µµ¼ Á¤º¸
³» ¶óÀ̺귯¸®
Google Play µµ¼
CONTENTS.
Letters of transmittal..
Letter of submittal..
CHAPTER I.-BRIEF HISTORICAL VIEW OF ANTITRUST LEG-
Sec. 1. Introductory...
ISLATION.
2. English law regarding monopolies and restraint of trade.
Monopolies by Crown patent....
Engrossing, regrating, forestalling, price agreements, etc..
Agreements in restraint of trade tending to fix prices or to control
the market....
3. Law regarding monopolies and restraint of trade in the United States
prior to the Antitrust Act......
Common law regarding restraint of trade and monopoly..
Trusts..
Holding companies.....
4. Legislation against combinations prior to the Sherman Antitrust Act..
State antitrust laws.....
Interstate Commerce Act of 1887.
5. Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890..
6. Early judicial interpretation (1890–1901)..........
Ineffective enforcement of the law..
Knight case (1895).............
Trans-Missouri Freight Association case (1897)..
Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. case (1899)....
12
8. Northern Securities case (1901-1904) and its political and economic
effects......
Northern Securities case (1904)........
**
14
Decline of consolidations and development of "gentlemen's agree-
ments" and "cooperation".
15
Increase of activity in the prosecution of trusts..
9. Standard Oil and Tobacco decisions and their results..
16
Standard Oil and Tobacco decisions (1911)..
Character and effect of dissolutions...
17
Prosecution of the Steel Corporation....
10. The Federal Trade Commission and supplementary antitrust legisla-
CHAPTER II.-COMMON-LAW DECISIONS BY COURTS IN THE
UNITED STATES IN REGARD TO AGREE-
MENTS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE.
Sec. 1. Introduction.....
2. Agreements connected with the sale of a business..
3. Agreements among competitors to restrict competition.
Control of supply....
Division of territory.
CHAPTER III.-THE FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAWS AND THEIR
U. S. v. Hamburg - Amerikanische Packet-Fahrt - Actien - Gesell-
schaft et al.
81
U. S. v. Pacific & Arctic Railway & Navigation Co. et al........
U. S. v. Prince Line et al....
82
U. S. v. American-Asiatic S. S. Co. et al..f
American Tobacco v. U. S..
7. Restraint of trade.....
U. S. v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association.
U. S. v. Joint Traffic Association..
Standard Oil Co. v. U. S.......
U. S. v. American Tobacco Co......
8. Monopolize and attempt to monopolize.. Standard Oil Co. v. U. S....
Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.
9. Trading and manufacturing combinations......
83
84
85
86
88
89
90
91
92
Page.
Sec. 10. Labor combinations.....
Loewe v. Lawlor, or Danbury Hatters' Case....
U. S. v. Debs et al..
U. S. v. Workingmen's Amalgamated Council of New Orleans..
International Harvester Co. v. Commonwealth of Missouri
11. Railroad combinations....
12. Farmers' combinations...
Steers v. U. S.....
Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co..
13. Forms of combination in restraint of trade..
14. Mergers.....
U. S. v. American Tobacco Co.....
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
Wheeler-Stenzel Co. v. National Window Glass Jobbers' Assn..
United States Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co....
U. S. v. Standard Oil Co...............
Wheeler-Stenzel Co. v. National Window Glass Association .
United States Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co..........
20. Agreements to divide earnings or profits...
Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. U. S....
Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.............
U. S. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Co...
U. S. v. Patten.....
22. Patents Use in violation of Sherman Law.
National Harrow Co. v. Hench...
Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. U. S..
Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co...
Hartman v. John D. Park & Sons' Co.....
Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons' Co...
24. The Sherman Act not void for uncertainty...
Nash v. U. S.......
25. Character of judicial proceedings under the act..
Criminal proceedings...................
Suits in equity by the Government..
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
122
Sec. 25. Character of judicial proceedings under the act-Continued.
Condemnation proceedings.............
Actions for treble damages..
Other suits between private parties.........
General price cutting and other methods of injuring competitors..
192