U.S.C.C.A.Alaska) Alaska cannery lilatter action involving different issues.-Filbert cense act does not tax property-Pacific Amerv. Arkansas & Missouri Highway Dist., 2 ican Fisheries v. Territory of Alaska, 2 F. F.(20) 114.
7(4) (U.S.C.C.A.Alaska) Tax imposed on XVII. FOREIGN JUDGMENTS.
fish canneries in Alaska held not unreasonable Omw 828(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Decree of state and discriminatory.-Pacific American Fisheries court determining constitutionality of tax bills v. Territory of Alaska, 2 F.(20) 9. for local improvement held not binding on parties to suit in federal court.-Fidelity Nat.
LIENS. Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City v. Swope, 2 See Attorney and Client, em 174; Maritime F.(20) 676.
28 (App.D.C.) Proper decree in remainder864(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Ky.) Revival by succes- man's action to restrain life tenant from assion of deceased plaintiff.---Fordson Coal Co. v. serting adverse title stated. --Gaskin v. Gaskin, Jackson, 2 F.(20) 466.
2 F.(20) 931. Com 864 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.Ky.) Revival of judgment in ejectment by successor in interest;
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. procedure.- Fordson Coal Co. v. Jackson, 2
See Adverse Possession.
I. STATUTES OF LIMITATION.
(A) Nature, Validity, and Construction in
General. ES, AND OBJECTIONS. el 16 (U.S.C.C.A.Tenn.) Discharge of jurors Ow2() (U.S.C.C.A.Minn.) Action for share in open court for failure to convict held ground
of profits of joint venture controlled by statfor challenge to panel.-McLendon v. U. S., 2
ute of state in which action brought.-Green F. (20) 660.
v. Tuttle, 2 F.(20) 455. Om 136 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.Ohio) Common defend- 3(2) (U.S.D.C.Mo.) Statute exempting cerant in cases tried together entitled to same
tain lands from purview of statute of limitanumber of peremptory challenges as all of the
tions held not impliedly repealed by subsequent plaintiffs.-Davis v. Jessup, 2 F.(20) 433.
statute.-Summers v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 2 F.(20) 717.
O4(2) (U.S.D.C.Ohio) Statute reviving LANDLORD AND TENANT.
claim for reparations held not unconstitutional. IV. TERMS FOR YEARS.
-Lakewood Engineering Co. v. New York Cent.
R. Co., 2 F.(20) 121. (D) Termination, Om 108(1) (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Lease not forfeit- II. COMPUTATION OF PERIOD OF able where landlord held deposit as security.
LIMITATION. In_re Hool Realty Co., 2 F.(20) 334.
(A) Accrual of Right of Action or DeEquities of third parties to be considered in
fense. determining right of lessor to forfeit lease.--Id. Erw48(2)(U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Limitations Om 112(2) (U.S.C.C.A.T.I.) Collection of rent after notice of forfeiture waives right.-In re
mence to run as of date of demand note.-In re
German-American Improvement Co., 2 F.(20) Hool Realty Co., 2 F.(20) 334.
991. VIII. RENT AND ADVANCES.
(F) Ignorance, Mistake, Trust, Fraud, and (A) Rights and Liabilities.
Concealment of Cause of Action. C200 (112) (App.D.C.) Rent Act inoperative, 104 (3) (U.S.D.C.Md.) Limitations and in so far as it provides for regulation of rents laches held not to apply, where delay caused by after emergency which justified enactment of concealment of defendant:-Curtin .v. Gildea, 2 statute has ceased to exist.-Peck v. Fink, 2 F.(20) 865. F.(20) 912. Act' continuing Rent Law in force after
(H) Commercement of Action or Other emergency had ceased to exist held unconstitu
Om 119(2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Delivery of
mons to marshal held not commencement of acIX. RE-ENTRY AND RECOVERY OF POS- tion.-U. S. v. Scudder, 2 F.(20) 632. SESSION BY LANDLORD.
Om 127 (4) (U.S.C.C.A.Tex.) Amended peti315(4) (App.D.C.) Validity of judgment on tion, alleging cause of action based on same tenant's undertakings in landlord and tenant ac- contract, held not to state new cause of action. tion not affected by erroneous inclusion in orig- -Willits & Patterson v. Texas Refining Co., inal claim of items subsequently withdrawn and 2 F.(20) 547. not included in judgment.-Bailey v. Allan E. @ 130(11), (U.S.C.C.A.Okl.) When tort acWalker, Inc., 2 F.(20) 123.
tions saved' from bar by Oklahoma statute stat
ed.--Midland Oil Co. v. Moore, 2 F.(20) 34. LARCENY.
Action by partners for injury to partnership
cattle held barred under Oklahoma statutes. See Receiving Stolen Goods.
V, PLEADING, EVPDENCE, TRIAL, AND Pro 72 (4) (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Instructions on malREVIEW.
ice held correct.-Walton Trust Co. v. Taylor, 183(5) (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Exceptions in 2 F.(20) 342. statute of limitations, not invoked in support w72(5) (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Instruction on exof suit, need not be negatived in answer.-U. S. press malice as foundation for punitive damv. One Diamond Ring, 2 F.(2d) 732.
ages held warranted.-Walton Trust Co. v. TayOm 190 (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Exceptions to stat- lor, 2 F.(20) 342. utes of limitations relied on may be first pleaded in reply.-U. S. y. One Diamond Ring, 2 F.
MANDAMUS. (20) 732.
I. NATURE AND GROUNDS IN GENERAL. LIQUOR SELLING.
Onw3(6) (U.S.D.C.Mass.) Mandamus by Daval
officer to compel payment of salary proper See Intoxicating Liquors.
remedy, not suit in Court of Claims.-Mare y.
Alexander, 2 F.(20) 895. LIVERY STABLE AND GARAGE Cw4(1) (App.D.C.) Will not serve purpose of KEEPERS.
appeal or writ of error.-U. S. ex rel. McCabe
v. Work, 2 F.(20) 941. Omn 41/2 (App.D.C.) Consent required for construction of garage.-Hazard v. Blessing, 2 individual naval officer to compel himself as dis
On 22 (U.S.D.C.Mass.) May issue at suit of F.(20) 916. Jurisdiction of board of commissioners to
bursing officer to pay his own salary.-Wylly
v. McCarl, 2 F.(20) 897. issue permit for garage in residential district does not attach until applicant has filed requi- II. SUBJECTS AND PURPOSES OF RELJEF. site consents.--Id.
(B) Acts and Proceedings of Public Om
cers and Boards and Municipalities. LOGS AND LOGGING.
Om 105 (App.D.C.) Department of the Interim4 (U.S.C.C.A.Tex.) Payment for extension or's determination as to discontinuance of of timber lease held required to be made only pension not reviewable by manuamus.-U. S. es within reasonable time.-Bond v. Brown, 2 rel. McCabe v. Work, 2 F.(20) 941. F. (20) 797.
Omw 107 (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Naval disbursing officer Tender of amount due for extension of tim
may be compelled by mandamus to pay salary ber lease held made within reasonable time.-Id. of officer.-Hetfield v. Barber, 2 F.(20) 723.
Extension of time for removal of timber un-
Om172 (U.S.C.C.A.Nev.) Circuit Court of Ap
peals would exceed its jurisdiction in ordering II. WANT OF PROBABLE CAUSE. payment of money to trustee under deed of Om 18(7) (U. S. C. C. A. Mo.) Defendants, re
trust.-In re Old Colony Trust Co., 2 F.(20)
407. fraining from trying to learn facts, cannot con
MARITIME LIENS. tend there was probable cause.—Walton Trust Co. v. Taylor, 2 F.(20) 342.
1. NATURE, GROUNDS, AND SUBJECTCum 21 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Imparting, of half
MATTEK IN GENERAL. facts to attorney not sufficient foundation for
(A, Under Maritime Law. defense of advice of counsel.-Walton Trust Co. v. Taylor, 2 F.(20) 342.
w 9 (U.S.D.C.Del.) Item covering, charges 22 (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Advice of prosecuting
for towage, guaranteeing; and paying bills, attorney may be relied on.-Walton" Trust Co. etc., allowed against vessel.-The Richmond, 2 v. Taylor, 2 F.(20) 342.
F.(20) 903. 24 (6) (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Binding
(B) Under Statutory Provisions. justice of peace not conclusive on question of probable cause.-Walton Trust Co. v. Taylor, 2
24 (U.S.C.C.A.Va.) Furnisher of repairs F.(20) 342.
held entitled to lien.-Carr v. George E. WarV. ACTIONS.
ren Corporation, 2 F.(20) 333. ww42 (U.S.C.C.A.Ala.) That plaintiff was II. CREATION, OPERATION, AND EFFECT, charged with unlawful possession of narcotics did not relieve defendant, whose agents caused
Om 27 (U.S.C.C.A.Va.) Furnisher of coal held arrest for larceny of narcotics. Southeastern Corporation, 2 F.(20) 333.
entitled to lien.-Carr v. George E. Warren Express Co. v. Kendrick, 2 F.(20) 968. Principal liable for agent's acts within scope supplies to dredge, without knowledge of un
Cam 30 (U.S.D.C.Pa.) Furnishers of repairs and of employment, regardless of whether particu- recorded contract of conditional sale, held lar act authorized.--Id.
entitled to liens.—The Hurricane, 2 F.(20) 70. Om64(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Ala.) Evidence held to
Con33 (U.S.D.C.Del.) Libelant hierd entitled to warrant finding prosecution was instigated by lien for agreed sum for services in discharging defendant's agents.-Southeastern Express Co.
cargo notwithstanding cargo was short of esv. Kendrick, 2 F.(20) 968.
timated quantity.-The Richmond, 2 F.(20) mm 64(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Evidence held support finding of malicious prosecution.-Wal- Em52 (U.S.C.C.A.Va.) Bail in suit in rem diston Trust Co. v. Taylor, 2 F.(20) 342. Cu?! (2) (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Probable cause held charges lien on ship.—The Susana, 2 F.(20)
410. for jury.-Walton Trust Co. v. Taylor, 2 F.(20)
Discharge of lien from ship held not to re342. 71 (3) (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Malice held for ju
lease owner from liability in personam.-Id. ry.--Walton Trust Co. v. Taylor, 2 F.(20)
III. ENFORCEMENT. 342.
(A) In Admiralty. Om7! (4). (U.S.C.C.A.Mo.) Advice of counsel held for jury.-Walton Trust Co. v. Taylor, 2 O 64 (U.S.D.C.Del.) Libe! held sufficient to F.(20) 342.
establish maritime lien against vessel for supOm72(2) (U. S.C.C. A. Mo.) Instructions on plies.--The Richmond, 2 F.(2d) 903. probable cause.-Walton Trust Co. v. Taylor, 2 Allegation of libel held indefinite as failing to F.(20) 342.
state whether libelant advanced money to masCa 72(3) (U.S.C.C.A.Me.) Instruction sub- ter or paid bills.-Id. mitting question whether there was omission C65 (U.S.D.C.Del.) Libelant's statement held in laying case before prosecuting attorney held insufficient to overcome presumption that serpproper under evidence.-Walton Trust Co. v. ices, etc., were furnished on vessel's credit, Taylor, 2 F.(20) 342.
The Richmond, 2 F.(20) 903.
For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER
-286(10) (U.S.C.C.A.Okl.) Negligence in
failing to supply belt shifter held for jury.See Divorce; Husband and Wife.
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Hendrix, 2 F. MASTER AND SERVANT.
ww286(19), (U.S.C.C.A.Ala.) Evidence negliI. THE RELATION.
gence of mine owner's agent caused injury to (B) Statutory Regulation,
convict in involuntary servitude held sufficient
to go to jury, and to warrant verdict for plain-13 (U.S.D.C.Ill.) Delay caused by pulled
tiff.--Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Brewdrawbar held due to unforeseen accident, pre
er, 2 F.(20) 401. cluding conviction under Hours of Service Act. -U. S. v. Marion & E. R. Co., 2 F.(22) 782. VI. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACTS. Om 18 (U.S.D.C.UI.) Burden on railroad com
(A) Nature and Grounds of Master's Linpany to justify violation of Hours of Service
bility. Act.-U. S. v. Marion & E. R. Co., 2 F.(20) 782.
Cm354 (U.S.C.C.A.Ohio) Workmen's Compen
sation Act held to give administrator option II. SERVICES AND COMPENSATION.
to sue third party for negligence causing death. ' (A) Performance of Services.
-Davis v. Jessup, 2 F.(20) 433. 62 (U.S.C.C.A.Pa.) Equitable title to pat
MILITARY LAW. ent held to be in employer of inventor under
See Army and Navy. contract.-Fullman v. Steel City Electric Co., 2 F.(20) 4.
MINES AND MINERALS. III. MASTER'S_LIABILITY FOR INJURIES II. TITLE, CONVEYANCES, AND CONTO SERVANT.
TRACTS. (B) Tools, Machinery, Appliances, and
(B) Conveyances in General. Places for Work.
55(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Okl.) Conveyance of land Om 108 (U.S.C.C.A.Okl.) Oklahoma Factory reserving nine-tenths of oil held not to give Act, requiring belt shifters, held applicable to grantee right to one-tenth of oil free of expumping station.-Humble Oil & Refining Co. penses of development.-Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Hendrix, 2 F.(20) 33.
V. Allen, 2 F.(2d) 566. Om 122 (U.S.C.C.A.Ark.) Master not liable for injuries from hidden defects not discoverable by (C) Leases, Licenses, and Contracts. due care.-Kaemmerling v. Athletic Mining &
~78(2) (U.S.D.C.La.) Default under oil and Smelting Co., 2 F.(20) 574.
gas lease held such as to entitle lessors to can(F) Risks Assumed by Servant.
cellation.-Spencer v. Transcontinental Oil Co.,
2 F.(20) 273. 204 (2) (U.S.D.C.Fla.) Assumption of risk
Equities of lessee on cancellation of oil and not available as defense in action based on
gas lease determined.-Id. violation of statute.-Delaney v. Tampa Northern R. Co., 2 F.(20) 734.
OPERATION OF MINES, QUARRIES, w219(10) (U.S.C.C.A.Ark.) Servant does not
AND WELLS. assume risk from hidden defects in machinery. (C) Rights and Liabilities Incident to -Kaemmerling v. Athletic Mining & Smelting
Working. Co., 2 F.(20) 574.
Om 109 (U.S.C.C.A.Ky.) Statute relating to (G) Contributory Negligence of Servant.
operation of mines held not applicable to con
tract for mining.–Ford Elkhorn Mining Co. v. Cam228 (2) (U.S.D.C.Fla.) In action under Mullins, 2 F.(20) 717. Safety Appliance Act, contributory negligence is not defense.-Delaney V. Tampa Northern
MINORS. R. Co., 2 F.(20) 734.
See Infants, (H) Actions. Omw 257 (U.S.C.C.A.Ala.) Allegation negligence
MONOPOLIES. injured plaintiff while performing duties for II. TRUSTS AND OTHER COMBINATIONS defendant held to state cause of action.--Sloss
IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE. Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Brewer, 2 F.(20)
C 23 (U.S.C.C.A.S.C.) That plaintiff is par401.
ty to an illegal combination not a defense to ac. Allegation convict was injured while work
tion for goods sold.-Bell v. Lamborn, 2 F. ing for mine owner implied relationship re
(20) 205. quiring care for convict's safety.-Id.
III. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION. C258(12) (U.S.C.C.A.Okl.) Complaint for in
(D) Lien and Priority. jury by belt held to state cause of action.
151 (3) (U.S.C.C.A.Va.) Statute giving suHumble Oil & Refining Co. v. Hendrix, 2 F.
perior lien for supplies held invalid as to liens (20) 33. em 258 (15). (U.S.C.C.A.Ala.) Allegation negli- existing prior to its date and valid as to subgence of mine owner's agent caused injury to
sequent liens.--Citizens' & Marine Bank of convict in service held to warrant recovery.
Newport News, Va. v. Mason, 2 F. (20) 352. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Brewer, 2 VI. TRANSFER OF PROPERTY MORTF.(20) 401.
GAGED OR OF EQUITY OF Cm 265(5) (U.S.C.C.A.Ark.) Rule of “res ipsa
REDEMPTION. loquitur" applicable to servant's action for
295(1) (U.S.D.C.La.) Mortgage on timber injury.-Kaemmerling Athletic Mining & held not extinguished by confusion by ineffecSmelting Co., 2 F.(20) 574.
tive reconveyance of the land, if subsequently am 265 (6) (App.D.C.) Railroad employee set aside.-Pacific Improvement Co. v. Duson, found dead not presumed killed by employer's 2 F. (20) 261. negligence.-Bennett v. Washington Terminal Co., 2 F.(20) 913.
VII. PAYMENT OR PERFORMANCE OF 285(2) (App.D.C.) Verdict properly direct
CONDITION, RELEASE, AND ed for defendant, where cause of injury was
SATISFACTION. matter of speculation.-Bennett v. Washington C 316 (U.S.D.C.La.) Purchaser of timber on Terminal Co., 2 F.(20) 913.
mortgaged property held not necessary party