Hearing Before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, United States Senate, Sixty-second Congress, Pursuant to S. Res. 98: A Resolution Directing the Committee on Interstate Commerce to Investigate and Report Desirable Changes in the Laws Regulating and Controlling Corporations, Persons, and Firms Engaged in Interstate Commerce, 1±Ç |
µµ¼ º»¹®¿¡¼
100°³ÀÇ °á°ú Áß 1 - 5°³
36 ÆäÀÌÁö
I wish you would read that section of your bill which perhaps gives authority to regulate these agreements . ... A joint application shall be presented to the commission filing therewith a copy of the proposed agreement signed by all ...
I wish you would read that section of your bill which perhaps gives authority to regulate these agreements . ... A joint application shall be presented to the commission filing therewith a copy of the proposed agreement signed by all ...
40 ÆäÀÌÁö
Passing that , therefore , I come to the proposition to legalize in some form or other agreements which in a ... Do you think that this agreement should extend to the protection of a small producer and enable him to make a profit if his ...
Passing that , therefore , I come to the proposition to legalize in some form or other agreements which in a ... Do you think that this agreement should extend to the protection of a small producer and enable him to make a profit if his ...
42 ÆäÀÌÁö
You do not suggest any agreement between the small producer and the big producer , do you ? Mr. VINSON . I do not limit it . Senator CUMMINS . Do you see any occasion for an agreement between the small man and the big man ?
You do not suggest any agreement between the small producer and the big producer , do you ? Mr. VINSON . I do not limit it . Senator CUMMINS . Do you see any occasion for an agreement between the small man and the big man ?
44 ÆäÀÌÁö
from entering into an agreement with each other to reduce the cost of production ? Mr. Vinson . No ; not where they are located in the same district ; there is nothing in the law to prevent that . Senator Cummins .
from entering into an agreement with each other to reduce the cost of production ? Mr. Vinson . No ; not where they are located in the same district ; there is nothing in the law to prevent that . Senator Cummins .
54 ÆäÀÌÁö
Supposing quite a number of the smaller coal mining companies were to form an agreement , a trade agreement , and it ... The bill itself provides that only such agreements as would be in reasonable restraint , agreements that would not ...
Supposing quite a number of the smaller coal mining companies were to form an agreement , a trade agreement , and it ... The bill itself provides that only such agreements as would be in reasonable restraint , agreements that would not ...
´Ù¸¥ »ç¶÷µéÀÇ ÀÇ°ß - ¼Æò ¾²±â
¼ÆòÀ» ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù.
±âŸ ÃâÆÇº» - ¸ðµÎ º¸±â
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
ACTING CHAIRMAN agree agreement American Tobacco amount apply Attorney authority BAKER Bank believe bill capital carry cent Cigar coal combination commission committee common companies competition concerns Congress considered contract corporations course decision decree defendants Department effect enforcement engaged existing fact Federal further give given Government held hold individual industry interstate commerce legislation LEVY limited manufacturers MARTIN matter mean mining monopoly necessary objection operation opinion organization Panama parties person practically present President principle profit proposed question railroad reason referred regulate restraint of trade result rule securities sell Senator BRANDEGEE Senator CUMMINS Senator NEWLANDS Senator POMERENE Senator TOWNSEND Sherman law statute Steel Street suggested Supreme Court thing tion trust understand United UNTERMYER Vinson violation York