 | William Williamson Kerr - 1868 - 498 페이지
...v. Kuight Bruce, LJ, commentof the liability of a principal for the acts of his agent, Cbap. I. done in the course of his master's business, and for his...distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and any other wrong (f). A man cannot adopt and take the benefit of a contract entered into by his agent,... | |
 | Albert Venn Dicey - 1870 - 582 페이지
...Se. App. 145. See further as to the liability of a corporation for fraud, Chapter XXVIII. PRINCIPAL answerable for the act of his agent in the course...business and for his master's benefit, no sensible distiuctlon can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The general rule... | |
 | Herbert Broom - 1874 - 880 페이지
...the agent who makes the contract is the fraud of the principal."4 And "with respect to the question whether a principal is answerable for the act of his...for his master's benefit, no sensible distinction," it has been observed,5 " can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The... | |
 | Thomas William Saunders - 1874 - 238 페이지
...Stock Bank (L. Rep. 2 Ex. 259-267 ; 36 LJ, Ex. 147.) He there says : "But with respect to the question whether a principal is answerable for the act of his...master's business, and for his master's benefit, no serviceable distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. The... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 830 페이지
...upon the principle involved), the learned justice proceeded to say : " With respect to the question whether a principal is answerable for the act of his...distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and any other wrong. The general rule is, that the master is anewerable for every such wrong of the servant... | |
 | William Macpherson, Herbert Cowell, Arthur Maynard Talbot - 1878 - 268 페이지
...or ratified those acts, and that the acts were not shewn to have been committed for their benefit. A principal is answerable for the act of his agent...his master's business and for his master's benefit, and for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service, and... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1881 - 968 페이지
...App. 394, and the doctrine above adverted to reiterated, the court saying " there is no distinction between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong;" and both cases hold that an action of deceit may be maintained against a company, whether incorporated... | |
 | William Edward Hearn - 1883 - 422 페이지
...company never authorized him to do." I may add the following observations by Mr. Justice Willesf : — "The general rule is that the master is answerable...such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed 1 in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of... | |
 | Henry Hurrell, Sir Clarendon Golding Hyde - 1884 - 190 페이지
...state of things, not the agent but the principal is the person liable. With respect to the question whether a principal is answerable for the act of his agent in the course of his master's business, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and of any other wrong. The master is... | |
 | Nathaniel Cleveland Moak - 1884 - 940 페이지
...because (as it was well put by Mr. Justice Willes in BarwicK's Case (*) ), " with respect to the question whether a principal is answerable for the act of his agent in the course of his master's business, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong." It... | |
| |
With respect to the question whether a principal is answerable for the act of his agent in the course of his master's business, and for his master's benefit, no sensible distinction can be drawn between the case of fraud and the case of any other wrong. 
