페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

CASES CITED.

(A reference to all the Reports will be found under each citation.)

ACEBAL v. Levy, 27
Acraman v. Morrice, 57
Aldridge v. Johnson, 56, 61
Alexander v. Gardner, 61, 67, 91, 125,

127
Allen v. Bennet, 19

v. Pink, 31 Anglo-Egyptian Nav. Co. v. Rennie,

62
Armitage v. Insole, 81, 83
Atkinson v. Bell, 57
Azémar v. Caselia, 36, 48

Brady v. Oastler, 132 Brogılen v. M. Rly. Co., 15 Brown v. Edgington, 43

v. Muller, 133 Brownc v. Hare, 63, 66 Bryan v. Lewis, 21 Buckman v. Levi, 92 Buddle v. Green, 80, 83, 130 Bull v. Robison, 93 Burnby v. Bollett, 40 Bute v. Thompson, 21 Buxton v. Rust, 19

Bird v.

BABCOCK v. Lawson, 74
Bailey v. Sweeting, 19
Baldey v. Parker, 143
Barr v. Gibson, 36, 40
Barrow v. Arnaud, 129, 132, 110
Beer v. Walker, 45, 93
Behn v. Burness, 31, 38, 138
Bentley v. Vilmont, 9, 74, 75
Bethell v. Clark, 109, 111, 114, 119
Biddlecombe v. Bond, 150
Bigge v. Parkinson, 42, 46
Bilton v. Crofts, 150

Brown, 116
Blenkinsop v. Clayton, 18
Bloxam v. Saunders, 80, 81, 82, 101,

103, 104, 105, 107, 122 Bodger v. Nichols, 142 Bolton v. Lanc. & Y. Rly. Co., 108,

110, 115, 118
Boorman v. Nash, 128, 133
Borries v. Hutchinson, 131, 134
Borrowman v. Drayton, 31, 38
Bowes v. Shand, 31, 35, 38
Bowlby v. Bell, 20
Boydell v. Drummond, 19
Bradford v. Williams, 31
Bradley v. Holdsworth, 20

CALCUTTA Co. v. De Mattos, 63, 68,

80, 91
Carr v. L. & N. W. Rly. Co., 70
Case of Market Overt, 71
Cassaboglou v. Gibb, 100
Castle v. Playford, 126

v. Sworder, 18
Cazet de la Borde v. Othon, 137
Chalmers, Ex parte, 99
Chambers v. Davidson, 108
Chanter v. Hopkins, 35, 149
Chinery v. Viall, 56, 82, 130
Clarke v. Hutchins, 92

v. Westrope, 28
Clifford v. Watts, 22
Col. Ins. Co. v. Adelaide, 31, 86
Cooper, Ex parte, 85, 107, 114, 117
Cort v. Ambergate Rly. Co., 128
Couston v. Chapman, 33, 97
Couturier v. Hastie, 21, 23
Cox v. Mayor, &c., of London, 7
Crane v. London Dock Co., 71
Cundy v. Lindsay, 69, 73
Cunlitle v. Harrison, 87
Cusack v. Robinson, 18, 91

[ocr errors]

DALE v. Humfrey, 19

Davis v. Hedges, 139
Derry v. Peek, 149
Dixon v. Baldwen, 111, 112

v. Yates, 52, 54, 56, 100, 101, 105, 109, 109, 113, 118, 120, 121 Drummond v. Van Ingen, 43, 44, 47,

50 Dunlop v. Grote, 126

v. Higgins, 132 Dutton v. Solomonson, 63, 90

EBERLE's Hotel 2. Jonas, 137
Edan v. Dudfield, 18
Edwards v. Pearson, 34
Eicholtz v. Bannister, 34
Elbinger A. G. v. Armstrong, 130,

134, 140
Elmore v. Kingscote, 19, 26
Elphick v. Barnes, 13, 24, 60, 67
Emmerson v. Heelis, 143
Emmerton v. Mathews, 40, 41
Ess v. Truscott, 28

FEISE 2. Wray, 101
Fells v. Read, 137
Field v. Lelea 82
Ford v. Yates, 16
Fragano v. Long, 55, 63, 67, 90, 125,

127
Freeman v. Cooke, 70
Freeth v. Burr, 86
Frost v. Knight, 134
Fuentes v. Montis, 69

GABARRON v. Kreeft, 65
Gardiner v. Gray, 36, 46
Gilmour v. Supple, 55, 56
Gladstone v. Padwick, 78
Godts v. Rose, 18, 52, 53, 64, 66, 84
Goodhart v. Lowe, 122
Greaves v. Ashlin, 98
Grébert-Borgnis v. Nugent, 130, 135,

140
Green v. Baverstock, 144
Grice v. Richardson, 105, 106
Grimoldby v. Wells, 97
Gunn v. Bolckow, Vaughan & Co., 7,

100

[ocr errors]

HADLEY v. Baxendale, 128, 130, 132 Hall v. Conder, 35

Hammond v. Bussey, 130
Hanson 2. Meyer, 58, 105
Hargreave v. Spink, 72
Harman v. Bennett, 45

v. Reeve, 17
Harnor v. Groves, 95
Hart v. Mills, 87
Hastie v. Couturier, 20
Head v. Tattersall, 25, 59, 67
Heilbutt 2. Hickson, 13, 32, 50, 94,

95, 96, 138 Heseltine v. Siggers, 20 Hewison 2. Guthrie, 108 Heyworth v. Hutchinson, 32, 48, 138 Hibblewhite v. M‘Morine, 21, 48 Hills v. Sughrue, 21, 22, 23 Hinde v. Liddell, 131, 134 Hoadly v. M‘Laine, 19, 26, 27 Hoare v. Rennie, 31, 85, 86 Honck v. Muller, 32, 86 Horncastle v. Farran, 108 Horwood v. Smith, 75 Howell v. Coupland, 22, 25 Humble v. Mitchell, 20 Hydraulic Eng. Co. v. M'Haffie, 134,

135, 140

IRELAND v. Livingstone, 100
Isherwood v. Whitmore, 94

JACKSON v. Lowe, 19
Jacobs v. Harbach, 60
Jenner v. Smith, 53, 58, 61
Johnson v. Raylton, 7, 45
Johnstone v. Marks, 14
Jones v. Bowden, 45, 142

v. Bright, 41, 42, 43, 44
v. Jones, 118
v. Just, 42, 44

v. Padgett, 42 Josling v. Irvine, 133

v. Kingsford, 36, 37, 49 Joyce v. Swann, 27, 66

KEMP v. Falk, 107, 122
Kendal v. Marshall, 112, 113, 115
Kibble v. Gough, 18
King 2. Reedman, 82
Knight v. Barber, 20

LACKINGTON v. Atherton, 117

Laing v. Fidgeon, 42, 44
Laird v. I'im, 126, 127
Lamond v. Devalle, 124
Lee v. Butler, 77
Leigh v. Patterson, 128, 131
Levy v. Green, 88
Lickbarrow v. Mason, 109, 118
Lockett v. Nicklin, 16, 29, 81
Logan v. Le Mesurier, 55, 58
Lord v. Price, 103, 122
Lorymer v. Smith, 21, 48
Lucas v. Dixon, 19
Lucy v. Mouflet, 97
Lyons v. Hoffnung, 109, 112

Paliner v. Johnson, 5
Pandorf v. Hamilton, 8
Parfitt v. Jepson, 145
Parker v. Gossage, 150

v. Palmer, 47
Parkinson v. Lee, 42, 49, 51
Pawle v. Gunn, 20
Payne v. Cave, 143
Paynter v. James, 82
Pearson v. Pearson, 5
Perkins v. Bell, 96
Pettit v. Mitchell, 48, 94
Phelps v. Comber, 119
Philpotts v. Evans, 128
Phoenix Bessemer Steel Co., In re, 106
Pickard v. Sears, 69
Pickering v. Appleby, 20
Poulton v. Lattimore, 139
Powell v. Horton, 46

M'Bain v. Wallace, 10, 54
Macfarlane r. Taylor, 44, 49
Maclean v. Dunn, 81, 123, 124
Market Overt, case of, 71
Martindale v. Smith, 29, 56, 99, 104,

105, 121
Martineau v. Kitching, 27, 68
Marvin v. Wallis, 18
Matthews v. Baxter, 14
Mersey, &c. Co. v. Naylor, 29
Miles, Ex parte, 111, 112
Milgate v. Kebble, 122
Milnes v. Gery, 28
Mirabita v. Imp. Ott. Bank, 53, 61,

65
Mody v. Gregson, 39, 49
Molton v. Camroux, 14
Mondel v. Steel, 139, 140
Moran v. Pitt, 72
Morley 1. Attenborough, 34, 69
Mortinier v. Bell, 144
Morton v. Lamb, 82, 130

v. Tibbett, 18 Moss v. Sweet, 59 Mussen v. Price, 126

RANDALL v. Newson, 36, 42, 43, 51
Ray v. Barker, 60
Reader v. Knatchbull, 150
Reed, In re, 73
Reuss v. Picksley, 19
Reuter v. Sala, 29, 85, 87
Rigge v. Burbidge, 140
Rohde v. Thwaites, 13, 53, 61
Roper v. Johnson, 13:3
Rosevear China Clay Co., Ex parte,

111, 112, 113, 115 Rugg v. Minett, 57, 58 Ryder v. Wombwell, 14

NEWELL v. Radford, 19
Nichol v. Godts, 36, 37, 46
Nicholson v. Bradfield Union, 88
Nunns v. Scipio, 20

SANDERS v. Maclean, 83
Schotsman v. Lanc. & Y. Rly. Co.,

64, 65, 102, 112, 116, 121 Scott v. E. C. Rly. Co., 17

-- v. Pettit, 113
Scrivener v. G. N. Rly. Co., 108
Seath v. Moore, 55, 56, 58, 61
Seaton 2. Lafone, 70
Sewell v. Burdick, 70, 148
Shepherd v. Harrison, 66
Simmons 1. Swift, 56, 57, 67
Simpson v. Crippin, 31, 32, 86

v. Margitson, 30 Sleepers Supply Co., In re, 30 Smith v. Baker, 40, 41, 45

2. Surman, 19 Stanton v. Austin, 81 Stapleton, Ex parte, 123, 129

OGG v. Shuter, 64, 65
Okell v. Smith, 96
Oxendale v. Wetherell, 86, 87

[ocr errors]

PAGE v. Cowasjee, 102, 121

v. Morgan, 18

Startup v. Cortazzi, 131

v. Macdonald, 83, 85 Studds v. Watson, 19 Swain 1. Shepherd, 59 Sweeting v. Turner, 68

TARLING v, Baxter, 56, 67 Taylor v. Caldwell, 23, 25

2. Smith, 18, 96 Tempest v. Kilner, 20 Thornett v. Haines, 144 Thornton v. Kempster, 18 Thurnell v. Balbimnie, 28 “Tigress,” The, 105, 119 Took v. Hollingsworth, 150 Tregelles v. Sewell, 63, 68 Tripp v. Armitage, 62 Turley v. Bates, 54, 58 Turner v. Mucklow, 44 Tye v. Fynmore, 35, 46

Wait v. Baker, 65, 66, 91
Ward v. Hobbs, 40, 142
Warlow v. Harrison, 143
Watson, Ex parte, 119
Watts v. Friend, 26
Webb v. Fairmaner, 30
Wells v. Hopkins, 139
White, Ex parte, 60

v. Garden, 73

v. Wilks, 53 Whitehead v. Anderson, 108, 113,

114, 119
Whitehouse v. Frost, 52
Wieler v. Schilizzi, 37
Wigglesworth v. Dallison, 142
Wilkes v. Davis, 28
Wilkins v. Bromhead, 52
Wilkinson v. Evans, 19
Williams v. Reynolds, 132
Winfield v. Boothroyd, 137
Withers v. Reynolds, 29
Wood v. Bell, 62

v. Tassell, 83, 84 Woods v. Russell, 62 Wyman v. Knight, 137

[ocr errors]

VALPY v. Gibson, 26, 111 Van Casteel v. Booker, 116 Vandenbergh v. Spooner, 18 Vickers v. Vickers, 28

WADDINGTON V. Oliver, 86

| YOUNG v. Matthews, 57

THE

SALE OF

OF GOODS ACT, 1893

INTRODUCTION.

The Sale of Goods Act, which after some five years

has at last been added to the statute book, marks an important step towards the codification of that part of the common law which deals with and regulates mercantile transactions. Originally introduced by Lord Herschell about 1888, it has been before the Legislature on some three or four occasions, and though it has been from time to time altered and amended, it remains still what it originally professed to be, a substantially complete declaration of the existing law, and of the existing customs which have been formally recognized by judicial decisions, relating to the sale of goods, wares, and merchandise.

The Act itself closely follows the lines upon which the Bills of Exchange Act, 1882, was framed. The Bills of Exchange Act codified and declared the statute and case law relating to bills

N.S.G.

B

« 이전계속 »