 | 1885 - 544 페이지
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he...against the negligence of any one but himself ; and be is not liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person suffering does not... | |
 | Isaac Fletcher Redfield - 1870 - 708 페이지
...not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he...indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one hut himself; and he is not liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person... | |
 | Edward P. Weeks - 1879 - 368 페이지
...and voice, and yet acting together." The master is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when he is...servant, because the person suffering does not stand toward him in the relation of a stranger; but is one whose rights are regulated by contract, expressed... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 962 페이지
...Mete. 57. " The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when he is...might suffer ; but because the implied contract of the muster does not extend to indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one but himself; and... | |
 | 1882 - 658 페이지
...in a common employment. The master's liability depends upon the implied contract of the master not to indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one but himself. Hence the separatija of the employment into different departments does not take away the relation of... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1885 - 912 페이지
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he...servant, because the person suffering does not stand toward him in the relation of a stranger, but is one whose rights are regulated by contract, express... | |
 | Frederick Pollock - 1885 - 544 페이지
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when he is...as for the negligence of his servant, because the pei-son suffering does not stand towards him in the relation of a stranger, but is one whose rights... | |
 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - 1885 - 730 페이지
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the sen-ant has better means of providing for his safety, when he...negligence of any one but himself ; and he is not liable m tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the person suffering does not stand towards him... | |
 | 1885 - 1232 페이지
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he...to indemnify the servant against the negligence of anyone bul himself; and he is not liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 844 페이지
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he...suffer, but because the implied contract of the master docs not extend to indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one but himself; and he is not... | |
| |
The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed in immediate connection with those from whose negligence he might suffer ; but because the implied contract... 
