Hearing Before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, United States Senate, Sixty-second Congress, Pursuant to S. Res. 98: A Resolution Directing the Committee on Interstate Commerce to Investigate and Report Desirable Changes in the Laws Regulating and Controlling Corporations, Persons, and Firms Engaged in Interstate Commerce, 1±Ç |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
23 ÆäÀÌÁö
A Federal administrative system of publicity and registration should develop both strength and elasticity . The administration of such a system should result in a definite and broadening policy , based on exact information ...
A Federal administrative system of publicity and registration should develop both strength and elasticity . The administration of such a system should result in a definite and broadening policy , based on exact information ...
59 ÆäÀÌÁö
Of the Federal Constitution ? Mr. Vinson . Yes , sir . Senator POMERENE . Is there any provision in the Federal Constitution under which you would justify these several regulations ? Mr. Vinson . Well , Senator , I do not know ...
Of the Federal Constitution ? Mr. Vinson . Yes , sir . Senator POMERENE . Is there any provision in the Federal Constitution under which you would justify these several regulations ? Mr. Vinson . Well , Senator , I do not know ...
60 ÆäÀÌÁö
Mr. VINSON . I think not , Senator . Senator POMERENE . Well , assuming for the sake of the argument that it is not , it seems to me that that which gives the Federal Gov. is > ernment , or failed to give the Federal 60 HEARINGS BEFORE.
Mr. VINSON . I think not , Senator . Senator POMERENE . Well , assuming for the sake of the argument that it is not , it seems to me that that which gives the Federal Gov. is > ernment , or failed to give the Federal 60 HEARINGS BEFORE.
61 ÆäÀÌÁö
is > ernment , or failed to give the Federal Government , jurisdiction in the Sugar Refining Co. case was the fact that it was confined to a locality within the boundaries of a single State . Now , in that respect is not the mining ...
is > ernment , or failed to give the Federal Government , jurisdiction in the Sugar Refining Co. case was the fact that it was confined to a locality within the boundaries of a single State . Now , in that respect is not the mining ...
101 ÆäÀÌÁö
If interstate business on a scale large enough to secure these claimed adrantages is to continue , it is asserted by some that provision must be made by Federal law . ( a ) To permit large aggregations of capital under single control ...
If interstate business on a scale large enough to secure these claimed adrantages is to continue , it is asserted by some that provision must be made by Federal law . ( a ) To permit large aggregations of capital under single control ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
ACTING CHAIRMAN agree agreement American Tobacco amount apply Attorney authority BAKER Bank believe bill capital carry cent Cigar coal combination commission committee common companies competition concerns Congress considered contract corporations course decision decree defendants Department effect enforcement engaged existing fact Federal further give given Government held hold individual industry interstate commerce legislation LEVY limited manufacturers MARTIN matter mean mining monopoly necessary objection operation opinion organization Panama parties person practically present President principle profit proposed question railroad reason referred regulate restraint of trade result rule securities sell Senator BRANDEGEE Senator CUMMINS Senator NEWLANDS Senator POMERENE Senator TOWNSEND Sherman law statute Steel Street suggested Supreme Court thing tion trust understand United UNTERMYER Vinson violation York