 | Hanna F. Pitkin - 1973 - 400 페이지
...this means, in sum, "that human agreement decides what is true and what is false." But he responds: "It is what human beings say that is true and false;...That is not agreement in opinions but in forms of life."76 The conventionality of language is not contractual; and if it limits the empirical .possibilities... | |
 | T. Binkley - 1973 - 244 페이지
...imagine a form of life. (§ 19) "So you are saying that human agreement decides what is true and what is false?" - It is what human beings say that is true...they use. That is not agreement in opinions but in form of life. (§241) What has to be accepted, the given, is - so one could say - forms of life. (P-... | |
 | Robert A. Evans - 1973 - 272 페이지
...that human agreement decides what is true or false? — It is what human beings say that is true or false: and they agree in the language they use. That is not agreement in opinions but in form of life".1 Tillich's distinction between the experimental and the experiential method and his... | |
 | Lon Luvois Fuller, Thomas W. Bechtler - 1978 - 256 페이지
...that everyone will share the same opinions. Wittgenstein, in fact, denies such a view. 'So you are saying that human agreement decides what is true and...they use. That is not agreement in opinions but in form of life.'1- But Wittgenstein doesn't quite escape the criticism that he accepts the Protagorean... | |
 | Tsong-kha-pa Blo-bzang-grags-pa - 1991 - 476 페이지
...convention.) 137 One objects: "So you are saying that human agreement decides what is true and what is false?" —It is what human beings say that is true...they use. That is not agreement in opinions but in form of life. 138 Here we strike rock bottom, that is, we have come down to conventions. 139 When philosophers... | |
 | Ruth Wodak, Pete Van de Craen - 1987 - 408 페이지
...for socially valid grammar: '"So you are saying that human agreement decides what is true and what is false?" — It is what human beings say that is true...is not agreement in opinions but in forms of life.' (PI 241) Here it becomes clear how the concept of grammar and forms of life can be integrated into... | |
 | Steven B. Smith - 1991 - 266 페이지
...p. 20; Werfee8:60. 76. See Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, par. 241, p. 88: "So you are saying that human agreement decides what is true and...is not agreement in opinions but in forms of life." by force or fraud but must be the outcome of discussion, persuasion, and dialogue. This is not unlike... | |
 | Tsoṅ-kha-pa Blo-bzaṅ-grags-pa - 1989 - 492 페이지
...convention.)137 One objects: "So you are saying that human agreement decides what is true and what is false?" — It is what human beings say that is true...they use. That is not agreement in opinions but in form of life.138 Here we strike rock bottom, that is, we have come down to conventions.139 When philosophers... | |
 | Susan L. Hurley - 1989 - 478 페이지
...the following: "So you are saying that human agreement decides what is true and what is false?"—It is what human beings say that is true and false; and...they use. That is not agreement in opinions but in form of life. 12 The agreement of humans that is a presupposition of logic is not an agreement in opinions,... | |
 | Patrick Nerhot - 1989 - 468 페이지
...par. 241, where Wittgenstein answers an imagined objection from the representational ist: 'So you are saying that human agreement decides what is true and...in the language they use. That is not agreement in opinion but in form of life. Wittgenstein locates consensus in a realm that is already presupposed... | |
| |
So you are saying that human agreement decides what is true and what is false?" —It is what human beings say that is true and false; and they agree in the language they use. That is not agreement in opinions but in form of life. 
